The Role of Human Dignity in the Assessment of Fair Compensation for Unfair Dismissals

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i4a2511

Keywords:

Constructive dismissal, Right to dignity, Harassment, Unfair dismissal, Compensation for unfair dismissal, Solatium, Relational contract

Abstract

South African labour law is concerned with the attainment of fairness for both the employer and the employee. In weighing up the interests of the respective parties it is of paramount importance to ensure that a delicate balance is achieved so as to give credence to commercial reality as well as an individual's right to dignity. In other words the attainment of fairness in the employment relationship must give cognisance not only to surrounding socio-economic reality but also to human rights. The environment within which the world of work operates has at its core a free enterprise economy. Ultimately, an employer should generally not be penalised to the extent that it is crippled and unable to continue operating. It is argued in this article that in ascertaining what constitutes appropriate compensation for an unfair dismissal, the underlying reality that labour law operates in a free enterprise system must be and is given cognisance to by the legislation and the courts. At the same time in ascertaining what constitutes fair compensation for unfair dismissal due regard must be had not only to the labour rights contained in the Constitution but also to other rights protected in terms of the Constitution, most importantly, the rights to dignity and equality.

 

The fact that the basis of the employment relationship is commercial and an employer is entitled and even encouraged to make profits is reflected in our law by the fact that there are caps on the amount of compensation for unfair dismissal in the interests of business efficiency and certainty. However, an analysis of relevant case law demonstrates that this can never be at the expense of a person's dignity. Hence the notion that the employment relationship is relational. This is reflected by the interpretation given to the legislation by the courts. Where there has been discrimination or an impairment of the employee's dignity, there are no such limits as to the amount of compensation a court can award. If there has been unfair discrimination, the courts may even award punitive and non-pecuniary damages.

    

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bibliography

Brassey Employment and Labour Law

Brassey M Employment and Labour Law (Juta Cape Town 2000)

Brassey et al New Labour Law

Brassey M et al The New Labour Law (Juta Cape Town 1987)

Claassen Dictionary

Claassen RD Dictionary of Legal Words and Phrases (Butterworths Durban 1975-)

Grogan Workplace Law

Grogan J Workplace Law 10th ed (Juta Cape Town 2010)

Van Niekerk Unfair Dismissal

Van Niekerk A Unfair Dismissal 4th ed (Siber Inc Claremont 2008)

Vettori 2011 Stell LR

Vettori S "Constructive dismissal and repudiation of contract: What must be proved?" 2011 Stell LR 173-187

Register of legislation

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998

Labour Relations Act 28 of 1956

Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995

Register of case law

Alert Employment Personnel (Pty) Ltd v Leech 1993 14 ILJ 655 (LAC)

Alpha Plant and Services (Pty) Ltd v Simmonds 2001 22 ILJ 359 (LAC)

Chemical Energy Paper Printing Wood & Allied Workers Union v Glass and Aluminium 2000 CC 2002 23 ILJ 695 (LAC)

Chothia v Hall Longmore & Co (Pty) Ltd 1997 18 ILJ 1090 (LC)

Coetzer v Minister of Safety & Security 2003 24 ILJ 163 (LC)

Da Silva v Coutinho 1971 3 SA 123 (A)

Dial Tech CC v Hudson 2007 28 ILJ 1237 (LC)

Ditsamai v Gauteng Shared Services Centre 2009 5 BLLR 456 (LC)

F v Minister of Safety and Security 2012 1 SA 536 (CC)

Farhana v Open Learning Systems Education Trust (Unreported Labour Court Case No JS347/10, 20 April 2011)

Feldman (Pty) Ltd v Mall 1945 AD 733

Ferodo (Pty) Ltd v De Ruiter 1993 14 ILJ 974 (LAC)

Fose v Minister of Safety and Security 1997 3 SA 786 (CC)

Gauteng Shared Services Centre v Samai (Unreported Labour Appeal Court Case No JA44/09, 7 December 2011)

Gcaba v Minister of Safety & Security (Unreported Constitutional Court Case No T64/08, 7 October 2009)

Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 25 ILJ 439 (C)

Johnson v Unisys Ltd 2001 IRLR 279

Johnson & Johnson v CWIU 1998 12 BLLR 1209 (LAC)

K v Minister of Safety and Security 2005 3 All SA 519 (SCA)

K v Minister of Safety and Security 2005 8 BLLR 749 (CC)

Le Monde Luggage CC t/a Pakwells Petje v Dunn 2007 28 ILJ 2246 (LAC)

Lukie v Rural Alliance CC t/a Rural Development Specialist 2004 25 ILJ 1445 (LC)

Marsland v New Way Motor & Diesel Engineering 2009 30 ILJ 169 (LC)

Media 24 Ltd v Grobler 2005 26 ILJ 1007 (SCA)

Minister of Safety and Security Services v Jordaan t/a Andre Jordaan Transport 2000 4 SA 21 (SCA)

Minister for Justice & Constitutional Development v Tshishonga 2009 9 BLLR 862 (LAC)

Minister van Veiligheid en Sekuriteit v Japmoco BK h/a Status Motors 2002 5 SA 649 (SCA)

Minister van Veiligheid en Sekuriteit v Phoebus Appollo Aviation BK 2002 5 SA 475 (SCA)

Murray v Minister of Defence 2009 3 SA 130 (SCA)

National Union of Metalworkers of SA v Precious Metal Chains (Pty) Ltd 1997 18 ILJ 1346 (LC)

Nkopane v Independent Electoral Commission 2007 28 ILJ 670 (LC)

Ntsabo v Real Security CC 2003 4 ILJ 2341 (LC)

Parry v Astral Operations Ltd 2005 10 BLLR 989 (LC)

Pretoria Society for the Care of the Retarded v Loots 1997 18 ILJ 981 (LAC)

Rawlins C Dr DC Kemp t/a Centralmed (Unreported Supreme Court of Appeal Case No 483/09, 2010)

Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation & Arbitration 2007 28 ILJ 2246 (LAC)

South African Maritime Safety Authority and Fafie Fortune Mckenzie 2010 31 ILJ 529 (SCA)

Spring v Guardian Assurance Plc 1995 2 AC 296

Trotman v Edwick 1951 1 SA 443 (A)

Viljoen v Smith 1997 1 SA 309 (A)

Whitehead v Woolworths (Pty) Ltd 1999 8 BLLR 862 (LC)

Published

29-05-2017

How to Cite

Vettori, S. (2017). The Role of Human Dignity in the Assessment of Fair Compensation for Unfair Dismissals. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 15(4), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i4a2511

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.