"Fair" Mathematics in Assessing Delictual Damages


  • Loma Steynberg University of south Africa




Delictual damages, actuary, expert witness, evidence, burden of proof, judicial discretion, contingencies, probability


In assessing delictual damages the plaintiff is burdened with the duty to prove loss with a preponderance of probability, including uncertain future loss. In quantifying such a claim an actuary is often used to make actuarial calculations based on proven facts and realistic assumptions regarding the future. The role of the actuary is to guide the court in the calculations to be made. Relying on its wide judicial discretion the court will have the final say regarding the correctness of the assumptions on which these calculations are based. The court should give detailed reasons if any assumptions or parts of the calculations made by the actuary are rejected. It should preferably refrain from making its own calculations if an actuary is involved and should rather instruct the actuary to do recalculations if necessary. It does, however, fall within the wide discretion of the court to make a general contingency adjustment after the basic calculations have been accepted. In assessing delictual damages it is the duty of the court to ensure that both objective and subjective factors are considered in such a manner that the assessment may be regarded as an application of "fair" mathematics.



Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...



Anderson Actuarial Evidence

Anderson DR Actuarial Evidence Valuing Past and Future Income 2nd ed (Carswell Toronto 1986)

Boberg Law of Delict

Boberg PQR The Law of Delict: Vol 1 Aquilian Liability (Juta Cape Town 1984)

Buchanan 1960 SALJ

Buchanan JL "Prospective Damages in Actions for Damages for Bodily Injury" 1960 SALJ 187-192

Charles Handbook on Assessment of Damages

Charles WHR Handbook on Assessment of Damages in Personal Injury Cases 2nd ed (Carswell Toronto 1990)

Cohen Probable and Provable

Cohen LJ The Probable and the Provable (Clarendon Press Oxford 1977)

Eggleston Evidence

Eggleston R Evidence, Proof and Probability 2nd ed (Weidenfeld and Nicolson London 1983)

Eggleston 1991 ALJ

Eggleston R "The Philosophy of Proof" 1991 ALJ 130-148

Fienberg Statistical Assessments

Fienberg SE (ed) The Evolving Role of Statistical Assessments as Evidence in the Courts (Springer-Verlag New York 1989)

Gauntlett Quantum of Damages

Gauntlett JJ Corbett The Quantum of Damages in Personal and Fatal Injury Cases Vol 1 - General Principles 4th ed (Juta Cape Town 1995)

Hodgkinson Expert Evidence

Hodgkinson T Expert Evidence: Law and Practice (Sweet & Maxwell London 1990)

Klopper Third Party Compensation

Klopper HB The Law of Third Party Compensation 2nd ed (LexisNexis Durban 2008)

Keynes Treatise on Probability

Keynes JM A Treatise on Probability (MacMillan and Co London 1921)

Koch Damages for Lost Income

Koch RJ Damages for Lost Income (Juta Cape Town 1984)

Koch 1986 THRHR

Koch RJ "Damages for Personal Injury and Death" 1986 THRHR 215-224

Koch 1989 THRHR

Koch RJ "Aquilian Damages for Personal Injury and Death" 1989 THRHR 66-80

Koch Reduced Utility

Koch RJ The Reduced Utility of a Life Plan (Rustica Press Cape Town 1993)

Ligertwood Australian Evidence

Ligertwood A Australian Evidence 3rd ed (Butterworths Sydney 1998)

Meintjies-Van der Walt 2001 THRHR

Meintjies-Van der Walt L "A Few Plain Rules? A Comparative Perspective on Exclusionary Rules of Expert Evidence in South Africa" 2001 THRHR 236-256

Neethling and Potgieter Law of Delict

Neethling J and Potgieter JM Neethling-Potgieter-Visser Law of Delict 6th ed (Lexis Nexis Durban 2010)

Ogus Law of Damages

Ogus AI The Law of Damages (Butterworths London 1973)

Paizes 1999 SALJ

Paizes A "Chasing Shadows: Exploring the Meaning, Function and Incidence of the Onus of Proof in the South African Law" 1999 SALJ 531-585

Reinecke 1976 TSAR

Reinecke MFB "Die Elemente van die Begrip Skade" 1976 TSAR 26-58

Robertson and Vignaux 1992 OJLS

Robertson B and Vignaux GA "Expert Evidence: Law, Practice and Probability" 1992 OJLS 392-403

Robertson and Vignaux 1993 OJLS

Robertson B and Vignaux GA "Probability – The Logic of the Law" 1993 OJLS 457-478

Saner Prescription

Saner J Prescription in South African Law (Butterworths Durban 1996)

Schmidt and Rademeyer Bewysreg

Schmidt CWH and Rademeyer H Bewysreg 4th ed (Butterworths Durban 2000)

Stauch 1997 OJLS

Stauch M "Causation, Risk, and Loss of Chance in Medical Negligence" 1997 OJLS 205-225

Stein 1996 CJLJ

Stein A "The Refoundation of Evidence Law" 1996 CJLJ 279-342

Steynberg Gebeurlikhede

Steynberg L Gebeurlikhede in die Deliktuele Skadevergoedingsreg (LLD-thesis UNISA Pretoria 2006)

