Application of Section 30 of the Restitution of Land Rights Act in the Courts: Some Guidelines




Evidence, restitution of land, oral history


In terms of section 30 of the Restitution of Land Rights Act, the court is allowed to "admit any evidence, including oral evidence, which it considers relevant and cogent to the matter being heard by it, whether or not such evidence would be admissible in any other court of law". This means that the normal rules of evidence can be relaxed in the case of restitution claims. This articles analyses the way in which courts have dealt with the section, with a specific focus on oral histories. The paper also makes a few suggestions as to how courts can better grapple with the question in the future, to ensure that a strict adherence to the rules of evidence does not preclude justice in the context of land restitution claims.


Google_Scholar_1204.png    ScienceOpen_Log03434.png


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...



Borrows 2001 Osgoode Hall LJ

Borrows J "Listening for a Change: The Courts and Oral Tradition" 2001 Osgoode Hall LJ 1-38

Denzin Research Act

Denzin NK The Research Act: A Theoretical Orientation to Sociological Methods (McGraw-Hill New York 1978)

Denzin 2012 J Mix Methods Res

Denzin NK Triangulation 2.0 2012 (Apr) J Mix Methods Res 80-88

Errante 2000 Educational Researcher

Errante A "But Sometimes You're not Part of the Story: Oral Histories and Ways of Remembering and Telling" 2000 Educational Researcher 16-27

Foster and Grove 1993 U Brit Colum L Rev

Foster H and Grove A "Looking behind the Masks: A Land Claims Discussion Paper for Researchers, Lawyers and their Employers" 1993 U Brit Colum L Rev 213-255

Gover and Macaulay 1996 Sask L Rev

Gover BJ and Macaulay ML "Snow Houses Leave no Ruins: Unique Evidence Issues in Aboriginal and Treaty Rights Cases" 1996 Sask L Rev 47-89

Jick 1979 Admin Sci Q

Jick TD "Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action" 1979 Admin Sci Q 602-611

Nedelsky "Judgment, Diversity, and Relational Autonomy"

Nedelsky J "Judgment, Diversity, and Relational Autonomy" in Beiner R and Nedelsky J (eds) Judgement, Imagination and Politics: Themes from Kant and Arendt (Rowman & Littlefield Lanham Md 2001) 103-120

Pienaar Land Reform

Pienaar JM Land Reform (Juta Cape Town 2014)

Schmidt and Rademeyer Law of Evidence

Schmidt C and Rademeyer H Law of Evidence (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 2003)

Tribe 1974 Harv L Rev

Tribe LH "Triangulating Hearsay" 1974 Harv L Rev 957-974

Wicomb "Limits of the Law"

Wicomb W "The Limits of the Law: The Struggles of the Traditional Fishers of Hobeni Village" in Rodríguez

Garavito CA (ed) Human Rights in Minefields: Extractive Economies, Environmental Conflicts, and Social Justice in the Global South (Dejusticia Bogotá DC 2015) ch 2

Case law

Alexkor Ltd v Richtersveld Community 2004 5 SA 460 (CC)

Delgamuukw v British Coumbia 1997 3 SCR 1010

Department of Land Affairs v Goedgelegen Tropical Fruits (Pty) Ltd 2007 6 SA 199 (CC)

Kranspoort Community Re: Farm Kranspoort 48 LS 1999 ZALCC 67 (10 December 1999)

Minister of Land Affairs of the Republic of South Africa v Slamdien 1999 ZALCC 6 (10 February 1999)

Prinsloo v Ndebele-Ndzundza Community 2005 6 SA 144 (SCA)

R v Van der Peet 1996 2 SCR 507

Richtersveld Community v Alexkor Ltd 2001 3 SA 1293 (LCC)

Richtersveld Community v Alexkor Ltd 2003 6 BCLR 583 (SCA)

Salem Community v Government of the Republic of South Africa 2015 2 All SA 58 (LCC)

Salem Party Club v Salem Community 2017 1 All SA 712 (SCA)

Stellenbosch Farmers' Winery Group Ltd v Martell & Cie SA 2002 ZASCA 98 (6 September 2002)


Law of Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988

Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994

Internet sources

Ndebele 2012

Ndebele NS 2012 Mind, Spirit, and Imagination: Inaugural Address as Chancellor of the University of Johannesburg accessed 12 August 2017



How to Cite

Du Plessis, E. (2017). Application of Section 30 of the Restitution of Land Rights Act in the Courts: Some Guidelines. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 20, 1–24.



Special Edition: Engaging with Customary Law

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.