PER/PELJ - Pioneer in peer-reviewed, open access online law publications
Authors Yeukai Mahleza Mahlatse & Maake-Malatji
Affiliation University of Pretoria South Africa North-West University, South Africa
Email ynd.mahleza@up.ac.za Mahlatse.MaakeMalatji@nwu.ac.za
Date Submitted 22 January 2024
Date Revised 20 March 2024
Date Accepted 20 March 2024
Date Published 25 November 2024
Guest Editor Prof BM Mupangavanhu
Journal Editor Prof C Rautenbach
How to cite this contribution
Mahleza YND and Maake-Malatji MI "A Case for the Right to Education for Stateless and Undocumented Children: A South African Analysis in the Light of International Law" PER / PELJ 2024(27) - DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a17750
Copyright
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a17750
Abstract
|
This paper is grounded in the right to education, guaranteed to |
---|
Keywords
Statelessness; undocumented; children; education; South Africa; international law.
……………………………………………………….
1 Introduction
Various pieces of legislation deal with the right to education.
1
Yeukai ND Mahleza. LLB (UNILIM) LLM (Uni of Notre Dame) LLD (UNISA). Lecturer, Constitutional Law and Human Rights, University of Pretoria, South Africa. Email: ynd.mahleza@up.ac.za. ORCiD: https://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-8494-3134. Mahlatse I Maake-Malatji. LLB (UNILIM) LLM LLD (UCT). Senior Law Lecturer, Constitutional Law, North-West University, Potchefstroom. South Africa. Email: Mahlatse.MaakeMalatji@nwu.ac.za. ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4494-1916. 1 Other relevant legislation dealing with documented and undocumented children in South Africa include the Children's Act 38 of 2005, the Births and Deaths Registration Act 51 of 1992, and the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 (the Citizenship Act), and the South African Schools Act 84 of 1996 (SASA). 2 Section 29(1)(b) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (the Constitution).
Furthermore, section 28(1)(a) provides that every child has the right to a name and nationality from birth. Section 28(1)(a) is of interest in this paper because it provides for the right to nationality, which is proven through documentation such as birth certificates and identity documents which stateless and undocumented children do not possess. They do not possess identification documents which are required by national educational policies to register at schools,
3
3 GN 2342 in GG 19377 of 19 October 1998 (National Admission Policy for Ordinary Schools of 1998).
As will be discussed below, the researchers posit that the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 (the Immigration Act) contains provisions that are detrimental to stateless and undocumented children. The Constitution accentuate the child's interests, showing them to be of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child. The concept contained in the Constitution, namely that of a child's best interests, is of paramount importance as it is also cemented in international and/or regional instruments such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (ACRWC). Article 4(1) of the ACRWC importantly provides that in "all actions concerning the child undertaken by
any person or authority the best interests of the child shall be the primary consideration." Accordingly, this shows how essential it is to protect the right to education for stateless and undocumented children despite the children having nationality and identification issues. Despite the existence of various laws applicable to children's rights in South Africa, challenges are experienced in relation to access to education for stateless and undocumented children.
4
4 The concepts "stateless" and/or "undocumented", though they have different meanings, will be used interchangeably throughout the article. The paper refers to undocumented children because they are at risk of becoming stateless.
The challenges faced by undocumented or stateless children do not end with basic education but continue to the time when they must register at institutions of higher learning. For example, at the matric level such children are unable to register with the Department of Basic Education (DBE) in order for them to write the national exams and obtain a National Senior Certificate.
5
5 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/1976-media-statement-sahrc-s-application-tojoin-undocumented-learners-litigation-to-be-heard-in-grahamstown-high-court 1.
2 The international normative framework
This section examines how international and regional law addresses the right to education. While some instruments guarantee everyone's right to an education, others apply only to certain groups such as children, refugees or immigrants. This study examines instruments that guarantee this right with the understanding that a reference to children would include stateless and undocumented children.
2.1 The right to basic education in international and regional law
The right to education is acknowledged in many human rights instruments. These instruments broadly emphasise that it is in the best interest of every child to exercise the right to education. Equality is the core foundation in providing the right to education, and no child must be discriminated against on the basis of the child's legal status. South Africa is a party to some of the instruments providing for the right to education. For example, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)
6
6 See Articles 13 and 14 of the ICESCR. 7 See Articles 10 and 14 of the CEDAW.
Africa (the Maputo Protocol of 2003) (Article 12).
8
8 See Article 12 of the Maputo Protocol of 2003.
Article 13(2)(a) of the ICESCR provides that "[p]rimary education shall be compulsory and available free to all." Article 13(1) stipulates that "education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and the sense of its dignity, and shall strengthen the respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms." Article 2(2) stipulates that the rights that are pronounced in the ICESCR shall be practised free from all forms of discrimination such as national or social origin, birth, or other status. Furthermore, Article 10(3) guarantees in the relevant parts that "[s]pecial measures of protection and assistance should be taken on behalf of all children and young persons without any discrimination for reasons of parentage or other conditions." As a result, the South African Government should comply with and fulfil its obligations under these instruments as provided for in sections 39 and 233 of the Constitution.
Governments violate the rights of learners by applying standards stipulating who should fully exercise the right to education.
9
9 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/1976-media-statement-sahrc-s-application-tojoin-undocumented-learners-litigation-to-be-heard-in-grahamstown-high-court 3-4. 10 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/1976-media-statement-sahrc-s-application-tojoin-undocumented-learners-litigation-to-be-heard-in-grahamstown-high-court 3-4. 11 Nanima and Durojaye 2019 LDD 270-298. See also CCL 2022 https://pmg.org.za/files/221115Submission_-_Centre_for_Child_Law.docx.
The international legal instruments examined above provide insight into the importance of the right to education. Therefore, the policies and regulations related to the right to education must be clear. This is to avoid different interpretations resulting in the violation of the right by educational institutions and any stakeholders involved with undocumented and stateless learners.
12
12…… See s233 of the Constitution. Also see SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/1976-media-statement-sahrc-s-application-tojoin-undocumented-learners-litigation-to-be-heard-in-grahamstown-high-court 9. 13 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/1976-media-statement-sahrc-s-application-tojoin-undocumented-learners-litigation-to-be-heard-in-grahamstown-high-court 10-11.
