Judging Under a Bill of Rights

Authors

  • Louis TC Harms NWU

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i3a2732

Abstract

 

 We are pleased to publish here, as an oratio, the Ebsworth Memorial Lecture delivered by Mr Justice Louis Harms in February 2007.  In his lecture he addressed a range of contentious issues regarding the challenges of judging under a (new) Bill of Rights and he inter alia raises, "without answering, the question of whether a bill of rights should reflect existing societal values or whether it should create them."  He also spoke candidly of judicial activism, verbosity emanating from the bench, the judiciary and the separation of powers and (in-)consistency in constitutional adjudication.  Among his conclusions he states that a Bill of Rights "is supposed to remove arbitrariness, not only of legislation but also of adjudication." 

    

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bibliography

Barker 2005 ALJ

Barker I "Judicial Activism in Australia: A perspective" 2005 79 Australian Law Journal 783-794

Grayling The Heart of Things

Grayling AC The Heart of Things (Orion London 2006)

Hayek The Road to Serfdom

FA Hayek The Road to Serfdom (Routledge London 1944)

Megarry 1980 Austr LJ

Megarry R "Temptations of the Bench" 1980 Australian Law Journal 61-67

Orwell Politics and the English Language

Orwell G Politics and the English Language (Horizon London 1946)

Posner 2005 Harv LR

Posner R "A Political Court" 2005 (119) Harvard Law Review 31-102

Venter 2005 ZaöRV

Venter F "The Politics of Constitutional Adjudication" 2005 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 129-166

Vila-Matas Bartleby & Co

Vila-Matas E Bartleby & Co (New Directions Barcelona 2004)

Register of legislation

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 200 of 1993

Register of court cases

A v Home Secretary [2005] 2 AC 68 par [41]

Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2006] UKHL 44

K v Minister of Safety and Security 2005 (3) SA 179 (SCA); 2005 (9) BCLR 835 (CC)

Merck & Co Inc v Generics (UK) Ltd [2003] EWHC 2842 (Pat)

Phoebus Apollo Aviation CC v Minister of Safety and Security 2002 (5) SA 475 (SCA); 2003 (2) SA 34 (CC)

Rail Commuters Action Group v Transnet t/a Metrorail 2005 (2) SA 359 (CC) Reynolds v Times Newspapers Ltd [1999] UKHL 45

Published

26-06-2017

How to Cite

Harms, L. T. (2017). Judging Under a Bill of Rights. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 12(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i3a2732

Issue

Section

Orationes

Most read articles by the same author(s)