PER/PELJ - Pioneer in peer-reviewed, open access online law publications

Authors >Howard Chitimira and Luck Mavhuru

Affiliation North-West University, South Africa

Email Howard.Chitimira@nwu.ac.za and mavhuruluck40@gmail.com

Date Submitted 14 November 2023

Date Revised 6 May 2024

Date Accepted 6 May 2024

Date Published 10 September 2024

Editor Prof W Erlank

Journal Editor Prof W Erlank

How to cite this contribution

Chitimira H and Mavhuru L "A Comparative Analysis of the Design and Implementation of the Twin Peaks Model of Financial Regulation in South Africa and Australia" PER / PELJ 2024(27) - DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a17256

Copyright

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a17256

In response to the 2007
-

Abstract

In response to the 2007

Keywords

Twin Peaks; financial regulation; prudential authority; consumer protection.

……………………………………………………….

1 Introductory remarks

The 2007-2009 global financial crisis prompted an international wave of institutional reform in financial regulation. 1

 Howard Chitimira. LLB (Cum Laude), LLM (UFH), LLD (NMMU). Research Professor, Research Director and Professor of Securities and Financial Markets Law, Faculty of Law, North-West University, South Africa. E-mail: Howard.Chitimira@nwu.ac.za. ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1881-1242 . Research towards writing this article was supported in part by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), Grant Number 141933. In this regard, the authors wish to thank the NRF for its valuable support.

 Luck Mavhuru. BSc Hons Sociology (UZ), LLB (Wits), LLM (UCT), PhD (UCT). Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Faculty of Law, North-West University, South Africa. Email: mavhuruluck40@gmail.com. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-5489 .

1 Van Hengel, Hilbers and Schoenmaker "Experiences with the Dutch Twin-Peaks Model: Lessons for Europe" 185-199; Claessens et al 2010 https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/wp1044.pdf 26; Godwin, Kourabas and Ramsay 2016 Int'l Law 273.

Since then, countries across the world have been reforming their regulatory architecture, targetting finance and related industries, actors' behaviour, and institutional composition. 2

2 Qumba 2022 SALJ 79; Norton 2005 Int'l Law 18; IMF 2018 Global Financial Stability Report 55-81.

In 2011, the South African government initiated a series of financial regulatory reforms. This followed a review of the financial regulatory system that began in 2007 and culminated in a policy paper entitled: A Safer Financial Sector to Serve South Africa Better. 3

3 National Treasury 2011 https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/20131211%20-%20item%202%20a%20safer%20financial%20sector%20to%20serve%20south%20africa%20better.pdf 1-82; Godwin 2017 Law and Financial Markets Review 152.

Central to the reforms was a move towards a Twin Peaks model of financial regulation. 4

4 Godwin 2017 Law and Financial Markets Review 151.

In recent years there has been an increased interest in the Twin Peaks model, which was first adopted by Australia in 1998 and has since been implemented in the Netherlands, South Africa, Belgium, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. 5

5 Godwin, Howse and Ramsay 2017 Journal of Banking Regulation 104; Moodley Twin Peaks Model 4; Qumba 2022 SALJ 80; Godwin 2017 Law and Financial Markets Review 151.

The design and implementation of this model differs from one country to another. The specific ways in which it has been structured in each country reflects, inter alia, the country’s unique history, its policies, size of its economy, its development, and its local business structure. 6

6 Norton 2005 Int'l Law 19.

In order to explore these ways and some related aspects, the article provides an analysis of the way in which the Twin Peaks model of financial regulation is structured and implemented in South Africa and Australia.

2 What is the Twin Peaks model of financial regulation?

The Twin Peaks model is the brainchild of Michael Taylor, who first advocated for it in 1995. 7

7 Taylor Twin Peaks 1-18; Bakir 2009 Public Administration 911; Van Niekerk and Van Heerden 2020 SALJ 109.

He submitted that a regulatory system that imposes a clear separation between banking, securities and insurance was no longer suitable for regulating financial institutions, where these distinctions are becoming increasingly irrelevant. 8

8 Taylor Peak Practice 1-19.

The Twin Peaks model provides for the separation of regulatory functions between two regulatory agencies. For example, one regulatory agency oversees supervision of the safety and soundness of financial institutions, and the other focusses on the regulation of business conduct. 9

9 Llewellyn "Institutional Structure" 17-93; Schoenmaker and Véron 2021 A ‘Twin Peaks’ Version for Europe 282 - 291

Put differently, the South African Twin Peaks model utilises a prudential regulator, namely the Prudential Authority (PA), which oversees the safety and soundness of all financial institutions such as banks (commercial, mutual and co-operative banks), insurance companies, co-operative financial institutions, financial conglomerates and other market infrastructures. The South African Twin Peaks model also employs a market conduct regulator, namely the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) which policies the efficiency and integrity of financial markets and the promotion of financial consumer protection. In other words, the PA's primary objective is prudential supervision, with a primary focus on the safety and soundness of financial institutions, while the FSCA regulates business conduct and promotes consumer protection. 10

10 Schmulow 2017 AJICL 393; National Treasury 2013 https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/20131211%20%20item%203%20roadmap.pdf; Schmulow 2018 https://theconversation.com/south-africa-joins-the-club-that-regulates-financial-markets-through-twin-peaks-95558

The Twin Peaks model mitigates regulatory overlap or underlap in order to prevent systemic risks by ensuring that prudential and market conduct regulation is effectively and consistently enforced. 11

11 Schmulow, Mazzola and De Zilva 2021 Federal Law Review 507.

It ensures that transparency, market integrity and consumer protection are adequately prioritised. 12

12 Oksiutycz and Angelopulo 2021 Communitas 207; Van Niekerk and Van Heerden 2020 SALJ 110; National Treasury 2011 https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/ 20131211%20-%20item%202%20a%20safer%20financial%20sector%20to%20

serve%20south%20africa%20better.pdf.

If properly enforced, the Twin Peaks model could curb the occurrence of financial crises. 13

13 Adair Turner, former chairman of the Financial Services Authority (FSA) in the United Kingdom, is a vocal supporter of the Twin Peaks model. He has argued that separating prudential and conduct regulation helps to create a more focussed and effective regulatory framework; Schmulow, Mazzola and De Zilva 2021 Federal Law Review 527.

According to Botha and Makina, 14

14 Botha and Makina 2011 International Business & Economics Research Journal 27.

the Twin Peaks model fulfils the four broad objectives of financial regulation, namely the protection of consumers,

ensuring the solvency and soundness of financial institutions, the promotion of fairness, efficiency and transparency of financial markets, and the promotion of a stable financial sector. The model was designed to provide all the benefits and efficiencies of an integrated approach while simultaneously addressing the inherent conflict between the objectives of safety and soundness and consumer protection. Under the Twin Peaks model, it is essential to ensure that the objectives of each regulator and the boundaries, or ''regulatory perimeters'', between them are clearly defined. This is crucial especially when a market participant is subject to the regulation by both regulators. Proponents of the Twin Peaks model such as Mc Vea 15

15 Mc Vea "The impact of Global Financial Crisis" 44-60.

also argue that it helps insulate prudential supervisors from excessive, intrusive consumer-oriented approaches. 16

16 Group of 30 2008 https://group30.org/images/uploads/publications/G30_Structure FinancialSupervision2008.pdf

The Twin Peaks model seeks to counter problems associated with innovations in product design and distribution which had "blurred" the boundaries between financial institutions and their financial products. 17

17 Bedeker “Appraisal of South Africa's Legislative Adoption" 4; Qumba 2022 SALJ 86.

For instance, challenges caused by different financial institutions such as banks merging with insurers and/or merchant banks merging with securities traders, resulting in some regulatory gaps in the financial sector. 18

18 Schmulow 2017 AJICL 396.

This integration between different types of financial entities posed challenges to regulatory frameworks, and oversight by regulatory bodies became unclear and insufficient.

The strength of the Twin Peaks model lies in the fact that the two peak regulators are more likely to have dedicated objectives and clear mandates to which they are exclusively committed. 19

19 Godwin and Schmulow "Genealogy and Topography of Twin Peaks" 1-14; National Treasury 2014 https://juta.co.za/media/filestore/2015/03/2014_12_12_Response_

document.pdf 5-46.

In other words, the twin peak regulatory agencies have clearly defined objectives enabling them to carry out their work expediently and creating an obligation of accountability on each of them. 20

20 Llewellyn "Institutional Structure" 17-85; Abrams and Taylor "Assessing the Case for Unified Financial Sector Supervision" 463-487.

Moreover, the Twin Peaks model combats the duplication of roles between the regulatory agencies. The prudential regulator exists to complement the regulatory efforts of the market conduct regulator. 21

21 Godwin 2017 Law and Financial Markets Review 151; Moodley Twin Peaks Model 58.

The Twin Peaks model tackles the challenges posed by the growing complexity of financial markets and the constant rise of different financial conglomerates. Furthermore, it seeks to curb the inherent conflict of interest that arises under a single or super regulator model. Such a regulator which combines both prudential and conduct regulation is normally unable to

objectively fulfil all its conflicting priorities timeously. Different financial sectors often have divergent needs and priorities. Balancing these interests without favouring one sector over another could be more challenging for a single or super regulator. Thus, a single or super regulator could struggle to provide unbiassed and equitable oversight in the financial sector. The likelihood of this occurring under Twin Peaks is lower due to the fact that both the prudential and the market conduct regulators are clearly focussed on their mandates and objectives. Nonetheless, the only weakness of the Twin Peaks model is that it could create challenges of regulatory overlap on dual-regulated entities.

