PER/PELJ - Pioneer in peer-reviewed, open access online law publications

Author Windell Nortje

Affiliation University of Western Cape, South Africa

Email wnortje@uwc.ac.za

Date Submitted 23 January 2024

Date Revised 28 March 2024

Date Accepted 28 March 2024

Date Published 11 December 2024

Guest Editor

Prof BM Mupangavanhu

Journal Editor

Prof C Rautenbach

How to cite this contribution

Nortje W "Decolonising the South African Criminal Procedure: Towards a Critical Approach to the Use of Ubuntu in Sentencing" PER / PELJ 2024(27) - DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a17751

Copyright

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a17751

South African Criminal Procedure has colonial roots which are
yet to be fully uprooted. While several sections of the

Abstract

South African Criminal Procedure has colonial roots which are

Keywords

uBbuntu; sentencing; South Africa; decolonisation; Criminal Procedure Act; colonisation; minimum sentencing; retribution.

……………………………………………………….

1 Introduction

In 1810 Saartjie Baartman left South Africa for England. She looked forward to making a fortune overseas. Instead she became one of the first South African victims of human trafficking, and once she had died a French museum pickled her brain and genitals. 1

* Windell Nortje. LLB (NWU) LLM (UWC) LLD (UWC). Senior Law Lecturer: University of the Western Cape, South Africa. Email: wnortje@uwc.ac.za. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8033-5537.

1 Saartjie Baartman Centre for Women and Children date unknown http://www.saartjiebaartmancentre.org.za/about-us/saartjie-baartmans-story/.

Her remains were returned to South Africa only in 2002. She was a victim of colonisation. Colonialism is a crime and egregiously genocidal. 2

2 Williams The American Indian 6.

Colonial processes continue to oppress the oppressed in South Africa. 3

3 See Nielsen and Robyn Colonialism is Crime 1.

Indeed, "the transition to the 'new' South Africa did not restore full, integral, comprehensive and unencumbered sovereignty to the indigenous peoples conquered in the unjust wars of colonisation." 4

4 Ramose 2007 GLR 313.

The transition from Apartheid was a compromise and the legal system has also been compromised. There has, however, been some hope. In 1998 Justice Mokgoro wrote an article about ubuntu, the role that it can play in the African renaissance, and demonstrated "the potential that traditional African values of ubuntu have for influencing the development of a new South African law and jurisprudence." 5

5 Mokgoro 1998 PELJ 17.

Africanisation and decolonisation have made slow progress in the new democratic dispensation but there has been some good progress in transformative constitutionalism as depicted by the landmark Constitutional Court judgments over the last few decades. The Africanisation and decolonisation of the South African criminal justice system has similarly had its ups and downs. South African criminal procedure is codified in the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (CPA). 6

6 The Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (the CPA) contains over 340 sections.

The roots, however, can be found in Roman-Dutch Law and predominantly in English law. 7

7 Van der Merwe "Basic Introduction to Criminal Procedure" 22.

The South African criminal justice system therefore exhibits aspects of colonialism.

There have been many amendments to the CPA since the rise of democracy in 1994 and important transformative and decolonial jurisprudence by the Judiciary, but more needs to be done to address the matter. This article focusses on how a more progressive stance on decolonisation in relation to criminal procedure could lead to a more effective system and one that would be appreciated by its citizens. Insufficient academic attention has been given to the decolonisation of the

Law of Criminal Procedure in South Africa. 8

8 For an overview of the literature that has been written on the matter, see generally Xaba Exploring the Principle of uBuntu; Himonga, Taylor and Pope 2013 PELJ; Mokgoro 1998 PELJ.

Most scholarship has focussed on the decolonisation of South African legal education. 9

9 See for example Himonga and Diallo 2017 PELJ; Motshabi 2018 Strategic Review for Southern Africa; Louw and Van Wyk 2016 Social Work.

It is important for South Africa to ensure that it decolonises fully, considering that it was subjected to centuries of colonialism. Decolonisation broadly refers to giving a voice and listening to non-Western individuals. 10

10 Thambinathan and Kinsella 2012 IJQM 1.

In South Africa western individuals were in control of the country during the establishment of the formal criminal justice system and created a colonial system of justice.

This paper will examine how the law of criminal procedure could be further decolonised by analysing how the values of ubuntu could be better applied during sentencing proceedings. Sentencing is an aspect of criminal procedure and provides an ideal platform for judicial officers to apply the values of ubuntu. Sentencing is one of the last stages of the criminal justice process and also the most difficult one for judicial officers and offenders alike. It is complex because the life and prospects of the convicted offender at this stage are solely in the hands of the magistrate or judge. The presiding officers wield significant power, which was especially evident prior to the advent of democracy, when judges often passed the death penalty. 11

11 See Magobotiti 2022 Scientia Militaria 104-114.

While the days of the death penalty are well behind us, various aspects of the current sentencing regime remain steeped in colonial practices, mainly because South Africa has not done enough to formally address decolonisation in the criminal justice system. The decolonisation of the sentencing regime is imperative because South Africa cannot afford to subject its offenders as well as the victims of crimes to practices that are still colonial. The central contribution which this article makes is that the current sentencing regime has not been decolonised fully. The author argues that ubuntu can play a significant role in this proposed decolonisation, especially because in traditional Africa concepts such as ubuntu, indigenous justice, community and restoration are interlinked. 12

12 Schoeman "African Concept of uBuntu" 291.

uBuntu is an African value that has been interpreted by our highest courts and debated among scholars but it seems to be a philosophical value instead of a value that can be used to the advantage of the people. While ubuntu played a significant role in the 1995 judgment in S v Makwanyane, 13

13 See, for example, S v Makwanyane 1995 3 SA 391 (CC) para 308 (Makwanyane).

where the Constitutional Court abolished the death penalty, other criminal courts have been reluctant to apply the values of ubuntu during sentencing. This article questions and challenges this position.

The article makes an important contribution to the field of law and decolonisation and adds to the current body of literature by focussing primarily on how sentencing practices could be decolonised using the African value of ubuntu. This is important because the South African criminal justice system as a whole still requires significant change if it is to address and eradicate its colonial roots. The article is all the more important as the author is not aware of any prior attempt to address the decolonisation of South African criminal procedure law.

The main research questions which this article examines are (a) to what extent is South African Criminal Procedure colonial, and (b) how can ubuntu be implemented to decolonise sentencing in South Africa? The article is presented in four parts. Firstly, it looks at the concepts of colonisation, decolonisation and ubuntu. It then examines the historical colonial roots of sentencing in South Africa from 1652 up until the enactment of the CPA, the current regime. Thirdly it analyses how ubuntu could be utilised and applied by presiding officers during sentencing. The study concludes by making several recommendations.

2 Conceptualising decolonisation and ubuntu: A South African perspective

2.1 Colonisation versus decolonisation

In order to understand the meaning of decolonisation it is necessary to examine what is meant by colonisation. Apart from its mission to "civilise" and christianise 14

14 Christianisation refers to the spreading of the gospel by the colonisers, and in an African context the gospel was communicated by Westerners to Africans. See Van der Merwe 2016 Stellenbosch Theological Journal 581.

Ramose describes colonialism as having the intention "to annihilate and obliterate all the experiences of the indigenous conquered peoples, replacing their experience and knowledge with [the colonisers’] own unilaterally defined meaning of experience, knowledge and truth." 15

15 Ramose 2007 GLR 313.

Wa Thiong'o defines classic colonialism in Africa to mean:

the exploitation of Africa's natural resources and the exploitation of African labour by European capital. Africa became the source of raw materials, the source of cheap labour and also a market for European goods. This exploitation was accompanied by direct political rule and direct oppression and suppression of the people by colonial armies and police. 16

16 Wa Thiong'o Writers in Politics 119.

Colonisation also involves an arbitrary replacement of the conquered people's culture – a calculated exercise. 17

17 Sesanti 2019 JBS 434.

South Africa's colonisation by the Dutch in 1652 and by the British in 1795 was deliberate and systematic. Roman-Dutch Law, reformed religion, capitalism and slavery were some of

the tools used to colonise the Cape at the time. 18

18 Oliver and Oliver 2017 HTS Theological Studies 4-5. Also see Mudimbe's work on how religious missions fostered colonialism, Mudimbe Invention of Africa 44-97.

The English employed strategies similar to those of the Dutch and also introduced English legal principles, including civil and criminal procedure. Finally, internal colonisation took place during the 20th century when South Africa was under Afrikaner rule. 19

19 See Oliver and Oliver 2017 HTS Theological Studies 5.

Decolonisation could therefore start in earnest only after 1994 with the fall of Apartheid - or did it?

Decolonisation, like colonisation, does not have a universal definition. It can be defined as "both a calculated process of military engagement and diplomatic negotiation between the two contending parties: colonial and anticolonial." 20

20 Betts "Decolonization" 23.

It was also inevitable, though it took longer in some countries than in others. 21

21 Betts "Decolonization" 24.

This sense of inevitability was referenced by the United Nations when the General Assembly passed the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and People on 14 December 1960, 22

22 Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples UN Doc A/RES/1514(XV) (1960).

which states that "the peoples of the world ardently desire the end of colonialism in all its manifestations." 23

23 Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples UN Doc A/RES/1514(XV) (1960).