To the extent that some of the policies and practices experienced by the undocumented and stateless learners from the South African Government do not conform to the provisions of sections 39 and 233 of the Constitution, the South African Government has failed to comply with the international human rights standards related to the right to education. It is the authors' view that if the South African Government, especially through the DBE and Department of Home Affairs (DHA) continues to show a lack of concern in providing solutions, this translates into an uncertain future for the children affected and their immersion in a cycle of poverty-stricken generations. The contention made in this regard is in support of the removal of barriers hindering stateless and undocumented children from enjoying the fruits of the right to education.
In addition to the points made above, it is the authors argument that every child should be able to enjoy the right to education, notwithstanding the child's nationality. Accordingly, the enjoyment of the right to education should be an absolute right that every child should be able to exercise, notwithstanding the child's nationality, whether documented and/or stateless; and whether in the context of basic education or institutions of higher learning.
2.2 The right to education for stateless children through the ACRWC
A closer look at the provisions of the ACRWC in relation to stateless children guides the discussion towards Article 6, which pronounces the right to
nationality and birth registration. Of interest and particularly linked to stateless children is the wording of subsection 4, which stipulates as follows:
States Parties to the present Charter shall undertake to ensure that their Constitutional legislation recognize the principles according to which a child shall acquire the nationality of the State in the territory of which he has been born if, at the time of the child's birth, he is not granted nationality by any other State in accordance with its laws.
Failure by any state to apply Article 6 would lead to the child being stateless with the consequences of not being afforded the rights guaranteed to nationals. While the right to education is provided for in the ACRWC, it is made available for every child and this means that whether the child is stateless or not, the child must be afforded the right. Furthermore, the child may not be discriminated against while the child exercises this right. In the case that the child encounters a situation that may hinder him/her from exercising any rights provided for, the ACRWC takes a step further and emphasises that any person or authority must consider the best interest of a child when making decisions related to that child. Read together, these provisions stipulate that when an issue related to a stateless child's education arises and a right is affected, the "best interest of the child" principle will be activated.
3 The normative guidance on the right to basic education in South Africa
Sections 39(1) and 233 the Constitution convey the understanding that the Bill of Rights shall be interpreted in accordance with international law. This means that international law provides details about the nature of the right to education. The ICECSR calls for the right to education to be immediately realised.
14
14 CESCR 1999 https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838c22.pdf (CESCR General Comment No 13) paras 31, 32. See also CESCR 1990 https://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838e10.html (General Comment No 3) para 1. 15 Governing Body of the Juma Musjid Primary School v Essay 2011 8 BCLR 761 (CC) para 37 (Juma Musjid). 16 These cases include, for example, cases such as Juma Musjid, Moko v Acting Principal of Malusi Secondary School 2021 3 SA 323 (CC), Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education 2020 3 SA 141 (ECG) (Centre for Child Law), Section 27 v Minister of Education 2013 2 SA 40 (GNP) para 21 referring to the Juma Musjid
case and Minister of Basic Education v Basic Education for All 2016 4 SA 63 (SCA) para 36.
Two of the relevant regulations and policies in South Africa include the National Admission Policy for Ordinary Schools of 1998 (National Admission Policy), and the South African Schools Act 84 of 1996 (SASA). The National Education Policy Act 27 of 1996 governs educational policies. According to this Act, the Minister of Education has the authority to enact educational policy in terms of sections 3(4) and 7. The National Admission Policy provides for documents that are required for admission and also provides that no student will be unfairly discriminated against.
17
17 Sections 9 and 15 National Admission Policy for Ordinary Schools of 1998 read with ss 19-21 (for the documents required) and s 5 of the SASA. 18 Section 15 of the National Admission Policy for Ordinary Schools of 1998.
The use of the word "may" in section 15 of the National Admission Policy refers to the conditional admission of students pending their final admission upon the parents ensuring "that the admission of the learner is finalised within three months of conditional admission" through the submission of the required documents.
19
19 On 10 February 2021 there was a call for comments on the National Admission Policy for Ordinary Schools of 1998 which includes changes such as removing words like "may". Documents such as asylum seeker visas or refugee visas have been included, but the final stages of the policy had not been reached at the time this paper was written; see GN R38 in GG 44139 of 10 February 2021. Also see SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20Paper%20on %20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 6-7.
Despite the existence of provisions not allowing unfair discrimination when admitting undocumented learners into schools, undocumented learners still struggle to be admitted. It is argued that in cases where a child is found without documents, the assumption must be that the child is a refugee or is stateless and must be admitted into school. This is aligned with the provisions of section 44 of the Immigration Act, which stipulate in the relevant parts that "any person whose status or citizenship could not be ascertained, cannot be prevented from receiving services or performance 'to which illegal foreigners and foreigners are entitled under the Constitution or any law.'"
20
20 Also see SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/1976-media-statement-sahrc-s-application-tojoin-undocumented-learners-litigation-to-be-heard-in-grahamstown-high-court 7.
rural areas, and whose birth was not correctly captured or not yet captured. For those that are migrants and undocumented or are stateless for various reasons, they should be afforded their right to education, as the right is provided for without excluding any child on the basis of the child being documented.
3.1 The position of stateless children in South Africa
This section discusses the definition of a child and who a stateless child is and contextualises the categories that undocumented children may fall under, considering their risk of becoming stateless and their status having not been ascertained in terms of the Immigration Act. It further contextualises the place of the four guiding principles on the rights of the child, with guidance from the ACRWC.
3.1.1 Defining the term stateless child
Before we define the term stateless child, it is prudent to understand the definition of a child and the rights a child has. Article 2 of the ACRWC defines a child as "every human being below the age of 18 years". The CRC also has a similar definition in Article 1. Both the CRC and the ACWRC not only define who a child is but they explain their rights too. Four essential principles form the foundation of children's rights, which must be seen as rights and as guides to practice. They are also interrelated, cannot be used in isolation, and one cannot be applied without considering the other three.
21
21 Humanium date unknown https://www.humanium.org/en/the-guiding-principles-of-the-childrens-rights-convention/; see also Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009 https://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/AdvanceVersions/CRC-C-GC-12.pdf (General Comment No 12) para 68.
(a) Non-discrimination, which ensures that all children without exception have equal access to their rights.
(b) The best interests of the child guarantee that "in all actions concerning children the best interest of the child shall be a primary consideration."
(c) Life, survival and development ensure that the child's rights to economic and social well-being are fully protected, in addition to the right to life.
(d) Inclusion and participation maintain that all children have the right to express their thoughts, as well as the right to have those viewpoints recognised.
22
22 Humanium date unknown https://www.humanium.org/en/the-guiding-principles-of-the-childrens-rights-convention/; see also General Comment No 12 1-7.
