Investigating the Reasons behind the Increase in Medical Negligence Claims
Keywords:medical negligence, patient autonomy, increase in medical negligence claims, patient-centred legislation, patient
Medical negligence claims have increased significantly over the last number of years. The trend is still ongoing and concerns have been raised about the impact of this increase on the medical industry. Medical practitioners are increasingly practising defensive medicine in an attempt to limit the risk of medical negligence claims being instituted against them. Medical negligence claims are instituted for a number of reasons, such as lack of communication between doctor and patient. Birth-related claims are instituted most frequently.
This contribution investigates the possible reasons behind the increase in both the value and the number of medical negligence claims. The focus falls especially on the increase in the number of claims. The contribution considers a decline in the level of professionalism amongst medical practitioners as one reason behind the increase, followed by the possibility that lawyers may be responsible for the increase in claims. In addition, it is pointed out that patients are simply becoming more aware of their rights.
The contribution further focuses on patient-centred legislation and pronouncements by courts that bolster patient autonomy and place patients in an ever stronger position to enforce their rights. Relevant provisions of the Constitution, the National Health Act, the Consumer Protection Act and the Children's Act are singled out for discussion, followed by a brief discussion of case law in line with themes identified in the aforementioned legislation.
The contribution submits that the increase in medical negligence claims should not come as a surprise, considering the high regard that our courts had for patient autonomy even before the enactment of the 1996 Constitution. The Constitution and the above legislation now contain specific rights that patients, including child patients, can enforce. The best interests of the child principle embodied in both the Constitution and the Children's Act is very prominent in the medical context and impacts on the medical practitioner's responsibilities towards a child patient. The Constitutional Court relied on this principle in its recent judgment to the effect that claims for wrongful life (brought by a child with a disability), may possibly have a place in our law. If the claim for wrongful life is eventually confirmed, we will no doubt see a further increase in medical negligence claims.
Patient-centred legislation and pronouncements by our courts that constantly reiterate the importance of patient rights arguably create very fertile ground for medical negligence claims. These are, as the contribution concludes, merely contributing factors to the phenomenon under investigation.
Ackerknecht Short History of Medicine
Ackerknecht EH A Short History of Medicine (Ronald Press New York 1968)
Amundsen "Liability of the Physician"
Amundsen DW "The Liability of the Physician in Roman Law" in Karplus H (ed) International Symposium on Society, Medicine and Law, Jerusalem, March 1972 (Elsevier Amsterdam 1973) 17-31
Bateman 2011 SAMJ
Bateman C "Medical Negligence Pay-outs Soar by 132% - Subs Follow" 2011 SAMJ 216-218
Berkhouwer and Vorstman Aansprakelijkheid van de Medicus
Berkhouwer C and Vorstman LD De Aansprakelijkheid van de Medicus voor Beroepsfouten door Hem en Zijn Helpers Gemaakt (Tjeenk Willink Zwolle 1950)
Carstens 2004 Fundamina
Carstens PA "Regshistoriese Perspektiewe oor die Oorsprong en Ontwikkeling van Mediese Nalatigheid" 2004
Coetzee 2003 CILSA
Coetzee LC "A Critical Evaluation of the Therapeutic Privilege in Medical Law: Some Comparative Perspectives" 2003 CILSA 268-288
Coetzee and Carstens 2013 "Medical Malpractice"
Coetzee LC and Carstens P "Medical Malpractice and Compensation in South Africa" in Oliphant K and Wright KW (eds) Tort and Insurance Law Vol 32 (Water & De Gruyter Berlin 2013) 397-437
Hyman 2011 Dispute Resolution Journal
Hyman CS "Mediation and Medical Malpractice: Why Plaintiffs, Physicians and Hospitals Should Be at the Table" 2011 Dispute Resolution Journal 32-37