Decolonisation further involves a commitment to end racism and to reimagine the world in terms of a progressive political project. 24

24 Horton 2021 The Lancet 1950.

Apart from its political manifestation, it also includes economic, cultural and psychological elements. 25

25 Gardiner "Decolonization" 269.

Decolonisation is achieved not only by the achievement of political independence but also by the achievement of economic control. 26

26 Betts "Decolonization" 29.

In South Africa the achievement of economic control and land redistribution have failed, which has prevented actual decolonisation. This failed decolonisation is often attributed to the tendency of the decolonised world to mimic the Western world. 27

27 Betts "Decolonization" 34.

This is regularly seen in so-called decolonised education which actually includes the elements of a western curriculum and propagates a western ideology that is subtly designed to westernise African minds. 28

28 See Hlatshwayo and Alexander 2017 Journal of Education 52.

If South African law students are taught a westernised law degree then how can we expect our future lawyers to decolonise the justice system? The concept of "decolonisation" has not been discussed in great detail by our courts but it did surface in the recent case of Afriforum v Economic Freedom Fighters, where the Economic Freedom Fighters stated

that free and decolonised education is one of its non-negotiable pillars. 29

29 Afriforum v Economic Freedom Fighters (EQ 04/2020) [2022] ZAGPJHC 599 (25 August 2022) para 69.

After the #FeesMustFall movement, which started in South Africa in 2015, there has been some progress in decolonising higher education by requesting law faculties to include Decolonisation, "Africanisation" and Transformative Constitutionalism in their curriculum. 30

30 See Council on Higher Education 2017 Briefly Speaking 1-12. See generally Naude 2019 J Bus Ethics 23-37.

Africanisation refers to the affirmation of the African identity and culture in the global arena and not about excluding Europeans. 31

31 Makgoba Mokoka 199.

Transformative Constitutionalism, on the other hand, generally refers to transforming a nation's social and political institutions and power relationships in a participatory and democratic direction. 32

32 Klare 1998 SAJHR 146.

All in all, the progress of incorporating these theories has been slow and it can be argued that the LLB curriculum has not been fully decolonised. Merely including elements of "Africanisation" and Decolonisation into the curriculum will not suffice. The degree needs a complete overhaul. Only then will we see some kind of significant change.

Decolonisation can be considered to be violent in that "the naked truth of decolonisation evokes for us the searing bullets and blood-stained knives which emanate from it." 33

33 Fanon Wretched of the Earth 29-30.

This was seen during the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) hearings in South Africa during the mid-90s, when victims had to relive their horrific apartheid experiences. 34

34 See generally TRC 1998 https://www.justice.gov.za/trc/report/, and in particular the third volume of the TRC Report dealing with the testimonies of the victims of the TRC.

Apart from the economic, cultural, educational and psychological elements, the legal impact of decolonisation is important. This could take the form of acknowledging human rights abuses, holding those to account who committed atrocities during colonial times, or restructuring the legal system, the issue to which this article aims to contribute. It seems therefore, as discussed above, that the South African transition has not included a meaningful push for decolonisation.

2.2 South Africa in a state of limbo

Scholars such as Ramose and Madlingozi have labelled the South African Constitution colonial and it can only be decolonised if the coloniser's "right of conquest" is terminated. 35

35 Ramose 2007 GLR 321; Madlingozi 2017 Stell LR 140.

Madlingozi posits that

terminating this assumed right would begin the process of terminating the bifurcated world because this putative right grounds the colonisers' self-arrogation of the power to draw a line that separates humans from those who

are deemed sub-human; those who have the right to conquer and those who are liable to be conquered; those who form part of the polity and those banished to its underside. 36

36 Madlingozi 2017 Stell LR 140-141.

These arguments also fall within the broader concept of recolonisation, where one country perpetuates and reinstates its former control over another country. 37

37 Horton 2021 The Lancet 1950.

Another concept that is also important to note is that of neo-colonialism, where "social and economic inequalities in former colonising and colonised states were and continue to be evident…" 38

38 Maekawa 2014 J Imp & Commonw Hist 334. Also see generally Nkrumah Neo-Colonialism.

In the case of South Africa, it is arguable that we have never been decolonised, let alone recolonised, but that we are in a state of neo-colonialism. Madlingozi frames South Africa's current state of affairs as one of neo-apartheid. 39

39 See generally Madlingozi 2017 Stell LR.

He explains the concept of neo-apartheid as colonialism which "has survived the so-called transition from apartheid to post-apartheid in that impoverished black people remain ensnared in a zone of stasis" while they feel excluded from the "miracle" of the new South Africa. 40

40 Madlingozi 2017 Stell LR 125.

It has been over 25 years since democracy and the "miracle" is only true for a few. Ndlovu-Gatsheni concludes that "South Africa is a typical example of a society where the myths of decolonisation and illusions of freedom are manifesting themselves in broad daylight in a most detestable form." 41

41 Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2012 TWQ 77.

The situation on the ground remains tense. The 2021 riots in Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal underlined the inequality in South Africa and COVID-19 exposed the reality of a neo-apartheid state. 42

42 See Harris-Cik 2021 Acta Criminologica i.

At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, thousands of people were arrested in South Africa, convicted and sentenced for violating COVID-19 regulations. 43

43 See for example, Lubaale 2020 SACJ 684-706.

Some of the crimes were trivial, such as not wearing a mask in public and driving around during curfews. Moreover, the sentences that the offenders received were too harsh and left many of the offenders with a criminal record, even those who decided to pay an admission of guilt fine. 44

44 The payment of admission of guilt fines is regulated by s 57 of the CPA. For a comprehensive overview of admission of guilt fines, see Van As and Erasmus 2020 SACQ 57-67.

It must also be acknowledged that the pandemic presented the criminal justice system with unique challenges never faced before as it was not business as usual – but business unusual. It is argued that the State should have adopted a more restorative approach to COVID-19-related offences, which could have included informal mediation instead of convictions that led

to criminal records. 45

45 See Staff Writer 2021 https://businesstech.co.za/news/lifestyle/481707/over-400000-people-have-been-arrested-for-breaking-south-africas-covid-19-rules/.

Restorative justice includes the healing of the offender and the victim and the involvement of the community in the process of justice. 46

46 See Bean Punishment 13.

Restorative justice is in direct contrast with the punitive way in which the State dealt with COVID-19 offences. It is good to be able to note, however, that the South African parliament passed a bill on 19 September 2023 which would expunge the criminal records of those offenders who committed minor crimes during the pandemic, which include not wearing a mask, curfew-related offences and other such offences. 47

47 Maseko 2023 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-66877630.

The Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997 (the CLAA) provides for minimum sentences, another harsh form of sentencing in South Africa. This reflects a criminal justice system that is focussed on punishment. The author argues that the South African criminal justice system has colonial roots and is sometimes unnecessarily retributive. These colonial roots are apparent in the fact that the South African criminal justice system is solely based on punishing the offender and does not include the community in seeking justice, which would lean more towards an approach consistent with the African value of ubuntu. Subjecting young adults and first-time offenders to minimum sentencing laws and imposing severe penalties and sentences on offenders during the COVID-19 lockdowns showcased the flaws in South Africa's criminal justice system. A restorative approach or an approach steeped in ubuntu should have been adopted. Most of these flaws in the system should have been amended since the advent of democracy, yet 30 years later criminal procedure has not been decolonised fully. Surely, more should have been done to address these concerns by now. In this regard Ramose observes that:

[d]etention without trial is clearly an instance of law working against the protection and recognition of human dignity. This is what we have now with the new dispensation: a law that actively retards the process of justice for the indigenous conquered peoples of South Africa. It is quite ironical that most of the so called negotiators including Mandela himself were trained lawyers, how could they not see that? Seriously ironical. [Cyril] Ramaphosa, lawyer, Matthew Phosa, lawyer, Mandela, lawyer. Where did they study the law, how could they not see? I don't think it makes sense! It just cannot make sense. 48

48 Ramose 2016 PINS 97.

Our country has been in a state of limbo since 1994, like a teenager with an identity crisis - a rainbow nation, colourful yes, but heavily sedated and confused. The author believes that the process to fully decolonise South Africa will be a painstaking one, but one that needs to happen sooner rather than later. It is argued that ubuntu could be the solution, the ultimate way to

eradicate colonialism and its remnants for good – or at least in the realms of criminal procedure.

2.3 The value and philosophy of ubuntu

uBuntu is of significant value in the decolonising project and hence requires a deeper understanding and exploration. It is the foundational value of all Africans. It is a beautiful value and philosophy grounded in compassion and respect for others. Mbiti euphorically defines ubuntu as "I am because we are, and since we are, therefore, I am." 49

49 Mbiti African Religions 141. Also see Etieyibo "uBuntu and the Environment" 635.

In Nguni languages ubuntu is a short form of the acclaimed African principle known in full as umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu (in the Zulu language) and in Sotho it is translated as motho ke motho ka batho. 50

50 Letseka 2012 Stud Philos Educ 48.

These phrases can be loosely translated as "a person is a person through other persons." 51

51 Letseka 2012 Stud Philos Educ 48.

uBuntu is difficult to define as it is a state of being. 52

52 Mnyongani 2010 Obiter 135.

It is a personal experience and something that you realise when you see it. 53

53 Mokgoro 1998 PELJ 18.

"Ubuntu represents the African ontology of humanness and the essence of African humanity." 54

54 Dauda "African Humanism and Ethics" 476.

It is a living value. It seeks to instil humanity, human dignity and social protection amongst humans. 55

55 Tshoose 2009 AJLS 12.

The Kwazulu-Natal High Court Division in S v Mncube defined it "as a fundamental African value embracing dignity, human interdependence, respect, neighbourly love and concern." 56

56 S v Mncube (Judgment on Sentence) (CCP42/2021) [2023] ZAKZPHC 16 (17 February 2023) para 1.

It involves a sense of integration and hospitality towards strangers. 57

57 Tshoose 2009 AJLS 13.

uBuntu is also known as one of the narratives of return, as it has been used to restore the identity and dignity of Africans. 58

58 Matolino and Kwindingwi 2013 SAJP 198.

It has been an informal and tacit philosophy for centuries among Africans south of the Sahara. 59

59 Van der Walt and Oosthuizen 2021 PiE 89.

It is therefore an important value for the African Union, which used the slogan "Africa, ubuntu! – stronger together" to encourage African States in the fight against COVID-19. 60

60 See AU 2020 https://au.int/en/videos/20200521/stronger-together-covid19. Also see Henrico 2016 US-China Law Review 823.