In relation to the use of the above principles when it comes to decisions and actions that affect a child in either the public or the private sphere, the child's best interests must be assessed and taken into account as the primary consideration. When it comes to children's rights "there is no hierarchy of rights in the Convention; all the rights provided for therein are in the 'child's best interests' and no right could be compromised by a negative interpretation of the child's best interests."
23
23 Committee on the Rights of the Child 2013 https://www2.ohchr.org/English/bodies/crc/docs/GC/CRC_C_GC_14_ENG.pdf (General comment No 14) paras 1-7. 24 General Comment No 14 para 41. 25 General Comment No 14 para 42. 26 General Comment No 14 para 43.
Article 1 of the 1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (1954 Convention) defines a "stateless person" as a person who is not considered a national by any State under the operation of its law. On the other hand, an "undocumented person" is someone with no government-issued proof of identity (for example, a birth certificate, an identity document or a passport) either because no attempt was made to apply (for any reasons) or the document was lost but can be reapplied for.
27
27 LHR 2021 https://static.pmg.org.za/210309Presentation_by_LHR_on_Stateless ness.pdf.
The South African Government is a party to neither the 1954 Convention nor the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness (1961 Convention). In 2011 the South African Government pledged to become a party to the 1954 and 1961 United Nations (UN) Conventions on Statelessness.
28
28 LHR 2021 https://static.pmg.org.za/210309Presentation_by_LHR_on_Stateless ness.pdf.
by its pledge to the Global Refugee Forum (GRF) in 2019.
29
29 LHR 2021 https://static.pmg.org.za/210309Presentation_by_LHR_on_Stateless ness.pdf. 30 Agenzia Fides 2023 https://www.fides.org/en/news/73747-AFRICA_SOUTH_ AFRICA_Stateless_children_An_invisible_problem_in_southern_Africa. Also see Ngala 2023 https://cruxnow.com/church-in-africa/2023/05/african-prelate-says-war-migration-and-trafficking-drive-statelessness. 31 UNHCR 2019 https://reporting.unhcr.org/globalreport/southern-africa. 32 UNHCR 2019 https://reporting.unhcr.org/globalreport/southern-africa.
As undocumented children are at risk of becoming stateless and their status may be irregular, it is important to note that the concept is "driven by multiple distinct factors and affects South African[s], migrant, and stateless persons simultaneously". Therefore, "[u]ndocumented learners can be part of the following categories":
33
33 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/1976-media-statement-sahrc-s-application-tojoin-undocumented-learners-litigation-to-be-heard-in-grahamstown-high-court 2.
i. South African children whose birth has not been, or is unable to be, registered in terms of the Births and Deaths Registration Act in South Africa
ii. stateless persons
iii. migrants in an irregular situation (Emphasis added.)
Based on the guiding principles on how all rights related to children should be interpreted and implemented, it is posited that it is in the best interest of the stateless and/or undocumented children to be afforded the right to education without any form of discrimination, especially based on their nationality or lack of documentation. These are the principles that states should consider in all issues related to stateless and undocumented children. Other scholars support the best interest principle and it has been noted that "this principle serves as a gap-filling tool that reconciles the violation of the rights of a child with the expected solution to the violation ... clarifies approaches and meanings of the rights under a given law and gives a mediating principle to resolve conflicts among competing rights."
34
34 Nanima and Durojaye 2019 LDD 281.
4 A critical analysis of the courts in relation to access to basic education by stateless children
This section evaluates how courts deal with basic education and stateless children. The discussion shows the challenges that they experience which they attempt to resolve by approaching the courts.
4.1 The challenges to the right to education for stateless and undocumented children in South Africa
There is a broad swathe of literature discussing the role of the 1954 and 1961 Conventions in addressing issues arising from statelessness. This study is not grounded on such discussions but closely looks into the realities and challenges of statelessness as it impacts on access to education. The issue of statelessness seems to be an ongoing problem, and there are few ameliorative mechanisms for addressing the challenges attached thereto. Hence, there appears to be room for improvement.
According to Tigere,
35
35 Tigere 2015 De Rebus 41. 36 Tigere 2015 De Rebus 41. 37 Tigere 2015 De Rebus 41.
In the case of the Governing Body of the Juma Musjid Primary School (Juma Musjid),
38
38 Juma Musjid para 37.
It is important ... to understand the nature of the right to 'a basic education' under section 29(1)(a). Unlike some of the other socio-economic rights, this right is immediately realisable. There is no internal limitation requiring that the right be 'progressively realized' within 'available resources' subject to 'reasonable legislative measures'. The right to a basic education in section 29(1)(a) may be limited only in terms of a law of general application which is 'reasonable and justifiable in an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality and freedom'. This right is therefore distinct from the right to 'further education' provided for in section 29(1)(b). The state is, in terms of that right, obliged, through reasonable measures, to make further education 'progressively available and accessible'. (Italics added only for purposes of emphasis.)
Relying on the Juma Musjid case, the authors ask the question: what does it help for a child to be given the right to basic education which is
disconnected from the right to further education? How does does this right assist the children after they have completed their basic education, as they would not have access to higher education in the country that gave them the right to basic education? Presumably, the net effect of all this is to disregarded that educating our children should be the most urgent priority.
39
39 Mandela Nelson Mandela by Himself 129.
Most importantly, as has been held in case law, children "are the soul of our society", and if they are failed, "then we have failed as a society".
40
40 SS v Presiding Officer of the Children's Court: District of Krugersdorp 2012 6 SA 45 (GSJ) para 1. 41 Nanima and Durojaye 2019 LDD 279. Also see Juma Musjid para 37.
Arguably, identification documents must be provided before the child is registered. In the 2020 case of Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education (the Centre for Child Law), it was highlighted that "there are over a million children who have been admitted subject to the condition that they will be excluded should they not produce the requisite documents."
42
42 Centre for Child Law para 65. 43 Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education (ECG) (unreported) case number 3317/2018 of 10 December 2018.
Eventually the High Court found that restricting undocumented children's access to education was against the Constitution, which guarantees the rights to equality, dignity and a basic level of education, and further asserts
that children's best interests come first.