3 Overview of the Australian Twin Peaks model

3.1 The history and structure of the Twin Peaks model

The introduction of the Twin Peaks model in Australia was spearheaded by the Wallis Inquiry, which was set up by the Australian government in 1996 to review its financial system. 22

22 Godwin and Ramsay 2015 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id =2657355 4; Godwin, Howse and Ramsay 2017 Journal of Banking Regulation 107. According to the Australian Treasury, in June 1996 the Financial System Inquiry (known as the Wallis Inquiry) was established to examine the results of the deregulation of the Australian financial system, to examine the forces driving further change, particularly technological, and to recommend changes to the regulatory system to ensure an "efficient, responsive, competitive and flexible financial system to underpin stronger economic performance, consistent with financial stability, prudence, integrity and fairness." The Inquiry was chaired by Australian businessman, Mr Stan Wallis, and was supported by a full-time secretariat.

The Wallis Inquiry held that innovation in product design and distribution had blurred the boundaries between financial institutions and their different products. It also noted that there was an increase in competition in the financial market and "conglomeration" in financial services institutions. 23

23 The Treasury 1996 https://treasury .gov.au/publication/p1996-fsi-fr; Godwin 2017 Law and Financial Markets Review 184; Bain and Harper 2000 North American Actuarial Journal 17.

Product innovation had enabled different types of financial institutions to offer essentially identical financial products while being subject to different degrees of financial regulation. 24

24 Bain and Harper 2000 North American Actuarial Journal 14; Lumpkin 2009 OECD Financial Market Trends Report 2; Blundell-Wignall 2009 OECD Forum 1-6.

The Wallis Inquiry recommended that a single agency should be established for the regulation of companies, market conduct and consumer protection. 25

25 Cooper 2006 https://download.asic.gov.au/media/1339352/integration-financial-regulatory-authorities.pdf 1-14; The Treasury 1996 https://treasury.gov.au/ publication/p1996-fsi-fr 258; Godwin 2017 Law and Financial Markets Review 184.

As a result, the Australian government enacted the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority Act 26

26 Australian Prudential Regulation Authority Act 50 of 1998 (APRA Act).

and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act, 27

27 Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 51 of 2001 (ASIC Act).

which effectively introduced the Twin Peaks model. The

implementation of this legislation signified a departure from a single regulator model to a Twin Peaks model, which empowers two regulators to oversee their specific mandates in Australia. Accordingly, Australia consolidated the functions for financial regulation into two regulators, namely the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), which is responsible for the regulation of companies, market conduct and consumer protection, and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), which is responsible for prudential regulation. The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) is responsible for monetary policy and financial stability, including ensuring a safe and reliable payments system. 28

28 Section 10 and 11 of Reserve Bank Act 4 of 1959; Reserve Bank of Australia date unknown https://www.rba.gov.au/about-rba/.

To this extent, Schumlow describes the Australian model as a three-peak model, with each peak created as an independent statutory authority. 29

29 Schmulow 2017 AJICL 396.

3.2 The role of the APRA

APRA is an independent statutory authority established for the purpose of prudential supervision and for promoting financial stability in Australia. It is a body corporate with perpetual succession and it functions completely outside the remit of the RBA. 30

30 Section 13 of the APRA Act.

This means that the APRA can enter contracts, sue or be sued, 31

31 Section 13(1) of the APRA Act.

and hold property in its own name, separately from the RBA. The perpetual succession component empowers the APRA to engage in long-term planning and strategy development, knowing that the entity will endure over time. This enables better decision-making and investment in the financial sector. The APRA is able to plan and make long-term regulatory decisions since it has perpetual succession. The APRA took over the responsibilities of eleven separate state and federal financial regulators upon its formation in 1998. 32

32 Black 2006 Law & Policy 1-30; Gaskel 2007 IMF Working Together Seminar Series 84-93; Schmulow 2017 AJICL 396.

The APRA Act specifies that APRA was created to oversee the regulation of financial sector institutions in accordance with prudential laws and regulations. 33

33 Section 8 of the APRA Act; Hanrahan 2008 Economic Papers 9.

The APRA may establish prudential standards that should be complied with by regulated institutions. 34

34 APRA 2024 https://www.apra.gov.au/apras-functions-0.

These standards provide a number of requirements aimed at promoting the financial soundness, risk management and governance in the Australian financial institutions and financial sector. 35

35 APRA 2024 https://www.apra.gov.au/apras-functions-0.

The APRA 2019-20 Annual Report provides that its core functions include the identification and timeous response to the operation and performance of the APRA. 36

36 APRA 2021 https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-01/Governance% 20and%20Senior%20Executive%20Accountabilities.pdf.

The

APRA Act provides that the APRA executive board should have at least three members and up to five members. 37

37 Section 16(1) of the APRA Act.

The five members consist of the chairperson, deputy chairperson, and three other members. The APRA members are appointed by the Governor General, on the advice of the Australian Government, for terms of up to five years. 38

38 Section 16 of the APRA Act; note that the Governor-General is the King's representative in Australia. The Governor General is appointed by the King on the recommendation of the Prime Minister and is appointed at "the King's pleasure" - that is, without a fixed term - but governors-general are usually given a 5-year term that can be extended. The Governor General has some responsibility for making sure Australia is governed in accordance with the Australian Constitution .

The APRA has eight divisions and two independent internal teams. These divisions consist of banking, insurance, superannuation, policy and advice cross-industry, enterprise services, technology, and data division. The two independent internal teams consist of the Chief of Staff Internal Audit Team and the Enterprise Security and Risk Team. 39

39 APRA 2023 https://www .apra.gov.au/apras-organisation-structure.

The Banking division supervises licensed deposit-taking institutions such as banks, credit unions and building societies. 40

40 APRA 2023 https://www.apra.gov.au/apras-organisation-structure.

The Insurance division oversees general insurers, life companies, friendly societies and private health insurance companies. 41

41 APRA 2023 https://www.apra.gov.au/apras-organisation-structure.

The Superannuation division supervises all registered superannuation entity licensees. The Policy and Advice division ensures that APRA's frontline supervisors have the best possible tools to support them in their risk analysis and supervisory interventions. 42

42 APRA 2023 https://www.apra.gov.au/apras-organisation-structure ; IMF Australia Country Report No. 19/053.

This division consists of legal services, policy, advice and approvals, resolution and licensing. 43

43 APRA 2023 https://www.apra.gov.au/apras-organisation-structure ; UNSW Law Society 2020 https://issuu .com/unswlawsociety/docs/pic_2020_final_copy/s/ 11207013.

Cross-industry division combines industry analysts and risk experts to assist frontline supervisors in monitoring individual entities and industries as a whole. Enterprise services help other divisions achieve APRA's strategic goals through shared services functions. 44

44 IMF Australia Country Report No. 19/053.

The internal audit team advises on managing risk across all of APRA and it has an independent reporting line to the audit committee and direct access to the APRA members and executive board. The APRA is accountable to the Australian government and the parliament. It also promotes the stability in the financial sector.

The division of APRA into the entities has led to greater efficiency and productivity. This partly explains why the Australian financial sector survived the 2007-2009 global financial crisis. The creation of specialised divisions in each industry, such as insurance and superannuation, ensures that each division focusses on a narrow set of tasks and/or functions. Furthermore,

specialised divisions make it easier to monitor and assess the performance of the relevant financial institutions in the financial sector. This enables a more accurate evaluation of outcomes and adjustments to improve performance by the APRA. As a result, decision-making is faster and more informed since individuals within a division will have a deeper understanding of the issues and challenges pertaining to their specific domain. Each division hires employees with appropriate expertise for their specific functions to increase efficiency.

3.3 The role of the ASIC

The ASIC commenced its operation in 1991, when it was known as the Australian Securities Commission (ASC). Put differently, its name was changed from ASC to ASIC in 1998. The ASIC is the business conduct regulator responsible for promoting market integrity and consumer protection across the financial markets in Australia. 45

45 Section 12A(2) of the ASIC Act; Comino 2009 Aust Jnl of Corp Law 23 6.

The ASIC Act provides that the ASIC is responsible for maintaining, facilitating and improving the conduct of financial institutions. 46

46 Section 1(2) of the ASIC Act; ASIC 2019 https://download.asic.gov.au/media/ 5314396/asic-annual-report-2018-19-full.pdf 5-285.

This Act stipulates further that the ASIC is obliged to focus on financial predictability, reducing business costs, and improving the efficiency and development of the economy. 47

47 Section 1(2) of the ASIC Act; the ASIC 2019 https://download.asic.gov.au/media/

5314396/asic-annual-report-2018-19-full.pdf 5-285.

In addition, the ASIC ensures that investors and consumers effectively participate in the financial sector. 48

48 Section 1 of the ASIC Act.

It also issues financial licenses and monitors financial services providers to ensure that they operate efficiently, honestly and fairly. This is done through the Australian financial services licensing system. 49

49 Cooper 2006 https://download.asic.gov.au/media/1339352/integration-financial-regulatory-authorities.pdf ; Financial Regulator Assessment Authority 2022 https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2022-08/apo-nid319322.pdf.

