Greening the Judiciary

Authors

  • M Kidd University of KwaZulu-Natal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2006/v9i3a2826

Abstract

This note considers the performance of the South African courts in deciding environmental cases and suggests that, notwithstanding some good decisions, there are still too many decisions where the courts are not applying relevant legislative provisions or misinterpreting the law. It is suggested that the future acceptable performance of the courts not only rests on correct interpretation and application of the legislation, but also increased familiarity by judges with the technical environmental context within which the cases are situated. The role of legal practitioners in achieving this is also highlighted.

    ScienceOpen_Log0478.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bibliography

Kidd 2001 SAJELP

Kidd M ―The Constitutional Court’s Dilution of NEMA: Minister of Public

Works and Others v Kyalami Ridge Environmental Association and

Another" 2001 South African Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 119127

Register of legislation

Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act 45 of 1965

Environment Conservation Act 73 of 1989

National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998

Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000

Register of cases

All the Best Trading CC t/a Parkville Motors and Others v SN Nayagar Property Development and Construction CC and Others 2005 3 SA 396 (T)

Bareki NO and Another v Gencor Ltd and Others 2006 1 SA 432 (T)

Bato Star Fishing (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism and Others 2004 (4) SA 490 (CC)

BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd v MEC for Agriculture, Conservation, Environment and Land Affairs 2004 5 SA 124 (T)

Capital Park Motors CC and Another v Shell South Africa Marketing (Pty) Ltd Unreported case no 3016/05 (T)

Director: Mineral Development, Gauteng Region and Sasol Mining (Pty) Ltd v

Save the Vaal Environment and Others 199 2 SA 709 (SCA)

Earthlife Africa (Cape Town) v Director-General: Department of Environmental

Affairs and Tourism and Another 2005 3 SA 156 (C)

Hichange Investments (Pty) Ltd v Cape Produce Co (Pty) Ltd t/a Pelts Products and others 2004 2 SA 393 (E)

Lloyd and Others v The Premier, Eastern Cape Province and Others

Unreported case no 333/2004 (E)

MEC for Agriculture, Conservation, Environment and Land Affairs v Sasol Oil

(Pty) Ltd and Another Unreported case no 368/04 (SCA)

Merebank Environmental Action Committee v Executive Member of KwaZulu-

Natal Council for Agricultural and Environmental Affairs and others

Unreported case no 2691/01 D

Minister of Public Works and Others v Kyalami Ridge Environmental

Association and Another 2001 3 SA 1151 (CC)

Rapanos v United States 547 US (2006)

Sasol Oil (Pty) Ltd and Another v Metcalfe NO 2004 5 SA 161 (W)

South Durban Community Environmental Alliance v Head of Department:

Department of Agriculture and Environmental Affairs, KwaZulu-Natal and Others 2003 6 SA 631 (D)

Published

05-07-2017

How to Cite

Kidd, M. (2017). Greening the Judiciary. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 9(3), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2006/v9i3a2826

Issue

Section

Articles