"In Which the Partners Undertook Reciprocal Duties of Support" – A Discussion of the Phrase as Used in Bwanya v Master of the High Court, Cape Town

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2022/v25ia13159

Keywords:

Bwanya v Master, intestate succession, maintenance, life-partnerships.

Abstract

In December 2021 the Constitutional Court delivered judgment in Bwanya v Master of the High Court, Cape Town. The court ruled that survivors of life-partnerships "in which the partners undertook reciprocal duties of support" would be entitled to claim benefits under the Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act (the MSSA) and the Intestate Succession Act (the ISA). This case note focusses on the phrase "in which the partners undertook reciprocal duties of support." It examines the jurisprudential development of the phrase through the case law. It considers whether reliance on the phrase is likely to present an obstacle to potential claimants or whether the phrase can be interpreted in a way that broadens the protection provided by the MSSA and ISA so as to ensure that all vulnerable partners can be protected.

The note suggests that the optimal way in which to interpret the requirement that the life-partners had undertaken reciprocal duties of support would be to focus on the claimant's needs and financial dependence and to assess how the law can provide protection and redress to those who have incurred relationship-induced dependence as a consequence of the particular form and nature of the reciprocal support provided in the intimate relationship. Previous court judgments have noted the typically gendered nature of the contributions made by family members. The law must ensure that it furthers the constitutional goal of achieving substantive equality between men and women, while also acknowledging and responding to the intersectional forms that discrimination and disadvantage assumes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Literature

Albertyn C "Substantive Equality and Transformation in South Africa" 2007 SAJHR 253-276 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2007.11864921

Barratt A "Private Contract or Automatic Court Discretion? Current Trends in Legal Regulation of Permanent Life-Partnerships" 2015 Stell LR 110-131

Bonthuys E "Family Contracts" 2004 SALJ 879-901

Bonthuys E "Institutional Openness and Resistance to Feminist Arguments: The Example of the South African Constitutional Court" 2008 Can J Women & L 1-36

Bonthuys, E "A Duty of Support for All South African Unmarried Intimate Partners Part I: The Limits of the Cohabitation and Marriage Based Models" 2018 PELJ 1-32 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a4410

Bonthuys E "A Duty of Support for All South African Unmarried Intimate Partners Part 2: Developing Customary and Common Law and Circumventing the Volks Judgment" 2018 PELJ 1-36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a4411

Clark B (ed) Family Law Service (Lexis-Nexis South Africa online service)

Clark B "Families and Domestic Partnerships" 2002 SALJ 634-648

De Vos P "Same-Sex Sexual Desire and the Re-imagining of the South African Family" 2004 SAJHR 179-206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2004.11864816

De Vos P and Barnard J "Same-Sex Marriage, Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships in South Africa: Critical Reflections on an Ongoing Saga" 2007 SALJ 795-826

Goldblatt B "Regulating Domestic Partnerships: A Necessary Step in the Development of South African Family Law" 2003 SALJ 610-629

Goldblatt B "Satchwell v President of the Republic of South Africa 2002(6) SA 1 (CC)" 2003 SAJHR 118-123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2003.11865175

Kruuse H "'Here's to You, Mrs Robinson': Peculiarities and Paragraph 29 in Determining the Treatment of Domestic Partnerships" 2009 SAJHR 380-391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2009.11865207

Kruuse H "You Reap What You Sow: Regulating Marriages and Intimate Partnerships in Diverse, Post-Apartheid Society" 2013 International Survey of Family Law 343-362

Lind C "Domestic Partnerships and Marital Status Discrimination" 2005 AJ 108-130

Meyerson D "Who's In and Who's Out? Inclusion and Exclusion in the Family Law Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of South Africa" 2010 CCR 295-316

Mochela RJ and Smith BS '"Mind the Gap(s)": Legal Differentiation Between Same-Sex and Heterosexual Cohabitees Regarding Intestate Succession: Options for Reform and Comparative Insights into the Regulation of "Polygamous" Life Partnerships (Part 1)" 2020 TSAR 480-495