The ASIC is empowered to investigate violations of the ASIC Act, initiate the prosecution of minor offences and disqualify people from managing corporations or dealing in financial services. 50

50 Section 12GLD and 15 of the ASIC Act; Gilligan and Ramsay 2021 Company and Securities Law Journal 436.

The ASIC operates under the direction of three full-time Commissioners appointed by the Governor General in liaison with the relevant Minister. 51

51 Section 9 of the ASIC Act; ASIC 2024 https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/what-we-do/how-we-operate/.

The Commissioners report to the Minister through their annual report, briefings, submissions and meetings with the Treasurer or Parliamentary Secretary. 52

52 ASIC 2024 https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/what-we-do/how-we-operate/.

The ASIC seeks to curb the collapse of financial institutions by ensuring that they comply with provisions of the ASIC Act and certain

competency standards. The ASIC also ensures the compliance of financial institutions with client funds and it protects clients' property rights. 53

53 IMF 2012 https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2012/cr12314.pdf 41. See related discussion on ASIC 2023 https://asic.gov.au/regulatory-resources/markets/market-supervision/.

However, the ASIC does not have an explicit mandate to promote financial stability. Its focus is on market conduct and investor/consumer protection. In 2010, the ASIC took on the additional responsibility of consumer credit and finance broking, regulating trustees and fulfilling a supervisory function over trading on Australian-licensed equity, derivatives and futures markets. 54

54 ASIC date unknown https://asic .gov.au/about-asic/what-we-do/our-role/history/.

In light of the above, it appears that the APRA Act and the ASIC Act provide clear responsibilities and objectives for each regulator. The ASIC promotes confidence and the informed participation of consumers and investors in the financial sector. There is clear demarcation between the roles of the regulators to combat possible overlapping challenges. Moreover, the APRA and the ASIC operate as independent bodies that are free from government or industry interference. To this extent, Australia is considered to have done well during the 2007-2009 global financial crisis because of the clear a delineation of responsibilities between the APRA and the ASIC. 55

55 Hill " Why did Australia Fare so Well" 203-300.

This approach enabled the ASIC to curb regulatory arbitrage and other challenges posed by the 2007-2009 global financial crisis. 56

56 Hill " Why did Australia Fare so Well" 203-300.

The ASIC also managed to avoid possible conflicts of interest that could have occurred when prudential oversight and business conduct regulatory functions are concentrated in a single regulator.

3.4 The role of the RBA

In most countries the central bank is historically responsible for financial stability, prudential regulation and the supervision of banks. 57

57 Lumpkin 2002 https://www.oecd.org/finance/insurance/2089622.pdf; European Central Bank date unknown https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/prudential supcbrole_en.pdf.

However, this has not been the case in Australia since the adoption of the Twin Peaks model of financial regulation in 1998. It is important to note that the Wallis Inquiry recommended that the prudential regulator should be a separate entity from the central bank, though it should cooperate very closely with the RBA in order to collectively maintain financial stability in Australia. 58

58 Godwin and Ramsay 2015 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=2657355 2-46.

Thus, the RBA's prudential supervision mandate was transferred to the APRA in1998. Notably, the RBA is still responsible for the promotion of financial

stability. 59

59 APRA date unknown https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/MoU-RBA-Reserve-Bank-of-Australia.PDF.

As part of its financial stability mandate, the RBA assesses a variety of financial and economic data which assists in gauging the robustness of the financial sector regulations. 60

60 Joshi Appraisal of the Twin Peaks Model 45; Reserve Bank of Australia date unknown https://www.rba.gov.au/fin-stability/reg-framework/role-of-the-reserve-bank-in-maintaining-financial-stability.html.

Furthermore, the Reserve Bank Act 4 of 1959 was amended in 1998 to establish the Payments System Board in the RBA to promote the safety and efficiency of the Australian payments system. As part of its functions, the RBA takes steps such as maintaining low and stable inflation rates and overseeing sustainable economic growth to ensure that the environment is conducive for better financial stability. The RBA has responsibilities as the lender of last resort in line with its financial stability mandate.

4 The South African Twin Peaks model

4.1 The history and structure of the Twin Peaks model

The Twin Peaks model of financial regulation was adopted by South Africa almost two decades after its adoption in Australia. 61

61 National Treasury 2018 https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/Press% 20release%20Twin%20Peaks%20implementation%20March2018_FINAL.pdf.

In the wake of the 2007-2009 global financial crisis, the South African government committed itself to a financial regulatory reform agenda that was aimed at strengthening its financial stability. The 2007-2009 global financial crisis highlighted several issues including the need to better coordinate monetary and fiscal policy while minimising systemic risk. 62

62 National Treasury 2011 https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/20131211%20-%20item%202%20a%20safer%20financial%20sector%20to%20serve%20south%20africa%20better.pdf.

As a result, the government of South Africa issued a policy paper in 2011 titled 'A Safer Financial Sector to Serve South Africa Better' which outlined weaknesses in the structure and features of South Africa's financial sector indicating that there were various gaps that needed to be addressed. 63

63 National Treasury 2011 https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/20131211%20-%20item%202%20a%20safer%20financial%20sector%20to%20serve%20south%20africa%20better.pdf 1-82; FSCA date unknown https://www.fsca.co.za/Documents/

FSCA%20Financial%20Inclusion%20Strategy.pdf 5-21.

The adoption of the Twin Peaks model by South Africa was also necessitated by the country's desire to increase transparency and accountability in its financial markets. 64

64 Mahasela Effectiveness of the Twin Peaks 51; Qumba 2022 SALJ 84.

The South African government acknowledged that market conduct regulations were being neglected. 65

65 National Treasury 2014 https://juta.co.za/media/filestore/2015/03/2014_12_12_ Response_document.pdf 5-46.

A dedicated regulator that is responsible for consumer protection was regarded as the most appropriate solution to this problem. Another reason for South Africa's adoption of the Twin Peaks model was its

international commitment to a sound and safe regulatory framework. 66

66 Qumba 2022 SALJ 84.

The country needed to align its financial sector with the international trends in financial regulation. 67

67 Qumba 2022 SALJ 85.

The South African government wanted to explore any potential contagion by following acceptable, robust standards in financial regulation and supervision. 68

68 The South African Treasury 2013 https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/ 20131211%20%20item%203%20roadmap.pdf 5-75; Qumba 2022 SALJ 86.

Unlike in Australia, where the Twin Peaks model was introduced a year after the Willy Inquiry, the implementation of the model was a two-phase process in South Africa. The first phase involved developing and promulgating overarching legislation to empower the prudential and market conduct regulators to deliver on their mandates. The second phase comprised of harmonising financial sector legislation such as the Banks Act 94 of 1990, the Short-Term Insurance Act 53 of 1998 and the Long-Term Insurance Act 52 of 1998 with the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017 (FSR Act) and developing conduct of financial institutions legislation.

South Africa's Twin Peaks model established two separate regulators, namely the FSCA, which is the market conduct regulator, and the PA, which is the prudential regulator. However, unlike in Australia where these two separate regulators are governed by two different statutes, both the FSCA and the PA are established by the FSR Act in South Africa. 69

69 Masthead 2017 https://www.masthead.co.za/newsletter/twin-peaks-newsletter-issue-2-fsb-approach/.

The FSCA seeks to enhance South Africa's approach to consumer protection through financial conduct regulation. 70

70 National Treasury 2015 https://juta.co.za/media/filestore/2015/03/2014_12_12_ Response_document.pdf.

Additionally, the adoption of Twin Peaks in South Africa was mainly aimed at creating a more resilient and stable financial sector through prudential regulation.

4.2 The role of the PA

The PA is one of the pillars that constitute the South African Twin Peaks model. The PA is established in terms of section 32 of the FSR Act. It plays a similar role to that of the APRA in Australia and it ensures that financial institutions operating in the financial sector are safe and financially sound. 71

71 Section 33 of the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017 (the FSR Act); SARB 2020 https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/what-we-do/prudential-regulation/PA%20Regulatory%20and%20Supervisory%20Strategy%202021.pdf.

However, unlike in Australia, where APRA is an independent body, the PA is a juristic person housed in and administered by the South African Reserve Bank (SARB). 72

72 IMF 2022 https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2022/06/16/South-Africa-Financial-Sector-Assessment-Program-Technical-Note-on-Insurance-Sector-519728 3-31; section 32(2) of the FSR Act.

To this extent, the PA is tasked with micro-prudential

supervision while the SARB is responsible for macro-prudential supervision and overseeing the financial stability in the financial sector. 73

73 Qumba 2022 SALJ 88; SARB 2018 https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/ publications/publication-detail-pages/prudential-authority/PA-financial-sector-regulation/sector-regulation-act/2018/8800 1-27.