44
44 Centre for Child Law. 45 Centre for Child Law para 65. 46 Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education (CCT 19/19) Constitutional Court order of 15 February 2019; this order set aside the order granted by Mtshabe AJ, dated 10 December 2018. The Constitutional Court order directed, inter alia, that the learners be admitted pending the final determination of the litigation instituted in the High Court under case number 2480/17. 47 Centre for Child Law. Also see ESCR-NET 2020 https://www.escr-net.org/caselaw/2022/centre-child-law-and-others-v-minister-basic-education-and-others-28402017. 48 Mahleza Interplay of Citizenship 23-26.
The Constitutional Court on appeal made an order that the learners be readmitted to school. The history of the Centre for Child Law case resonates with the argument that despite the Constitution and other laws providing for the right to basic education for all children, stateless and undocumented children struggle to access their right to basic education. When a court is approached to decide whether to allow learners to access their right to basic education and in doing so the court makes an unfavourable order or an order that is not in the best interest of the learners, as the High Court did initially in this case,
49
49 Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education (ECG) (unreported) case number 3317/2018 of 10 December 2018.
The stateless and undocumented children's only hope, in this case, then came from the Constitutional Court, which overruled the High Court's first ruling. If it were not for the Constitutional Court's order, which was followed by a second High Court judgment allowing the children to attend school, the children would still not be admitted. It is also contended that children who lack legal status and are stateless may not even benefit from a foundational
education when they reach adulthood because they will not be able to find employment, open bank accounts and access healthcare, and will not be able to avoid being detained frequently, among other things.
50
50 Mahleza Interplay of Citizenship 23-26.
Besides facing the danger of being stateless, the children are beset by two problems: first, being abandoned by their parents and, second, being denied the right to basic education on the basis that they lack a piece of paper identifying who they are and lack the means, themselves, to acquire identification documents.
51
51 Centre for Child Law para 65.
In addition, other challenges include the problem of undocumented mothers who live and give birth to children in South Africa and are unable to register the births of stateless and undocumented children.
52
52 Centre for Child Law para 5. 53 Bennett 2020 https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2020-11-29-no-country-no-future-the-bleak-plight-of-stateless-children-in-south-africa/.
[5]. Sections 39 and 42 of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 do not prohibit the admission of illegal foreign children into schools and do not prohibit the provision of basic education to illegal foreign children.
[6]. The first, second and third respondents are interdicted and restrained from, in any manner whatsoever, removing or excluding from schools, children, including illegal foreign children, already admitted purely by reason of the fact that the children have no identity document number, permit or passport, or have not produced any identification documents.
54
54 Centre for Child Law para 135.
Furthermore, it is argued that while the right to education for stateless and undocumented children should be defended, more should be done for them to become documented and regularised. Fighting for their education is only a part of the solution, which is in some ways counterproductive if they are not going to be accepted as citizens or if their status is not regularised because they will not be able to work or even enrol in a tertiary institution.
55
55 Mahleza Interplay of Citizenship 24.
The challenges of statelessness and being undocumented are not unique to non-nationals but affect many South Africans as well.
56
56 LRC 2015 http://lrc.org.za/art_external/pdf/2015_06_12_Submission_UN_Arbitrary _deprivation_of_Nationality.pdf11.
DHA.
57
57 LRC 2015 http://lrc.org.za/art_external/pdf/2015_06_12_Submission_UN_Arbitrary _deprivation_of_Nationality.pdf 11; Mahleza Interplay of Citizenship 25. 58 LRC 2015 http://lrc.org.za/art_external/pdf/2015_06_12_Submission_UN_Arbitrary _deprivation_of_Nationality.pdf 14.
To comply with the "international law norms for access to nationality in international treaties to which several SADC States are signatories",
59
59 Muller 2017 http://www.southernafricalitigationcentre.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/08/GOAL-16-Book-Muller.pdf. 60 Mahleza Interplay of Citizenship 25. 61 LRC 2015 http://lrc.org.za/art_external/pdf/2015_06_12_Submission_UN_Arbitrary _deprivation_of_Nationality.pdf 15. See also Mahleza Interplay of Citizenship 25.
In addition, there are conversations on inclusive education. South Africa has adopted an inclusive education policy to address barriers to learning in the education system.
62
62 Dalton, Mckenzie, Kahonde 2012 Afr J Disabil 1-7. 63 Serfontein 2019 Obiter 139. 64 Du Plessis 2013 De Jure 76-92. 65 Department of Education 2001 https://www.vvob.org/files/publicaties/rsa_ education_white_paper_6.pdf. 66 United Nations Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities GA Res 48/96, UN Doc A/RES/48/96 (1993).
The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees makes provision for states to consider providing documentation to the beneficiaries of the Convention to enable them to exercise their rights, such as the right to
education. Furthermore, the Children's Act applies to all children, and this places direct responsibility for meeting the socio-economic and educational needs of refugee, stateless and undocumented children on the South African Government.
67
67 Serfontein 2019 Obiter 131.
There is a need for children to realise the role played by education in their lives. It is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if s/he is denied the opportunity of an education.
68
68 Centre for Child Law para 4 following remarks articulated by the United States Supreme Court case of Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 (1954) 493. 69 Arendt Origins of Totalitarianism 296-297. 70 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20 Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 20.
Arendt argues that it is not just "a question of statelessness but one of common humanity and the responsibility we have to one another as human beings who share the world in common."
71
71 Arendt discussed in Hill 2018 https://medium.com/quote-of-the-week/arendt-on-citizenship-d9e23beb4aad. Also see Minister of Home Affairs v Jose 2021 6 SA 369 (SCA) para 1 where the Supreme Court of Appeal cited this. 72 Hill 2018 https://medium.com/quote-of-the-week/arendt-on-citizenship-d9e23be b4aad. See also Minister of Home Affairs v Jose 2021 6 SA 369 (SCA) para 1 where the Supreme Court of Appeal cited this. 73 Centre for Child Law v Director-General: Department of Home Affairs 2022 2 SA 131 (CC) para 21.
In addition to the points made in the paragraph above, the courts in South Africa have noted the practice of the DHA of failing to recognise the applicants' citizenship and to give effect to the rights emanating from it without providing adequate reasons for this denial in a manner consistent
with the superior court orders and procedural requirements.
74
74 Chisuse v Director-General, Department of Home Affairs 2020 6 SA 14 (CC) (Chisuse) para 84. 75 Chisuse para 24. 76 Chisuse para 43.
[43] In terms of the 1995 Citizenship Act, citizenship by birth was acquired in the following ways. First, any person who, immediately prior to the commencement of the 1995 Citizenship Act was a citizen by birth, remained a citizen by birth under the new legislation.
