Interpreting socio-economic rights - transforming South African society

Authors

  • Linda Jansen van Rensburg North West University(Potchefstroom Campus)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2003/v6i2a2874

Abstract

Honourable Justices, Ladies and Gentlemen, before I embark on my paper I would like to quote the following words of Archbishop Desmond Tutu1 who describes human rights as "God-given, there simply and solely because we are human beings".  He further notes that: 

they were universal – everyone, just everyone whoever they might be, whether rich or poor, learned or ignorant, beautiful or ugly, black or white, man or woman, by the fact of being a human being had these rights. …. As a Christian I would add that each person was of infinite value because everyone had been created in the image of God.  Each one was a God carrier and to treat any such person as if they were less than this was blasphemous, a spitting in the face of God.2 

Human Rights and the continuous transformation thereof in a Bill of fundamental enforceable rights have changed the face of South African society forever.  These rights guarantee each citizen equality, freedom and human dignity irrespective of race, colour, sex and the fact that they may be rich or poor.  The Constitution contains a Bill of Rights that addresses both civil and political rights as well as socio-economic rights.  Socio-economic rights in laymen's terms are rights placing an obligation on the state to act positively in favor of its citizens. These rights are also known as second generation -, welfare – or (and) red rights. They are specifically aimed at realizing the rights to access to housing, health-care, sufficient food and water, and social security of those in need.  

 

Google_Scholar_180.png    ScienceOpen_Log058.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Chaskalson A "Third Bram Fischer Memorial Lecture: Human Dignity as a Foundational Value of Our Constitutional Order" 2000 SAJHR 193–205.

Daniel Y et al The Universal Declaration: of Human Rights Fifty Years and Beyond (New York 1999).

De Vos P "Grootboom, the right of access to housing and substantive equality as contextual fairness" 2001 SAJHR 258 – 276.

De Waal J, Currie I en Erasmus G The Bill of Rights Handbook (Kenwyn 2001).

Jansen van Rensburg L "Die beregtiging van die fundamentele reg op toegang tot sosiale sekerheid" [The adjudication of the fundamental right to access to social security] LL D-Thesis (RAU Johannesburg 2000).

Jansen van Rensburg L and Olivier MP "The Role and Influence of International Human Rights Instruments on South African Poverty Law" 2001 Law and Poverty IV - Moving towards International Poverty Law? Onati, Spain (to be published in Onati Proceedings by The Onati International Institute for the Sociology of Law.

Leckie S "Another step towards indivisibility: identifying the key features of the violations of economic, social and cultural rights" 1998 Human Rights Quarterly 81-124.

Ngwena "Aids in Africa: Access to health care as a human right" 2000 SAPL 1-25.

Pellonpää M Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Macdonald RStJ, Matscher F en Petzold H (red) The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Dortrecht 1993) 855-874.

Scheinin M Economic and Social Rights as Legal Rights in Eide A, Krause C en Rosas A (red) Economic, Social and Cultural Rights A Textbook (Dordrecht 1995) 41-62.

Van der Walt AJ "Tentative Urgency: sensitivity for the paradoxes of stability and change in social transformation decisions of the Constitutional Court" 2001 SAPL 1–27.

Soobramoney v Minister of Health (KwaZulu-Natal) 1997 12 BCLR 1696 (CC)

Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others v Grootboom and Others 2000 11 BCLR 1169 (CC).

Minister of Health and others v Treatment Action Campaign and others CCT8/02 (5 July 2002).

Published

10-07-2017

Issue

Section

Special Edition: Socio-Economic Issues

How to Cite

van Rensburg, L. J. (2017). Interpreting socio-economic rights - transforming South African society. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 6(2), 54-69. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2003/v6i2a2874