The Law Regarding Pension Interest in South Africa Has Been Settled! Or Has it? With Reference to Ndaba v Ndaba (600/2015)  ZASCA 162
Keywords:Pension Interest, Entitlement, Divorce, pension fund, spouse
This article reflects on the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In particular, it assesses whether the Supreme Court of Appeal in Ndaba v Ndaba had adequately clarified how this area of law should be understood. In light of the inconsistent approaches from various divisions of the High Court, it has not always been clear how the courts should interpret the law relating to pension interest in South Africa. In this paper, aspects of this area of law which have been clarified by the Supreme Court of Appeal are highlighted. This paper further demonstrates aspects of this area of law which the Supreme Court of Appeal did not settle and would potentially be subject to future litigation. This paper is based on the premise that while Ndaba v Ndaba is welcomed, the Supreme Court of Appeal nonetheless, missed a golden opportunity to authoritatively provide a basis upon which the law relating to pension interest in South Africa should be understood.
Davey 2013 De Rebus
Davey J 'Pension interest and divorce K v K and Another – a critique' 2013 (July) De Rebus 27-28
Marumoagae 2014 PER
Marumoagae C "Non-member's Entitlement to the Pension Interest of the Member's Pension Fund" 2014 (6) PER 2488-2524
Marumoagae 2016 De Rebus
Marumoagae C "Entitlement to Pension Interest upon divorce! A Reply" 2016 (Aug) De Rebus 30-31
Pinaar 2015 De Rebus 38
Pinaar M "Does a non-member spouse have a claim on pension interest?" 2015 (Dec) De Rebus 38
Van Niekerk Patrimonial Litigation if Divorce Proceedings
Van Niekerk P A Practical Guide to Patrimonial Litigation in Divorce Actions (LexisNexis Durban: Issue 17/2015)
Chiloane v Chiloane 2007 ZAGPHC 183 of 7 September 2007
De Kock v Jacobson and Another 1999 4 SA 346 (W) 348J–349B.
Elesang v PPC Lime Limited (NC) unreported case number 1076/2006 of 15 December 2006
Eskom Pension and Provident Fund v Krugel 2012 6 SA 143 (SCA)
Fritz v Fundsatwork Umbrella Pension Fund 2013 4 SA 492 (ECP)
Kgopane v Kgopane unreported case number 1819/2011 58 of 16 August 2012
Kotze v Kotze 2013 JOL 30037 (WCC), ML v JL 2013 ZAFSHC 55
Lamb v Lamb 2002 JDR 0463 (T)
M v M 2012 ZAKZDHC 17
M v M 2014 ZAGPJHC 296
M v M 2016 ZALMPPHC 2
Maharaj v Maharaj 2002 2 SA 648 (D&CLD)
Mmampane and Another v Mmampane nee Moshitoa 2015 ZAGPPHC 420
Maria v Brian 2008 ZAGPHC 317 of 28 August 2008)
Motsetse v Motsetse  2 All SA 495 (FB)
Ndaba v Ndaba  ZASCA 162
O v O 2012 ZANCHC 20
Old Mutual Life Assurance Company (SA) Ltd and Another v Swemmer 2004 ZASCA 140
Peters v Peters 2008 ZAWCHC 309 of 2 December 2008
Sempapalele v Sempapalele 2001 2 SA 306 (O)
Divorce Act 70 of 1979
Merriam-Webster English dictionary date unknown http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/entitlement
Merriam-Webster English dictionary date unknown http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/entitlement (accessed 22 October 2016).
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright in all material published in PER/PELJ vests in the author, provided that authors grant, by submission of their contributions, permission that their contributions may be shared and adapted without restriction. An author furthermore agrees that the same contribution may not be published elsewhere without the written permission of the editor.
Anyone gaining access, electronically or otherwise, to a contribution to PER, may quote from such contribution, use the intellectual content thereof, share and adapt it, but subject to the following conditions:
you must give appropriate credit, provide a link and indicate if changes were made; and
the copyright of the author(s) may not be infringed in any way.