The PA functions as a system-wide prudential regulator that is tasked with overseeing all financial institutions that provide financial products or securities services and market infrastructures. 74

74 Section 32(2) of the FSR Act; Moodley Twin Peaks Model 14.

It is also obliged to promote sustainable competition in the provision of financial services and financial products. It is also required to cooperate and collaborate with the Competition Commission, 75

75 Section 34(1)(d) of the FSR Act.

and it has supervisory roles over banks, insurers and pension funds. 76

76 IMF 2022 https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2022/184/article-A001-en.xml 2-40.

The PA is governed by the Prudential Committee, which consists of the Governor of the SARB (as Chairperson), the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the PA (who is also a Deputy Governor of the SARB) and other Deputy Governors of the SARB. 77

77 Section 36 of the FSR Act; SARB 2024 https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/what-we-do/Prudentialregulation.

The CEO is appointed by the Governor of the SARB in consultation with the Minister of Finance. A person appointed as the CEO holds office for a term not longer than five years. The structure of the PA comprises four departments, namely Banking, Insurance and Financial Market Infrastructure Supervision; Financial Conglomerate Supervision; Policy, Statistics and Industry Support; and Risk Support.

4.3 The role of the FSCA

The FSCA came into operation on the 1 April 2018 in terms of section 56 of the FSR Act. 78

78 Section 56 of FSR Act.

The FSCA is obliged to oversee the conduct of financial institutions operating in South Africa. 79

79 Section 58 read with ss 56 and 57 of the FSR Act; Moodley Twin Peaks Model 14.

It is responsible for protecting financial consumers and promoting confidence in South African financial sector. It achieves this by overseeing the regulation of market conduct for various financial entities such as banks, insurers, financial advisers, intermediaries and investment institutions. The FSR Act provides that the main aim of the FSCA is to enhance and support the efficiency and integrity of financial markets and protect financial customers. 80

80 Section 57 of the FSR Act.

Like the ASIC in Australia, it is solely an independent market conduct authority separate from the central bank. 81

81 Section 57 of the FSR Act; Godwin, Howse and Ramsy 2017 SALJ 674.

The FSCA is obliged to regulate and supervise the conduct of financial institutions in accordance with the relevant financial

sector regulation laws. 82

82 Section 58 of the FSR Act.

One of the objectives of the FSCA is to promote sustainable competition in the provision of financial products and financial services through cooperating and collaborating with the Competition Commission. 83

83 Section 58(1)(d) of the FSR Act; FSCA 2023 https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulatory %20Frameworks/FinTechDocuments/Draft%20Position%20Paper%20on%20Open%20Finance.pdf 20.

The FSR Act provides for an executive committee to manage the affairs of the FSCA. 84

84 Section 60 of the FSR Act; Masthead 2017 https://www.masthead.co.za/newsletter/ twin-peaks-newsletter-issue-2-fsb-approach/.

The executive committee is made up of a commissioner and between two and four deputy commissioners, each with the appropriate expertise in the financial sector. 85

85 Section 58(1)(a) of the FSR Act.

The commissioner is responsible for the day-to-day management and administration of the FSCA. 86

86 Section 61 of the FSR Act; the FSCA 2022 https://www.fsca.co.za/Annual% 20Reports/FSCA%20Annual%20Report%202021-2022.pdf 5-70.

The commissioner and the deputy commissioners are appointed by the Minister of Finance. The FSR Act provides that a person appointed as commissioner or deputy commissioner holds office for a term determined by the Minister, which may not be longer than five years. 87

87 Section 63 of of the FSR Act.

5 Overview comparative analysis

One striking difference between the implementation of the Twin Peaks model in South Africa and Australia is that in the latter, the regulatory model is implemented by two different statutes, while in the former, one statute is used. The ASIC Act and the APRA Act govern the implementation of the Twin Peaks model in Australia while the FSR Act governs the same in South Africa. 88

88 Qumba 2022 SALJ 96; see the preamble of the FSR Act.

However, this difference does not have an effect on the implementation of the Twin Peaks model in these two countries. Moreover, there are no under-regulation or over-regulation challenges relating to thereliance on the Twin Peaks model in either South Africa or Australia. The FSR Act is the overarching statute enforcing the Twin Peaks model in South Africa and there has so far been no under-regulation and/or over-regulation of financial institutions in the financial sector. Thus, the financial sector is adequately regulated with the Twin Peaks model under the FSR Act. The FSR Act provides the necessary mechanisms to ensure compliance with the rules and standards of the Twin Peaks model. Similarly, even though two statutes underpin the Australian Twin Peaks, financial institutions are not subject to excessive, draconian or burdensome regulation. Both Australia and South Africa do not apply the model rigidly. Each of these countries has carefully adopted the Twin Peaks model with two peak regulators that have clear and distinct objectives on, inter alia, prudential regulation, market conduct regulation and consumer protection. In South

Africa, the financial sector is also regulated by other role players such as the National Credit Regulator (NCR), the National Consumer Commission (NCC), the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT) and the SARB. In terms of prudential regulations, the SARB monitors monetary policy and financial stability, including payment system safety and reliability. 89

89 South African Reserve Bank Act 90 of 1989; see s 10.

In addition, the SARB, inter alia, preserves its traditional role as a lender of last resort and a provider of emergency liquidity assistance. 90

90 De Jager 2006 SA Merc LJ 174; SARB 2022 https://www.resbank.co.za/ content/dam/sarb/publications/media-releases/2022/position-paper-on-ela-for-banks/Position%20paper%20on%20ELA%20for%20Banks%20%28Final%29.pdf 1-16.

On the other hand, the NCR regulates all retail credit provision by credit providers, including banks. 91

91 Vessio 2008 SA Merc LJ 231.

The NCR operates independently as a credit market regulator. The NCC promotes and protects the interests and rights of consumers in South Africa. On the other hand, the NCT hears and decides on any matter involving consumers, service providers, credit providers and other aggrieved parties. It also reviews decisions of the NCT and the NCC. Consequently, the South African Twin Peaks model does not prohibit the existence of multiple regulatory bodies in the financial sector regulation. This is also the case in Australia. A third, unofficial "pillar" of the Australian financial regulatory framework is Australia's central bank. The RBA is responsible for promoting financial stability in Australia. It develops monetary policy to promote and maintain stability in the financial sector. The RBA also ensures the stability, efficiency and competitiveness of the payments system in Australia. 92

92 Reserve Bank of Australia 2023 https://www.rba.gov.au/education/resources/in-a-nutshell/pdf/roles-and-functions.pdf.

The prudential regulators are structured differently in Australia and South Africa. For instance, the APRA is a stand-alone independent body 93

93 Godwin and Schmulow 2015 SALJ 760.

that operates outside of the central bank's remit. 94

94 Cooper "Integration of Financial Regulatory Authorities" 3-5.

This is not the case in South Africa, where the PA is a subsidiary of the SARB. The rationale for housing the PA in the SARB could be for the purposes of sharing financial resources and related infrastructure. 95

95 Qumba 2022 SALJ 96.

It could be also motivated by the need for mutual collaboration and information sharing between the SARB and the PA. This approach is effective only when the central bank is completely independent from political and socio-economic influences and biases. It appears that this is the case in South Africa, where the Constitution provides for the independence of the SARB. 96

96 Section 224(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.

A central bank often has access to a vast amount of economic and financial data. Therefore, integrating the PA in the central bank could enable timeous sharing of such data. This enhances smooth coordination between monetary policy decisions and

prudential supervision. The approach could also enable the prudential authority and the central bank to timeously recognise and manage all potential threats to financial stability. Moreover, incorporating the PA into the central bank could enable it to develop better economic management policies as well as high standards of transparency and accountability. 97

97 Nier 2009 https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2009/wp0970.pdf 2-64; IMF Country Report No. 20/33.

While these are positive developments, they do not solve the problem of blurred boundaries and regulatory overlaps since the PA is not entirely separate from the central bank, as is the case in Australia.

In addition to the above, cooperation and coordination between the two pillars are crucial for the Twin Peaks model to be effective. Regulatory frameworks that divide authority between multiple agencies require strong coordination mechanisms to ensure that issues needing regulatory oversight do not fall through the gaps. Many jurisdictions such as New Zealand and the United Kingdom have adopted a structure of Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) and have financial stability committees in place to foster collaboration, information sharing and better coordination between regulators. 98

98 Schedule 17A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000; Qumba 2022 SALJ 108; also see European Central Bank Memorandum of understanding on cooperation between the financial supervisory authorities, central banks, and finance ministries of the European Union on cross-border financial stability.

Both South Africa and Australia recognise the need for cooperation, collaboration and coordination among financial regulators. 99

99 Section 27 of the FSR Act; section 10A of the APRA Act.

The Australian Twin Peaks model provides a non-binding system of coordination among financial agencies. The APRA Act 100

100 Section 10A of the APRA Act; Godwin and Ramsay 2015 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2657355 2-46.

provides that APRA should have regard to the desirability of cooperating with other financial sector supervisory agencies and with other agencies specified in regulations when performing and exercising its functions and powers. In relation to this, the Australian financial regulatory framework is largely dependent on informal bilateral coordination mechanisms as well as the Council of Financial Regulators (CFR), an informal organisation with no regulatory functions in the form of MOUs and informal protocols. 101

101 Van Niekerk and Van Heerden 2020 SALJ 130.

Neither the CFR nor the content of the regulatory MOUs is prescribed by statute. 102

102 Godwin and Ramsay 2015 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=2657355 41.

This soft law approach of employing MOUs is merely persuasive and not legally binding. Consequently, MOUs are non-binding measures that do not give rise to legal consequences for any non-compliance on the part of the offenders. 103

103 Zimmermann 2021 CADHI Expert Workshop 5.

Therefore, there is poor enforceability of the relevant laws and related measures and/or soft law instruments. In this regard, it must be

noted that requirements for collaboration were inserted in the APRA Act after the collapse of HIH Insurance. The collapse was partly attributed to coordination deficiencies between the APRA and the ASIC. 104

104 Van Niekerk and Van Heerden 2020 SALJ 130; Godwin and Ramsay 2015 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2657355 2-46.