Jordaan and Ismail 2014 Without Prejudice
Jordaan E and Ismail R "Appeal Court Sets the Record Straight" 2014 (Nov) Without Prejudice 24-25
Malherbe 2013 SAMJ
Malherbe J "Counting the Cost: The Consequences of Increased Medical Malpractice Litigation in South Africa" 2013 SAMJ 83-84
Moore and Slabbert 2013 SAJBL
Moore W and Slabbert MN "Medical Information Therapy and Medical Malpractice Litigation in South Africa" 2013 SAJBL 60-63
Oosthuizen and Carstens 2015 THRHR
Oosthuizen WT and Carstens PA "Medical Malpractice: The Extent, Consequences and Causes of the Problem" 2015 THRHR 269-284
Patel 2008 SAJBL
Patel B "Medical Negligence and Res Ipsa Loquitur in South Africa" 2008 SAJBL 57-60
Pepper and Slabbert 2011 SAJBL
Pepper MS and Nothling Slabbert M "Is South Africa on the Verge of a Medical Malpractice Litigation Storm?" 2011 SAJBL 29-35
Robinson 2003 PELJ
Robinson JA "Children's Rights in the South African Constitution" 2003 PELJ 1-16
Van den Heever 2005 SAMJ
Van den Heever P "Pleading the Defence of Therapeutic Privilege" 2005 SAMJ 420-421
Van Oosten 1995 De Jure
Van Oosten FFW "Castell v De Greef and the Doctrine of Informed Consent: Medical Paternalism Ousted in Favour of Patient Autonomy" 1995 De Jure 164-179
Zietsman 2007 Akroterion
Zietsman JC "Medical Negligence in Ancient Legal Codes" 2007 Akroterion 87-98
Administrator Natal v Edouard 1990 3 SA 581 (A)
Afrox Healthcare Bpk v Strydom 2002 4 All SA 125 (SCA)
Bhe v Magistrate, Khayelitsha 2005 1 SA 580 (CC)
Castell v De Greef 1994 4 SA 482 (C)
Friedman v Glicksman 1996 1 SA 1134 (W)
Goliath v Member of the Executive Council for Health, Eastern Cape 2015 2 SA 97 (SCA)
H v Fetal Assessment Centre 2015 2 SA 193 (CC)
Jansen van Vuuren v Kruger 1993 2 All SA 619 (A)
Louwrens v Oldwage 2006 1 All SA 197 (SCA)
McDonald v Wroe 2006 3 All SA 565 (C)
Michael v Linksfield Park Clinic (Pty) Ltd 2002 1 All SA 384 (SCA)
Mukheiber v Raath 1999 3 SA 1065 (SCA)
NM v Smith 2007 5 SA 250 (CC)
Oldwage v Louwrens 2004 1 All SA 532 (C)
Pearce v Fine 1987 3 SA Practice Management 14D
Richter v Estate Hamman 1976 3 SA 226 (C)
Silver v Premier of the Gauteng Provincial Government 1998 4 SA 258 (W)
Stewart v Botha 2007 6 SA 247 (C)
Stewart v Botha 2008 6 SA 310 (SCA)
Teddy Bear Clinic for Abused Children v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development 2014 2 SA 168 (CC)
Tshabalala-Msimang v Makhanya 2008 1 All SA 509 (W)
Van Wyk v Lewis 1924 AD 438
Child Care Act 74 of 1983 (repealed)
Children's Act 38 of 2005
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
Mental Health Care Act 17 of 2002
National Health Act 61 of 2003
Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013
Anonymous 2012 Doctors Lose Patience as Suits Spike http://www.citypress.co.za/news/doctors-lose-patience-as-suits-spike-20120707/ accessed 18 February 2015
Anon 2014 http://www.health24.com/News/SA-hospitals-face-billions-in legal-claims-20140117
Anonymous 2014 Gauteng Hospitals Face Billions in Legal Claims http://www.health24.com/News/SA-hospitals-face-billions-in-legal-claims-20140117 accessed 16 February 2015
Anonymous 2015 Negligence Claims Affect Healthcare, Hike Doctors' Fees http://www.citypress.co.za/news/motsoaledi-negligence-claims-affect-healthcare-hike-doctors-fees/ accessed 8 July 2015
Child K 2014 Hospital Horrors Costing SA Plenty http://www.timeslive.co.za/news/2014/01/17/hospital-horrors-costing-sa-plenty accessed 16 February 2015
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright in all material published in PER/PELJ vests in the author, provided that authors grant, by submission of their contributions, permission that their contributions may be shared and adapted without restriction. An author furthermore agrees that the same contribution may not be published elsewhere without the written permission of the editor.
Anyone gaining access, electronically or otherwise, to a contribution to PER, may quote from such contribution, use the intellectual content thereof, share and adapt it, but subject to the following conditions:
you must give appropriate credit, provide a link and indicate if changes were made; and
the copyright of the author(s) may not be infringed in any way.