Die Reg van die Kind op Kontak met Beide Ouers: Opmerkings na Aanleiding van Onlangse Ontwikkelinge in die Nederlandse Reg

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i1a2545

Keywords:

Alternative care, enforcement of right to contact, family care, obligation to have contact, parental care, parental responsibilities and rights, right to contact (of child with both parent)

Abstract

This contribution discusses the amendment to section 1:  377a lid 1 BW of 1 March 2009, in Dutch law.  According to this provision a child has the right to have contact with both parents as well as with those who have sufficient close personal links with the child.  The parent who is not responsible for the physical care of the child has the right and obligation to have contact with the child.  The question whether the South African law, through the provisions of section 28 of the Constitution and the Children's Act, provides such a right and obligation, is investigated.  Even though the conclusion is reached that the South African law indirectly provides such right and obligation, it is argued that the explicit recognition thereof in the Children's Act would provide a statutory legal duty on parents to have and maintain contact with their child.  This would enhance legal certainty.  Attention is also given to the enforcement of such right of the child.

    

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bibliografie

Human "Theory of Children’s Rights"

Human S "The Theory of Children’s Rights" in Boezaart T (red) Child Law in South Africa (Juta Claremont 2009)

Jacobs 1996 TPR

Jacobs K "Het omgangsrecht in België en Nederland" 1996 TPR 827-876

Kilkelly The Child and the European Convention on Human Rights

Kilkelly U The Child and the European Convention on Human Rights (Aldershot Ashgate 1999)

Labuschagne 1993 De Jure

Labuschagne JMT "Deïnjuriëring van verlowingsbreuk: Opmerkinge oor die morele dimensie van deliktuele aanspreeklikheid" 1993 De Jure 126-139

Labuschagne 1998 THRHR

Labuschagne JMT "`n Reg as teenkant van `n reg: Opmerkinge oor die opkoms van interaksieregte" 1998 THRHR 137- 141

Louw Acquisition of Parental Responsibilities and Rights

Louw AS Acquisition of Parental Responsibilities and Rights (LLD proefskrif UP 2009)

Robinson 1999 De Jure

Robinson JA "Moderne ontwikkelinge in die Duitse reg aangaande die regposisie van buite-egtelike kinders: Enkele lesse vir Suid-Afrika" 1999 De Jure 259-282

Skelton "Parental Responsibilities and Rights"

Skelton A "Parental Responsibilities and Rights" in Boezaart T (red) Child Law in South Africa (Juta Claremont 2009)

Van Aswegen 1995 SAJHR

Van Aswegen A "The implications of a bill of rights for the law of contract and delict" 1995 SAJHR 50-69

Van Der Linde 2002 Obiter

Van Der Linde A "Reg op inligting van ouers en hul minderjarige kinders" 2002 Obiter 338-347

Van der Linde 2005 De Jure

Van der Linde A "Begrensing van die toegangsreg van die natuurlike vader tot sy buite-egtelike kind onder die Europese Verdrag van die Regte van die Mens" 2005 De Jure 162-171

Van der Linde en Labuschagne 2001 THRHR

Van der Linde A en Labuschagne JMT "Die omgangsreg van die ongehude vader en sy buite-egtelike kind en die vraagstuk van deliktuele aanspreeklikheid binne konteks van ’n interaksiereg" 2001 THRHR 308-315

Van Der Vyver en Joubert Persone- en Familiereg

Van Der Vyver JD en Joubert DJ Persone- en Familiereg 3de uitg (Juta Cape Town 1991)

Van Zyl en Bekker 2000 De Jure

Van Zyl GJ en Bekker JC "Vonnisbespreking van Jooste v Botha" 2000 De Jure 149-154

Vanlerberghe 1990 Jura Falconis

Vanlerberghe B "Omgangsgercht in het licht van artikel 8 EVRM" 1990 Jura Falconis 149 ev

Vlaardingerbroek ea Het hedendaagse personen- en familierecht

Vlaardingerbroek P ea Het hedendaagse personen- en familierecht: behoudens het huwelijksvermogensrecht 4de uitg (Kluwer Deventer 2004)

Vlaardingerbroek 2009 FJR

Vlaardingerbroek P "Die wetgewer laat Jeroen (en de vele ander kinderen) niet in de kou staan" 2009 FJR 228-239

Wortmann 1995 FJR

Wortmann SFM "Ouderlike gezag en omgang" 1995 FJR 210-215

Register van wetgewing

Nederland

A 1:247 BW

A 1:377a lid 1, 2 en 3 BW

Suid-Afrika

Children’s Act (Kinderwet) 38 van 2005

Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika 108 van 1996

Verdrae

European Convention on Human Rights

United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child

Register van hofsake

Europese Hof vir die Regte van die Mens

Hendricks v Nederland Aansoek No 8427/8 (1982) DR 295

Hoffman v Austria (1994) 17 EHRR 293

Ignaccolo-Zenide v Roemenië EHRM 25 Jan 2000 (ongerapporteer)

Rieme v Sweden (1993) 16 EHRR 155

Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v Portugal EHRM 21 Des 1999 (ongerapporteer)

Nederland

Hof Amsterdam 9 Junie 2009, nr 200.026.995/01 LJN BI9807

Hof Amsterdam 9 Junie 2009, nr 200.028.832/01 en 200.028.832/02 LJN BI8257

Hof’s-Gravenhage 2 Juni 2009 nr 200.007.856/01, LJN BI17307

Hof’s-Gravenhage 9 Juni 2009, nr 200.008.475/01 LJN BI393

HR 22 Des 1995, NJ 1996 419

HR 11 April 2008, NJ 2008 555

Suid-Afrika

Allsop v McCann 2001 2 SA 706 (K)

B v S 1995 3 SA 571 (A)

Bhe v Magistrate, Khayelitsha (Commission for Gender Equality as Amicus Curiae); Shibi v Sithole; South African Human Rights Commission v President of the Republic of South Africa 2005 1 SA 580 (KH)

Clinton-Parker v Administrator, Transvaal; Dawkins v Administrator, Transvaal 1996 2 SA 37 (W)

Fraser v Children’s Court, Pretoria North 1997 2 SA 218 (T)

Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom 2001 1 SA 46 (KH)

Guggenheim v Rosenbaum (2) 1961 4 SA 21 (W)

Heystek v Heystek 2002 2 SA 754 (T)

Jooste v Botha 2000 2 SA 199 (T)

Krugel v Krugel 2003 6 SA 220 (T)

MB v NB 2010 3 SA 220 (GSJ)

McCalman v Thorne 1934 NPD 86

P v P 2002 6 SA 105 (N)

S v M (Centre for Child Law as Amicus Curiae) 2008 3 SA 232 (KH)

Sephiri v Scanlan 2008 1 SA 322 (K)

T v M 1997 1 SA 54 (A)

Townsend-Turner v Morrow [2004] 1 All SA 235 (K)

V v V 1998 4 SA 169 (K)

Van Den Berg v Le Roux [2003] 3 All SA 599 (NK)

Van Niekerk: In re Van Niekerk v Van Niekerk, Ex parte [2005] JOL 14218 (T)

Wicks v Fisher 1999 2 SA 504 (N)

Townsend-Turner v Morrow [2004] 1 All SA 235 (K)

Published

06-06-2017

How to Cite

van der Linde, A., & van Schalkwyk, N. (2017). Die Reg van die Kind op Kontak met Beide Ouers: Opmerkings na Aanleiding van Onlangse Ontwikkelinge in die Nederlandse Reg. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 14(1), 67–103. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i1a2545

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.