The APRA Act did not have any cooperation or coordination mechanism at its inception.

Like the position in Australia, the South African Twin Peaks model provides an equally non-binding system of cooperation and coordination among financial regulatory bodies. 105

105 Chapter 5 of the FSR Act; National Treasury 2014 https://juta.co.za/media/ filestore/2015/03/2014_12_12_Response_document.pdf.

Financial agencies are required to collaborate and cooperate for two reasons. 106

106 Sections 26; 34 and 76 of the FSR Act.

The first reason is for financial stability, and the second is to ensure the efficient implementation and operation of the Twin Peaks model. 107

107 Van Niekerk and Van Heerden 2020 SALJ 114.

The act mandates collaboration and cooperation at various levels, including at the cabinet and forum levels. 108

108 Sections 26, 34 and 76 of the FSR Act.

It provides that financial sector regulators must cooperate and collaborate with the SARB and with each other to maintain, protect and enhance financial stability. 109

109 Section 26 of FSR Act.

The FSR Act 110

110 Section 34 of FSR Act.

also obliges the SARB to cooperate with other financial regulators in order to fulfil the financial stability mandate of the central bank effectively. The PA is required to collaborate with and assist the SARB, the Financial Stability Oversight Committee, the FSCA, the NCR, and the Financial Intelligence Centre in order to achieve its objective of financial stability. 111

111 Section 58 of FSR Act.

In addition to this, the FSR Act 112

112 Section 76 of FSR Act.

requires financial regulators to collaborate with each other when performing their functions in terms of financial sector laws such as the National Credit Act 113

113 National Credit Act 34 of 2005 (NCA).

and the Financial Intelligence Centre Act. 114

114 Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 (FICA).

Further, the section obliges financial regulators to inform each other and share information about matters of common interest. 115

115 Section 76 of the FSR Act.

The Act also establishes the Financial Sector Inter-Ministerial Council to facilitate the cooperation and collaboration among Cabinet members who administer legislation relevant to financial sector regulation and supervision.To give effect to this, the FSR Act, like the APRA Act in Australia, requires financial regulators to enter into one or more MOUs. 116

116 Section 76 of the FSR Act

The enforcement of MOUs is a challenge, however, because they are generally non-binding and do not carry the same weight as formal contracts. In the case of South Africa's Twin Peaks model, their weight is diminished by sections 26(4) and 77(3), of the FSR Act, which provide that

non-compliance with a MOU does not affect a regulator's actions under the FICA and NCA. 117

117 Sections 26(4) and 77(3) of the FSR Act.

Accordingly, it can be argued that South Africa has modelled its collaboration and cooperation mechanism on the Australian approach, which also utilises non-binding MOUs between various regulators. The two countries have adopted an ineffective method of the use of MOUs to foster cooperation and collaboration among financial regulators.

It is also important to note that both Australia and South Africa employ a risk-based regulatory system in their implementation of the Twin Peaks model. Such a system provides for the development of decision-making frameworks and procedures to prioritise regulatory activities and the deployment of resources, principal inspection and enforcement activities. 118

118 Baldwin and Black 2016 Journal of Law and Society 567.

That prioritisation is determined by an assessment of the risks that regulated institutions and companies pose to the regulator's objectives. 119

119 Black 2006 Law & Policy 1-30.

It is submitted that a risk-based approach is a problem-based regulation where regulators "should focus on the most important problems and fix them." 120

120 Baldwin and Black 2016 Journal of Law and Society 565.

Thus, priority should be given to high-risk problems and relevant resources should be provided to the regulatory bodies to curb such problems. The risk-based approach also stipulates that financial institutions should take enhanced measures to manage and mitigate high risks while less intensive measures are recommended for low risks. Therefore, a risk-based approach has a two-stage inquiry. The first stage involves the identification of the level of risk and the second stage entails acting on the high-level risk.

The FSR Act requires the PA to consider the need for a pre-emptive, outcomes-focussed and risk-based approach so as to prioritise its resources in accordance with the significance of risks to the achievement of its objectives. 121

121 Section 34(4)(b) of the FSR Act.

The FSCA is also required to employ a risk-based approach in achieving its objectives. In other words, the risk-based approach requires the FSCA to identify key risks to the achievement of its objectives and prioritise the resources according to the significance of such risks. 122

122 Section 54 of the FSR Act.

The regulatory strategy of the FSCA entails that the objective of the risk-based approach is to pre-emptively identify and assess risks, including cross-sector risks, risks related to specific financial sub-sectors, and risks concerning individual financial institutions. 123

123 FSCA date unknown https://www.fsca.co.za/News%20Documents/FSCA%20 Regulatory%20Strategy%202021-2025.pdf.

It is also aimed at intervening on a timely basis when the governance, culture, or practices of the supervised financial institution are imprudent, unsafe and endangering the integrity of the markets to the detriment of consumers and market

participants. However, the FSR Act does not provide detailed guidance on how regulators should employ the risk-based approach. It is silent on the mechanisms and/or measures that should be employed when applying the risk-based approach in South Africa.

On the other hand, Australia has implemented a robust and detailed risk-based regulatory system to enforce its Twin Peaks model, which is enforced through the risk-based regulatory system which was modelled and shaped by the collapse of the HIH insurance company. 124

124 Black 2006 Law & Policy 2.

The collapse of this company exposed weaknesses in APRA's risk assessment mechanisms and the absence of an effective supervision culture. 125

125 APRA 2016 https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/information-paper-risk-culture1.pdf.

To this end, the APRA modified its risk-based approach to financial regulation in 2002 by introducing a system consisting of two elements, namely the Probability and Impact Rating System (PAIRS) and the Supervisory Oversight and Response System (SOARS). 126

126 APRA 2020 https://www.apra.gov.au/supervision-risk-and-intensity-sri-model; Black 2006 Law & Policy 8.

The PAIRS is a framework for assessing how "risky" an institution is in relation to APRA objectives. 127

127 Black Development of Risk-Based Regulation 32.

It focusses on the probability and impact of the risks that a particular institution poses to APRA's objectives, namely, ensuring that financial institutions meet their obligations to beneficiaries in the context of an efficient and competitive financial sector. 128

128 Black 2006 Law & Policy 9.

Under the PAIRS, financial institutions are ranked according to their ability to meet relevant financial commitments and their impact on the Australian financial sector should they be liquidated. 129

129 Black 2006 Law & Policy 10.

The output of the PAIRS process is a risk score which is translated into a probability index rating and an impact score. 130

130 Black 2006 Law & Policy 4; IOPS 2012 https://www.iopsweb.org/ toolkit/Module4riskmitigants.pdf 4-38.

The SOARS is designed to determine how officials respond to that risk. It consists of two components, namely the supervisory attention index and the supervisory stance. 131

131 APRA 2018 https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-02-pairs-guide-ud-external_0.pdf.

The supervisory attention index rating is determined by taking the geometric average of the probability rating and the impact index rating. 132

132 APRA 2018 https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-02-pairs-guide-ud-external_0.pdf.

This rating is intended to set the level of resources to be applied to the financial institution.

South Africa also adopts a risk-based approach to enforce the Twin Peaks model. However, unlike Australia, South Africa does not provide robust risk-based assessment mechanisms. It appears that South Africa has not yet

developed a detailed risk management mechanism because it has not yet experienced the same level of instability that was experienced in Australia when HIH insurance collapsed. In South Africa, both the PA and the FSCA are mandated to utilise the risk-based approach in fulfilling their objectives. On the other hand, only the APRA is obliged to rely on the risk-based approach to fulfil its functions in Australia.

The reliance on the risk-based approach empowers regulatory bodies to employ appropriate measures that are commensurate with the relevant risks that are posed to financial institutions. The risk-based approach requires resources to be directed where they are needed the most to curb high risk threats to the financial sector. If properly employed, the risked based approach reduces compliance burdens by minimising regulatory intervention where detected risks are relatively low. 133

133 De Sousa 2016 AIAL Forum 24.

It is assumed that regulatory bodies may sometimes fail to respond to all alleged breaches or monitor all illicit conduct in the financial sector. 134

134 De Sousa 2016 AIAL Forum 24.

This means that there are some risks that do not pose much threat to the financial sector. Regulatory bodies should carefully determine the severity of each risk.