77
77 Section 2(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act 88 of 1995. 78 See ss 2(1)(b), (2)(a)-(b), and (3) of the Citizenship Act 88 of 1995. 79 Section 2(1)(c) of the Citizenship Act 88 of 1995. 80 Child Care Act 74 of 1983. See also s 2(4) of the Citizenship Act 88 of 1995. 81 Section 2(4) of the Citizenship Act 88 of 1995. This was intended to ensure that no person born in South Africa would be considered stateless.
In addition, the Constitutional Court held as follows:
82
82 Chisuse para 44.
[44] A person could acquire citizenship by descent in the following ways. First, if they were a citizen by descent immediately before the 1995 Citizenship Act commences, they would remain so.
83
83 Section 3(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 states that "[a]ny person ... who, immediately prior to the date of commencement of this Act, was a South African citizen by descent ... shall, subject to the provisions of subsection (2), be a South African citizen by descent." 84 See s 3(1)(b)(i) of the Citizenship Act 88 of 1995. 85 Section 3(1)(b)(ii) of the Citizenship Act 88 of 1995.
outside of South Africa and they had subsequently been adopted by a South African citizen in terms of the Child Care Act and their birth was registered.
86
86 Section 3(1)(b)(iii) of the Citizenship Act 88 of 1995.
It is against this background that we see the impact that statelessness has on the right to education. The significant causes of statelessness are the lack of the registration of births and the issuing of birth certificates.
87
87 Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform 2019 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg16; Muller 2017 http://www.southern africalitigationcentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/GOAL-16-BookMuller.pdf 140; and the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights 2014 https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/54cb3c8f4.pdf 5. 88 Article 7 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1990) and Article 6 of the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (1999). 89 See in general SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21 /files/SAHRC%20Position%20Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf.
In some cases, the DBE has used its lack of resources as an excuse not to admit stateless or undocumented children into schools.
90
90 Centre for Child Law para 29 also referred to as the Phakamisa judgment; also see in general cases about a lack of resources discussed in Nanima and Durojaye 2019 LDD 270-298. 91 UNHCR 2015 https://www.unhcr.org/ibelong/wp-content/uploads/2015-10-Stateless Report_ENG16.pdf. 92 UNHCR 2015 https://www.unhcr.org/ibelong/wp-content/uploads/2015-10-Stateless Report_ENG16.pdf.
choices they did not make, as education ensures a dignified self-sufficient future, and the lack thereof fosters a culture of poverty and dependency.
93
93 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20 Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf. Also see Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education (ECG) (unreported) case number 3317/2018 of 10 December 2018 (this case illustrates how a court can make a decision that is not in the best interest of undocumented learners) and a discussion by Buttle 2019 https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/protecting-the-right-to-a-basic-education-for-undocumented-learners-an-update-from-the-legal-resources-centre/, discussing the Centre for Child Law case, which is also known as the Phakamisa judgment.
5 The executive's position considering the interpretative declaration by the government following the ratification of the ICESCR
This section analyses the executive's position considering the interpretative declaration by the government following the ratification of the ICESCR. It is important to note the executive's compliance or non-compliance in this regard. The section further interrogates whether the South African Government meets international law standards on human rights in relation to the executive's position on education for stateless and/or undocumented children. It also critically examines whether the policies violate the children's rights and the position of the jurisprudence in that regard.
The South African Government’s declaration that in ratifying the ICESCR it would "give progressive effect to the right to education, as provided for in Article 13(2)(a) and Article 14, within the framework of its National Education Policy and available resources" was not spared of criticism.
94
94 Education declaration mars ICESCR ratification by Section 27 21 Jan 2015 available at http://section27.org.za/2015/01/education-declaration-mars-icescr-ratification/, cited in Nanima and Durojaye 2019 LDD 276. 95 Nanima and Durojaye 2019 LDD 276. 96 CESCR General Comment No 13 paras 51 and 57. 97 Nanima and Durojaye 2019 LDD 276.
to create policies that might violate rights, basing their reasons on declarations such as this one, which is not consistent with the Constitution.
5.1 Whether South Africa meets international law standards on human rights
The existence of the legal gaps and practical impediments that prevent stateless and undocumented learners from fully exercising their right to education
98
98 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20 Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf. 99 Guam and Esterhuizen 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/opinion-pieces/item/1772-thousands-of-undocumented-children-are-being-deprived-of-the-basic-right-to-education-write-andre-gaum-and-eden-esterhuizen.
Compliance and enforcement become difficult to implement if in deciding cases involving undocumented or stateless children the judiciary interprets the law in such a manner as to exclude them. This observation emanates from the outcome of the Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education,
100
100 Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education (ECG) (unreported) case number 3317/2018 of 10 December 2018. 101 Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education (ECG) (unreported) case number 3317/2018 of 10 December 2018. Also see Guam and Esterhuizen 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/opinion-pieces/item/1772-thousands-of-undocumented-children-are-being-deprived-of-the-basic-right-to-education-write-andre-gaum-and-eden-esterhuizen. 102 Guam and Esterhuizen 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/opinion-pieces/item/1772-thousands-of-undocumented-children-are-being-deprived-of-the-basic-right-to-education-write-andre-gaum-and-eden-esterhuizen.
It is the thesis of this paper argues that when educational policies, rules, and regulations exclude undocumented or stateless children, it proves that states are failing to comply with international and regional standards providing for the right to education. Different treaties
103
103 Convention on the Rights of the Child (1990) in Arts 28 and 29, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) in Arts 13 and 14 and s 29 of the Constitution. 104 Sections 9 and 29(1)(b) and of the Constitution. 105 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/1976-media-statement-sahrc-s-application-tojoin-undocumented-learners-litigation-to-be-heard-in-grahamstown-high-court 11. 106 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/1976-media-statement-sahrc-s-application-tojoin-undocumented-learners-litigation-to-be-heard-in-grahamstown-high-court 11-15. 107 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights 2013 https://fra.europa.eu/ sites/default/files/fra-2013-apprehension-migrants-irregular-situation_en.pdf para (e), as read in SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/ files/SAHRC%20Position%20Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 15.
