When the Judiciary Flouts Separation of Powers: Attenuating the Credibility of the National Prosecuting Authority (with Corrigendum)


  • Lindiwe Maqutu Lecturer, College of Law and Management Studies, School of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa




National Prosecuting Authority reputation, judicial review of executive conduct, review for legality, separation of powers.


The stature of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has been subverted through highly publicised political interference by the executive. Beginning with the marathon legal entanglements of the current South African president the decisions of sitting National Directors of Public Prosecutions (NDPP) on high-profile criminal matters, particularly those involving prominent members of the political leadership, have been marred with controversy. Undoubtedly unwarranted intrusion into the prosecutorial domain, at the behest of key political protagonists, has blighted the repute of the NPA. The judiciary too has played a pivotal, if lesser role, in eroding the sagging reputation of the NPA.

This article charts the narrative of judicial influence on the diminishing credibility of the NPA, using selected cases from the recent past. It shows that key political events such as the Zuma corruption saga have placed the judiciary together with political forces at centre stage where the focus is their culpability for exceeding their lawful mandate. Finding itself vulnerable as a result of its being the target of rhetoric casting doubt on its integrity and threatening its independence, the judiciary (through a crucial judgment) entered the political fray and positioned itself behind what it judged to be the pervasive political sentiment of the day. The article examines whether, subsequently, in an effort to curb undue political influence of the executive on the NPA, the Constitutional Court in Democratic Alliance v President of South Africa interpreted and extended judicial authority in a manner that violated the doctrine of separation of powers. Furthermore, the article argues that in Freedom Under Law v National Director of Public Prosecutions the court again misconstrued its powers by unduly interfering with the discretionary decision-making powers of the NDPP. These cases illustrate that, once they have been issued, the far reaching consequences of judicial decisions may not be erased by corrections during the appellate process. Far from being an impartial adjudicator, the judiciary has played a significant role in attenuating the stature of the NPA.



Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


ANC 2005 http://www.anc.org.za/show.php?id=55

ANC 2005 Annual Statement, 8th January 2005 http://www.anc.org.za/show.php?id=55 accessed 3 March 2015

Anon 2006 http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/Archives/ZumaFiles/Zuma-can-be-charged-again-20060920

Anon 2006 Zuma 'Can be Charged Again' http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/Archives/ZumaFiles/Zuma-can-be-charged-again-20060920 accessed 19 February 2015

Anon 2008 http://www.bdlive.co.za/articles/2008/07/18/to-which-revolution-are-they-counter?service=print

Anon 2008 To Which Revolution are They Counter? http://www.bdlive.co.za/articles/2008/07/18/to-which-revolution-are-they-counter?service=print accessed 3 April 2015

Bekink 2009 http://blogs.up.ac.za/ipoj.php

Bekink B 2009 A Perilous Slide to the Precipice of Constitutional Abdication: A Comment on the Non-prosecution of Mr Jacob Zuma http://blogs.up.ac.za/ipoj.php accessed 13 September 2010

Bruce 2007 http://www.csvr.org.za/old/wits/articles/artdb31.htm

Bruce D 2007 Political Manipulation Undermines the Judiciary and Credibility of the Law http://www.csvr.org.za/old/wits/articles/artdb31.htm accessed 30 March 2015

COSATU 2005 http://www.cosatu.org.za/show.php?ID=1133

COSATU 2005 Press Statement on Shabir Shaik (6 June 2005) http://www.cosatu.org.za/show.php?ID=1133 accessed 30 March 2015

Le Roux 2008 http://mg.co.za/article/2008-01-12-zuma-backers-put-sa-judges-on-trial

Le Roux M 2008 Zuma Backers Put SA Judges on Trial http://mg.co.za/article/2008-01-12-zuma-backers-put-sa-judges-on-trial accessed 20 February 2015

Mail & Guardian Staff Reporter 2006 http://mg.co.za/article/2006-09-20-zuma-case-struck-from-the-roll

Mail & Guardian Staff Reporter 2006 Zuma Case Struck from the Roll http://mg.co.za/article/2006-09-20-zuma-case-struck-from-the-roll accessed 19 February 2015

Mail & Guardian Staff Reporter 2008 http://mg.co.za/article/2008-06-17-we-are-prepared-to-die-for-zuma

Mail & Guardian Staff Reporter 2008 We are Prepared to Die for Zuma http://mg.co.za/article/2008-06-17-we-are-prepared-to-die-for-zuma accessed 20 February 2015

Matshiqi 2007 http://www.csvr.org.za/archive/index.php/publications/1512-undamaged-reputations-implications-for-the-south-african-criminal-justice-system-of-the-allegations-against-and-prosecution-of-jacob-zuma.html

Matshiqi A 2007 Undamaged Reputations? Implications for the South African Criminal Justice System of the Allegations against and the Prosecution of Jacob Zuma http://www.csvr.org.za/archive/index.php/publications/1512-undamaged-reputations-implications-for-the-south-african-criminal-justice-system-of-the-allegations-against-and-prosecution-of-jacob-zuma.html accessed 5 April 2015

Mokone 2012 http://www.timeslive.co.za/thetimes/2012/06/07/ramatlhodi-flays-the-judiciary

Mokone T 2012 Ramatlhodi Flays the Judiciary http://www.timeslive.co.za/thetimes/2012/06/07/ramatlhodi-flays-the-judiciary accessed 2 April 2015

Moseneke 2009 http://lectures.nmmu.ac.za/getmedia/7eb1c53b-9e83-40a3-a6df-c9c065cdc090/Inagural-Griffiths-And-Victoria-Mxenge-Memorial-Lecture?disposition=attachment

Moseneke D 2009 Inaugural Griffiths and Victoria Mxenge Memorial Lecture Delivered at the Faculty of Law - Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University on 30 October 2009: "Establishing Social Consensus on the Shifting Boundaries between Judicial and Executive Functions of the State - Lessons from the Recent Past" http://lectures.nmmu.ac.za/getmedia/7eb1c53b-9e83-40a3-a6df-c9c065cdc090/Inagural-Griffiths-And-Victoria-Mxenge-Memorial-Lecture?disposition=attachment accessed 3 April 2015

Mpshe 2009 http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page


Mpshe M 2009 Statement by the National Director of Public Prosecutions on the Matter S v Zuma and Others - 6 April 2009 http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page71619?oid=124273&sn=Detail accessed 5 April 2015

Tolsi 2012 http://mg.co.za/article/2012-96-14-judicial-autonomy-frightens-the-JSC

Tolsi N 2012 Judicial Autonomy Frightens the JSC http://mg.co.za/article/2012-96-14-judicial-autonomy-frightens-the-JSC accessed 4 April 2015

Zapiro 2008 http://www.zapiro.com/cartoon/122794-080907st#.VP6iEE0cTIU

Zapiro 2008 Rape of Justice Cartoon 1 http://www.zapiro.com/cartoon/122794-080907st#.VP6iEE0cTIU accessed 30 March 2015



How to Cite

Maqutu, L. (2015). When the Judiciary Flouts Separation of Powers: Attenuating the Credibility of the National Prosecuting Authority (with Corrigendum). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 18(7), 2671–2705. https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v18i7.08