In terms of the governance framework, individuals tasked with supervising the implementation of the Twin Peaks model are appointed in both South Africa and Australia. In South Africa, the Commissioners governing the FSCA are appointed by the Minister of Finance. 135

135 Section 61 of the FSR Act.

The same is true for the PA, whose CEO is appointed by the Governor of the SARB. 136

136 Section 36 of the FSR Act.

In Australia, the ASIC Commissioners and the APRA Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson are appointed by the Governor-General from the nominations of the relevant Minister. 137

137 Section 16 of the APRA Act; s 9 of the ASIC Act.

Nevertheless, there are some differences in terms of where these officials report. The APRA is to some extent answerable to the Treasurer, and both the APRA and the ASIC report to the Federal Parliament through the submission of Annual Reports. 138

138 Section 59 of the APRA Act; Black and Jacobzone 2009 OECD Working papers on public governance 27.

In South Africa, the PA reports to the deputy governor and is accountable to the SARB. 139

139 Section 55 of the FSR Act.

The PA also prepares an annual report on its activities, which is submitted to the Minister of Finance for reporting in Parliament. 140

140 Section 55 of the FSR Act; IMF 2012 Country Report No. 12/314.

The Governor-General has the power to terminate the appointment of an APRA member under the APRA Act. 141

141 Section 25 of the APRA Act; also see IMF 2019 Country Report No. 19/49

This is in contrast to the situation in South Africa, where the Minister of Finance has the power to appoint and dismiss the PA's Chief Executive Officer and is vested with the authority to remove

the FSCA Commissioner from office. 142

142 Section 36 and 39 of the FSR Act.

This approach could result in undue political interference in the functioning of the PA and FSCA. 143

143 Osode 2021 Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics and Business Law 9-32.

Thus, the current South African Twin Peaks model does not expressly provide measures that prevent and combat undue political interference on the part of the PA and the FSCA. 144

144 Osode 2021 Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics and Business Law 9-32.

6 Concluding remarks

As noted above, South Africa and Australia have fundamentally sound designs of the Twin Peaks model. The model is not rigidly enforced in both South Africa and Australia. In this regard it has been carefully adapted to suit the socio-economic needs and circumstances of each country. In addition to the prudential regulator and market conduct regulator, the central banks still play a fundamental role in ensuring financial stability in both South Africa and Australia. Nonetheless, as indicated above, there are still some gaps and flaws that need to be addressed. Accordingly, it is submitted that the Twin Peaks model should be carefully enforced in both countries to foster cooperation and collaboration among the prudential regulator, market conduct regulator, central banks and other relevant role-players. Moreover, it is submitted that South Africa should consider following the Australian approach of not housing the PA in the central back to promote its independence and curb political interference. However, the complete separation of the prudential regulator from the central bank should be flexibly utilised so as not to discourage relevant cooperation and collaboration between the prudential regulator, the market conduct regulator, central banks and other relevant role-players. Both Australia and South Africa should carefully move away from the soft law approach of relying on MOUs to enact adequate statutory provisions in the APRA Act and the FSR Act to foster compliance, cooperation and collaboration between financial institutions, market participants, financial regulators and other role-players. This approach could ensure that all relevant parties are legally bound to comply with the MOUs and statutory provisions of the APRA Act and the FSR Act. The risk-based approach should be effectively utilised in Australia and South Africa to enforce the Twin Peaks model and detect, prevent and combat all systemic risks in their respective financial sectors. In relation to this, South Africa should consider amending the FSR Act to enact provisions that expressly and adequately stipulate the measures and/or mechanisms that should be used to implement its risk-based approach to enforce the Twin Peaks model.

Bibliography

Literature

Abrams and Taylor "Assessing the Case for Unified Financial Sector Supervision"

Abrams RK and Taylor MW "Assessing the Case for Unified Financial Sector Supervision" in Arner DW and Lin J (eds) Financial Regulation: A Guide to Structural Reform (Sweet & Maxwell Hong Kong 2003) 463-487

Bain and Harper 2000 North American Actuarial Journal

Bain EA and Harper IR "Integration of Financial Services: Evidence from Australia" 2000 North American Actuarial Journal 1-19

Bakir 2009 Public Administration

Bakir C "The Governance of Financial Regulatory Reform: The Australian Experience" 2009 Public Administration 910-922

Baldwin and Black 2016 Journal of Law and Society

Baldwin R and Black J "Driving Priorities in Risk-based Regulation: What's the Problem? " 2016 Journal of Law and Society 565-595

Bedeker Appraisal of South Africa's Legislative Adoption

Bedeker C Appraisal of South Africa's Legislative Adoption of the Twin-Peaks System in Light of International Experiences (LLM-dissertation University of the Western Cape 2021)

Black 2006 Law & Policy

Black J "Managing Regulatory Risks and Defining the Parameters of Blame: A Focus on the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority" 2006 Law & Policy 1-30

Black Development of Risk-Based Regulation

Black J The Development of Risk-Based Regulation in Financial Services: Canada, the UK and Australia (ESRC Centre for the Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science London 2004)

Black and Jacobzone 2009 OECD Working Papers on Public Governance

Black J and Jacobzone S "Tools for Regulatory Quality and Financial Sector Regulation: A Cross-Country Perspective" 2009 OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 1-95

Blundell-Wignall 2009 OECD Forum

Blundell-Wignall A "Restoring Confidence in Financial Systems" 2009 OECD Forum 1-6

Botha and Makina 2011 International Business & Economics Research Journal

Botha E and Makina D "Financial Regulation and Supervision: Theory and Practice in South Africa" 2011 International Business & Economics Research Journal 27-36

Comino 2009 Aust Jnl of Corp Law

Comino V "The Challenge of Corporate Law Enforcement in Australia" 2009 Aust Jnl of Corp Law 233-265

Cooper "Integration of Financial Regulatory Authorities"

Cooper J "The Integration of Financial Regulatory Authorities – The Australian Experience" Unpublished contribution presented at the 30th Anniversary Conference of the Securities and Exchange Commission of Brazil (4-5 September 2006 Rio de Janeiro)

De Jager 2006 SA Merc LJ

De Jager J "The South African Reserve Bank: An Evaluation of the Origin, Evolution and Status of a Central Bank (Part 1)" 2006 SA Merc LJ 159-174

De Sousa 2016 AIAL Forum

De Sousa D "Is a Risk-Based Approach Appropriate when Regulating Matters Affecting our National Security?" 2016 AIAL Forum 23-35

European Central Bank Memorandum of understanding on cooperation between the financial supervisory authorities, central banks, and finance ministries of the European Union on cross-border financial stability

European Central Bank "Memorandum of understanding on cooperation between the financial supervisory authorities, central banks, and finance ministries of the European Union on cross-border financial stability" 2008 ECFIN/CEFCPE(2008)REP/53106

Gaskel 2007 IMF Working Together Seminar Series

Gaskel C "Negotiating Cooperation Agreements: The Experience of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)" 2007 IMF Working Together Seminar Series 84-93

Gilligan and Ramsay 2021 Company and Securities Law Journal

Gilligan G and Ramsay I "Is There Underenforcement of Corporate Criminal Law? An Analysis of Prosecutions Under the ASIC Act and Corporations Act: 2009–2018" 2021 Company and Securities Law Journal 435-458

Godwin 2017 Law and Financial Markets Review

Godwin A "Australia’s Trek towards Twin Peaks – Comparisons with South Africa" 2017 Law and Financial Markets Review 183-193

Godwin, Howse and Ramsay 2017 Journal of Banking Regulation

Godwin A, Howse T and Ramsay I "A Jurisdictional Comparison of the Twin Peaks Model of Financial Regulation" 2017 Journal of Banking Regulation 103-131

Godwin, Howse and Ramsy 2017 SALJ

Godwin A, House T and Ramsy I "Twin Peaks: South Africa’s financial sector regulatory framework" 2017 SALJ 665 – 702

Godwin 2017 Law and Financial Markets Review

Godwin A "Introduction to Special Issue –The Twin Peaks Model of Financial Regulation and Reform in South Africa" 2017 Law and Financial Markets Review 151-153

Godwin, Kourabas and Ramsay 2016 Int'l Law

Godwin A, Kourabas S and Ramsay I "Twin Peaks and Financial Regulation: The Challenges of Increasing Regulatory Overlap and Expanding Responsibilities" 2016 Int'l Law 273-297

Godwin and Schmulow "Genealogy and Topography of Twin Peaks"

Godwin A and Schmulow A "The Genealogy and Topography of Twin Peaks" in Godwin A and Schmulow A (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Twin Peaks Financial Regulation (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2021) 1-14

Godwin and Schmulow 2015 SALJ 760

Godwin A and Schmulow A "The Financial Sector Regulation Bill in South Africa, second draft : lessons from Australia" 2015 SALJ 756-768

Hanrahan 2008 Economic Papers

Hanrahan PF "Improving the Process of Change in Australian Financial Sector Regulation" 2008 Economic Papers 6-23

Hill " Why did Australia Fare so Well"

Hill J "Why did Australia Fare so Well in the Global Financial Crisis?" in Ferran E et al (eds) The Regulatory Aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2012) 203-300

IMF 2018 Global Financial Stability Report

International Monetary Fund "Regulatory Reform 10 Years After the Global Financial Crisis: Looking Back, Looking Forward" 2018 IMF Global Financial Stability Report 55-81

IMF Australia Country Report No. 19/053

IMF "Australia: Financial Sector Assessment Program-Detailed Assessment of Observance-Basel Core Principles For Effective Banking Supervision" 2019 Australia Country Report No. 19/053

IMF Country Report No. 20/33

IMF "Article IV Consultation—Press Release; Staff Report; and Statement by the Executive Director for South Africa" 2019 IMF Country Report No. 20/33

IMF 2012 Country Report No. 12/314

IMF "Australia: IOSCO Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation— Detailed Assessment of Implementation" 2012 Country Report No. 12/314

IMF 2019 Country Report No. 19/49

IMF 2019 "Australia Financial Sector Assessment Program Technical Note Insurance Sector Regulation and Supervision" Country Report No. 19/49

Joshi Appraisal of the Twin Peaks Model

Joshi SP An Appraisal of the Twin Peaks Model of Financial Regulation in South Africa (LLM-dissertation University of Pretoria 2019)

Llewellyn "Institutional Structure"

Llewellyn DT "Institutional Structure of Financial Regulation and Supervision: The Basic Issues" in Carmichael J, Fleming A and Llewellyn DT (eds) Aligning Financial Supervisory Structures with Country Needs (World Bank Washington DC 2004) 17-93

Lumpkin 2009 OECD Financial Market Trends Report.