Quite clearly there are gaps with respect to immigration control and education policies or laws of South Africa. These gaps include uncertainty on the procedures to follow in matters concerning stateless and undocumented learners. These gaps contribute to the difficulties in obtaining children's documentation and often lead to litigation, as may be seen in the cases discussed above. Hence, more problems in terms of compliance are created by these existing gaps. The failure by the Government to fulfil its obligation, as provided for by the Constitution, exacerbates these challenges. It is therefore suggested that the DHA should work together with civil society groups to eradicate the existing impediments
that hinder access to education. The same can be said about the DBE. It could also work with civil society groups with the support of the DHA to develop a guide to help all parties involved in issues relating to education. This is not impossible, as an example may be drawn from the recent activity of "[t]he Children's Institute and the Legal Resources Centre, with the support of the [South African Social Security Agency], [who] have developed a guide to help parents and caregivers without Home Affairs documentation to understand the grant application process and to navigate the barriers to access."
108
108 Van Schalkwyk, Nyathi and Proudlock 2023 https://www.dailymaverick. co.za/article/2023-04-25-new-guide-released-on-how-to-apply-for-sassa-grants-for-children-without-birth-certificates/.
As noted above, the right to education is immediately realisable. Therefore, South Africa cannot rely on the defence of limited resources as a basis for excluding stateless and undocumented children.
109
109 As confirmed by the Constitutional Court in the case of Juma Musjid para 37. 110 See Juma Musjid para 37 and SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za /home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 4-5. 111 Guam and Esterhuizen 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/opinion-pieces/item/1772-thousands-of-undocumented-children-are-being-deprived-of-the-basic-right-to-education-write-andre-gaum-and-eden-esterhuizen.
Some of the provisions in the National Admission Policy and the Immigration Act, and practices such as utilising immigration control in a manner that violates the exercise and protection of fundamental rights are a violation of the right to education. Such practices have created fear and resulted in the conclusion that South Africa has not fully complied with its obligation to realise the right to education for every child, because through such practices it excludes stateless or undocumented learners.
112
112 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20 Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 11-15.
Government must address the inequalities and discriminatory conditions undocumented and stateless learners face.
As noted above, South Africa's non-compliance and exclusionary tendencies are found in section 42(1) of the Immigration Act, which provides that it is a criminal offence to "aid, abet, assist, enable or in any manner help" an "illegal foreigner" or a "foreigner" "in a manner that violates their status, including by providing instruction or training to him or her, or allowing him or her to receive instruction or training."
113
113 See s 44 of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002, which refers to "any illegal foreigner, or any person whose status or citizenship could not be ascertained." The fact that a person's status or citizenship cannot be ascertained may make the person fall under the category of having an irregular status. Also see the term "undocumented" as explained in this paper. 114 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20 Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 7.
The provisions in the SASA do not exclude any learner based on documentation. In this regard, this paper notes that there is no documentation requirement in the sections for accessing basic education. The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) regards the birth registration certificate requirement as possible indirect discrimination against persons who do not have the certificates.
115
115 CESCR General Comment No 13.
In support of the above observations it is noted that other international bodies
116
116 CESCR General Comment No 13 para 34; CESCR 2005 https://www.refworld.org/docid/42dd174b4.html (CESCR General Comment No 6) para 41; and the Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers 2011 https://www.refworld.org/docid/4ed3553e2.html para 57. 117 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20 Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 4.
bodies and that provisions of these treaties have become part of customary international law means that South African is bound to provide the right of access to basic education to everyone, and that it violates these rights by refusing such access.
118
118 In this regard, see the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966) in Arts 13 and 14 and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1990) in Arts 28 and 29.
In summary, South Africa must address the issues faced by undocumented and stateless learners "in accessing basic education as a result of multiple barriers, including a lack of clarity in the legal and policy framework, legal gaps, administrative and socio-economic barriers, funding models for schools, the lack of awareness of applicable laws and policies, and the lack of separation between the provision of basic services and immigration control."
119
119 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20 Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 8.
120 This provision should also be available where the following documents are not available: permits, travel documents such as passports, affidavits etc.
121 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20 Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 19.
Another aspect worth considering is the creation of substantial information enlightening people (the beneficiaries and officials) on the rules, regulations,
procedures and rights concerning the admission of stateless or undocumented students.
122
122 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20 Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 21.
6 Conclusion and recommendations
It is against this background that it has been observed that there are many gaps the State needs to address in the educational, legal and policy framework. It is concluded that since it has been established that the right to education serves as an essential right that assists in eradicating poverty, every child should be able to fully exercise it despite their legal status or whether they are documented or not.
123
123 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20 Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf. 124 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20 Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 4. 125 UNHCR 2021 https://www.unhcr.org/research/evalreports/60f18fcd4/evaluation-unhcr-led-initiatives-end-statelessness.html iv.
In addition to all the observations and findings that have been highlighted throughout this article, it is suggested that the rules and regulations for birth registration should be revisited and amended to accommodate undocumented and stateless children. If this ineffectiveness is not addressed, South Africa will be non-compliant with the international instruments that have been discussed in this paper.
As noted above, the DBE must ensure that when policies and processes related to education are updated, issues such as access to writing Matric Examinations and access to results for undocumented and stateless children must be addressed. This information should be distributed to all stakeholders.
126
126 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20 Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 20.
information must be disseminated to all schools and district offices. Furthermore, the information in the awareness material should also be considered when the National Admission Policy is updated with specific reference to information such as: allowing the admission of learners and access to school despite a lack of documentation; schools should not threaten removal from classes based on a lack of documentation; there is to be no exclusion from school post the lapsing of the period specified for the completion of admission; and any circular from the Department impeding the admission to schools of undocumented, stateless and migrant children should be withdrawn.
127
127 SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position% 20Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf 19; also see CCL 2022 https://pmg.org.za/files/221115Submission_-_Centre_for_ Child_Law.docx.
Lastly, South Africa should make provision to implement educational policies and practices aligned with the existing international and regional treaties and should comply with its obligation to provide the right to education, for example by eradicating any policies and practices preventing stateless and undocumented learners from accessing education, by ensuring that administrative barriers such as the requirement of identification documentation are removed, and by affording stateless and undocumented learners prospects of formal and informal learning.
