Discovering the Value of Liberty in Intellectual Property Adjudication: A Methodological Critique of the Reasoning in Discovery Ltd v Liberty Group Ltd 2020 4 SA 160 (GJ)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a10703

Keywords:

intellectual property, trademark, unlawful competition, constitutional methodology, constitutional interpretation, transformative adjudication

Abstract

This article discusses the recent decision in Discovery Ltd v Liberty Group Ltd 2020 4 SA 160 (GJ), which concerned a claim of trade mark infringement in terms of sections 34(1)(a) and 34(1(c) of the Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993 and unlawful competition on a developed reading of the common law. This article argues that the court arrived at the correct conclusion by the incorrect means and failed to adequately construe the array of constitutional interests and considerations that pertained to the matter on the facts. Further, the lack of clarity on the appropriate constitutional port of entry for the judicial enquiry unnecessarily leaves future courts guessing regarding the correct methodology to employ in cases where intellectual property rights are asserted in opposition to constitutional rights and interests. It is argued that the transformative impetus of section 39(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, as well as numerous substantive constitutional provisions are undermined when courts neglect to anchor judicial reasoning in the constitutional context and merely apply a constitutional veneer to whatever outcome has already been reached. Accordingly, we argue that courts are under a general obligation to root all adjudication in constitutional norms and method, which, we submit, secures a thicker concept of the value of liberty than has been produced in this decision.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bibliography

Literature

Currie I and De Waal J The Bill of Rights Handbook 6th ed (Juta Cape Town 2013)

Danay RJ and Foster J "The Sins of the Media: The SABC Decision and the Erosion of Free Press Rights" 2006 SAJHR 563-596

Davis DM "How Many Positivist Legal Philosophers Can be Made to Dance on the Head of a Pin? A Reply to Professor Fagan" 2012 SALJ 59-72

Davis DM "The Importance of Reading – A Rebutter to the Jurisprudence of Anton Fagan" 2013 SALJ 52-59

Du Bois M "Intellectual Property as a Constitutional Property Right: The South African Approach" 2012 SA Merc LJ 177-193

Dworkin R Law's Empire (Belnap Press Cambridge 1986)

Fagan A "The Secondary Role of the Spirit, Purport and Objects of the Bill of Rights in the Common Law's Development" 2010 SALJ 611-627

Fagan A "A Straw Man, Three Red Herrings, and a Closet Rule-Worshipper – A Rejoinder to Davis JP" 2012 SALJ 788-798

Illsley T "How to Tell a Take-Off from a Rip-Off: Trade Mark Parody and Freedom of Expression in South Africa" 2006 SAJHR 119-125

Mills L "The Regulations Relating to Foodstuffs for Infants and Young Children (R991): A Formula for the Promotion of Breastfeeding or Censorship of Commercial Speech?" 2014 PELJ 252-295

Neethling J "The Law of Unlawful Competition (Misappropriation of a Rival's Product) and its Constitutional Compatibility: Phumelela Gaming and Leisure Ltd v Gründlingh" 2008 SA Merc LJ 414-421

Neethling J Unlawful Competition 2nd ed (LexisNexis Durban 2008)

Nel S "Freedom of Commercial Speech: Evaluating the Ban on Advertising of Legal Products such as Tobacco" 2004 CILSA 65-83

Raz J Ethics in the Public Domain: Essays in the Morality of Law and Politics (Oxford University Press New York 1994)

Underkuffler L The Idea of Property: Its Meaning and Power (Oxford University Press New York 2003)

Van der Walt AJ "The Modest Systemic Status of Property Rights" 2014 Journal of Law, Property, and Society 15-106

Case law

Abbott Laboratories v UAP Crop Care (Pty) Ltd 1999 3 SA 624 (C)

Abdulhay M Mayet Group (Pty) Ltd v Renasa Insurance Co Ltd 1999 4 SA 1039 (TPD)

Affordable Medicines Trust v Minister of Health 2006 3 SA 247 (CC)