Despite the fact that ubuntu is a special African form of community orientation and is located within African traditional communities, 61

61 See Tshoose 2009 AJLS 13.

the value of ubuntu is global, being loosely related to the generally accepted notions

of our common humanity and the need to care for others. Chief Seattle of the Duwamish and Suquamish tribes in 1854 held that

the earth does not belong to man; man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. 62

62 Kaiser "Chief Seattle" 527.

Harper Lee, the American novelist who authored To Kill a Mockingbird, wrote:

you never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view. Until you climb inside of his skin and walk around in it. 63

63 Lee To Kill a Mockingbird 36.

uBuntu refers to community and not solitude. Dr Martin Luther King Jr explained that:

All life is interrelated. We are all caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied into a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. 64

64 King Jr 1967 https://soundcloud.com/user-763792570/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-christmas-sermon-1967.

uBuntu is truly a global phenomenon, a connection that all humans share, and has been influential in healing transitional societies or at least ensuring relative peace and reconciliation in turmoil, such as in the case in South Africa. 65

65 See Eliastam 2015 Verbum et Ecclesia 1.

It has not, however, had the desired impact in relation to South African law reform.

The Preamble of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995, the legislation that regulated the South African TRC, states that "there is a need for understanding but not for vengeance, a need for reparation but not for retaliation, a need for ubuntu but not for victimization." 66

66 Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995.

Reconciliation in South Africa was facilitated through a political dialogue, which included a compromise between the former rulers and the incumbents in the context of incomplete decolonisation. 67

67 Mandaza "Reconciliation and Social Justice" 509.

The 1993 interim Constitution included the value of ubuntu in its postamble by stating that: 68

68 See Postamble of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 200 of 1993.

[t]he adoption of this Constitution lays the secure foundation for the people of South Africa to transcend the divisions and strife of the past, which generated gross violations of human rights, the transgression of humanitarian principles in violent conflicts and a legacy of hatred, fear, guilt and revenge. These can now be addressed on the basis that there is a need for understanding but not for vengeance, a need for reparation but not for retaliation, a need for ubuntu but not for victimisation.

The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (the Constitution) omits any reference to the word ubuntu. No explanation was provided for the omission. The justification for the exclusion, according to several authors, is that the spirit of ubuntu is captured in various parts of the Constitution including the Preamble, where the words "united in our diversity" and provisions related to the development of customary law can be linked to ubuntu. 69

69 See, for example, Netshitomboni uBuntu 7; Himonga, Taylor and Pope 2013 PELJ 373.

The Constitutional Court and other high courts have also made concerted efforts to apply the value of ubuntu in selected cases, a matter which this paper will discuss shortly, and especially in the light of criminal cases. 70

70 See section 4.1 of this article.

Before we can examine how ubuntu can contribute to decolonising sentencing, an analysis of the colonial roots of criminal procedure and more specifically sentencing in South Africa is apt.

3 Colonial criminal procedure in South Africa

When South Africa became a colony of the Dutch in the 17th century, the indigenous peoples had their own unwritten laws and this included criminal procedure, and more generally, ways to deal with offenders in their communities. 71

71 For a history of criminal procedure in indigenous societies, see generally Maine Early History of Institutions.

This was, however, egregiously overshadowed and supplanted during the colonial periods between 1650 and 1994. This forceful dominance and manifestation of European legal principles over indigenous law fuelled racism at the time as indigenous law was seldom recognised as valid law. 72

72 Du Bois 2004 IJLI 218.

The indigenous people were not prepared for the savagery imposed on them by colonial criminal procedure. This colonial system is still operational in South Africa today as South African Criminal Procedure was never formally decolonised. Below I examine some important periods between 1652 and 1977, just before the passing of the CPA.

3.1 1652-1806

When the Dutch occupied and colonised the Cape in 1652 the Roman-Dutch law system of criminal procedure was introduced. The criminal court structure in the Cape differed from that of the Netherlands as the High Court, located in Cape Town, was known as the Raad van Justisie and had both civil and criminal jurisdiction. 73

73 Dugard South African Criminal Law 18.

Appeals were heard by the Supreme Court of Batavia. 74

74 Dugard South African Criminal Law 18.

Criminal procedure at the time was regulated by the Ordinance

of 1570, 75

75 The Ordinance which dealt exclusively with criminal procedure was passed by Philip II of Spain on 9th July 1570.

a Roman-Dutch law, also applicable in the Netherlands during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. 76

76 See Geldenhuys and Joubert Criminal Procedure Handbook 15; Dugard South African Criminal Law 5-6, 18.

The Prosecutor at the time had limited powers as the Court decided whether a prosecution should proceed or not. 77

77 Dugard South African Criminal Law 18.

The Ordinance embodied a barbarous system of criminal justice and included sentences such as breaking on the wheel, 78

78 This consisted of tying an offender to a big wooden wheel in a public square, breaking an offender's bones with a wooden wheel, applying other methods of torture and then letting the offender die. See Medievalists.net 2019 https://www.medievalists.net/2019/09/archaeologists-discover-medieval-man-broken-on-the-wheel/.

hanging, and strangling. 79

79 Dugard South African Criminal Law 10.

The torture of prisoners (and in particular slaves) was the order of the day, as captured by this statement by Botha:

[t]he early Cape records show that not only the rack, but also the thumbscrew was used for this purpose. The degree of torture seems to have varied. We read of the prisoner being brought into the torture room ad actum proximum. The accused was hoisted up by a rope tied to his hands and suspended by a pulley from the ceiling. Weights were attached to his great toes. These weights varied according to the degree of torture. "Full torture" consisted of 50 lb. weights being suspended from each of the great toes. 80

80 Botha 1915 SALJ 322.

Other sentences included whipping, banishment, branding, dismemberment, imprisonment, fines and the confiscation of property. 81

81 Dugard South African Criminal Law 19.

3.2 1806-1910

With the British occupation in the early 19th century, Roman-Dutch law remained in force in the Cape. The English made a few changes to the court structure, however. 82

82 Lansdown, Hoal and Lansdown South African Criminal Law 7.

In addition to the Raad van Justisie, a High Court of Appeals for criminal cases was established, replacing the Supreme Court of Batavia. 83

83 Dugard South African Criminal Law 19-20.

Circuit courts were established and certain procedures were introduced, such as an accused appearing before a court within eight days. 84

84 Dugard South African Criminal Law 21.

The accused were allowed the representation of counsel but only when the trial started. 85

85 Dugard South African Criminal Law 22.

To add insult to injury, convicted offenders were even forced to pay the costs of the criminal proceedings. 86

86 Dugard South African Criminal Law 23.

The different forms of sentencing employed during the Dutch colonisation were still in force. 87

87 Dugard South African Criminal Law 23.

In 1827 the Supreme Court for the Cape of Good Hope was

established. 88

88 Erasmus 2013 Fundamina 273.

In 1828 the British enacted the Cape Criminal Procedure Ordinance and shortly thereafter the Evidence Ordinance of 1830. 89

89 See Lansdown, Hoal and Lansdown South African Criminal Law 7.

These ordinances regulated criminal procedure until the early 20th century. In 1869 it was decided that the death penalty was not to be carried out in public any more. 90

90 Dugard South African Criminal Law 27.

The colonies of the Cape, Natal, Orange Free State and Transvaal had their own courts and followed the 1828 and 1830 Cape ordinances. 91

91 See Lansdown, Hoal and Lansdown South African Criminal Law 7.

Today, many elements of English criminal procedure and to a lesser extent Roman-Dutch law, are part of our current criminal procedure regime.

3.3 1910-1977

Before South Africa became a Union in 1910 the South Africa Act, 1909 established the Supreme Court of South Africa. The Highest Court at the time was the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, the court of final appeal for the UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies, which still exists today. 92

92 For its latest judgments, see the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council date unknown https://www.jcpc.uk/.