Osman F "Splitting Hairs? Bwanya v the Master of the High Court" 2021 SALJ 521-534

Picarra L "Gory v Kolver NO 2007 (4) SA 97 (CC)" 2007 SAJHR 563-569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2007.11864937

Sinclair J and Bonthuys E "Law of Persons and Family Law" 2004 Ann Surv SA L 115-159

Sinclair J and Heaton J The Law of Marriage Vol 1 (Juta Kenwyn 1996)

Sloth-Nielsen J and Van Heerden B "The 'constitutional Family': Developments in South African Child and Family Law 2003-2013" 2014 IJLPF 100-120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebt018

Smith BS "Rethinking Volks v Robinson: The Implications of Applying a 'Contextualised Choice Model' to Prospective South African Domestic Partnerships Legislation" 2010 PELJ 238-300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v13i3.63674

Smith BS "Intestate Succession and Surviving Heterosexual Life Partners: Using the Jurist's 'Laboratory' to Resolve the Ostensible Impasse that Exists after Volks v Robinson" 2016 SALJ 284-315

Smith BS "Have We Read Volks Wrong All Along?" 2018 THRHR 149-161

Smith B and Heaton J "Extension of the Dependant's Action to Heterosexual Life Partnerships After Volks v Robinson and the Coming into Operation of the Civil Union Act: Thus Far and No Further?" 2012 THRHR 472-484

Case law

Bannatyne v Bannatyne (Commission for Gender Equality as Amicus Curiae) 2003 2 SA 363 (CC)

Butters v Mncora 2012 4 SA 1 (SCA)

Bwanya v Master of the High Court, Cape Town 2022 3 SA 250 (CC)

Bwanya v The Master of the High Court 2021 1 SA 138 (WCC) DOI: https://doi.org/10.47348/SALJ/v138/i3a4

Camps Bay Ratepayers' and Residents' Association v Harrison 2011 4 SA 42 (CC)

Daniels v Campbell 2004 5 SA 331 (CC) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14746514040040050801

Dawood v Minister of Home Affairs; Shalabi v Minister of Home Affairs; Thomas v Minister of Home Affairs 2000 3 SA 936 (CC)

Du Plessis v Road Accident Fund 2004 1 SA 359 (SCA)

Gory v Kolver (Starke Intervening) 2007 4 SA 97 (CC)

Gory v Kolver 2006 2 All SA 640 (T)

Gumede (Born Shange) v President of the Republic of South Africa 2009 3 SA 152 (CC)

Kooverjee v Kooverjee 2006 6 SA 127 (C)

Langemaat v Minister of Safety and Security 1998 3 SA 312 (T)

Laubscher v Duplan 2017 2 SA 264 (CC)

National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Home Affairs 2000 2 SA 1 (CC) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718160020958926

Paixão v Road Accident Fund 2012 6 SA 377 (SCA)

Robinson v Volks 2004 6 SA 288 (C) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075066080-8/50013-X

Santam Bpk v Henery 1999 3 SA 421 (SCA)

Satchwell v President of the Republic of South Africa 2001 12 BCLR 1284 (T)

Satchwell v President of the Republic of South Africa 2002 6 SA 1 (CC)

Volks v Robinson 2005 5 BCLR 446 (CC) DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2005.11.8.19616

Legislation

Aliens Control Act 96 of 1991

Civil Union Act 17 of 2006

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Divorce Act 70 of 1979

Judges' Remuneration and Conditions of Employment Act 88 of 1989

Intestate Succession Act 81 of 1987

Maintenance of Surviving Spouses Act 27 of 1990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0015-1882(90)80511-I

Published

2022-06-24

How to Cite

Barratt, A. (2022). "In Which the Partners Undertook Reciprocal Duties of Support" – A Discussion of the Phrase as Used in Bwanya v Master of the High Court, Cape Town: . Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 25, (Published 24 June 2022) pp 1 –28. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2022/v25ia13159

Issue

Section

Case Notes