Endumeni and Water Trading in the Superior Courts: Falling Short of a Unitary Approach to Statutory Interpretation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a19923Keywords:
statutory interpretation, Endumeni, modern approach, United Manganese, Lotter, water tradingAbstract
This article critiques recent decisions on water trading in the superior courts in light of the approach to statutory interpretation set out in Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality (2012 (4) SA 593 (SCA)). The Endumeni approach, which is the preferred modern approach to statutory interpretation, entails a unitary interpretive technique whereby text and context are interpreted together from the outset. Following CSARS v United Manganese of Kalahari (Pty) Ltd (2020 (4) SA 428 (SCA), context extends beyond the statutory enactment to constitutional, historical and purposive considerations. The article presents an updated account of the Endumeni approach and analyses five water trading decisions through this lens. It finds that the water trading decisions fall short of a unitary approach as a result of their failure to anchor their analysis in the correct parts of section 25 of the National Water Act 36 of 1998, over-reliance on the statutory context, limited consideration of constitutional, historical and purposive contexts, and reliance on arguments indirectly invoking the intention of the legislature.
Downloads
References
Armitage RM An Economic Analysis of Surface Irrigation Water Rights Transfers in Selected Areas of South Africa Water Research Commission Report 870/1/99 (Water Research Commission Pretoria 1999)
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry White Paper on a National Water Policy for South Africa (The Department Pretoria 1994)
Department of Water and Sanitation National Water Policy Review (The Department Pretoria 2013)
Du Plessis L Re-interpretation of Statutes (Lexis Nexis Durban 2007)
Klare K "Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism" 1998 SAJHR 146-188
Kroeze I "Power Play: A Playful Theory of Interpretation" 2007 TSAR 19-34
Le Roux W "Editorial: Special Edition – Legal Interpretation after Endumeni: Clarification, Contestation, Application" 2019 PELJ 1-9
Moosa F "Interpretation of Wills – Does the Endumeni Case Apply?" 2021 PELJ 1-30
Perumalsamy K "The Life and Times of Textualism in South Africa" 2019 PELJ 1-28
Seligson M "Judicial Forays in Statutory Construction: Endumeni and Its Impact on the Interpretation of Fiscal Legislation" 2021 Business Tax and Company Law Quarterly 8-18
Wallis M "Interpretation Before and After Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality 2012 (4) SA 593 (SCA)" 2019 PELJ 1-29
Case law
Airports Company South Africa v Big Five Duty Free (Pty) Ltd 2019 5 SA 1 (CC)
Bato Star Fishing (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism 2004 4 SA 490 (CC)
Capitec Bank Holdings Limited v Coral Lagoon Investments 194 (Pty) Ltd 2022 1 SA 100 (SCA)
Commissioner of the South African Revenue Services v Daikin Air Conditioning South Africa (Pty) Limited (185/2017) [2018] ZASCA 66 (25 May 2018)
Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service v United Manganese of Kalahari (Pty) Ltd 2020 4 SA 428 (SCA)
Commissioner South African Revenue Service v Bosch 2015 2 SA 174 (SCA)
Cool Ideas 1186 CC v Hubbard 2014 4 SA 474 (CC)
Ezulwini Mining Company (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy 2023 5 SA 112 (SCA)
Jaga v Donges 1950 4 SA 653 (A)
Kingswood Golf Estate (Pty) Ltd v Witts-Hewinson 2014 2 All SA 35 (SCA)
Lötter v Minister of Water and Sanitation 2022 1 SA 392 (SCA)
Marshall v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service 2019 6 SA 246 (CC)
Masethla v President of the Republic of South Africa 2008 1 SA 566 (CC)
Minister of Water and Sanitation v Lötter; Minister of Water and Sanitation v Wiid; Minister of Water and Sanitation v South African Association for Water Users Associations 2023 4 SA 434 (CC)
Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality 2012 4 SA 593 (SCA)
R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Fewings [1995] 1 All ER 513 (QB)
Ramah Farming v Great Fish River Water Users Association 2021 2 SA 547 (ECG)
South African Association for Water Users Associations v Minister of Water and Sanitation; Lötter v Minister of Water and Sanitation; Wiid v Minister of Water and Sanitation (71913/2018; 42072/2018; 90498/2018) [2020] ZAGPPHC 516 (12 August 2020)
Telkom SA SOC Limited v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service 2020 4 SA 480 (SCA)
Transnet SOC Limited v Total South Africa (Pty) Limited 2023 3 BCLR 333 (CC)
Legislation
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
Mineral and Petroleum Resources Royalty Act 28 of 2008
National Water Act 36 of 1998
Water Act 54 of 1956
Government publications
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry Legal Services Circular 18 of 2001
Department of Water Affairs Legal Services Circular No 1 of 2017
GN 65 in GG 27199 of 28 January 2005 (National Water Resource Strategy I)
GN 845 in GG 36736 of 16 August 2013 (National Water Resource Strategy II)
Internet sources
South African Association for Water User Associations 2023 About Us https://www.saafwua.com/about-us accessed 19 August 2024
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tracy-Lynn Field
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}