The Legislative Authority of the Local Sphere of Government to Conserve and Protect the Environment: A Critical Analysis of Le Sueur v eThekwini Municipality [2013] ZAKZPHC 6 (30 January 2013)

Authors

  • Warren Freedman University of KwaZulu-Natal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2014/v17i1a2263

Keywords:

Constitution, allocation of legislative authority, local government, environment, municipal planning, Durban Open Space System (DMOSS), constitutional validity of municipal laws.

Abstract

Legislative authority in South Africa is divided among the national, provincial and local spheres of government. Section 43 of the Constitution provides in this respect that the legislative authority of the national sphere of government is vested in Parliament; that the legislative authority of the provincial sphere of government is vested in the provincial legislatures; and that the legislative authority of the local sphere of government is vested in the municipal councils.

 

The allocation of legislative authority to municipal councils gives rise to a number of complex questions. One of these is the extent to which municipal councils are entitled to pass legislation that deals with the conservation and protection of the "environment". This issue was considered by the KwaZulu-Natal High Court: Pietermaritzburg in Le Sueur v eThekwini Municipality [2013] ZAKZPHC 6 (30 January 2013).

 

In this case the High Court found that even though the functional area of "environment" has been explicitly allocated to the national and provincial spheres of government and not to the local sphere by the Constitution (see Schedule 4A of the Constitution), municipal councils are entitled to pass legislation that deals with the conservation and protection of the "environment", at least in those circumstances where it forms a part of "municipal planning".

 

While there is no doubt that the functional area of "municipal planning" does encompass certain specific environmental matters at the local level, it does not encompass the broad area of the "environment", as the High Court suggests in its judgment. The approach adopted by the High Court, therefore, is open to some criticism. The purpose of this article is to set out and discuss the High Court’s judgment as well as the criticisms that may be levelled against it in the light of the allocation of legislative authority to the three spheres of government.

   ScienceOpen_Log0343220.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Literature

Freedman "Constitutional Law"

Freedman DW "Constitutional Law: Structures of Government" in Joubert WA (ed) LAWSA Vol 5 Part 3 2nd ed (LexisNexis Durban 2012) 1-348

Steytler and De Visser Local Government Law

Steytler N and De Visser J Local Government Law of South Africa (LexisNexis Durban 2012)

Case law

Abahlali Basemjondolo Movement SA v Premier of the Province of KwaZulu-Natal 2010 2 SA 99 (CC)

City of Cape Town v Robertson 2005 2 SA 323 (CC)

Executive Council, Western Cape Legislature v President of the RSA 1995 4 SA 887 (CC)

Ex parte Chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly: In re Certification of the Constitution of the RSA 1996 1996 4 SA 744 (CC)

Ex parte President of the RSA: In re Constitutionality of the Liquor Bill 2000 1 SA 732 (CC)

Ex parte Speaker of the KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Legislature: In re KwaZulu Amakhosi and Iziphakanyiswa Amendment Bill of 1995 1996 4 SA 653 (CC)

Habitat Council v Provincial Minister of Local Government etc, Western Cape 2013 6 SA 113 (WCC)

Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Gauteng Development Tribunal 2010 2 SA 554 (SCA)

Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Gauteng Development Tribunal 2010 6 SA 182 (CC)

Lagoon Bay Lifestyle Estate (Pty) Ltd 2013 ZACC 39

Le Sueur v eThekwini Municipality 2013 ZAKZPHC 6

Maccsand (Pty) Ltd v City of Cape Town 2012 4 SA 181 (CC)

Mazibuko v City of Johannesburg 2010 4 SA 1 (CC)

Minister for Mineral Resources v Swartland Municipality 2012 7 BCLR 712 (CC)

Minister of Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning v Lagoon Bay Lifestyle (Pty) Ltd 2013 ZACC 39

Minister of Local Government, Environmental Affairs and Development Planning v Premier, Limpopo Province v Speaker of the Limpopo Provincial Government 2011 6 SA 396 (CC)

Warey Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Stalwo (Pty) Ltd 2009 1 SA 337 (CC)

Western Cape Provincial Government: In re DVB Behuising (Pty) Ltd v North West Provincial Government 2001 1 SA 500 (CC)

Legislation

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000

National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998

National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act 10 of 2004

Government publications

GN R796 in GG 22605 of 24 August 2001 (Local Government: Municipal Planning and Performance Management Regulations)

Published

21-04-2017

How to Cite

Freedman, W. (2017). The Legislative Authority of the Local Sphere of Government to Conserve and Protect the Environment: A Critical Analysis of Le Sueur v eThekwini Municipality [2013] ZAKZPHC 6 (30 January 2013). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 17(1), 566–594. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2014/v17i1a2263

Issue

Section

Notes

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.