Does Mistaken Belief in Consent Constitute a Defence in South African Rape Cases?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15002Keywords:
consent, intention, mistaken in belief, rape, reasonable belief in consentAbstract
In the 2020 case of Coko v S 2022 1 SACR 24 (ECG), the Eastern Cape High Court held that a person's mistaken belief in consent to penetrative sex could constitute a valid defence in law. In statutory provisions and jurisprudence, the absence of the victim's consent is fundamental in establishing a case of rape. This paper evaluates the decision, where it was held that when an appellant reasonably believes that the complainant/victim had consented to sex, this alone could be enough to acquit the appellant of the charge of rape.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Bibliography
Literature
Alencar T "Conditional Consent and Sexual Crime: Time for Reform?" 2021 JCL 455-465 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220183211056135
Amirthalingam K "Ignorance of Law, Criminal Culpability and Moral Innocence: Striking a Balance between Blame and Excuse" 2002 Sing JLS 302-327
Boyle C and MacCrimmon M "To Serve the Course of Justice: Disciplining Fact Determination" 2001 Windsor YB Access Just 55-85
Burchell JM Principles of Criminal Law 4th ed (Juta Cape Town 2013)
Burchell JM and Milton JRL Principles of Criminal Law 2nd ed (Juta Cape Town1997)
Burgin R and Flynn A "Women's Behavior as Implied Consent: Male 'Reasonableness' in Australian Rape Law" 2021 Criminology and Criminal Justice 334-352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895819880953
Feinberg J "Victims Excuses: The Case of Fraudulently Procured Consent" 1986 Ethics 330-345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/292750
Flecha R, Tomás G and Vidu A "Contributions from Psychology to Effectively Use, and Achieving Sexual Consent" 2020 Frontiers in Psychology 1-14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00092
Gibson M "Deceptive Sexual Relations: A Theory of Criminal Liability" 2020 OJLS 82-109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqz031
Gore A "It's All or Nothing: Consent, Reasonable Belief and Continuum of Sexual Violence in Judicial Logic" 2021 Social and Legal Studies 522-540 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663920947813
Hoctor SV Snyman's Criminal Law 7th ed (Lexis Nexis Durban 2021)
Hubin DC and Haely K "Rape and the Reasonable Man" 1999 Law & Phil 113-139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3505194
Illsley T "The Defence of Mistaken Belief in Consent" 2008 SACJ 63-80
Labuschagne JMT "Dwaling ten Aansien van Toestemming as Verweer by Verkragting" 1999 SACJ 348-363
Lyon MR "No Means No? Withdrawal of Consent During Intercourse and Continuing Evolution of the Definition of Rape" 2004 J Crim L & Criminology 277-314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3491384
MacKinnon CA Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (Harvard University Press Cambridge 1989)
Mangale B and O'Brien S "One Step Forward, Two Steps Back for Victims of Gender Based Violence" 2021 Without Prejudice 59-61
Mokone G "The Constitutional Role of the Judiciary in Cases of Sexual GBV: An Analysis of Tsabalala v S, Ntuli v S 2020 (5) 1 (CC)" 2021 Obiter 406-420
Spies A "Perpetuating Harm: The Sentencing of Rape Offenders under South African Law" 2016 SALJ 389-408
Tadros V "Rape without Consent" 2006 OJLS 515-543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gql016
Vandervort L "Mistake of Law and Sexual Assault: Consent and Mens Rea" 1987 CJWL 233-309
Van der Bijl C "Rape as a Materially-Defined Crime: Could 'Any Act which Causes Sexual Penetration' Include Omissions?" 2010 SACJ 224-238
Legislation
Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007
Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977
Case law
Coko v S 2022 1 SACR 24 (ECG) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a9519
Director of Public Prosecutions Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg v Ramolefi (705/2018) [2019] ZASCA 90 (3 June 2019)
DPP v Morgan [1975] 2 WLR 913 [1975] 2 All ER 347
H v S (A400/2012) [2014] ZAGPJHC 214 (16 September 2014)
Maqhwara v S (2019/A171) [2021] ZAGPJHC 619 (26 October 2021)
Molaza v S 2020 4 All SA 167 (GJ)
Notito v The State (123/11) [2011] ZASCA 198 (23 November 2011) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00316.x
Otto v S 2019 3 SA 189 (WCC)
R v Esau [1997] 2 SCR 777
R v K 1958 3 SA 420 (A)
R v M 1953 4 SA 393 (AD)
R v Z 1960 1 SA 739 (A) DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1960.tb62779.x
S v Makayi 2021 2 SACR 197 (ECB)
S v Malgas 2001 SACR 469 (SCA)
S v Solomon 1973 4 SA 644 (C)
S v Van der Meyden 1999 1 SACR 447 (W)
S v Willemse 2011 2 SACR 531 (ECG)
S v Zuma 2006 2 SACR 191 (W)
Teddy Bear Clinic for Abused Children v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development 2014 1 SACR 327 (CC)
Tshabalala v S; Ntuli v S 2020 5 SA 1 (CC)
Y v S (537/2018) [2020] ZASCA 42 (21 April 2020)
Internet sources
King S-JM 2021 Judge 'Forced' into Controversial Ruling Due to Outdated Rape Laws - Lawyer https://www.capetalk.co.za/articles/430119/judge-forced-into-controversial-ruling-due-to-outdated-rape-laws-lawyer accessed 6 June 2022
Ngcukana L 2021 Sex vs Rape: Ngcukaitobi's Ruling Sparks Outrage https://www.news24.com/citypress/news/sex-vs-rape-ngcukaitobis-ruling-sparks-outage-20211017 accessed 6 June 2022
Sibanda OS 2021 Flawed Makhanda High Court Judgment is an Achilles' Heel in Rape Case Law in South Africa https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2021-10-17-flawed-makhanda-high-court-judgment-is-an-achilles-heel-in-rape-case-law-in-south-africa/ accessed 6 June 2022
Swemmer S 2021 "Foreplay" Judgment Shows How Problematic Judicial Views Around Consent in Rape Cases Persists https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2021-10-14-foreplay-judgment-shows-how-problematic-judicial-views-around-consent-in-rape-cases-persists/ accessed 6 June 2022
Xaso L 2021 We, the People: Being South African Means Reaching Out Your Hand to Humanise the Inhuman https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2021-12-03-we-the-people-being-south-african-means-reaching-out-your-hand-to-humanise-the-inhuman/ accessed 6 June 2022
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Serone Stal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}