Forfeiture to the State: Using Grammar to Interpret Section 35 of the Criminal Procedure Act
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a19242Keywords:
cognitive linguistics, forfeiture, grammar, instrument, language and law, Criminal Procedure Act, statutory interpretation, thematic rolesAbstract
Section 35(1)(a) of South Africa's Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 allows a court of law to declare items forfeited to the state if they were used as weapons or instruments in aid of committing an offence. However, it is not always clear what qualifies as potential instruments of crime or what the proximity of the instrument is to the offence. For the purpose of statutory interpretation, this contribution identifies a grammatical construction frequently present in abstractions of offence descriptions as a means to identify an instrument and its direct involvement in an offence. It takes the form of the construction, "X does Y to Z with A", which contains the instrument prepositional phrase "with A". Read with other thematic roles like "Agent" and "Patient", the statutory interpreter should be able to determine both the relevant instrument role and its potential to affect a change in the object of a sentence, suggesting direct involvement. To better understand the grammar, this contribution modestly explains the Cognitive Linguistic approach to argument structure and thematic roles and briefly summarises Ronald Langacker's "action chain" model. The grammatical construction is then applied to examples taken from South African and Dutch case law dealing with forfeiture to illustrate its potential as a tool for interpretation.
Downloads
References
Bibliography
Literature
Carney TR "Sintaktiese Uitleg van die BTW-Wet Bepaal Wanneer Goud Teen die Nulkoers Verkoop Mag Word. 'n Besinning van 'n Positiewe Taalkundige Benadering. Lueven Metals (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service [2022] ZAGPPHC 325" 2022 LitNet Akademies 834-846
Carney TR Linguistics for Legal Interpretation (UJ Press Johannesburg 2023)
Carney TR "Opmerkings oor die Woord Poes as Gekwalifiseerde Belediging in 'n Interdikoortreding. S v Lewis (54/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 59" 2024 LitNet Akademies 502-515
Evans V Cognitive Linguistics. A Complete Guide 2nd ed (Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh 2019)
Fromkin V, Rodman R and Hyams N An Introduction to Language 11th ed (Cengage Boston 2019)
Goldberg AE A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure (University of Chicago Press Chicago 1995)
Hamman A and Koen R "Carpe Pecuniam: Criminal Forfeiture of Tainted Legal Fees" 2020 De Jure 19-35
Kaplan JP Linguistics and Law (Routledge New York 2020)
Klopper RM and Van den Bergh NJC "Die Toepasbaarheid van die Moderne Linguistiese Benadering op Wetsuitleg" 1980 TRW 1-14
Kruger A Hiemstra's Criminal Procedure (LexisNexis Johannesburg 2024)
Langacker RW Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar (Mouton de Gruyter New York 2002)
Matthews PH Concise Dictionary of Linguistics 3rd ed (Oxford University Press Oxford 2014)
Radden G and Dirven R Cognitive English Grammar (John Benjamins Amsterdam 2007)
Saeed JI Semantics 3rd ed (Wiley-Blackwell Oxford 2009)
Taylor JR Cognitive Grammar (Oxford University Press Oxford 2002)
Van den Bergh NJC "Die Gebruikswaarde van Bepaalde Struktuuranalitiese Metodes vir Wetsuitleg" 1981 TSAR 136-149
Viljoen-Massyn E Die Forensiese Linguis en Regspleging: 'n Ondersoek na Handelsmerkdispute in Suid-Afrika (PhD thesis North-West University 2018)
Case law
Europe
ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2019:3713
ECLI:NL:GHARL:2022:8980
ECLI:NL:HR:2012:BX9542
ECLI:NL:HR:2023:614
ECLI:NL:PHR:2009:BJ6965
ECLI:NL:PHR:2010:BN0030
ECLI:NL:PHR:2015:2567
ECLI:NL:PHR:2023:270
South Africa
Attorney-General (Transvaal) v Steenkamp 1954 1 SA 351 (A)
Bhubezi Boerdery (Edms) Bpk v Minister of Justice 1965 1 SA 218 (T)
Chaplin v Fine (A115/2019) [2020] ZAWCHC 139 (21 July 2020)
Cool Ideas 1186 CC v Hubbard (CCT99/13) [2014] ZACC 16 (5 June 2014)
Ex Parte die Minister van Justisie 1968 1 SA 380 (A)
Forestry South Africa v Minister of Human Settlements, Water and Sanitation (19684/2019) [2021] ZAWCHC 164 (15 November 2023)
Lueven Metals (Pty) Ltd v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (31356/2021) 2022 ZAGPPHC 325 (19 May 2022)
Manyi v Dhlamini (36077/13) [2018] ZAGPPHC 563 (18 July 2018)
Media 24 Books (Pty) Ltd v Oxford University Press Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd (23368/12) [2015] ZAWCHC 68 (21 April 2015)
Media 24 Bpk v Ramsay, Son and Parker (Edms) Bpk 2006 5 SA 204 (C)
Namibian Association of Medical Aid Funds v Namibian Competition Commission (A348/2014) [2016] NAHCMD 80 (17 March 2016)
Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality (920/2010) [2012] ZASCA 13 (15 March 2012)
National Director of Public Prosecutions v RO Properties (Pty) Ltd (260/03) [2004] ZASCA 36 (13 May 2004)
Petersen v Minister of Police 2022 1 SACR 333 (WCC)
R v Corlett 1957 4 SA 1 (T)
R v Dawood 1947 2 SA 1097 (T)
R v Green 1941 WLD 209
R v Hurter 1948 3 SA 1180 (E)
R v Lourens 1949 1 SA 671 (N)
R v Makhubu 1957 4 SA 256 (C)
R v Moloto 1961 3 SA 496 (T)
R v Oosthuizen 1938 2 PHH 273
R v Swanepoel and Van Wyk 1930 TPD 214
Restivox (Pty) Ltd t/a Crazy Slots v Chairperson of the Free State Gambling, Liquor and Tourism Authority (6271/2018) [2020] ZAFSHC 80 (13 March 2020)
S v Bissessue 1980 1 SA 228 (N)
S v Cocklin 1971 3 SA 776 (A)
S v Hlangothe 1979 4 SA 199 (B)
S v Hoho 2009 1 SACR 276 (SCA)
S v Khan 1965 3 SA 783 (A)
S v Knutzen 1972 2 SA 488 (E)
S v Lewis (54/2024) [2024] ZAWCHC 59 (26 February 2024)
S v Matsane 1978 4 SA 66 (T)
S v Muharukua (CR 28/2020) [2020] NAHCNLD 65 (8 June 2020)
S v Nkepane 1973 1 SA 331 (O)
S v Noosi 1975 3 SA 521 (O)
S v Okah (CCT 315/16; CCT 193/17) [2018] ZACC 3 (23 February 2018)
S v Smith 1984 1 SA 583 (A)
S v Vermeulen 1995 2 SACR 439 (T)
S v Willemse 1966 3 SA 383 (O)
Smartpurse Solutions (Pty) Ltd v Firstrand Bank Ltd (35882/2022) [2024] ZAGPJHC 961 (26 September 2024)
UASA Union v Anglo American Platinum Limited (J400/23) [2024] ZALCJHB 199 (10 May 2024)
University of Johannesburg v Auckland Park Theological Seminary (CCT70/20) [2021] ZACC 13 (11 June 2021)
United States of America
Bailey v United States 516 US 137 (1995)
Smith v United States 508 US 223 (1993)
Legislation
Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977
Criminal Procedure Act 56 of 1955
Diamonds Act 56 of 1986
Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act 140 of 1992
Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Terrence R Carney

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.