Atlas Organic Fertilizers (Pty) Ltd v Pikkewyn Ghwano (Pty) Ltd 1981 2 SA 173 (T)

Barkhuizen v Napier 2007 5 SA 323 (CC)

Basson v Chilwan 1993 3 SA 742 (A)

British American Tobacco South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Health 2012 3 All SA 593 (SCA)

City of Cape Town v Ad Outpost (Pty) Ltd 2000 2 SA 733 (C)

Commercial Auto Glass (Pty) Ltd v Bayerische Motoren Werke AktienGesellschaft 2007 6 SA 637 (SCA)

Country Cloud Trading CC v MEC, Department of Infrastructure Development, Gauteng 2015 1 SA 1 (CC)

CTP Ltd v Argus Holdings Ltd 1995 4 SA 774 (A)

De Reuck v Director of Public Prosecutions (Witwatersrand Local Division) 2004 1 SA 406 (CC)

Discovery Ltd v Liberty Group Ltd 2020 4 SA 160 (GJ)

Giddey v JC Barnard 2007 5 SA 525 (CC)

Independent Outdoor Media v City of Cape Town 2013 2 All SA 679 (SCA)

Investigating Directorate: Serious Economic Offences v Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd In re: Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd v Smit 2001 1 SA 545 (CC)

Islamic Unity Convention v Independent Broadcasting Authority 2002 4 SA 294 (CC)

Khumalo v Holomisa 2002 5 SA 401 (CC)

Laugh It Off Promotions CC v South African Breweries International 2004 4 All SA 151 (SCA)

Laugh It Off Promotions CC v South African Breweries International (Finance) BV t/a Sabmark International 2006 1 SA 144 (CC)

Loureiro v Mvula Quality Protection (Pty) Ltd 2014 3 SA 394 (CC)

Magna Alloys & Research (SA) (Pty) Ltd v Ellis 1984 4 SA 874 (A)

Masstores (Pty) Limited v Pick n Pay Retailers (Pty) Limited 2017 1 SA 613 (CC)

Midi Television (Pty) Ltd v Director of Public Prosecutions (Western Cape) 2007 3 All SA 318 (SCA)

Motherland Design Agency (Pty) Ltd v Whitefernfranc (Pty) Ltd 2020 ZALCJHB 145 (31 August 2020)

North Central Local Council and South Central Local Council v Roundabout Outdoor (Pty) Ltd 2002 2 SA 625 (D)

Paulsen v Slip Knot Investments 777 (Pty) Limited 2015 3 SA 479 (CC)

Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association of South Africa: In re Ex Parte President of the Republic of South Africa 2000 2 SA 674 (CC)

Phumelela Gaming and Leisure Limited v Gründlingh 2007 6 SA 350 (CC)

Prestonettes Inc v Coty 1924 263 US 359

Reddy v Siemens Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd 2007 2 SA 486 (SCA)

S v Mamabolo 2001 3 SA 409 (CC)

South African Broadcasting Corporation Ltd v Downer 2007 1 All SA 384 (SCA)

South African Broadcasting Corporation Ltd v National Director of Public Prosecutions 2007 1 SA 523 (CC)

South African Diamond Producers Organisation v Minister of Minerals and Energy 2017 6 SA 331 (CC)

Strike Productions (Pty) Ltd v Bon View Trading 131 (Pty) Ltd 2011 ZAGPJHC 1 (20 January 2011)

Verimark (Pty) Ltd v Bayerische Motoren Werke AktienGesellschaft: Bayerische Motoren Werke AktienGesellschaft v Verimark (Pty) Ltd 2007 6 SA 263 (SCA)

Legislation

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Trade Marks Act 194 of 1993

Published

2021-09-14

How to Cite

Shay, R., & Moleya, N. I. (2021). Discovering the Value of Liberty in Intellectual Property Adjudication: A Methodological Critique of the Reasoning in Discovery Ltd v Liberty Group Ltd 2020 4 SA 160 (GJ): . Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 24, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a10703

Issue

Section

Case Notes