Steynberg 2007 PER

Steynberg L "Re-partnering as a Contingency Deduction in Claims for Loss of Support – Comparing South African and Australian Law" 2007 PER 1-25

Steynberg 2008 De Jure

Steynberg L "Die Inagneming van Positiewe en Negatiewe Gebeurlikhede in die Deliktuele Skadevergoedingsreg" 2008 De Jure 109-125

Thomson 1988 De Rebus

Thomson RJ "The determination of the deduction for remarriage from the pecuniary loss of a widow" 1988 De Rebus 67-70

Van der Walt Sommeskadeleer

Van der Walt CFC Die Sommeskadeleer en die "Once and for all"-Reël (LLD-thesis Unisa 1977)

Van Rensburg Juridiese Kousaliteit

Van Rensburg ADJ Juridiese Kousaliteit en Aspekte van Aanspreeklikheidsbeperking by die Onregmatige Daad (LLD-thesis Unisa 1970)

Visser et al Law of Damages

Visser PJ et al Visser and Potgieter’s Law of Damages 2nd ed (Juta Cape Town 2003)

Zeffertt et al Law of Evidence

Zeffertt DT et al The South African Law of Evidence (Butterworths Durban 2003)

Register of court cases

AA Mutual Insurance Association Ltd v Maqula 1978 1 SA 805 (A)

Anthony v Cape Town Municipality 1967 4 SA 445 (A)

Arendse v Maher 1936 TPD 162

Beukes v Mushet (Minister of Posts and Telegraphs) 1947 EDL 204

Blyth v Van den Heever 1980 1 SA 191 (A)

Burger v Union National South British Insurance Co 1975 4 SA 72 (W)

Carstens v Southern Insurance Association Ltd 1985 3 SA 1010 (C)

Chisholm v East Rand Proprietary Mines Ltd 1909 TH 297

Clair v Port Elizabeth Harbour Board 1886 EDC 311

De Klerk v ABSA Bank Ltd 2003 4 SA 314 (SCA)

De Sales v Ingrilli 2002 212 CLR 338 (HC)

Erasmus v Davis 1969 2 SA 1 (A)

Eskom v First National Bank of Southern Africa 1995 2 SA 386 (A)

Esso Standard SA (Pty) Ltd v Katz 1981 1 SA 964 (A)

Evins v Shield Insurance Co Ltd 1980 2 SA 814 (A)

Fair v South African Eagle Insurance Co Ltd 1997 2 All SA 396 (E)

Gentiruco AG v Firestone SA (Pty) Ltd 1972 1 SA 589 (A)

Goodall v President Insurance Co Ltd 1978 1 SA 389 (W)

Griffiths v Mutual & Federal Insurance Co Ltd 1994 1 SA 535 (A)

Guardian National Insurance Co Ltd v Engelbrecht 1989 4 SA 908 (T)

Hendricks v President Insurance Co Ltd 1993 3 SA 158 (C)

Hersman v Shapiro & Co 1926 TPD 367

Holian v United Grain Grovers Ltd 1980 5 WWR 501 (CA)

Holtzhauzen v Roodt 1997 4 SA 766 (W)

Hulley v Cox 1923 AD 234

Klopper v Maloko 1930 TPD 860

Kotwane v Unie Nasionaal Suid-Britse Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk 1982 4 SA 458 (O)

Krugell v Shield Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk 1982 4 SA 95 (T)

Laferrière v Lawson 1991 1 SCR 541

Lazarus v Rand Steam Laundries (1946) (Pty) Ltd 1952 3 SA 49 (T)

Mabaso v Felix 1981 3 SA 865 (A)

Mkwanzi v Van der Merwe 1970 1 SA 609 (A)

Milns v Protea Assurance Co Ltd 1978 3 SA 1006 (C)

Minister van Veiligheid en Sekuriteit v Geldenhuys 2004 1 SA 515 (SCA)

Modern Engineering Works v Jacobs 1949 3 SA 191 (T)

Ngubane v South African Transport Services 1991 1 SA 756 (A)

Nochomowitz v Santam Insurance Co Ltd 1972 1 SA 718 (T)

Parker v The Commonwealth 1965 112 CLR 295 (HC)

Paterson v South African Railways and Harbours 1931 CPD 289

Pillay v Krishna 1946 AD 946

Road Accident Fund v Guedes 2006 5 SA 583 (SCA)

Roxa v Mtshayi 1975 3 SA 761 (A)

Ruto Flour Mills v Adelson (1) 1958 4 SA 235 (T)

S v Gouws 1967 4 SA 527 (EC)

Shield Insurance Co Ltd v Booysen 1979 3 SA 953 (A)

Smart v SAR&H 1928 NLR 361

Snyders v Groenewald 1966 3 SA 795 (C)

Southern Insurance Association Ltd v Bailey 1984 1 SA 98 (A)

Trimmel v Williams 1952 3 SA 786 (C)

Turkstra Ltd v Richards 1926 TPD 276

Union and National Insurance Co Ltd v Coetzee 1970 1 SA 295 (A)

Union Government v Clay 1913 AD 385

Waring & Gillow Ltd v Sherborne 1904 TS 340

Register of legislation

Prescription Act 68 of 1969

Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996



How to Cite

Steynberg, L. (2017). "Fair" Mathematics in Assessing Delictual Damages. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 14(2), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i2a2557




Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.