Bibliography
Literature
Arendt Origins of Totalitarianism
Arendt H The Origins of Totalitarianism (Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich New York 1973)
Dalton, Mckenzie and Kahonde 2012 Afr J Disabil
Dalton EM, Mckenzie JA and Kahonde C "The Implementation of Inclusive Education in South Africa: Reflections Arising from a Workshop for Teachers and Therapists to Introduce Universal Design for Learning" 2012 Afr J Disabil 1-7
Du Plessis 2013 De Jure
Du Plessis P "Legislation and Policies: Progress towards the Right to Inclusive Education" 2013 De Jure 76-92
Mahleza Interplay of Citizenship
Mahleza YND The Interplay of Citizenship, Nationality and Statelessness: Interrogating South Africa's Legal Framework in Light of its International Obligations (LLD-thesis University of South Africa 2022)
Mandela Nelson Mandela by Himself
Mandela N Nelson Mandela by Himself: The Authorised Book of Quotations (MacMillan Johannesburg 2011)
Nanima and Durojaye 2019 LDD
Nanima RD and Durojaye E "Four Years Following South Africa's Declaration upon the Ratification of the ICESCR and Jurisprudence on the Right to Basic Education: A Step in the Right Direction?" 2019 LDD 270-298
Serfontein 2019 Obiter
Serfontein E "Giving Effect to Refugee Children's Fundamental Rights to Life and a Basic Education" 2019 Obiter 117-139
Tigere 2015 De Rebus
Tigere F "The Right to a Name and Nationality: The Issue of Undocumented Migrant Children" 2015 De Rebus 41-42
Case law
Brown v Board of Education of Topeka 347 US 483 (1954)
Centre for Child Law v Director-General: Department of Home Affairs 2022 2 SA 131 (CC)
Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education (ECG) (unreported) case number 3317/2018 of 10 December 2018
Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education (CCT 19/19) Constitutional Court order of 15 February 2019
Centre for Child Law v Minister of Basic Education 2020 3 SA 141 (ECG)
Chisuse v Director-General, Department of Home Affairs 2020 6 SA 14 (CC)
Governing Body of the Juma Musjid Primary School v Essay 2011 8 BCLR 761 (CC)
Minister of Basic Education v Basic Education for All 2016 4 SA 63 (SCA)
Minister of Home Affairs v Jose 2021 6 SA 369 (SCA)
Moko v Acting Principal of Malusi Secondary School 2021 3 SA 323 (CC)
Section 27 v Minister of Education 2013 2 SA 40 (GNP)
SS v Presiding Officer of the Children's Court: District of Krugersdorp 2012 6 SA 45 (GSJ)
Legislation
Births and Deaths Registration Act 51 of 1992
Child Care Act 74 of 1983
Children's Act 38 of 2005
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
Immigration Act 13 of 2002
National Education Policy Act 27 of 1996
South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995
South African Schools Act 84 of 1996
Government publications
GN 2342 in GG 19377 of 19 October 1998 (National Admission Policy for Ordinary Schools of 1998)
GN R38 in GG 44139 of 10 February 2021
International instruments
African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child (1999)
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979)
Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness (1961)
Convention on the Rights of the Child (1990)
Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (1951)
Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons (1954)
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966)
Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (2003)
United Nations Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities GA Res 48/96, UN Doc A/RES/48/96 (1993)
Internet sources
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights 2014 https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/54cb3c8f4.pdf
African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights 2014 The Right to a Nationality in Africa https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/54cb3c8f4.pdf accessed 10 April 2019
Agenzia Fides 2023 https://www.fides.org/en/news/73747-AFRICA_ SOUTH_AFRICA_Stateless_children_An_invisible_problem_in_southern_Africa
Agenzia Fides 2023 Stateless Children: An Invisible Problem in Southern Africa http://www.fides.org/en/news/73747-AFRICA_SOUTH_AFRICA_ Stateless_children_An_invisible_problem_in_southern_Africa accessed 3 July 2023
Bennett 2020 https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2020-11-29-no-country-no-future-the-bleak-plight-of-stateless-children-in-south-africa/
Bennett M 2020 No Country, No Future: The Bleak Plight of Stateless Children in South Africa https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2020-11-29-no-country-no-future-the-bleak-plight-of-stateless-children-in-south-africa/ accessed 15 May 2022
Buttle 2019 https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/protecting-the-right-to-a-basic-education-for-undocumented-learners-an-update-from-the-legal-resources-centre/
Buttle A 2019 Protecting the Right to a Basic Education for Undocumented Learners: An Update from the Legal Resources Centre https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/protecting-the-right-to-a-basic-education-for-undocumented-learners-an-update-from-the-legal-resources-centre/ accessed 10 October 2023
CCL 2022 https://pmg.org.za/files/221115Submission_-_Centre_for_ Child_Law.docx
Centre for Child Law Submissions on the Basic Education Laws Amendment Bill [B2-2022] https://pmg.org.za/files/221115Submission_-_Centre_for_Child_Law.docx accessed 4 July 2023
CESCR 1990 https://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838e10.html
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1990 CESCR General Comment No 3: The Nature of States Parties' Obligations (Art 2, Para 1, of the Covenant) https://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838e10.html accessed 27 May 2022
CESCR 1999 https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838c22.pdf
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 1999 CESCR General Comment No 13: The Right to Education (Art 13) https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838c22.pdf accessed 27 May 2022
CESCR 2005 https://www.refworld.org/docid/42dd174b4.html
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights 2005 CESCR General Comment No 6: Treatment of Unaccompanied and Separated Children Outside their Country of Origin https://www.refworld.org/docid/42dd 174b4.html accessed 9 March 2023
Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers 2011 https://www.refworld.org/docid/4ed3553e2.html
Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families 2011 General Comment No 1 https://www.refworld.org/docid/4ed3553e2.html accessed 9 March 2023
Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009 https://www2.ohchr.org/ english/bodies/crc/docs/AdvanceVersions/CRC-C-GC-12.pdf
Committee on the Rights of the Child 2009 General Comment No 12: The Right of the Child to be Heard https://www2.ohchr.org/ english/bodies/crc/docs/AdvanceVersions/CRC-C-GC-12.pdf accessed 10 November 2023
Committee on the Rights of the Child 2013 https://www2.ohchr.org/ English/bodies/crc/docs/GC/CRC_C_GC_14_ENG.pdf
Committee on the Rights of the Child 2013 General Comment No 14 on the Right of the Child to Have His or Her Best Interests Taken as a Primary Consideration (Art 3, Para 1) https://www2.ohchr.org/English/bodies /crc/docs/GC/CRC_C_GC_14_ENG.pdf accessed 10 October 2023