Lumpkin SA "Regulatory Issues Related To Financial Innovation" 2009 OECD Financial Market Trends Report 1-30

Mahasela Effectiveness of the Twin Peaks

Mahasela LJ The Effectiveness of the Twin Peaks Model Regulation in South African Banking Sector (MBA-dissertation North-West University 2020)

Mc Vea The impact of Global Financial Crisis

Mc Vea H "The impact of Global Financial Crisis upon the UK’s Regulatory architecture” in Cash D and Goddard R (eds) Regulation and the Global Financial Crisis: Impact, Regulatory Responses, and Beyond (Routledge London 2021) 44-60

Moodley Twin Peaks Model

Moodley A The Twin Peaks Model: A Critical Analysis of its Effectiveness in South Africa (Master's dissertation Wits University 2018)

Norton 2005 Int'l Law

Norton JJ "Global Financial Sector Reform: The Single Financial Regulator Model Based on the United Kingdom FSA Experience: A Critical Reevaluation" 2005 Int'l Law 15-62

Oksiutycz and Angelopulo 2021 Communitas

Oksiutycz A and Angelopulo G "Legitimisation of Banking Transparency in the Institutional Field Discourse in South Africa" 2021 Communitas 198-215

Osode 2021 Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics and Business Law

Osode PC "Two Heads are Better than One: Assessing South Africa's 'Twin Peaks' Financial Regulation Model" 2021 Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics and Business Law 9-32

Qumba 2022 SALJ

Qumba MF "A Comparative Analysis of the Twin Peaks Model of Financial Regulation in South Africa and the United Kingdom" 2022 SALJ 78-113

Schmulow 2017 AJICL

Schmulow AD "Financial Regulatory Governance in South Africa: The Move Towards Twin Peaks" 2017 AJICL 393-417

Schmulow , Mazzola and De Zilva 2021 FL Rev

Schmulow A, Mazzola P and De Zilva D "Twin Peaks 2.0: Avoiding Influence Over an Australian Financial Regulator Assessment Authority" 2021 Federal Law Review 505-527

Schoenmaker and Véron 2021 "A 'Twin Peaks' Vision for Europe"

Schoenmaker D and Véron N "A 'Twin Peaks' Vision for Europe" in Godwin A and Schmulow A (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Twin Peaks Financial Regulation (Cambridge University Press 2021) 282 - 291

Taylor Peak Practice

Taylor M Peak Practice: How to Reform the UK's Regulatory System (Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation London 1996)

Taylor Twin Peaks

Taylor M Twin Peaks: A Regulatory Structure for the New Century (Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation London 1995)

Van Hengel, Hilbers and Schoenmaker "Experiences with the Dutch Twin-Peaks Model"

Van Hengel M, Hilbers P and Schoenmaker D "Experiences with the Dutch Twin-Peaks Model: Lessons for Europe" in Kellermann AJ, De Haan J and de Vries (eds) Financial Supervision in the 21st Century (Springer Heidelberg 2013) 185-199

Van Niekerk and Van Heerden 2020 SALJ

Van Niekerk G and Van Heerden C "The Importance of a Legislative Framework for Cooperation and Collaboration in the Twin Peaks Model of Financial Regulation" 2020 SALJ 108-144

Vessio 2008 SA Merc LJ

Vessio M "What does the National Credit Regulator Regulate? " 2008 SA Merc LJ 227-242

Zimmermann 2021 CADHI Expert Workshop

Zimmermann JA "Possible Indirect Legal Effects of Non-legally Binding Instruments" 2021 CADHI Expert Workshop 1-26

Legislation

Australia

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority Act 50 of 1998

Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act 51 of 2001

Reserve Bank Act 4 of 1959

South Africa

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act, 1996

Banks Act 94 of 1990

Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001

Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017

Long-Term Insurance Act 52 of 1998

National Credit Act 34 of 2005

Short-Term Insurance Act 53 of 1998

South African Reserve Bank Act 90 of 1989

United Kingdom

Financial Services and Markets Act 2000

Internet sources

APRA date unknown https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/MoU-RBA-Reserve-Bank-of-Australia.PDF

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority date unknown Memorandum of Understanding: The Reserve Bank of Australia and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/ MoU-RBA-Reserve-Bank-of-Australia.PDF accessed 16 April 2024

APRA 2016 https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/information-paper-risk-culture1.pdf

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority 2016 Information Paper: Risk Culture https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/information-paper-risk-culture1.pdf accessed 16 April 2024

APRA 2018 https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-02-pairs-guide-ud-external_0.pdf

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority 2018 Probability and Impact Rating System https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-02-pairs-guide-ud-external_0.pdf accessed 16 April 2024

APRA 2020 https://www.apra.gov.au/supervision-risk-and-intensity-sri-model

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority 2020 Supervision Risk and Intensity (SRI) Model https://www.apra.gov.au/supervision-risk-and-intensity-sri-model accessed 16 April 2024

APRA 2021 https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-01/Governance%20and%20Senior%20Executive%20Accountabilities.pdf

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority 2021 Governance and Senior Executive Accountabilities https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-01/Governance%20and%20Senior%20Executive%20Accountabilities.pdf accessed 16 April 2024

APRA 2023 https://www.apra.gov.au/apras-organisation-structure

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority 2023 APRA's Organisation Structure https://www.apra.gov.au/apras-organisation-structure accessed 22 February 2024

APRA 2024 https://www.apra.gov.au/apras-functions-0

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority 2024 APRA's Functions https://www.apra.gov.au/apras-functions-0 accessed 16 April 2024

ASIC date unknown https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/what-we-do/our-role/history/

Australian Securities and Investments Commission date unknown History https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/what-we-do/our-role/history/ accessed 26 September 2023

ASIC 2019 https://download.asic.gov.au/media/5314396/asic-annual-report-2018-19-full.pdf

Australian Securities and Investments Commission 2019 Australian Security Investment Committee Annual Report 2018-19 https://download.asic.gov.au/media/5314396/asic-annual-report-2018-19-full.pdf accessed 2 October 2023

ASIC 2023 https://asic.gov.au/regulatory-resources/markets/market-supervision/

Australian Securities and Investments Commission 2023 Market Supervision https://asic.gov.au/regulatory-resources/markets/market-supervision/ accessed 16 April 2024

ASIC 2024 https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/what-we-do/how-we-operate/

Australian Securities and Investments Commission 2024 How We Operate https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/what-we-do/how-we-operate/ accessed 25 January 2024

Claessens et al 2010 https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ ft/wp/2010/wp1044.pdf

Claessens S et al 2010 Lessons and Policy Implications from the Global Financial Crisis. IMF Working Paper WP/10/44 https://www.imf.org/ external/pubs/ft/wp/2010/wp1044.pdf accessed 15 April 2024

Cooper 2006 https://download.asic.gov.au/media/1339352/integration-financial-regulatory-authorities.pdf

Cooper J 2006 The Integration of Financial Regulatory Authorities – The Australian Experience https://download.asic.gov.au/media/1339352/ integration-financial-regulatory-authorities.pdf accessed 26 September 2023

European Central Bank date unknown https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/ pdf/other/prudentialsupcbrole_en.pdf

European Central Bank date unknown The Role of Central Banks in Prudential Supervision https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ prudentialsupcbrole_en.pdf accessed 16 April 2024

Financial Regulator Assessment Authority 2022 https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2022-08/apo-nid319322.pdf

Financial Regulator Assessment Authority 2022 Effectiveness and Capability Review of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2022-08/apo-nid319322.pdf accessed 16 April 2024

FSCA date unknown https://www.fsca.co.za/Documents/FSCA%20Finan cial%20Inclusion%20Strategy.pdf

Financial Sector Conduct Authority date unknown FSCA Financial Inclusion Strategy https://www.fsca.co.za/Documents/FSCA%20Financial%20 Inclusion%20Strategy.pdf accessed 4 October 2023

FSCA date unknown https://www.fsca.co.za/News%20Documents/FSCA%

20Regulatory%20Strategy%202021-2025.pdf

Financial Sector Conduct Authority date unknown Regulatory Strategy 2021-2025 https://www.fsca.co.za/News%20Documents/FSCA%20Regulatory%20Strategy%202021-2025.pdf accessed 14 August 2023

