Relevance, Admissibility and Probative Value in a Rational System of Evidence: A South African Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2022/v25i0a11966Keywords:
Logical relevance, admissibility, Thayer, Wigmore & Bentham’s relevance theories, probability theory, Bayes Theorem, probative value, discretionary exclusionary rulesAbstract
In the South African legal system of fact finding and proof the relevance of an evidentiary fact is not governed by the rules of the law of evidence but by a set of extra-legal principles based on the logic of inferential reasoning and probability theory. However, there is no definitive legal definition, or practical test, of what constitutes relevance in a post-constitutional South African curial context, except for an ambiguous pre-1961 reference to a "blend of common sense, judicial experience and logic, laying outside the law". This article critically evaluates the relationship between relevance and admissibility in the adversarial adjudicative process, with particular reference to the peculiarities of the South African legal system, in which the procedural framework of the fact-finding process has been subjected to a post-apartheid constitutional democracy. In addition, this article provides an interpretative synthesis of prevailing international scholarship in the field, develops a functional three-legged practical relevance test for ease of application by all legal practitioners in the courtroom and provides a uniquely different possible statutory definition of relevance and admissibility.
Downloads
References
Bibliography
Literature
Allen RJ and Leiter B "Naturalized Epistemology and the Law of Evidence" 2001 Va L Rev 1491-1550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1073901
Baxter H "Autopoiesis and the 'Relative Autonomy' of Law" 1998 Cardozo L Rev 1987-2090
Bentham J Rationale of Judicial Evidence Vol I, Bowring ed (William Tait Edinburgh 1843)
Haack S "Epistemology Legalized: Or, Truth, Justice, and the American Way" 2004 Am J Juris 43-61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/49.1.43
Hoffmann LH "Similar Facts After Boardman" 1975 LQR 193-206
James GF "Relevancy, Probability and the Law" 1941 CLR 689-705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3477428
Lempert R and Salzburg S A Modern Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, Transcripts and Cases 2nd ed (West St Paul 1982)
Lempert R "Built on Lies: Preliminary Reflections on Evidence Law as an Autopoietic System" 1998 Hastings LJ 343-357
Lempert R "Modelling Relevance" 1977 Mich L Rev 1021-1057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1288024
Murphy P A Practical Approach to Evidence 10th ed (Oxford University Press Oxford 2008)
Pardo MS "The Nature and Purpose of Evidence Theory" 2013 Vand L Rev 547-613
Pattenden R "The Discretionary Exclusion of Relevant Evidence in English Civil Proceedings" 1997 E&P 361-385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/136571279700100501
Risinger DM "Inquiry, Relevance, Rules of Exclusion, and Evidentiary Reform" 2010 Brook L Rev 1349-1366
South African Law Reform Commission Discussion Paper 113, Project 126: Review of the Law of Evidence (Hearsay and Relevance) (South African Law Reform Commission Pretoria 2008)
Schwikkard PJ et al Principles of Evidence 3rd ed (Juta Cape Town 2009)
Stephen JF Digest of the Law of Evidence 12th ed (Macmillan London 1948)
Thayer JB Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law (Little, Brown & Co Boston 1898) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/781035
Tribe L "Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process" 1971 Harv L Rev 1329-1393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1339610
Twining WJ Theories of Evidence: Bentham and Wigmore (Weisenfeld & Nicholson London 1985)
Wigmore JH A Treatise on the Anglo-American System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law Vol I 3rd ed (Little, Brown & Co Boston 1940)
Zeffertt DT and Paizes AP The South African Law of Evidence 2nd ed (LexisNexis Durban 2009)
Zuckerman AAS The Principles of Criminal Evidence (Oxford University Press Oxford 1989)
Case law
AA Onderlinge Assuransie Assosiasie Bpk v De Beer 1982 2 SA 603 (A)
Ashmore v Corporation of Lloyd's [1992] 2 All ER 486 (HL)
Bates & Lloyd Aviation (Pty) Ltd v Aviation Insurance Co 1985 3 SA 916 (A)
Caswell v Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries Ltd [1939] All ER 722 (HL)
Conway v R [2000] 172 ALR 185
Fedics Group (Pty) Ltd v Matus: Fedics Group (Pty) Ltd v Murphy 1998 2 SA 617 (C)
Delew v Town Council of Springs 1945 TPD 128
DPP v Boardman [1975] AC 421
DPP v Kilbourne [1973] AC 729
Hollingham v Head (1858) 140 ER 1135
Holtzhausen v Roodt 1997 4 SA 766 (W)
Janit v Motor Industry Fund Administrators (Pty) Ltd 1995 4 SA 293 (A)
Lenco Holdings Ltd v Eckstein 1996 2 SA 693 (N)
Lithgow City Council v Jackson (2011) 244 CLR 352
Lloyd v Powell Duffryn Steam Coal Co Ltd [1914] AC 733
Morris v R [1983] 2 SCR 190
Noor Mohamed v R [1949] AC 182
People v O'Brien [1965] IR 142 (Ireland)
R v A (No 2) [2002] 1 AC 45
R v Adams [1996] 2 Cr App R 467
R v Cloutier (1979) 48 CCC (2d) 1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-48-2-201
R v Collins (2001) 160 CCC (3d) 85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4012732
R v Corbett [1988] 1 SCR 670
R v Funderburk [1990] 2 All ER 482
R v Gill (1987) 39 CCC (3d) 506 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3208254
R v Gordon (1995) 2 Cr App R 61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/61.1.232S
R v Katz 1946 AD 71
R v Kilbourne [1973] AC 729
R v Kumalo and Nkosi 1918 AD 500
R v Mathews 1960 1 SA 752 (A) DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1960.tb62794.x
R v Mohan [1994] 2 SCR 9
R v Mpanza 1915 AD 348
R v Nethercott [2002] 2 Cr App R 117
R v Patel [1952] 2 All ER 29
R v Rowton [1865] 169 ER 1497
R v Schauber-Kuffler 1969 2 SA 40 (RA)
R v Sims (1946) 13 Cr App R 158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1052524
R v Solomon 1959 2 SA 352 (A) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.5148.352
R v Stephenson [1976] VR 374 (Australia)
R v Straffen [1952] 2 QB 911
R v Trupedo 1920 AD 58
R v Wilson [1991] 2 NZLR 707
R v Yaeck (1991) 68 CCC (3d) 545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ed068p545
Ram Bihari Yadav v State of Bihar AIR (1998) SC 1850 (India)
S v Bergh 1974 4 SA 857 (A)
S v Gokool 1965 3 SA 461 (N)
S v M 2003 1 SA 341 (SCA)
S v Mayo 1990 1 SACR 659 (E)
R v Mohan [1994] 2 SCR 9
S v Moolman 1996 1 SACR 267 (A)
S v Mthembu 2008 2 SACR 407 (SCA)
S v Nel 1990 2 SACR 136 (C)
S v Nieuwoudt 1990 4 SA 217 (A)
S v Shabalala 1986 4 SA 734 (A)
S v Soci 1998 2 SACR 275 (E)
S v Tandwa 2008 1 SACR 613 (SCA)
S v Zuma 2006 2 SACR 191 (W)
Shephard v United States 290 US 96 (1933)
Legislation
Australian Evidence Act, 1995 (Cth)
Civil Proceedings Evidence Act 25 of 1965
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007
Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977
Criminal Procedure Amendment Act 92 of 1963
Electronic and Communications Act 25 of 2002
Law of Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988
New Zealand Evidence Act, 2006
USA Federal Rules of Evidence, 1975 as amended
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Adrian Bellengere, Associate Professor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}