In 1917 the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 31 of 1917 was enacted and regulated the entire criminal justice process, from arrests to pardons. 93

93 See generally Le Roux-Kemp and Horne 2011 SACJ 268.

The Act, which contained over 392 sections, is what most of the current Act is based on. 94

94 Dugard South African Criminal Law 34.

At the time, jury trials were in effect but the accused did not have a choice to have a trial by jury or a trial by judge, which the 1917 Act included. 95

95 Dugard South African Criminal Law 34.

The 1917 Act abolished most barbaric sentences but the death penalty, whipping and other less heinous sentences remained intact. In 1955 the 1917 Act was repealed and replaced by the Criminal Procedure Act 56 of 1955. The 1955 Act was amended by 30 statutes and trial by jury was eventually abolished in 1969, eight years after South Africa became a Republic. 96

96 Dugard South African Criminal Law 41-42.

The jury system was never a success in South Africa as only white people were elected jurors, which led to racially charged jury results, yet another form of colonial criminal imposition. 97

97 See Dugard South African Criminal Law 42-43.

Before 1955 only murder, rape and treason were punishable by death, with murder carrying a compulsory death sentence. 98

98 Dugard South African Criminal Law 46.

Punishment under the 1955 Act and the subsequent amendments took a turn for the worse. The following discretionary death penalty offences, amongst others, were included in the late 50s and 60s: robbery and housebreaking with aggravating circumstances, sabotage, terrorism, and kidnapping and child stealing. 99

99 Dugard South African Criminal Law 46-47.

This resulted in South Africa’s becoming the highest ranked country in the world in relation to executions, especially during the mid-60s, with 122 prisoners executed in 1966. 100

100 Van Niekerk 1967 Annual Survey 471-472.

3.4 The Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (the CPA)

The current CPA (or the Act) has been amended 75 times, which indicates how South Africa has attempted to sever the Act from its colonial roots. The abolition of the death penalty in Makwanyane was an important anticolonial change and stressed the significance of ubuntu and human dignity. 101

101 Makwanyane para 149.

The Constitution has played a major role in destroying the colonial foundations of the Act. 102

102 See for example Makwanyane; Centre for Child Law v Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development 2009 11 BCLR 1105 (CC) (Centre for Child Law); Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 10 BCLR 995 (CC).

Needless to say, this was not possible during apartheid as a result of parliamentary sovereignty. 103

103 For a discussion of parliamentary sovereignty in the late 1980s in South Africa, see Dlamini 1989 De Rebus.

It is submitted, however, that several provisions of the sentencing regime of the Act, which this paper focusses on, are still colonial. Three of those provisions are discussed below.

A form of neocolonial punishment is the payment of an admission of guilt fine. This fine, which is a form of sentence in South African law, is regulated by section 57 of the Act. The fine can be issued by a police officer or a prosecutor once the accused has admitted that he has committed one of the offences, which are mainly minor offences. 104

104 See s 57 of the CPA.

The accused does not have to appear in court since the fine can be issued before or after an accused appears in court. 105

105 See ss 57(1)(a) and 57A of the CPA.

What makes this fine colonial in nature and against the spirit of ubuntu is that the accused obtains a criminal record after paying the admission of guilt fine. 106

106 Section 57(6) of the CPA.

It is argued that this sentence, which is aimed at severely punishing the offender for committing a minor offence, is not in line with the spirit of ubuntu, as alternatives to a criminal record could be explored, including community service.

The accused are sometimes not informed that the payment of the fine will result in a conviction and criminal record. In S v Parsons the Court held that the police officer had not informed the accused that an admission of the commission of the offence in question, namely disturbing the peace, would result in a conviction and criminal record. 107

107 See S v Parsons 2013 1 SACR 38 (WCC). Also see Van As and Erasmus 2020 SACQ 59. For other cases involving the payment of admission of guilt fines, see NGJ Trading Stores (Pty) Ltd v Guerreiro 1974 4 SA 738 (A); S v Gilgannon (040/2013) [2013] ZAGPJHC 226 (29 August 2013); S v Karan 2019 2 SACR 334 (WCC).

The Court held that there was

a duty on every police officer to inform the accused of all the consequences of the payment of these fines. 108

108 S v Parsons 2013 1 SACR 38 (WCC) paras 4-5.

The payment of a traffic fine is also regarded as a conviction and a sentence but a criminal record is not attached to it. This section of the CPA is unnecessarily severe and should be reviewed as it makes little sense to punish with the imposition of criminal records individuals who commit minor crimes. This is not in the spirit of ubuntu.

Sentencing is regulated in general under Chapter 28 of the Act as well as the CLAA. Life imprisonment is currently the most severe sentence after the abolition of the death penalty in 1995. 109

109 Section 276(1)(b) of the CPA.

This sentence is effectively reserved for accused who must be permanently removed from society. 110

110 S v Bull 2001 2 SACR 681 (SCA) para 21.

The imposition of the sentence means that the accused must stay in prison for the rest of his/her life, 111

111 S v T 1997 1 SACR 496 (SCA) 498g-h.

even though release on parole, after serving 25 years, is provided for in the Correctional Services Act 111 of 1998. 112

112 Section 73(6)(b)(iv) of the Correctional Services Act 111 of 1998. This section also provides that an accused, sentenced to life imprisonment may be released on parole when s/he reaches the age of 65, providing s/he has already served 15 years of the sentence. Also see Terblanche Guide to Sentencing 268.

This sentence is fundamentally retributive and colonial because it was inherited from the colonisers and does not fall within the spirit of ubuntu. Harsh punitive sentences were not part of the social structure of indigenous cultures, as people lived in close proximity to one another and reconciliation was often used to respond to crime. 113

113 Louw and Van Wyk 2016 Social Work 491.

Similarly, Ndeunyema explains that "Namibia's current sentencing purposes, being a colonial relic, prioritize retributive practices through punitive measures that include fines and imprisonment." 114

114 Ndeunyema 2019 JAL 349.

Retributive sentences such as life imprisonment are inherently colonial as they do not embody African values, but rather a Western approach to criminal law. 115

115 See generally Ndeunyema 2019 JAL.

Former Justice of the Constitutional Court, Judge Edwin Cameron, who opposes life sentences and minimum sentencing legislation explains that:

[t]he major response to the crime wave in our country should be to recognise that the sole inhibiting institutional response to criminal conduct is the certainty of detection, the certainty of follow up, the certainty of arraignment, the certainty of prosecution – and the certainty of punishment. In this certainty, the length of sentence plays no role. In other words, whether a potential rapist faces a sentence of 2, 5, 10 years or life, it is not the length of sentence but the certainty of sentencing that will make them stop. 116

116 Cameron 2020 SACQ 7.

These statements by Cameron are insightful and underscore how the length of a sentence should not be regarded as the holy grail. It is more about the South African Police Service arresting suspects and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) ensuring that offenders are successfully charged and prosecuted. The majority of people, 117

117 See generally Makwanyane paras 87-89.

however, are generally in favour of harsh punishments and the public plays an integral role in creating new legislation through public participation. 118

118 Goliath 2022 Obiter 787-788.

The Constitutional Court held in S v Makwanyane that the majority of South African citizens were in favour of the death penalty, but this, fortunately, did not alter the decision of the Court to abolish the death penalty. 119

119 Makwanyane para 87.

The Supreme Court of Appeal importantly held that a sentencing policy that caters exclusively for public opinion is inherently flawed. 120

120 S v Mhlakaza 1997 2 All SA 185 (A) para 7. Also see S v Robertson (CC 4112020) [2022] ZAWCHC 104 (18 May 2022) para 24.

This general view of retribution by the public is an example of how colonialism and apartheid have infiltrated the African heritage and values and feeling of humanity for one another. 121

121 See Ndeunyema 2019 JAL 331.

These views should be challenged by government and ubuntu should be promoted in relation to sentencing practices.

It is clear from the above that the CPA has not been fully decolonised. This is the Act that lecturers teach to young legal scholars at universities, that police officers must enforce, that prosecutors must enforce, and that Judges must interpret on a daily basis. The CPA simply cannot remain colonial in nature.

Apart from the CPA, various other Acts of parliament and provisions also form part of the South African criminal procedure regime and must be read in conjunction with the Criminal Procedure Act. 122

122 See, for example, the Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997 (CLAA) and the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007.

One of these laws is known as the Minimum Sentencing Legislation, 123

123 See s 51 of the CLAA.

another colonial law which is regulated by the CLAA.

3.5 Minimum sentencing legislation

South African legislators, including the Dutch and British colonial rulers, have on several occasions limited the discretion of judicial officials. The South African laws at material times were subordinate to the parent laws in either the Netherlands or Britain as the relevant colonial powers. Section 1 of the Cattle Theft Repression Act 16 of 1864 compelled judges to impose a minimum sentence of three years for the theft of sheep and cattle. 124

124 See Farlam 2003 Fundamina 2.

This

led to an enormous surge in the number of prisoners in the Cape at the time and forced the legislature to pass a Bill granting more discretion to judges. 125

125 Farlam 2003 Fundamina 2.

In the 1970s minimum sentencing legislation was passed, which forced presiding officers to impose minimum sentences against their will, but nevertheless fell out of favour for two decades until 1997. 126

126 Dugard South African Criminal Law 47; Terblanche Guide to Sentencing 49.

CLAA introduced minimum sentences for certain offences. For example, life imprisonment is prescribed for accused who have been convicted of rape with aggravating circumstances and premeditated murder. 127

127 Section 51(1) of the CLAA.

If a court is convinced that there are substantial and compelling reasons to impose a lesser sentence than the minimum sentence it may impose such a sentence. 128

128 Section 51(3)(a) of the CLAA.

The constitutionality of the minimum sentencing legislation was tested in S v Malgas 129

129 S v Malgas 2001 3 All SA 220 (A).

and S v Dodo. 130

130 S v Dodo 2001 3 SA 382 (CC).

The Supreme Court of Appeal and the Constitutional Court respectively decided in these cases that section 51 of the CLAA is not unconstitutional as it was found to be consistent with an offender’s fair trial rights and the separation of powers principle. 131

131 Dodo para 49; Malgas para 18. See also Terblanche "Sentence" 399-441.

Moreover, the CLAA initially provided that minimum sentencing legislation was applicable to children between the ages of 16 and 18. 132

132 Section 51(6) of CLAA.

This matter was before the Constitutional Court in Centre for Child Law v Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development in 2009 and the Court decided that the imposition of minimum sentences violated the rights of children between the ages of 16 and 18 and was not in their best interests. 133

133 Centre for Child Law para 78. See also Terblanche "Sentence" 412.

It is inexplicable that the legislature initially decided to compel judges to enforce this neo-colonial law on children between the ages of 16-18. It is argued that the CLAA, although enacted after 1994, is a neocolonial experiment because it does not exhibit any characteristics of ubuntu and African philosophy. In fact, it removes the discretion of judges to impose lesser sentences where they believe the offender should rather be subjected to restorative justice practices or where a lower-than-average sentence is appropriate. 134

134 See Muntingh South African Prison Reform 385; Cameron 2020 SACQ 3.

It is further argued that because the criminal justice system was never formally decolonised, new criminal procedure laws such as the CLAA were not subjected to anticolonial critique in Parliament. South Africa has had a violent past, and imposing minimum sentences on violent offenders would at first glance therefore seem to be justified. It is also in line with public opinion. Indeed, the judges in Makwanyane held that the majority of the

public were in favour of the death penalty. 135

135 Makwanyane para 87.

Why would Parliament then want to object to the CLAA? Importantly, the minimum sentencing legislation was supposed to be a temporary solution to the problem of crime in South Africa when it was passed in the late 1990s. 136

136 Terblanche "Sentence" 441.

The Criminal Law (Sentencing) Amendment Act 38 of 2007, however, extended the system until it was expressly scrapped. 137

137 Terblanche "Sentence" 441.

Parliament therefore knew that the minimum sentencing legislation was retributive and not a permanent solution to the problem of crime, but has continued to extend it. It is argued that this is an example of how retributive sentencing practices are ingrained in the DNA of the South African criminal justice system. The minimum sentencing laws should never have been extended in 2007. This extension by parliament of a retributive regime is an outcome of the fact that South Africa as a society has never truly decolonised. 138

138 See generally Madlingozi 2017 Stell LR; Ngcukaitobi The Land is Ours.

We cannot therefore expect criminal procedure and sentencing to be subjected to decolonisation if the executive, the legislature and the judiciary have not been decolonised.

Minimum sentences have now been applied in our courts for over 25 years and the consequences are dire, because just as in 1864, the prisons have as a result started to become more and more overcrowded. 139

139 See Cameron 2020 SACQ 3. Also see Goliath 2022 Obiter 787.

Again and again the law makers make the same mistakes concerning minimum sentencing legislation. 140

140 See Farlam 2003 Fundamina 2.

The COVID-19 pandemic further exposed South Africa's deteriorating prison system, which remains a site for sexually transmitted diseases, HIV and TB. 141

141 See Cameron 2020 SACQ 5.

Such overcrowded institutions are not a place to rehabilitate offenders and are contrary to the spirit of ubuntu. This is not surprising, since the word "ubuntu" was not mentioned once in the Malgas and Dodo cases.

Yet what is the role of the Constitution in interpreting the Law of Criminal Procedure? Section 39(2) of the Constitution provides that "when interpreting any legislation, and when developing the common law or customary law, every court, tribunal or forum must promote the spirit, purport and objects of the Bill of Rights." When it comes to statutory interpretation, presiding officers are not bound by what statutory law provides but by what the Constitution, as the supreme law, provides. 142

142 Centre for Child Law para 107.

The Constitution therefore through our courts should play an instrumental role in ensuring that colonial laws are abolished. 143

143 See Makwanyane para 333 for a discussion of the death penalty as a colonial sentence.

However, colonial laws cannot

be abolished if challenges to colonial laws are not brought to court, or when parliament continues to rule that retributive and neo-colonial laws such as the minimum sentencing laws are legitimate. It is therefore important for civil society and other role players to challenge any laws that are colonial and overly retributive. This will ensure that the courts have the opportunity to measure these laws against the Constitution and determine whether they are within the spirit, purport and objects of the Bill of Rights. 144

144 See Currie and De Waal Bill of Rights Handbook 148.

The other problem is that while it can be argued that ubuntu falls within the ambit of "spirit, purport and objects", I argue that this is not sufficient. uBuntu needs to be expressly part of the Constitution.

4 Applying ubuntu in sentencing proceedings

This section of the paper analyses the use of or failure to use ubuntu by South African courts. Since the word ubuntu does not appear in the Constitution or any other law applicable in our courts on a daily basis, it is left to the discretion of the judiciary to apply ubuntu in sentencing proceedings.

4.1 Ubuntu jurisprudence

The landmark case involving the applicability of ubuntu in sentencing proceedings remains the case where the Constitutional Court abolished one of the most severe colonial sentences in the history of South Africa, the death penalty. In S v Makwanyane the court held that:

[g]enerally, ubuntu translates as ‘humaneness’. In its most fundamental sense it translates as personhood and ‘morality’. Metaphorically, it expresses itself in umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu, describing the significance of group solidarity on survival issues so central to the survival of communities. While it envelops the key values of group solidarity, compassion, respect, human dignity, conformity to basic norms and collective unity, in its fundamental sense it denotes humanity and morality. Its spirit emphasises a respect for human dignity, marking a shift from confrontation to conciliation. In South Africa ubuntu has become a notion with particular resonance in the building of a democracy. It is part of our rainbow heritage, though it might have operated and still operates differently in diverse community settings. In the Western cultural heritage, respect and the value for life, manifested in the all-embracing concepts of ‘humanity’ and ‘menswaardigheid’, are also highly prized. It is values like these that [s 39(1)(a)] requires to be promoted. They give meaning and texture to the principles of a society based on freedom and equality. 145

145 Makwanyane para 308.

uBuntu also permeates other areas of the law including civil litigation. The Constitutional Court in MEC for Education: KwaZulu Natal v Pillay declared unconstitutional a school's decision to force a pupil to remove her nose stud

which she wore in accordance with Hindu tradition. 146

146 MEC for Education: KwaZulu Natal v Pillay 2008 1 SA 474 (CC) paras 4-5.

The court applied ubuntu and held that

cultural identity is one of the most important parts of a person's identity precisely because it flows from belonging to a community and not from personal choice or achievement. And belonging involves more than simple association; it includes participation and expression of the community's practices and traditions. 147

147 MEC for Education: KwaZulu Natal v Pillay 2008 1 SA 474 (CC) para 53.

uBuntu has also featured prominently in cases involving socio-economic rights. The Constitutional Court in Port Elizabeth Municipality v Various Occupiers dealt with an eviction order and held that ubuntu

combines individual rights with a communitarian philosophy. It is a unifying motif of the Bill of Rights, which is nothing if not a structured, institutionalised and operational declaration in our evolving new society of the need for human interdependence, respect and concern. 148

148 Port Elizabeth Municipality v Various Occupiers 2005 1 SA 217 (CC) para 37. Also see City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Blue Moonlight Properties 39 (Pty) Ltd 2012 2 SA 104 (CC) para 38; Currie and De Waal Bill of Rights Handbook 590.

During the 2020 lockdown the courts also added important judgments regarding religious gatherings and how important it is to apply the value and ideals of ubuntu in these matters. 149

149 Mohamed v President of the Republic of South Africa 2020 5 SA 553 (GP) para 63. Also see Moela v Habib (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg) (unreported) case number 2020/9215 of 23 March 2020 para 60.

The value of ubuntu was also raised in South Africa's most publicised case at the time, that of the trial for murder of Oscar Pistorius. 150

150 See Director of Public Prosecutions, Gauteng v Pistorius 2016 1 SACR 431 (SCA).

Barry Roux, Pistorius's defence attorney, argued that ubuntu should be applied at his sentencing. 151

151 See News24 2014 https://www.news24.com/News24/oscar-has-lost-everything-roux-20141017-2.

He argued that society had become used to the idea that imprisonment has become the most appropriate sentence in murder cases and instead called for punishment that addressed the interest of all parties. 152

152 News24 2014 https://www.news24.com/News24/oscar-has-lost-everything-roux-20141017-2.

These references to ubuntu speak about the South Africa we all dream of and where we are truly one. uBuntu focusses on healing instead of revenge, unity instead of division, building up and not breaking down, respect and not tyranny. This is the power of ubuntu in criminal and civil proceedings, and which led eventually to the decision that the death penalty was not a sentence fit for a new South Africa. However, the imposition of minimum sentencing legislation and other colonial sentences has left offenders stranded and without hope in a country that apparently lives by the spirit of

ubuntu. A sentenced offender cannot develop and achieve his full potential if the justice system leaves him to his own devices and with a lack of support from the community and the judiciary. 153

153 See, for example, Gyekye "Person and Community in African Thought" 321.

This is not a decolonised system of criminal justice. This colonial system is not challenged when ubuntu is omitted from criminal proceedings.

4.2 Exclusion of ubuntu from criminal proceedings

Although ubuntu featured in the postamble of the 1993 Constitution, the inclusion of ubuntu in post-apartheid jurisprudence, especially in the field of criminal procedure, is scant. 154

154 Cornell and Van Marle 2005 AHRLJ 196.

It was disappointing that the Constitutional Court did not include any reference to the omission of ubuntu in the certification judgment of the 1996 Constitution. 155

155 See, for example, Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 1996 10 BCLR 1253 (CC).

This is surprising seeing that the certification judgment was delivered a year after ubuntu had been reflected on by the court in S v Makwanyane. 156

156 See Makwanyane paras 225-227.

The assumption would have been that ubuntu would become a staple in criminal cases after Makwanyane, but this was not to be. Instead, courts apply mechanical sentencing guidelines bereft of ubuntu. 157

157 See generally Cameron 2020 SACQ.

In a recent sentencing judgment, where the Southern Circuit High Court sentenced a serial murderer to multiple life imprisonment terms, Judge Wille started his judgment by referring to the following sentencing guidelines and how sentencing is approached in South Africa:

[s]entencing often requires more thought and consideration than is traditionally given to this very difficult process. Sentencing involves a very delicate balancing act, taking into account, inter alia, the seriousness of the offences perpetrated by the offender, the offender's personal circumstances and the vested interests of society. This is often referred to as the triad in Zinn. The imposing of sentence on an offender, therefore of necessity, requires an evaluative and objective analysis of a number of difficult and differing factors. 158

158 S v Mudyiwayana (CC17/2020) [2022] ZAWCHC 23 (2 March 2022) (S v Mudyiwayana) para 1.

In S v Mudyiwayana the court concluded the judgment by explaining the importance of deterrence and retribution and that rehabilitation or a reformative sentencing approach would not be applicable in this case since the offender is not a "fallen angel". 159

159 S v Mudyiwayana para 45.

The court then ruled that parole should not be considered in this case by the court and indicated that it is up to the parole board to consider parole. 160

160 S v Mudyiwayana para 46.

In effect, the judge might well have

sentenced the accused to life without parole, a brutal sentence which is not included in the CPA. The author is not blind to the fact that this offender is a dangerous person and should not be walking in our streets. However, the tone of the judgment is severely retributive and lacks the conciliatory tone and reference to comity included in Makwanyane. 161

161 See for example Makwanyane para 230.

While Wille J in S v Mudyiwayana clearly applied a retributive form of punishment on the offender, it is worth noting how he referred to reformative and rehabilitative sentencing, which are generally known as restorative justice. In S v Matyityi Ponnan J held that "restorative justice seeks to emphasise that a crime is more than the breaking of the law or offending against the State - it is an injury or wrong done to another person." 162

162 S v Matyityi 2011 1 SACR 40 para 16-17. Also see S v Jantjies (CC42/20) [2022] ZAWCHC 200 (6 October 2022) para 7.

Restorative justice has a significant impact on the victims of crime and has been shown to be more satisfying for them, simply because they are part of the criminal justice process. 163

163 Imiera 2018 De Jure 92.

In effect, adopting restorative justice processes during sentencing is a reflection of ubuntu, because the offender is not seen only as an individual acting against the State, but also as an individual whose relationships with the family of the victim and the familial state need to be restored. 164

164 See generally Schoeman "African Concept of uBuntu".

This is a truly communal process and it can be said to be anticolonial. Restorative justice will not be applicable in all cases, especially those that are more serious, but if the family of the victim is open to reconciliation, the path should be cleared for such a sentencing option.

Punishment is foreign to the indigenous justice system, as it seeks the outcome of a prisoner of shame instead of an offender who is imprisoned. 165

165 Keevy 2009 JJS 29. See Ntlapo uBuntu Justice 70.

Western law and justice do not include such practices as shaming. 166

166 Keevy 2009 JJS 30.

The system’s retributive foundation is largely based on the biblical dictum of "an eye for an eye", which has become the thrust of South African law over the centuries. 167

167 See Makwanyane para 129.

Such a retributive criminal justice system cultivates judges who are focussed on punishment and ignore the human element of punishment and accountability. Then again, the word ubuntu appears in neither the Judicial Service Commission Act 168

168 Judicial Service Commission Act 9 of 1994.

nor the Code of Judicial Conduct. 169

169 GN R865 in GG 35802 of 18 October 2012.

If judges are not compelled to apply ubuntu in criminal proceedings, then only a selective few will be open to applying ubuntu in sentencing.

In S v Gordon 170

170 S v Gordon (171298) [2018] ZAWCHC 106 (29 August 2018).

Thulare AJ delivered a scathing reprimand of a magistrate who failed to apply ubuntu in relation to criminal procedure and made the following telling remark:

the attitude of the Magistrate leaves a disconcerting revelation of a lack of knowledge or appreciation of his constitutional obligations. The principle of Ubuntu which is at the core of being and defines Africa, is simply absent. Nothing on the record gave any hope that the Magistrate played his crucial role of giving content and meaning to the rights of an unrepresented accused. 171

171 S v Gordon (171298) [2018] ZAWCHC 106 (29 August 2018) para 16.

What is promising in the S v Gordon case is that the high court judge called the magistrate out and explained the importance of ubuntu in our justice system. In King v De Jager, which dealt with a succession matter, the Constitutional Court in general terms "affirmed ubuntu as a principle in our law which should inform all forms of adjudication." 172

172 King v De Jager 2021 4 SA 1 (CC) para 237.

It is time to live up to this affirmation.

5 Conclusions and recommendations

uBuntu has become the Cinderella of South African criminal procedure. This study has shown that there has been a reluctance among criminal court judges to apply ubuntu on a regular basis. 173

173 See section 4.2 of this article.

Makwanyane was the blueprint for interpreting ubuntu in sentencing, as demonstrated in part 4 above. However, because judges have such a wide discretion in passing sentences, ubuntu has fallen through the cracks. As a result, and due to the influence of colonial practices over centuries, the current sentencing regime in South Africa does not align with the projects of Africanisation and decolonisation. 174

174 See section 2 of this article for a definition of these theories.

The criminal justice system is colonial and retributive. While the majority of South Africans still call for excessive punishment and long sentences, including the death penalty, 175

175 See Currie and De Waal Bill of Rights Handbook 259.

the author challenges this neo-colonial view. It is hereby submitted that ubuntu should be included in the Constitution, 176

176 Alternatively the Bill of Rights should be interpreted to include ubuntu as a fundamental value when interpreting law relevant to sentencing.

the CPA, the Judicial Service Commission Act, the Code of Judicial Conduct and any other acts related to criminal procedure. Even though the Bill of Rights includes several rights that include reference to ubuntu such as the right to human dignity, the right to life and various other fundamental rights, 177

177 See generally Xaba Exploring the Principle of uBuntu; Himonga, Taylor and Pope 2013 PELJ; Mokgoro 1998 PELJ.

177 See for example Himonga and Diallo 2017 PELJ; Motshabi 2018 Strategic Review for Southern Africa.

the author holds the conviction that ubuntu should be

included in the Constitution as a stand-alone fundamental value. In addition, the author submits that the inclusion of ubuntu in the Constitution and in legislation that is relevant to sentencing would enhance the enforcement of this value and the ability of the public to hold the judiciary accountable for the development of ubuntu as a fundamental value. It should be applied not only by a handful of judges but should become the norm, especially during sentencing proceedings. It should be customary for a presiding officer to interpret ubuntu and to connect ubuntu to the spirit, purport and objects of the Bill of Rights.

In the light of this critical analysis of the implementation of ubuntu in the South African Law of Criminal Procedure, the following recommendations are made:

(a) It is submitted that the defence should be more conscious of making representations for the consideration of ubuntu during sentencing. Legal Aid South Africa and the Legal Practice Council should look at holding workshops for defence counsels throughout the country focussing on the implementation of ubuntu in sentencing.

(b) While the inclusion of informal mediation at the NPA over the last few decades should be praised, 178

178 See NPA 2020 https://www.npa.gov.za/sites/default/files/New%20NPA% 20Strategic%20Plan%202020_2025.pdf 54.

prosecutors and presiding officers, both in the magistrates' courts and in the superior courts, should be trained to incorporate ubuntu into their interpretation of the law.

(c) The Department of Justice (when exercising oversight over magistrates) and the Judicial Service Commission (in its oversight role over judges) should include questions about ubuntu and its relation to the law of criminal procedure when interviewing candidates.

(d) The admission of guilt fines should be reviewed and it is submitted that criminal records for such admissions should be expunged, even if certain conditions have to be imposed for qualifying for the said expungement. Moreover, the minimum sentences legislation should be repealed and should have no place in our law.

(e) There is a need to create a pathway for change by instituting regular national dialogues on punishment and ubuntu since law reform is not a one-size-fits-all solution to the problem.

Presiding officers should have the freedom to pass sentences that are fair to both the community and the offender, while at the same time promoting ubuntu as a fundamental value. uBuntu knows no boundaries and can

transform our criminal procedure, which will not only improve the lives of offenders but also the security of society at large.

Bibliography

Literature

Bean Punishment

Bean P Punishment (Martin Robertson Oxford 1981)

Betts "Decolonization"

Betts RF "Decolonization: A Brief History of the Word" in Bogaerts E and Raben R (eds) Beyond Empire and Nation (Brill Leiden 2012) 23-37

Botha 1915 SALJ

Botha CG "Criminal Procedure at the Cape during the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries" 1915 SALJ 322-343

Cameron 2020 SACQ

Cameron E "The Crisis of Criminal Justice in South Africa" 2020 SACQ 1-15

Cornell and Van Marle 2005 AHRLJ

Cornell D and Van Marle K "Exploring uBuntu: Tentative Reflections" 2005 AHRLJ 195-220

Council on Higher Education 2017 Briefly Speaking

Council on Higher Education "Decolonising the Curriculum: Stimulating Debate" 2017 Briefly Speaking 1-12

Currie and De Waal Bill of Rights Handbook

Currie I and De Waal J The Bill of Rights Handbook 6th ed (Juta Cape Town 2018)

Dauda "African Humanism and Ethics"

Dauda B "African Humanism and Ethics: The Cases of uBuntu and Omolúwàbí" in Afolayan A and Falola T (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of African Philosophy (Palgrave Macmillan New York 2017) 475-491

Dlamini 1989 De Rebus

Dlamini CRM " Parliamentary Sovereignty, a Bill of Rights and Judicial Review" 1989 De Rebus 865-871

Du Bois 2004 IJLI

Du Bois F "The Past and Present of South African Law" 2004 IJLI 217-236

Dugard South African Criminal Law

Dugard J South African Criminal Law and Procedure. Volume 4 (Juta Cape Town 1977)

Eliastam 2015 Verbum et Ecclesia

Eliastam JLB "Exploring uBuntu Discourse in South Africa: Loss, Liminality and Hope" 2015 Verbum et Ecclesia 1-8

Erasmus 2013 Fundamina

Erasmus HJ "Circuit Courts in the Cape Colony during the Nineteenth Century: Hazards and Achievements" 2013 Fundamina 266-299

Etieyibo "uBuntu and the Environment"

Etieyibo E "uBuntu and the Environment" in Afolayan A and Falola T (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of African Philosophy (Palgrave Macmillan New York 2017) 633-657

Fanon Wretched of the Earth

Fanon F The Wretched of the Earth (Evergreen New York 1966)

Farlam 2003 Fundamina

Farlam I "Some Reflections on the Study of South African Legal History" 2003 Fundamina 1-10

Gardiner "Decolonization"

Gardiner D "Decolonization" in Dunner J (ed) Handbook of World History: Concepts and History (Owen London 1968) 268-272

Geldenhuys and Joubert Criminal Procedure Handbook

Geldenhuys T and Joubert JJ (eds) Criminal Procedure Handbook (Juta Cape Town 1994)

Goliath 2022 Obiter

Goliath A "A Short Critique of Minimum Sentences" 2022 Obiter 779-796

Gyekye "Person and Community in African Thought"

Gyekye K "Person and Community in African Thought" in Coetzee PH and Roux APJ (eds) The African Philosophy Reader (Routledge London 1998) 317-336

Harris-Cik 2021 Acta Criminologica

Harris-Cik T "Fighting a Pandemic or Fighting Each Other: The Inter-Relatedness of the 2021 South African Civil Unrest and the Covid-19 Pandemic" 2021 Acta Criminologica i-iv

Henrico 2016 US-China Law Review

Henrico R "Educating South African Legal Practitioners: Combining Transformative Legal Education with uBuntu" 2016 US-China Law Review 817-839

Himonga and Diallo 2017 PELJ

Himonga C and Diallo F "Decolonisation and Teaching Law in Africa with Special Reference to Living Customary Law" 2017 PELJ 1-20

Himonga, Taylor and Pope 2013 PELJ

Himonga C, Taylor M and Pope A "Reflections on Judicial Views of Ubuntu" 2013 PELJ 369-427

Hlatshwayo and Alexander 2017 Journal of Education

Hlatshwayo MN and Alexander I "'We've been Taught to Understand that We don't have Anything to Contribute towards Knowledge': Exploring Academics' Understanding of Decolonising Curricula in Higher Education" 2017 Journal of Education 44-59

Horton 2021 The Lancet

Horton R "Offline: The Real Meaning of Decolonisation" 2021 The Lancet 1950

Imiera 2018 De Jure

Imiera PP "Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Restorative Justice: Healing Crime Victims, Restoring the Offenders" 2018 De Jure 82-101

Kaiser "Chief Seattle"

Kaiser R "Chief Seattle's Speech(es): American Origins and European Reception" in Swann B and Krupat A (eds) Recovering the Word: Essays on Native American Literature (University of California Press Berkeley 1987) 525-530

Keevy 2009 JJS

Keevy I "uBuntu versus the Core Values of the South African Constitution" 2009 JJS 19-58

Klare 1998 SAJHR

Klare K "Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism" 1998 SAJHR 146-188

Lansdown, Hoal and Lansdown South African Criminal Law

Lansdown CWH, Hoal WG and Lansdown AV South African Criminal Law and Procedure. Volume 1 6th ed (Juta Cape Town 1957)

Le Roux-Kemp and Horne 2011 SACJ

Le Roux-Kemp A and Horne CS "An Analysis of the Wording, Interpretation and Development of the Provisions Dealing with the Use of Lethal Force in Effecting an Arrest in South African Criminal Procedure" 2011 SACJ 266-282

Lee To Kill a Mockingbird

Lee H To Kill a Mockingbird (JB Lippincott Philadelphia 1960)

Letseka 2012 Stud Philos Educ

Letseka M "In Defence of Ubuntu" 2012 Stud Philos Educ 47-60

Louw and Van Wyk 2016 Social Work

Louw D and Van Wyk L "The Perspectives of South African Legal Professionals on Restorative Justice: An Explorative Qualitative Study" 2016 Social Work 490-510

Lubaale 2020 SACJ

Lubaale EC "Covid-19-Related Criminalisation in South Africa" 2020 SACJ 684-706

Madlingozi 2017 Stell LR

Madlingozi T "Social Justice in a Time of Neo-Apartheid Constitutionalism: Critiquing the Anti-Black Economy of Recognition, Incorporation and Distribution" 2017 Stell LR 123-147

Maekawa 2014 J Imp & Commonw Hist

Maekawa I "Neo-Colonialism Reconsidered: A Case Study of East Africa in the 1960s and 1970s" 2014 J Imp & Commonw Hist 317-341

Magobotiti 2022 Scientia Militaria

Magobotiti CD "Historical Reflections on the Deterrent Effect of the Death Penalty on Capital Crimes in South Africa: Lessons from 1917-1995" 2022 Scientia Militaria 103-119

Maine Early History of Institutions

Maine H Early History of Institutions 6th ed (John Murray London 1893)

Makgoba Mokoko

Makgoba MW Mokoko: The Makgoba Affair: A Reflection on Transformation (Vivlia Johannesburg 1997)

Mandaza "Reconciliation and Social Justice"

Mandaza I "Reconciliation and Social Justice in Southern Africa: The Zimbabwe Experience" in Coetzee PH and Roux APJ (eds) Philosophy from Africa (Oxford University Press Oxford 2002) 508-516

Matolino and Kwindingwi 2013 SAJP

Matolino B and Kwindingwi W "The End of uBuntu" 2013 SAJP 197-205

Mbiti African Religions

Mbiti J African Religions and Philosophies (Doubleday New York 1970)

Mnyongani 2010 Obiter

Mnyongani F "De-Linking uBuntu: Towards a Unique South African Jurisprudence" 2010 Obiter 134-145

Mokgoro 1998 PELJ

Mokgoro Y "Ubuntu and the Law in South Africa" 1998 PELJ 17-27

Motshabi 2018 Strategic Review for Southern Africa

Motshabi KB "Decolonising the University: A Law Perspective" 2018 Strategic Review for Southern Africa 104-115

Mudimbe Invention of Africa

Mudimbe VY The Invention of Africa (Indiana University Press Bloomington 1988)

Muntingh South African Prison Reform

Muntingh L An Analytical Study of South African Prison Reform after 1994 (PhD-thesis University of the Western Cape 2012)

Naude 2019 J Bus Ethics

Naude P "Decolonising Knowledge: Can uBuntu Ethics Save Us from Coloniality?" 2019 J Bus Ethics 23-37

Ndeunyema 2019 JAL

Ndeunyema N "Reforming the Purposes of Sentencing to Affirm African Values in Namibia" 2019 JAL 329-358

Ndlovu-Gatsheni 2012 TWQ

Ndlovu-Gatsheni SJ "Fiftieth Anniversary of Decolonisation in Africa: A Moment of Celebration or Critical Reflection?" 2012 TWQ 71-89

Netshitomboni uBuntu

Netshitomboni S uBuntu: Fundamental Constitutional Value and Interpretive Aid (Masters-thesis University of South Africa 1998)

Ngcukaitobi The Land is Ours

Ngcukaitobi T The Land is Ours: Black Lawyers and the Birth of Constitutionalism in South Africa (Penguin Random House South Africa Cape Town 2018)

Nielsen and Robyn Colonialism is Crime

Nielsen MO and Robyn LM Colonialism is Crime (Rutgers University Press New Brunswick 2019)

Nkrumah Neo-Colonialism

Nkrumah K Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism (Panaf Books London 1965)

Ntlapo uBuntu Justice

Ntlapo HS uBuntu Justice and the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission: A Theological-Missiological Study (Masters-thesis Stellenbosch University 2022)

Oliver and Oliver 2017 HTS Theological Studies

Oliver E and Oliver WH "The Colonisation of South Africa: A Unique Case" 2017 HTS Theological Studies 1-8

Ramose 2007 GLR

Ramose MB "In Memoriam: Sovereignty and the 'New' South Africa" 2007 GLR 310-329

Ramose 2016 PINS

Ramose MB "'To whom Does the Land Belong?': Mogobe Bernard Ramose Talks to Derek Hook" 2016 PINS 86-98

Schoeman "African Concept of uBuntu"

Schoeman M "The African Concept of uBuntu and Restorative Justice" in Gavrielides T and Artinopoulou V (eds) Reconstructing Restorative Justice Philosophy (Ashgate Farnham 2013) 291-310

Sesanti 2019 JBS

Sesanti S "Decolonized and Afrocentric Education: For Centering African Women in Remembering, Re-Membering, and the African Renaissance" 2019 JBS 431-449

Terblanche Guide to Sentencing

Terblanche SS A Guide to Sentencing in South Africa 3rd ed (LexisNexis Durban 2016)

Terblanche "Sentence"

Terblanche SS "Sentence" in Joubert JJ (ed) Criminal Procedure Handbook 13th ed (Juta Cape Town 2020) 399-441

Thambinathan and Kinsella 2012 IJQM

Thambinathan V and Kinsella EA "Decolonizing Methodologies in Qualitative Research: Creating Spaces for Transformative Praxis" 2021 IJQM 1-9

Tshoose 2009 AJLS

Tshoose CI "The Emerging Role of the Constitutional Value of uBuntu for Informal Social Security in South Africa" 2009 AJLS 12-19

Van As and Erasmus 2020 SACQ

Van As H and Erasmus D "Admission of Guilt Fine: A Legal Shortcut with Delayed Shock?" 2020 SAQC 57-67

Van der Merwe "Basic Introduction to Criminal Procedure"

Van der Merwe SE "A Basic Introduction to Criminal Procedure" in Joubert JJ (ed) Criminal Procedure Handbook 13th ed (Juta Cape Town 2020) 3-29

Van der Merwe 2016 Stellenbosch Theological Journal

Van der Merwe D "From Christianising Africa to Africanising Christianity: Some Hermeneutical Principles" 2016 Stellenbosch Theological Journal 559-587

Van der Walt and Oosthuizen 2021 PiE

Van der Walt J and Oosthuizen I "uBuntu in South Africa: Hopes and Disappointments – A Pedagogical Perspective" 2021 PiE 89-103

Van Niekerk 1967 Annual Survey

Van Niekerk BVD "The Administration of Justice, Law Reform and Jurisprudence" 1967 Annual Survey of South African Law 444-490

Wa Thiong'o Writers in Politics

Wa Thiong'o N Writers in Politics (Heinemann London 1981)

Williams The American Indian

Williams RA The American Indian in Western Legal Thought: The Discourses of Conquest (Oxford University Press Oxford 1990)

Xaba Exploring the Principle of uBuntu

Xaba TR Exploring the Principle of uBuntu in the South African Criminal Law System (LLM-dissertation University of Johannesburg 2012)

Case law

Afriforum v Economic Freedom Fighters (EQ 04/2020) [2022] ZAGPJHC 599 (25 August 2022)

Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 10 BCLR 995 (CC)

Centre for Child Law v Minister for Justice and Constitutional Development 2009 11 BCLR 1105 (CC)

Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 1996 10 BCLR 1253 (CC)

City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Blue Moonlight Properties 39 (Pty) Ltd 2012 2 SA 104 (CC)

Director of Public Prosecutions, Gauteng v Pistorius 2016 1 SACR 431 (SCA)

King v De Jager 2021 4 SA 1 (CC)

MEC for Education: KwaZulu Natal v Pillay 2008 1 SA 474 (CC)

Moela v Habib (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg) (unreported) case number 2020/9215 of 23 March 2020

Mohamed v President of the Republic of South Africa 2020 5 SA 553 (GP)

NGJ Trading Stores (Pty) Ltd v Guerreiro 1974 4 SA 738 (A)

Port Elizabeth Municipality v Various Occupiers 2005 1 SA 217 (CC)

S v Bull 2001 2 SACR 681 (SCA)

S v Dodo 2001 3 SA 382 (CC)

S v Gilgannon (040/2013) [2013] ZAGPJHC 226 (29 August 2013)

S v Gordon (171298) [2018] ZAWCHC 106 (29 August 2018)

S v Jantjies (CC42/20) [2022] ZAWCHC 200 (6 October 2022)

S v Karan 2019 2 SACR 334 (WCC)

S v Makwanyane 1995 3 SA 391 (CC)

S v Malgas 2001 3 All SA 220 (A)

S v Matyityi 2011 1 SACR 40 (SCA)

S v Mhlakaza 1997 2 All SA 185 (A)

S v Mncube (Judgment on Sentence) (CCP42/2021) [2023] ZAKZPHC 16 (17 February 2023)

S v Mudyiwayana (CC17/2020) [2022] ZAWCHC 23 (2 March 2022)

S v Parsons 2013 1 SACR 38 (WCC)

S v Robertson (CC 4112020) [2022] ZAWCHC 104 (18 May 2022)

S v T 1997 1 SACR 496 (SCA)

Legislation

Cattle Theft Repression Act 16 of 1864

Correctional Services Act 111 of 1998

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 200 of 1993

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997

Criminal Law (Sentencing) Amendment Act 38 of 2007

Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007

Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act 31 of 1917

Criminal Procedure Act 56 of 1955

Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977

Judicial Service Commission Act 9 of 1994

Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995

South Africa Act, 1909

Government publications

GN R865 in GG 35802 of 18 October 2012

International instruments

Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples UN Doc A/RES/1514(XV) (1960)

Internet sources

AU 2020 https://au.int/en/videos/20200521/stronger-together-covid19

African Union 2020 Africa, uBuntu – Stronger Together. #AfricaResponses #Covid19 https://au.int/en/videos/20200521/stronger-together-covid19 accessed 8 November 2022

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council date unknown https://www.jcpc.uk/

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council date unknown Home https://www.jcpc.uk/ accessed 12 November 2022

King Jr 1967 https://soundcloud.com/user-763792570/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-christmas-sermon-1967

King Jr ML 1967 A Christmas Sermon - 1967 https://soundcloud.com/user-763792570/dr-martin-luther-king-jr-a-christmas-sermon-1967 accessed 8 November 2022

Maseko 2023 https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-66877630

Maseko N 2023 South Africa to Clear Covid Lockdown Criminal Records https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-66877630 accessed 15 October 2023

Medievalists.net 2019 https://www.medievalists.net/2019/09/archaeologists -discover-medieval-man-broken-on-the-wheel/

Medievalists.net 2019 Archaeologists Discover Medieval Man "Broken on the Wheel" https://www.medievalists.net/2019/09/archaeologists-discover-medieval-man-broken-on-the-wheel/ accessed 12 November 2022

News24 2014 https://www.news24.com/News24/oscar-has-lost-everything-roux-20141017-2

News24 2014 Oscar has Lost Everything – Roux https://www.news24.com/ News24/oscar-has-lost-everything-roux-20141017-2 accessed 18 November 2022

NPA 2020 https://www.npa.gov.za/sites/default/files/New%20NPA%20 Strategic%20Plan%202020_2025.pdf

National Prosecuting Authority 2020 Strategic Plan 2020-2025 https://www.npa.gov.za/sites/default/files/New%20NPA%20Strategic%20Plan%202020_2025.pdf accessed 14 January 2023

Saartjie Baartman Centre for Women and Children date unknown http://www.saartjiebaartmancentre.org.za/about-us/saartjie-baartmans-story/

Saartjie Baartman Centre for Women and Children date unknown Saartjie (Sarah) Baartman's Story http://www.saartjiebaartmancentre.org.za/about-us/saartjie-baartmans-story/ accessed 6 November 2022

Staff Writer 2021 https://businesstech.co.za/news/lifestyle/481707/over-400000-people-have-been-arrested-for-breaking-south-africas-covid-19-rules/

Staff Writer 2021 Over 400,000 People have been Arrested for Breaking South Africa's Covid-19 Rules https://businesstech.co.za/news/lifestyle/ 481707/over-400000-people-have-been-arrested-for-breaking-south-africas-covid-19-rules/ accessed 15 October 2023

TRC 1998 https://www.justice.gov.za/trc/report/

Truth and Reconciliation Commission 1998 Report. Volume Three https://www.justice.gov.za/trc/report/ accessed 15 October 2023

List of Abbreviations

AHRLJ

African Human Rights Law Journal

AJLS

African Journal of Legal Studies

AU

African Union

CLAA

Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997

CPA

Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977

GLR

Griffith Law Review

IJLI

International Journal of Legal Information

IJQM

International Journal of Qualitative Methods

JAL

Journal of African Law

J Bus Ethics

Journal of Business Ethics

JBS

Journal of Black Studies

J Imp & Commonw Hist

Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History

JJS

Journal of Juridical Science

NPA

National Prosecuting Authority

PELJ

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal

PiE

Perspectives in Education

PINS

Psychology in Society

SACQ

South African Crime Quarterly

SACJ

South African Journal of Criminal Justice

SAJHR

South African Journal on Human Rights

SAJP

South African Journal of Philosophy

SALJ

South African Law Journal

Stell LR

Stellenbosch Law Review

Stud Philos Educ

Studies in Philosophy and Education

TRC

Truth and Reconciliation Commission

TWQ

Third World Quarterly