FSCA 2022 https://www.fsca.co.za/Annual%20Reports/FSCA%20 Annual%20Report%202021-2022.pdf

Financial Sector Conduct Authority 2022 Annual Report 2021/2022 https://www.fsca.co.za/Annual%20Reports/FSCA%20Annual%20Report%202021-2022.pdf accessed 4 October 2023

FSCA 2023 https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulatory%20Frameworks/Fin TechDocuments/Draft%20Position%20Paper%20on%20Open%20Finance.pdf

Financial Sector Conduct Authority 2023 Draft Position Paper on Open Finance https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulatory%20Frameworks/FinTech Documents/Draft%20Position%20Paper%20on%20Open%20Finance.pdf accessed 15 April 2024

Godwin and Ramsay 2015 https://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2657355

Godwin A and Ramsay I 2015 Twin Peaks – The Legal and Regulatory Anatomy of Australia's System of Financial Regulation. CIFR Working Paper No. 074/2015 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id= 2657355 accessed 16 April 2024

Group of 30 2008 https://group30.org/images/uploads/publications/G30_ StructureFinancialSupervision2008.pdf

Group of 30 2008 The Structure of Financial Supervision Approaches and Challenges in a Global Marketplace https://group30.org/images/uploads/ publications/G30_StructureFinancialSupervision2008.pdf accessed 15 September 2023

IMF 2022 https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2022/184/article-A001-en.xml

International Monetary Fund 2022 South Africa: Financial Sector Assessment Program-Technical Note on Banking Regulation and Supervision. IMF Country Report No. 22/184 https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/002/2022/184/article-A001-en.xml accessed 24 January 2024

IMF 2022 https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2022/06/16/

South-Africa-Financial-Sector-Assessment-Program-Technical-Note-on-Insurance-Sector-519728

International Monetary Fund 2022 South Africa Financial Sector Assessment Program Technical Note on Insurance Sector Regulation and Supervision. IMF Country Report No 22/185 https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2022/06/16/South-Africa-Financial-Sector-Assessment-Program-Technical-Note-on-Insurance-Sector-519728 accessed 16 April 2024

IOPS 2012 https://www.iopsweb.org/toolkit/Module4riskmitigants.pdf

International Organisation of Pension Supervisors 2012 Module 4: Risk Mitigants and Risk Scoring https://www.iopsweb.org/toolkit/Module4 riskmitigants.pdf accessed 16 April 2024

Lumpkin 2002 https://www.oecd.org/finance/insurance/2089622.pdf

Lumpkin S 2002 Supervision of Financial Services in the OECD Area https://www.oecd.org/finance/insurance/2089622.pdf accessed 16 April 2024

Masthead 2017 https://www.masthead.co.za/newsletter/twin-peaks-newsletter-issue-2-fsb-approach/

Masthead 2017 Twin Peaks Newsletter – Issue 2: The FSB Approach https://www.masthead.co.za/newsletter/twin-peaks-newsletter-issue-2-fsb-approach/ accessed 16 April 2024

National Treasury 2011 https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/ 20131211%20-%20item%202%20a%20safer%20financial%20sector% 20to%20serve%20south%20africa%20better.pdf

National Treasury 2011 Policy Document: A Safer Financial Sector to Serve South Africa Better https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/20131211%20-%20item%202%20a%20safer%20financial%20sector%20to%20serve%20south%20africa%20better.pdf accessed 17 August 2023

National Treasury 2014 https://juta.co.za/media/filestore/2015/03/2014_

12_12_Response_document.pdf

National Treasury 2014 Twin Peaks in South Africa: Response and Explanatory Document Accompanying the Second Draft of the Financial Sector Regulation Bill https://juta.co.za/media/filestore/2015/03/2014_ 12_12_Response_document.pdf accessed 5 September 2023

National Treasury 2018 https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/ Press%20release%20Twin%20Peaks%20implementation%20March2018_FINAL.pdf

National Treasury 2018 New Twin Peaks Regulators Established https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/Press%20release%20Twin%20Peaks%20implementation%20March2018_FINAL.pdf accessed 16 April 2024

Nier 2009 https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2009/wp0970.pdf

Nier EW 2009 Financial Stability Frameworks and the Role of Central Banks: Lessons from the Crisis. IMF Working Paper WP/09/70 https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2009/wp0970.pdf accessed 16 April 2024

Reserve Bank of Australia date unknown https://www.rba.gov.au/about-rba/

Reserve Bank of Australia date unknown About the RBA https://www.rba.gov.au/about-rba/ accessed 14 September 2023

Reserve Bank of Australia date unknown https://www.rba.gov.au/fin-stability/reg-framework/role-of-the-reserve-bank-in-maintaining-financial-stability.html

Reserve Bank of Australia date unknown Role of the Reserve Bank in Maintaining Financial Stability https://www.rba.gov.au/fin-stability/reg-framework/role-of-the-reserve-bank-in-maintaining-financial-stability.html accessed 4 October 2023

Reserve Bank of Australia 2023 https://www.rba.gov.au/education/

resources/in-a-nutshell/pdf/roles-and-functions.pdf

Reserve Bank of Australia 2023 Roles and Functions of the Reserve Bank of Australia https://www.rba.gov.au/education/resources/in-a-nutshell/pdf/ roles-and-functions.pdf accessed 14 September 2023

SARB 2018 https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/publications/publication-detail-pages/prudential-authority/PA-financial-sector-regulation/sector-regulation-act/2018/8800

South African Reserve Bank 2018 Prudential Authority Regulatory Strategy for 2018-2021 https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/publications/publication -detail-pages/prudential-authority/PA-financial-sector-regulation/sector-regulation-act/2018/8800 accessed 16 April 2024

SARB 2020 https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/what-we-do/prudential-regulation/PA%20Regulatory%20and%20Supervisory%20 Strategy%202021.pdf

South African Reserve Bank 2020 Regulatory Strategy 2021-2024 https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/what-we-do/prudential-regulation/PA%20Regulatory%20and%20Supervisory%20Strategy%202021.pdf accessed 16 April 2024

SARB 2022 https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/sarb/publications/ media-releases/2022/position-paper-on-ela-for-banks/Position%20paper%20on%20ELA%20for%20Banks%20%28Final%29.pdf

South African Reserve Bank 2022 Position Paper: Overview of the South African Reserve Bank's Policy Framework for the Provision of Emergency Liquidity Assistance to Banks https://www.resbank.co.za/content/dam/ sarb/publications/media-releases/2022/position-paper-on-ela-for-banks/Position%20paper%20on%20ELA%20for%20Banks%20%28Final%29.pdf accessed 16 April 2024

SARB 2024 https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/what-we-do/ Prudentialregulation

South African Reserve Bank 2024 Prudential Regulation https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/what-we-do/Prudentialregulation accessed 16 April 2024

Schmulow 2018 https://theconversation.com/south-africa-joins-the-club-that-regulates-financial-markets-through-twin-peaks-95558

Schmulow 2018 South Africa joins the club that regulates financial markets through ‘Twin Peaks’ https://theconversation.com/south-africa-joins-the-club-that-regulates-financial-markets-through-twin-peaks-95558 accessed 16 April 2024

The South African Treasury 2013 https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/ 20131211%20%20item%203%20roadmap.pdf

The South African Treasury 2013 Implementing a Twin Peaks Model of Financial Regulation in South Africa accessed https://www.treasury.gov.za/twinpeaks/20131211%20%20item%203%20roadmap.pdf 14 October 2023

The Treasury 1996 https://treasury.gov.au/publication/p1996-fsi-fr

The Treasury, Australian Government 1996 Financial System Inquiry (1996) Final Report https://treasury.gov.au/publication/p1996-fsi-fr accessed 14 October 2023

UNSW Law Society 2020 https://issuu.com/unswlawsociety/docs/pic_ 2020_final_copy/s/11207013

UNSW Law Society 2020 Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) https://issuu.com/unswlawsociety/docs/pic_2020_final_copy/s/11207013 accessed 15 February 2024

List of Abbreviations

AIAL Forum

Australian Institute of Administrative Law

AJICL

African Journal of International and Comparative Law

APRA

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority

APRA Act

Australian Prudential Regulation Authority Act 50 of 1998

ASIC

Australian Securities and Investments Commission

ASIC Act

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001

ASC

Australian Securities Commission

Aust Jnl of Corp Law

Australian Journal of Corporate Law

CEO

Chief Executive Officer

CFR

Council of Financial Regulators

FICA

Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001

FL Rev

Federal Law Review

FSA

Financial Services Authority

FSCA

Financial Sector Conduct Authority

FSR Act

Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017

IMF

International Monetary Fund

Int'l Law

The International Lawyer

IOPS

International Organisation of Pension Supervisors

MOUs

Memoranda of Understanding

NCA

National Credit Act 34 of 2005

NCC

National Consumer Commission

NCR

National Credit Regulator

NCT

National Consumer Tribunal

PA

Prudential Authority

PAIRS

Probability and Impact Rating System

RBA

Reserve Bank of Australia

SA Merc LJ

South African Mercantile Law Journal

SALJ

South African Law Journal

SARB

South African Reserve Bank

SOARS

Supervisory Oversight and Response System