Department of Education 2001 https://www.vvob.org/files/publicaties/ rsa_education_white_paper_6.pdf
Department of Education 2001 White Paper on Special Needs Education: Building an Inclusive Education and Training System (White Paper 6) https://www.vvob.org/files/publicaties/rsa_education_white_paper_6.pdf accessed 6 July 2023
ESCR-NET 2020 https://www.escr-net.org/caselaw/2022/centre-child-law-and-others-v-minister-basic-education-and-others-28402017
ESCR-NET 2020 Centre for Child Law and Others v Minister of Basic Education and Others 2840/2017 https://www.escr-net.org/caselaw/2022/ centre-child-law-and-others-v-minister-basic-education-and-others-28402017 accessed 16 September 2022
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights 2013 https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2013-apprehension-migrants-irregular-situation_en.pdf
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights 2013 Apprehension of Migrants in an Irregular Situation – Fundamental Rights Considerations https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2013-apprehension-migrants-irregular-situation_en.pdf accessed 16 September 2022
Guam and Esterhuizen 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/opinion-pieces/item/1772-thousands-of-undocumented-children-are-being-deprived-of-the-basic-right-to-education-write-andre-gaum-and-eden-esterhuizen
Guam A and Esterhuizen E 2019 Thousands of "Undocumented" Children are Being Deprived of the Basic Right to Education https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/opinion-pieces/item/1772-thousands-of-undocumented-children-are-being-deprived-of-the-basic-right-to-education-write-andre-gaum-and-eden-esterhuizen accessed 19 May 2022
Hill 2018 https://medium.com/quote-of-the-week/arendt-on-citizenship-d9e23beb4aad
Hill SR 2018 American Citizenship https://medium.com/quote-of-the-week/arendt-on-citizenship-d9e23beb4aad accessed 22 April 2022
Humanium date unknown https://www.humanium.org/en/the-guiding-principles-of-the-childrens-rights-convention/
Humanium date unknown "The Guiding Principles of the Child's Rights Convention" https://www.humanium.org/en/the-guiding-principles-of-the-childrens-rights-convention/ accessed 29 June 2023
LHR 2021 https://static.pmg.org.za/210309Presentation_by_LHR_ on_Statelessness.pdf
Lawyers for Human Rights 2021 Statelessness and Nationality in South Africa: Presentation to the Department of Home Affairs Portfolio Committee 9 March 2021 https://static.pmg.org.za/210309Presentation_by_LHR_on_ Statelessness.pdf accessed 7 May 2022
LRC 2015 http://lrc.org.za/art_external/pdf/2015_06_12_Submission_ UN_Arbitrary_deprivation_of_Nationality.pdf
Legal Resources Centre 2015 Submissions on Arbitrary Deprivation of Nationality http://lrc.org.za/art_external/pdf/2015_06_12_Submission_UN_Arbitrary_deprivation_of_Nationality.pdf accessed 9 April 2019
Ngala 2023 https://cruxnow.com/church-in-africa/2023/05/african-prelate-says-war-migration-and-trafficking-drive-statelessness
Ngala KC 2023 African Prelate Says War, Migration and Trafficking Drive Statelessness https://cruxnow.com/church-in-africa/2023/05/african-prelate-says-war-migration-and-trafficking-drive-statelessness accessed 3 July 2023
Muller 2017 http://www.southernafricalitigationcentre.org/wp-content/ uploads/2017/8/GOAL-16-BookMuller.pdf
Muller LH 2017 Legal Identity for All: Ending Statelessness in SADC http://www.southernafricalitigationcentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/GOAL-16-BookMuller.pdf accessed 19 April 2019
SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/1976-media-statement-sahrc-s-application-tojoin-undocumented-learners-litigation-to-be-heard-in-grahamstown-high-court
South African Human Rights Commission 2019 SAHRC's Application to Join Undocumented Learners Litigation to be Heard in Grahamstown High Court https://www.sahrc.org.za/index.php/sahrc-media/news-2/item/1976-media-statement-sahrc-s-application-tojoin-undocumented-learners-litigation-to-be-heard-in-grahamstown-high-court accessed 19 May 2022
SAHRC 2019 https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position %20Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf
South African Human Rights Commission 2019 Position Paper: Access to a Basic Education for Undocumented Learners in South Africa https://www.sahrc.org.za/home/21/files/SAHRC%20Position%20Paper%20on%20Access%20to%20a%20Basic%20Education%20for%20Undocumented%20Learners%20in%20South%20Africa%20-%2012092019.pdf accessed 14 May 2022
Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform 2019 https://sustainable development.un.org/sdg16
Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform Sustainable Development Goal 16 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg16 accessed 19 April 2019
UNHCR 2015 https://www.unhcr.org/ibelong/wp-content/uploads/2015-10-StatelessReport_ENG16.pdf
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 2015 Statelessness Report: I am Here, I Belong. The Urgent Need to End Childhood Statelessness https://www.unhcr.org/ibelong/wp-content/uploads/2015-10-StatelessReport_ENG16.pdf accessed 6 July 2023
UNHCR 2019 https://reporting.unhcr.org/globalreport/southern-africa
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 2019 Southern Africa Pledges https://reporting.unhcr.org/globalreport/southern-africa accessed 6 July 2023
UNHCR 2021 https://www.unhcr.org/research/evalreports/60f18fcd4/ evaluation-unhcr-led-initiatives-end-statelessness.html
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 2021 Evaluation of UNHCR-led Initiatives to End Statelessness https://www.unhcr.org/ research/evalreports/60f18fcd4/evaluation-unhcr-led-initiatives-end-statelessness.html accessed 25 May 2022
Van Schalkwyk, Nyathi and Proudlock 2023 https://www.daily maverick.co.za/article/2023-04-25-new-guide-released-on-how-to-apply-for-sassa-grants-for-children-without-birth-certificates
Van Schalkwyk C, Nyathi M and Proudlock P 2023 New Guide Released on How to Apply for Sassa Grants for Children without Birth Certificates https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2023-04-25-new-guide-released-on-how-to-apply-for-sassa-grants-for-children-without-birth-certificates/ accessed 7 July 2023
List of Abbreviations
ACRWC |
African Charter on the Rights and Welfare |
---|---|
Afr J Disabil |
African Journal of Disability |
CCL |
Centre for Child Law |
CEDAW |
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women |
CESCR |
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights |
CRC |
Convention on the Rights of the Child |
DBE |
Department of Basic Education |
DHA |
Department of Home Affairs |
GRF |
Global Refugee Forum |
HLS |
High-Level Segment on Statelessness |
ICESCR |
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights |
LDD |
Law, Democracy and Development |
LHR |
Lawyers for Human Rights |
LRC |
Legal Resources Centre |
SAHRC |
South African Human Rights Commission |
SASA |
South African Schools Act 84 of 1996 |
UN |
United Nations |
UNHCR |
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees |