PER / PELJ - Pioneer in peer-reviewed, open access online law publications
Author Neels Kilian
Affiliation North-West University, South Africa
Email: Neels.Kilian@nwu.ac.za
Date Submitted 31 October 2022
Date Revised 10 October 2023
Date Accepted 10 October 2023
Date Published 29 February 2024
Guest Editors Dr N Ravyse Mr M Laubscher
Journal Editor Prof C Rautenbach
How to cite this contribution
Kilian N "Can Language Prevent Flexible SCR Calculations? New Duties for Auditors in The Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance Company Limited, Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg, Case Number 2022-19765" PER / PELJ 2024(27) – DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a15074
Copyright
This article analyses the importance of the solvency capital
requirement (hereafter SCR) and the minimum capital requirement
Abstract
This article analyses the importance of the solvency capital requirement (hereafter SCR) and the minimum capital requirement (hereafter MCR) formulae and why an insurer's external auditor should audit these and disclose its contents in the insurer's financial statements. When calculating the SCR, the reason for requiring such a disclosure is to allow the Prudential Authority an opportunity to understand whether the assumptions, parameters and techniques (also referred to as economic considerations) applied by actuaries comply with section 36 of the Insurance Act 18 of 2017. Administrative costs and written premiums are considered when calculating the MCR, although written premiums could be subjected to different interpretations, which might affect this formula. Accordingly, had Constantia Insurance Company Limited's auditor audited these formulae in 2018 and disclosed their contents in the financial statements, the Prudential Authority would have commenced liquidation procedures in 2019, not choosing instead to wait and monitor the company's solvency requirements on a weekly basis for four years. As a result, owing to the lack of transparency in the financial statements and non-compliance with the SCR and MCR, Constantia spent nearly R733 000 000 over the three-year period to fund its business activities.
Online ISSN 1727-3781
Keywords
Solvency capital requirement; minimum capital requirement; audit minimum capital requirement; auditor duties in insurance law; liquidation of an insurer; just and equitable; public purpose.
………………………………………………………
1 Introduction
The Prudential Authority lodged an ex parte application (during July 2022) to place Constantia Insurance Company Limited (hereafter Constantia) under provisional curatorship.
1
Neels Kilian. MA (Regensburg) LLM (UP) LLD (UFS). Associate Professor, Faculty of Law, North-West University, South Africa. E-mail:
corneliuskilian@hotmail.com
. ORCiD: https://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-2890-9350. 1 Ex parte the Prudential Authority (Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg) (unreported) case number 717/2022 of 18 August 2022 (hereafter Ex parte Prudential Authority). Contact the author for a copy of the affidavit or see SARB 2023 https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/publications/publication-detail-pages/media-releases/2022/Order-granted-for-the-liquidation-of-Constantia-Insurance-Company-Limited; Xuba Role of the Prudential Authority 15. 2 Godwin and Schmulow 2015 SALJ 756-768; Bechard 2022 https://www.moonstone.co.za/health-squared-placed-under-provisional-curatorship. KeyHealth was placed under provisional curatorship in September 2020, which was subsequently terminated at the end of April 2022. 3 See Poufina and Tsitsika 2018 Theoretical Economics Journal 2365 for an explanation of the history of solvency requirements and an explanation of the SCR formula. 4 Bechard 2022 https://www.moonstone.co.za/health-squared-placed-under-provisional-curatorship. In 2022 Health Squared was placed under provisional curatorship and is liquidated in the present. The amount paid to the provisional curator is estimated at R280 000 per month.
The ex parte application for provisional curatorship is not complex and is based on an affidavit stating why curatorship is important. However, there is no clear guidance on what constitutes a successful ex parte application with regard to insurers. In this regard it would appear that there must be an educated opinion that the insurer will become solvent in future.
5
5 Ex parte Prudential Authority paras 6-10 of the affidavit of Johan Heyneke. Contact the author for a copy of the affidavit.
(in October 2022).
6
6 The Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance Company Limited (Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg) (unreported) case number 2022-19765 of 14 September 2022 (hereafter Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance) para 17.1 of the affidavit of Kerwin Martin states that Constantia is in "a worse financial position than what was reported to" the Prudential Authority. Contact the author for a copy of the affidavit or see SARB 2023 https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/publications/publication-detail-pages/media-releases/2022/Order-granted-for-the-liquidation-of-Constantia-Insurance-Company-Limited. 7 See generally, Steffen 2008 International Study on Insurance Economics 62 that SCR could be calculated on a full or partial internal model. 8 FSB 2015 https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulated%20Entities/SAM%20DOCUMENTS/ Position%20Paper%2068%20(v%204)%20FINAL.pdf. The formula should not be expressed in difficult terms in order to allow for an audit thereof. It should be easily explicable to a Court as well. The EU directive for MCR in FSB 2016 https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulated%20Entities/SAM%20DOCUMENTS/Errata%20(v%204)%20to%20Position%20Paper%2074%20(v%204)%20FINAL.pdf states that calculations should be audited – audit implies the disclosure in financial statements. Also see solvency requirements for cell captives that uses a SCR formula simpler than that used by the insurers in the FSB Solvency Assessment and Management Steering Committee: Norton Rose Fullbright date unknown https://www.bila.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/old/509ce6da277006.77306714.pdf. 9 See generally, Frostmoser 1983 J Comp Bus & Cap Mkt L 305-316. 10 Insurance Act 18 of 2017 (hereafter the Insurance Act); Tarr and Mack 2013 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1009-1026. An audit is to verify information.
If the Prudential Authority believes that any value calculated by an insurer … in respect of its financial soundness does not reflect a reasonable value for the purposes of this Act, the Prudential Authority may direct the insurer or controlling company –
To appoint, at the cost of the insurer … a suitably qualified person to be approved by the Prudential Authority to determine a reasonable value … .
To calculate a value in a manner determined by the Prudential Authority, which value so calculated will be deemed to be the value.
Section 36(3)(b) of the Insurance Act provides for a possibility to argue that the Prudential Authority could recommend "improvements" to any SCR formula. For example, when the method of calculation, assumptions and
techniques used, adjustments made, calibration effected or parameters used by any insurer are inappropriate for calculating an effective SCR.
11
11 Section 36(5) of the Insurance Act or Minimum Capital Requirements (MCR); Pfeifer and Strassburger 2008 Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 62. The square root formula or standard formula can severely underestimate the true SCR required by regulators. 12 Tarantino 2001 The Physician Executive 72-76; Li "Research on Financial Statements" 508-512 for an explanation of some defective aspects of financial statements. 13 Section 37(1) of the Insurance Act. 14 Section 39(2)(a) of the Insurance Act. 15 Hock and Chung 2008 S Ac LJ 194. The duty of an auditor to "check on management" remains paramount. Equally, directors should exercise due supervision and oversight over the company's business affairs; Gaa 2010 Journal of Business Ethics 179-197, explaining why other stakeholders have a legitimate interest in transparent management or board of directors' decisions. 16 Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance para 27 of the affidavit of Kerwin Martin. 17 Todd 2022 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wUuFgSFkAjk. To confirm this, the Prudential Authority asked the Court that the provisional affidavit should not be made
public. If it were to be made public, policyholders would terminate their insurance making it extremely difficult for the curator to regain Constantia's financial soundness.
the Prudential Authority had since June 2019 requested weekly solvency calculations from Constantia, this monitoring process was in fact a fruitless exercise.
18
18 Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance para 27 of the affidavit of Kerwin Martin.
Subsequently, the Court granted the ex parte application and a provisional curator was appointed.
19
19 Sections 39 and 54 of the Insurance Act requires the insurer to notify the Prudential Authority without delay in the event of a deteriorating financial position and makes provision for curatorship instead of business rescue, among other things. 20 See generally, for example, s 4 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008, which explains liquidity and solvency with reference to the ability to pay creditors in a 12-month period. 21 Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance para 21 of the affidavit.
This article explains the term "cumulative excesses" to enable an understanding of how flexible SCR can be.
22
22 See part 2 of the article below. 23 See sub-part 2.1 of the article below. 24 Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance para 21 of the affidavit states that SCR or PCR should have been R903 342 000 instead of R304 158 000. See generally, Doff 2008 GPRIIP 193-206; Pfeifer and Strassburger 2008 Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 62. The square root formula or standard formula can severely underestimate the true SCR required by regulators.
only if an auditor observes the language that requires the disclosure of SCR and MCR formulae in the financial statements of insurers.
25
25 Huneberg 2019 Obiter 170-190. 26 The FSB is known as the FSCA (Financial Services Conduct Authority) at present. See, for example, FSB 2015 https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulated%20Entities/ SAM%20DOCUMENTS/Position%20Paper%2068%20(v%204)%20FINAL.pdf with specific reference to MCR; FSB 2016 https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulated%20 Entities/SAM%20DOCUMENTS/Errata%20(v%204)%20to%20Position%20Paper%2074%20(v%204)%20FINAL.pdf with reference to the EU position.
2 A simple explanation of the phrase "cumulative excess" and the way this explanation relates to more complex phrases or calculations
Constantia has recently been liquidated by the Prudential Authority of the Reserve Bank in terms of section 32 of the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017 (the FSRA). The purpose of this Act is to establish inter alia the Prudential Authority and the FSCA to ensure that the South African economy remains stable, as well as to enhance financial stability by conferring powers on the Reserve Bank.
27
27 Godwin and Schmulow 2015 SALJ 756-768. 28 Hollander and Van Lill 2019 https://www.ekon.sun.ac.za/wpapers/2019/wp112019 4. 29 Huneberg 2019 Obiter 170-190.
A cumulative excess serves a similar purpose, but its calculation is flexible and depends on the relevant circumstances of an accident. For example, whether the accident occurred after 1 a.m., the driver is under the age of 25, the driver obtained his or her driver's licence within the last two years, there are no witnesses or no third parties involved in the accident and lastly, the accident
occurred within six months of the inception of the policy. Each of these circumstances could be assigned a separate excess of 10%.
30
30 This example is underwriting at the claim stage, which is generally prohibited. See, for example, Deonandan Insurance Warranties 8. 31 R70 000 excess for each circumstance or economic consideration totals R350 000. 32 See, generally, Anderson Insurance Underwriting Managers Pty (Ltd) v Constantia Insurance Company Limited [2017] ZAGPJHC 195 (30 June 2017) (hereafter Anderson Insurance Underwriting Managers v Constantia Insurance).
Most financial customers or policyholders would agree to an excess or even a cumulative excess, but very few of them would understand the financial implications of a cumulative excess unless the cumulative effect were explained in detail. The purpose of a non-life broker (commonly known as a registered financial services provider) is to explain the above non-life products to a prospective policyholder to allow him or her to make an informed decision as to whether the non-life insurance product is suitable or not. Even if the policyholder agrees to a cumulative excess – without any form of explanation – it is assumed that the policyholder has been misled in concluding a policy of insurance.
33
33 See, generally, Huneberg 2019 Obiter 170-190. 34 Or MCR, without explaining Constantia's interpretation of administrative costs, for example.
2.1 More complex calculation than cumulative excesses – the loss ratio
Section 1 of the Insurance Act does not define a written premium. For this reason, it is possible to calculate the loss ratio for a particular binder holder with different end results based on the same written premium.
35
35 See, generally, Haight 1967 Dick L Rev 605. This article explains the importance of consensus between an insurer and an insured. In addition, an agent of an insurer should issue a binder to an insured to keep an insurer liable. This is also possible in South Africa where an agent sells a policy without an insurance company and acts as a
"binder" for a limited period only, such as 48 hours; see GN R1493 in GG 19495 of 27 November 1998 as amended by GN R1076 in GG 34877 of 23 December 2011 (Regulations under the Short-Term Insurance Act, 1998).
binder holder is an underwriting manager who will participate in the profits of an insurer. That is, if the binder holder is profitable as evidenced by a low loss ratio. The loss ratio calculation is based on various economic considerations which are relevant to the business of an insurer. Legislation is not too clear on how these considerations should be identified in practice to calculate a loss ratio. For example, considerations that affect the loss ratio calculation could include reinsurance commission, unearned premium reserve (UPR) and/or claims incurred but not reported (IBNR), to mention a few.
36
36 See Regulations under the Short-Term Insurance Act, 1998. See, generally, the calculation for loss ratios in Hardy 1888 JIA 256, the author explaining administrative costs; Nelson 1877 Journal of Statistical Society of London 42-89.
Example 1 – simple calculation:
37
37 Example 1 does not include all relevant economic considerations.
Earned premium |
1 000 000 |
---|---|
Less broker commission (12.5%) |
(125 000) |
Less binder fee (5%) |
(50 000) |
Less insurer fee (3%) |
(30 000) |
Less IBNR |
(100 000) |
Less claims |
(450 000) |
Total profits/(loss) for binder holder |
245 000 |
Loss ratio (755 000/1 000 000) |
75.5% |
Example 2:
Earned premium |
1 000 000 |
---|---|
*Plus reinsurance commission |
100 000 |
Less broker commission (12.5%) |
(125 000) |
Less binder fee (5%) |
(50 000) |
Less insurer fee (3%) |
(30 000) |
*Less UPR (unearned premium reserve) |
(20 000) |
*Less IBNR (claims incurred but not reported) |
(100 000) |
---|---|
Less claims |
(450 000) |
Total profits (or loss) for binder holder |
325 000 |
Loss ratio (675 000/1 000 000) |
67.5% |
Generally, the binder holder agreement between the insurer and the binder holder could either agree with example 1 (to exclude reinsurance commission etc.) or example 2 (to include reinsurance commission etc.). The consequence of this is clearly evident in example 2 above – a lower loss ratio. Therefore, the binder holder is more profitable and could share in a larger amount of profits.
Whether the binder holder is more profitable in example 1 or example 2 depends on the relevant economic considerations (e.g., reinsurance commission etc.) included in the binder holder agreement relevant to a loss ratio calculation. Nevertheless, if the excesses or loss ratios are designed to fit the risk profile of a specific policyholder or binder holder, then although such a policyholder enjoys insurance coverage or the binder holder is able to make profits, the financial implications could be severe for both parties owing to the flexibility of these calculations.
38
38 Anderson Insurance Underwriting Managers v Constantia Insurance paras 15-19, where the Court explained the difficulty finding new insurer for a binder holder in an instance when the previous insurer is liquidated. A new insurer will consider the binder application as a financial risk. This unfortunate outcome occurs without recourse to factual evidence. As a result, Constantia acquired 16 000 policyholders for free at the expense of Anderson.
calculation if it does not include all such considerations.
39
39 Pfeifer and Strassburger 2008 Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 62. The square root formula or standard formula can severely underestimate the true SCR required by regulators. 40 Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the Taking-up and Pursuit of the Business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) [2009] OJ L 335, 1-155 Annex IV para 1; EIOPA 2021 https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/rulebook/solvency-ii/article-6543_en.
Where:
SCRi denotes the sub-module i and SCRj denotes the sub-module j, and where Corr 'i,j' means that the sum of the different terms should cover all possible combinations of i and j. In the calculation, SCRi and SCRj are replaced by the following: SCR nl premium and reserve denotes the non-life premium and reserve risk sub-module and SCR nl catastrophe denotes the non-life catastrophe risk sub-module.
41
41 The factor Corr i,j denotes the items set out in row i and in column j of the following correlation matrix: j refers to right i refers to below Market Default Life Health Non-life Market 1 0,25 0,25 0,25 0,25 Default 0,25 1 0,25 0,25 0,5 Life 0,25 0,25 1 0,25 0 Health 0,25 0,25 0,25 1 0 Non-life 0,25 0,5 0 0 1
In terms of the FSRA the Reserve Bank, the Prudential Authority and the Financial Services Conduct Authority (hereafter the FSCA, which was previously known as the FSB) could consult one another to consider what should be included in the SCR formula to support the financial stability of South African policyholders or insurers; in other words, what assumptions, techniques or parameters should be taken into account when calculating a more complex SCR.
42
42 Preamble of the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017; Pfeifer and Strassburger 2008 Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 62. The square root formula or standard formula can severely underestimate the true SCR required by regulators.
would prevent any form of misrepresentation in the SCR or MCR calculation when financial statements are submitted to the FSCA.
43
43 See, for example, FSB 2015 https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulated%20Entities/ SAM%20DOCUMENTS/Position%20Paper%2068%20(v%204)%20FINAL.pdf with reference to the EU position.
The following paragraphs focus on the powers of the Reserve Bank, the Prudential Authority and the FSCA in this regard.
3 The Reserve Bank – the SCR as a more complex calculation than loss ratios
Cumulative excesses, as explained above, were implemented by an underwriting firm in South Africa, Anderson Insurance Underwriting Managers. An underwriting manager is a type of binder holder that can act on behalf of an insurer as if it were an insurance company; for example, to complete binder functions (to settle or reject claims, calculate premiums etc.) on behalf of an insurer. In the case of Anderson Insurance Underwriting Managers v Constantia Insurance Company Ltd
44
44 Anderson Insurance Underwriting Managers v Constantia Insurance. 45 Anderson Insurance Underwriting Managers v Constantia Insurance paras 15-19. 46 Anderson Insurance Underwriting Managers v Constantia Insurance paras 25-32.
the purpose or scope of the FSRA.
47
47 Godwin and Schmulow 2015 SALJ 756-768.
The powers of the Reserve Bank are regulated in Part 1 to 6 of the FSRA. Section 11 of the FSRA stipulates that the Reserve Bank may make use of any power to protect the financial stability of consumers and policyholders. Any power is regulated to some extent in the FSRA; for example, section 12(a)(ii) of the FSRA, which allows a financial sector regulator (e.g. the Prudential Authority or the FSCA) to dictate to the Reserve Bank how it (the Reserve Bank) should exercise its powers.
48
48 See Godwin and Schmulow 2015 SALJ 756-768. 49 See, generally, Pellecchia and Perciaccante 2019 Munich Personal RePEc Archive 1-8. The SCR formula could be changed depending on its underlying theory or assumption(s). 50 See as an example FSB 2015 https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulated%20 Entities/SAM%20DOCUMENTS/Position%20Paper%2068%20(v%204)%20FINAL.pdf.
intervention of the regulator to rectify the insurer's solvency – ex parte an application to appoint a provisional curator.
51
51 Norton Rose Fullbright 2015 https://www.nortonrosefullbright.com/en/knowledge/ publications/f12a4a4a/ten-things-you-need-to-know-about-insolvency-ii.
In South Africa the SCR is known as the prescribed capital requirement (hereafter PCR), while the MCR is the absolute minimum capital required to protect the policyholders when conducting the business of an insurer; that is, the minimum capital required to settle policyholders' claims successfully in the future.
52
52 FSB 2015 https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulated%20Entities/SAM%20DOCUMENTS/ Position%20Paper%2068%20(v%204)%20FINAL.pdf. 53 See FSB 2015 https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulated%20Entities/SAM%20DOCUMENTS /Position%20Paper%2068%20(v%204)%20FINAL.pdf.
4 The Prudential Authority
The Prudential Authority is a juristic or legal person operating side by side with the Reserve Bank, as indicated by section 32(2) of the FSRA. The objective of the Prudential Authority is to promote the financial soundness of insurers and to protect policyholders should an insurer fail to meet its PCR.
54
54 Godwin and Schmulow 2015 SALJ 756-768. 55 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36 of the affidavit of Johan Heyneke.
to the well-known insolvency law principle – concursus creditorum (e.g. policyholders who submitted claims and are awaiting payment of these claims are considered creditors – continuously decreasing the R700 000 000 has a direct impact on the pro rata settlement of claims).
4.1 A comparison of Constantia's MCR and PCR
The Prudential Authority submitted an affidavit attesting to why Constantia should be liquidated (in October 2022) and why the provisional appointment of a curator should be terminated immediately. Section 48(2)(a) of the FSRA allows an individual working for the Prudential Authority to bring such an application on behalf of the CEO of the Prudential Authority and the Governor of the Reserve Bank. It is clear that the Prudential Authority and the FSCA had been working together on Constantia's financial position from 2019 to 2022, since Constantia had been required to send weekly insolvency calculations. It is also clear that after the appointment of the provisional curator, the provisional curator had recalculated the PCR based on the true financial information pertaining to Constantia.
The curator focussed on the calculated MCR and PCR as presented by the board of directors of Constantia in the past, which showed the PCR as R304 158 000 and the MCR as R272 178 000. However, the curator realised that Constantia required R909 342 000 to cover its PCR requirements (a deficit of R600 000 000).
56
56 Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance paras 45 and 46 of the affidavit; Godwin and Schmulow 2015 SALJ 756-768. 57 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36 of the affidavit. 58 See, generally, Penman 2016 https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/ D82N5DNK 1-58 on how to design financial statements to promote transparency. 59 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36 of the affidavit.
MCR. However, R908 342 000 exceeds the MCR by far more than the required 25%. The questions relating to the auditor above were not answered or explained in the affidavit for liquidation submitted by the Prudential Authority. After realising that the weekly calculations submitted had been incorrect since 2019, the Prudential Authority used its own actuaries to calculate the PCR.
60
60 Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance para 47 of the affidavit. 61 See, generally, Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36 of the affidavit. 62 For an explanation of the financial position as communicated to the Prudential Authority before liquidation, see Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36 of the affidavit. 63 Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance para 47.5 of the affidavit. See, generally, The Commissioner of the South African Revenue Services v Zikhulise Cleaning Maintenance and Transport Services (High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria) (unreported) case number 14886/16 of 14 October 2020 para 9 pertaining to a bona fide argument.
5 The relationship between the annual financial statements and PCR
Constantia's financial statements complied with section 44 of the Insurance Act and section 29 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 as well as with the International Financial Reporting Standards (hereafter IFRS).
64
64 Section 29(2) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 that financial statements should not be incomplete in any material matter; IFRS date unknown https://www.ifrs.org. 65 Deloitte date unknown https://www.iasplus.com/en/resources/ifrsf/iasb-ifrs-ic/iasb.
PCR and MCR.
66
66 See, generally, Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36 of the affidavit; Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance para 48 of the affidavit. 67 Norton Rose Fullbright 2015 https://www.nortonrosefullbright.com/en/knowledge/ publications/f12a4a4a/ten-things-you-need-to-know-about-insolvency-ii. 68 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36.1.4 of the affidavit.
Whatever the case, the reason why Constantia's financial statements showed the company to be solvent is because the balance sheet had a positive equity amount in line with accounting principles, which are not the same as actuarial calculations. In terms of accounting principles, liabilities plus equity equal assets, and if there is no equity owing to an increase in liabilities, such a company is considered insolvent. In the 2021 balance sheet the equity disclosed was R84 000 000. The cash flow position had also improved significantly, from R75 000 000 to R191 000 000.
69
69 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36.3 of the affidavit.
In addition, a balance sheet is merely a snapshot of the business affairs of a company on a specific day, while the cash flow statement indicates all incoming and outgoing cash during the financial year.
70
70 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36 of the affidavit.
Constantia had also invested in equity portfolios which amounted to nearly R733 000 000 in 2019 but decreased to R133 000 000 in March 2022.
71
71 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36 of the affidavit.
Conduit Capital. These investments together with reinsurance in 2019 had allowed for PCR compliance and it would probably have been much easier to achieve the required PCR in 2019 than in 2022, when the equity portfolios decreased to approximately R133 000 000.
72
72 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 38 of the affidavit. 73 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 38.20 of the affidavit. It is assumed that it was used to supplement Constantia's cashflow. See, generally, Commissioner of Taxes v Booysens Estates Ltd 1918 AD 576 579. Selling the equity portfolio might have been intended to assist in conducting the business of the company.
Accordingly, it would appear that Constantia used the basic PCR formula, the auditor neglected to audit the formulae and Constantia never disclosed the basic PCR formula to either the Prudential Authority or the FSCA. The Prudential Authority realised the material differences only when a provisional curator was appointed, who indicated that the actual PCR was closer to R900 000 000. The audited financial statements indicated liquidity and solvency for Constantia, which is contrary to the actual PCR and MCR calculations. In this regard, one wonders what the value of the financial statements relevant to the business of an insurer is if an auditor did not audit these formulae and did not give a relevant explanation of them in the financial statements.
74
74 See, generally, Hanion 2003 Nat'l Tax J 831-863. In specific circumstances the value of financial statements is "not much".
6 The relationship between actual equity investments and dividends
In the above paragraph it is said that Constantia's equity portfolio was divided between Finbond, Trustco and Conduit Capital. The exact percentage of shares or investments in each of these companies is uncertain. Whatever the case, Trustco also tried to purchase shares in Constantia in 2019 (i.e., 32.2% in total). The Prudential Authority granted it permission to continue with this transaction, the sole purpose being to invest in or inject capital into Constantia as a way of improving its solvency requirements. The reason why Constantia did not continue with the Trustco transaction remains unclear and is not disclosed in the ex parte affidavit for provisional curatorship.
75
75 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 38.5 of the affidavit.
very difficult to use Constantia as a finance vehicle in this case.
76
76 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 38.4.2 of the affidavit. 77 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 38.7 of the affidavit.
Additionally, Constantia (through Conduit Capital) approached Mmuso Consortium (a broad-based black economic empowerment company) to invest R500 000 000 in Constantia. In return Mmuso would have become a significant owner or shareholder of Constantia by subscribing to new Constantia shares subject to certain conditions.
78
78 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 38.17 of the affidavit. 79 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 38.19 of the affidavit. 80 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 38.21 of the affidavit.
7 When being placed under curatorship, is there a possibility of finding future investors?
It is clear that the Prudential Authority had not recognised the severity of the PCR and MCR in 2019, 2020, 2021, since it believed that if a provisional curator was appointed in 2022 there was a possibility of finding a suitable investor to rectify Constantia's solvency requirements.
81
81 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 44.2 of the affidavit.
provisional curator to encourage any investor to invest in Constantia on fair contractual terms to secure its economic or financial stability.
82
82 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 44.4 of the affidavit.
8 Balance sheet on the day of application for liquidation
When the application for liquidation was lodged in October 2022, the Prudential Authority stated that the equity in Constantia's balance sheet was a negative R85 000 000. This position implied that Constantia's liabilities exceeded its assets. A balance sheet is not a true reflection of solvency since, as discussed earlier, it is merely a snapshot of a company's business affairs on a specific day. In this regard more emphasis should be placed on the cash flow statement, as was discussed earlier.
83
83 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 48.1 of the affidavit. 84 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 48.2 of the affidavit.
Based on the MCR, the application for liquidation clearly stated that Constantia was not sufficiently solvent to continue with its business activities, since the MCR does not deviate more than 25% of the PCR.
85
85 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 48.4 of the affidavit. 86 See, generally, Marlles 2007 J Transnat'l L & Pol'y 308. The term "public purpose" could be explained as that which is beneficial to society. It could also imply a public interest because it requires some genuine interest of the public. If a mere reference to public interest can magically be put forward or argued, then such an interest is meaningless. 87 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36 of the affidavit. 88 Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance para 50 of the affidavit; Lee, Ali and Gloeck 2008 Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research 27-34.
capital.
89
89 Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance para 51 of the affidavit. It should be pointed out that there is no realistic expectation of finding a few investors who not only are able to invest R900 000 000, but also have the additional capital to comply with s 7(2) of the Insurance Act pertaining to the significant owners of an insurer.
9 Just and equitable to liquidate?
In the above discussion we have noticed public purpose being stated as a ground for liquidating Constantia. In terms of section 344(H) of the Companies Act 61 of 1973, when a company is liquidated the liquidation must also be just and equitable.
90
90 The Companies Act 61 of 1973 is still valid under exceptional circumstances such as the liquidation of a company. In this regard, see for example Wynand Cornelius van Zyl v Boat Lodge Investments CC (High Court of Kwa-Zulu Natal) unreported case number 9417/2019P of 31 May 2021. In this case there was a deadlock in the management of the close corporation. The Court had to decide whether it was just and equitable to wind up the close corporation due to a deadlock in management decisions. See, further, Chesterman 1973 MLR 129-152. 91 Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance para 52 of the affidavit; Maloka and Muthugulu-Ugoda 2016 PELJ 1-23. 92 See, for example, Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36 of the affidavit. 93 Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance paras 57-58 of the affidavit. 94 Ex parte Prudential Authority paras 59.3 and 59.7 of the affidavit; in Paarwater v South Sahara Investments Pty (Ltd) 2005 4 All SA 185 (SCA) just and equitableness is proven on a balance of probabilities.
submitted, thus making it impossible to settle the full amount of the claims.
95
95 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 59 of the affidavit. 96 Ex parte Prudential Authority para 61 of the affidavit. S 57(2)(e) of the Insurance Act makes provision for no security.
10 Conclusion
It is clear that the Reserve Bank and the Prudential Authority now have a greater responsibility to protect the South African economy than prior to the promulgation of the FSRA.
97
97 FSCA, previously known as the FSB, had to liquidate insurers; See SaXum Insurance date unknown http://saxuminsurance.com; Kruger 2016 https//www.moonstone.co.za/ liquidation-of-saxum-insurance. 98 See, generally, Ex parte Prudential Authority para 36 of the affidavit. To hold an auditor liable for failing to audit the contents of an agreement, see, generally KPMG Chartered Accountants v Securefin 2009 2 All SA 523 (SCA). See, further, Maroun and Gowar 2013 International Journal of Auditing 177-189. 99 See generally, Ex parte Prudential Authority paras 36-37 of the affidavit.
nature of an insurer's business is insurance, and more focus should be placed on section 36 of the Insurance Act to promote a stable South African economy. Financial statements that contain no auditing of the PCR and MCR should not be relied on.
100
100 See part 1 of this article.
Bibliography
Literature
Chesterman 1973 MLR
Chesterman MR "The Just and Equitable Winding-Up of Small Private Companies" 1973 MLR 129-152
Deonandan Insurance Warranties
Deonandan N Insurance Warranties in South Africa: Consideration of Reform of the Law on Insurance Warranties in South Africa and Why There is a Need for Such Reform (LLM-dissertation University of Cape Town 2019)
Doff 2008 GPRIIP
Doff R "A Critical Analysis of the Solvency II Proposals" 2008 GPRIIP 193-206
Frostmoser 1983 J Comp Bus & Cap Mkt L
Frostmoser P "The Duties and Liabilities of Auditors under Swiss Law" 1983 J Comp Bus & Cap Mkt L 305-316
Gaa 2010 Journal of Business Ethics
Gaa J "Corporate Governance and the Responsibility of the Board of Directors for Strategic Financial Reporting" 2010 Journal of Business Ethics 179-197
Godwin and Schmulow 2015 SALJ
Godwin A and Schmulow A "The Financial Regulation Bill in South Africa, Second Draft: Lessons from Australia" 2015 SALJ 756-768
Haight 1967 Dick L Rev
Haight BS "Predated Automobile Insurance Issued in Absence of a Binder – An Insurance is Void" 1967 Dick L Rev 605-621
Hanion 2003 Nat'l Tax J
Hanion M "What can We Infer about a Firm's Taxable Income from its Financial Statements" 2003 Nat'l Tax J 831-863
Hardy 1888 JIA
Hardy GF "Friendly Societies" 1888 JIA 245-288
Hock and Chung 2008 S Ac LJ
Hock C and Chung T "Who Left the Gates Unlocked? Reconciling the Duties of Auditors and Company Directors" 2008 S Ac LJ 171-194
Huneberg 2019 Obiter
Huneberg S "Consumer Protection Measures in Non-Life Insurance Contracts: A South African and Australian Trend?" 2019 Obiter 170-190
Lee, Ali and Gloeck 2008 Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research
Lee T, Ali A and Gloeck J "A Study of Auditor's Fraud Responsibility for Fraud Detection in Malaysia" 2008 Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research 27-34
Li "Research on Financial Statements"
Li Y "Research on Financial Statements System Based on Enterprise Resources" in 6th Asia-Pacific Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (25-27 October 2019 Manila) 508-512
Maloka and Muthugulu-Ugoda 2016 PELJ
Maloka T and Muthugulu-Ugoda S "The Deadlock Principle as a Ground for the Just and Equitable Winding Up of a Solvent Company: Thunder Cats Investments 92 Pty (Ltd) v Nkonjane Economic Prospecting Investment Pty (Ltd) 2014 5 SA 1 (SCA)" 2016 PELJ 1-23
Marlles 2007 J Transnat'l L & Pol'y
Marlles JR "Public Purpose, Private Losses: Regulatory Expropriation and Environmental Regulation in International Investment Law" 2007 J Transnat'l L & Pol'y 275-336
Maroun and Gowar 2013 International Journal of Auditing
Maroun W and Gowar C "South African Auditors Blowing the Whistle without Protection: A Challenge for Trust and Legitimacy" 2013 International Journal of Auditing 177-189
Nelson 1877 Journal of Statistical Society of London
Nelson FGP "Some Statistics of the Affiliated Order of Friendly Societies (Odd Fellows and Foresters)" 1877 Journal of Statistical Society of London 42-89
Pellecchia and Perciaccante 2019 Munich Personal RePEc Archive
Pellecchia M and Perciaccante G "The Calculation of Solvency Capital Requirement using Copulas" 2019 Munich Personal RePEc Archive 1-8
Pfeifer and Strassburger 2008 Scandinavian Actuarial Journal
Pfeifer D and Strassburger D "Solvency II: Stability Problems with SCR Aggregation Formula" 2008 Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 61-77
Poufina and Tsitsika 2018 Theoretical Economics Journal
Poufina T and Tsitsika P "An Assessment of the Market Risk Solvency Capital Requirement Simplifications for Insurance Undertakings" 2018 Theoretical Economics Journal 2362-2387
Steffen 2008 International Study on Insurance Economics
Steffen T "Solvency II and the Work of CEIOPS" 2008 International Study on Insurance Economics 60-65
Tarantino 2001 The Physician Executive
Tarantino D "Understanding Financial Statements" 2001 The Physician Executive 72-76
Tarr and Mack 2013 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
Tarr J and Mack J "Auditor Obligations in an Evolving Legal Landscape" 2013 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 1009-1026
Xuba Role of the Prudential Authority
Xuba A The Role of the Prudential Authority in the South African Twin Peaks Model (LLM-thesis University of Pretoria 2019)
Case law
Anderson Insurance Underwriting Managers Pty (Ltd) v Constantia Insurance Company Limited [2017] ZAGPJHC 195 (30 June 2017)
Commissioner of Taxes v Booysens Estates Ltd 1918 AD 576
Ex parte the Prudential Authority (Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg) (unreported) case number 717/2022 of 18 August 2022
KPMG Chartered Accountants v Securefin 2009 2 All SA 523 (SCA)
Paarwater v South Sahara Investments Pty (Ltd) 2005 4 All SA 185 (SCA)
The Commissioner of the South African Revenue Services v Zikhulise Cleaning Maintenance and Transport Services (High Court of South Africa,
Gauteng Division, Pretoria) (unreported) case number 14886/16 of 14 October 2020
The Prudential Authority v Constantia Insurance Company Limited (Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg) (unreported) case number 2022-19765 of 14 September 2022
Wynand Cornelius van Zyl v Boat Lodge Investments CC (High Court of Kwa-Zulu Natal) unreported case number 9417/2019P of 31 May 2021
Legislation
Companies Act 61 of 1973
Companies Act 71 of 2008
Conventional Penalties Act 15 of 1962
Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017
Insurance Act 18 of 2017
Government publications
GN R1493 in GG 19495 of 27 November 1998 as amended by GN R1076 in GG 34877 of 23 December 2011 (Regulations under the Short-Term Insurance Act, 1998)
International instruments
Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on the Taking-up and Pursuit of the Business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) [2009] OJ L 335, 1-155
Internet sources
Bechard 2022 https://www.moonstone.co.za/health-squared-placed-under-provisional-curatorship
Bechard M 2022 Health Squared Placed under Provisional Curatorship https://www.moonstone.co.za/health-squared-placed-under-provisional-curatorship accessed 12 September 2022
Deloitte date unknown https://www.iasplus.com/en/resources/ifrsf/iasb-ifrs-ic/iasb
Deloitte date unknown International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) https://www.iasplus.com/en/resources/ifrsf/iasb-ifrs-ic/iasb accessed 1 September 2022
EIOPA 2021 https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/rulebook/solvency-ii/article-6543_en
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority 2021 Solvency II Single Rulebook: Calculation of the Basic Solvency Capital Requirement https://www.eiopa.europa.eu/rulebook/solvency-ii/article-6543_en accessed 19 September 2023
FSB 2015 https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulated%20Entities/SAM%20 DOCUMENTS/Position%20Paper%2068%20(v%204)%20FINAL.pdf
Financial Services Board 2015 Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Position Paper 68 (v4). SCR – Simplifications for First Party Insurance Structurers https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulated%20Entities/ SAM%20DOCUMENTS/Position%20Paper%2068%20(v%204)%20FINAL.pdf accessed 17 October 2022
FSB 2016 https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulated%20Entities/SAM%20DOC
UMENTS/Errata%20(v%204)%20to%20Position%20Paper%2074%20(v%204)%20FINAL.pdf
Financial Services Board 2016 Solvency Assessment and Management: Steering Committee Errata (v 4) to Final Position Paper 741 (v 4). Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR) https://www.fsca.co.za/Regulated%20Entities/ SAM%20DOCUMENTS/Errata%20(v%204)%20to%20Position%20Paper%2074%20(v%204)%20FINAL.pdf accessed 30 October 2022
Hollander and Van Lill 2019 https://www.ekon.sun.ac.za/wpapers/2019/ wp112019
Hollander H and Van Lill D 2019 A Review of the South African Reserve Bank's Financial Stability Policies. Stellenbosch Economic Working Papers: WP11/2019 https://www.ekon.sun.ac.za/wpapers/2019/wp112019 accessed 19 September 2023
IFRS date unknown https://www.ifrs.org
International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation date unknown Home https://www.ifrs.org accessed 12 October 2022
Kruger 2016 https//www.moonstone.co.za/liquidation-of-saxum-insurance
Kruger P 2016 Liquidation of SaXum Insurance https//www.moonstone.co.za/ liquidation-of-saxum-insurance accessed 17 October 2022
Norton Rose Fullbright date unknown https://www.bila.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/old/509ce6da277006.77306714.pdf
Norton Rose Fullbright date unknown Solvency II: Ten Things to Know https://www.bila.org.uk/wp-
content/uploads/old/509ce6da277006.77306714.pdf accessed 17 October 2022
Norton Rose Fullbright 2015 https://www.nortonrosefullbright.com/en/ knowledge/publications/f12a4a4a/ten-things-you-need-to-know-about-insolvency-ii
Norton Rose Fulbright 2015 Ten Things You Need to Know about Solvency II https://www.nortonrosefullbright.com/en/knowledge/publications/f12a4a4a/ten-things-you-need-to-know-about-insolvency-ii accessed 4 October 2022
Penman 2016 https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/ D82N5DNK
Penman SH 2016 The Design of Financial Statements https://academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D82N5DNK accessed 19 September 2023
SaXum Insurance date unknown http://saxuminsurance.com
SaXum Insurance (In Liquidation) date unknown Main http://saxuminsurance.com accessed 5 September 2022
SARB 2023 https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/publications/publication-detail-pages/media-releases/2022/Order-granted-for-the-liquidation-of-Constantia-Insurance-Company-Limited
South African Reserve Bank 2023 Order Granted for the Final Winding Up (Liquidation) of Constantia Insurance Company Limited https://www.resbank.co.za/en/home/publications/publication-detail-pages/media-releases/2022/Order-granted-for-the-liquidation-of-Constantia-Insurance-Company-Limited accessed 24 September 2023
Todd 2022 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wUuFgSFkAjk
Todd P 2022 Constantia Insurance's Remarkable Turnaround https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wUuFgSFkAjk accessed 17 October 2022
List of Abbreviations
CEO |
chief executive |
---|---|
Dick L Rev |
Dickinson Law Review |
EIOPA |
European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority |
EU |
European Union |
FSB |
Financial Services Board |
FSCA |
Financial Services Conduct Authority |
FSRA |
Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017 |
GPRIIP |
Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice |
---|---|
IASB |
International Accounting Standards Board |
IBNR |
incurred but not reported |
IFRS |
International Financial Reporting Standards |
J Comp Bus & Cap Mkt L |
Journal of Comparative Business and Market Law |
J Transnat'l L & Pol'y |
Journal of Transnational Law and Policy |
JIA |
Journal of the Institute of Actuaries |
MCR |
minimum capital requirement |
MLR |
Modern Law Review |
Nat'l Tax J |
National Tax Journal |
PCR |
prescribed capital requirement |
PELJ |
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal |
S Ac LJ |
Singapore Academy of Law Journal |
SALJ |
South African Law Journal |
SARB |
South African Reserve Bank |
SCR |
solvency capital requirement |
UPR |
unearned premium reserve |