Forfeiture of Patrimonial Benefits and the Dissolution of Marriage through Death: Monyepao v Ledwaba (1368/18) [2020] ZASCA 54 (27 May 2020)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2022/v25i0a11707

Keywords:

Forfeiture of patrimonial benefits, Customary marriages, deceased estate, intestate succession

Abstract

Section 9 of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 provides for the forfeiture of patrimonial benefits when a decree of divorce is granted on the ground of the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage. This case note discusses the possibility of an order for forfeiture of patrimonial benefits when a marriage dissolves after death under certain circumstances. It follows on the Supreme Court of Appeal decision in Monyepao v Ledwaba (1368/18) [2020] ZASCA 54 (27 May 2020). The respondent, the estranged first surviving spouse, and the deceased were married in terms of customary law in 2007. In 2008 the deceased left the matrimonial home. In 2009 the respondent entered into a civil marriage with another person. In 2010 the deceased also entered into a customary marriage with the appellant, the second surviving spouse. In 2012 the deceased died. Following his death, both the appellant and the respondent, as surviving spouses, were appointed co-executors of the deceased estate. The appellant sought an order directing the Master to withdraw the appointment as co-executor of the first surviving spouse on the ground that she had renounced her earlier customary marriage to the deceased when she entered into a civil marriage with another person. Alternatively, she sought an order in terms of section 9 of the Divorce Act that the first surviving spouse forfeit patrimonial benefits in favour of the deceased estate. The High Court, Polokwane granted the order. However, on appeal the full bench, Polokwane overturned the decision of the court a quo. The appellant took the decision of the full bench on appeal to the SCA. The SCA dismissed her appeal and upheld the decision of the full bench on the ground that a forfeiture order can be made only during divorce proceedings and it may be brought only by a party to the marriage and not by a third party. This note turns on this aspect of the decision. It will be argued that a forfeiture order should be available when a marriage is dissolved through death. It will also argue that a second spouse is a party to a customary marriageSection 9 of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 provides for the forfeiture of patrimonial benefits when a decree of divorce is granted on the ground of the irretrievable breakdown of a marriage. This case note discusses the possibility of an order for forfeiture of patrimonial benefits when a marriage dissolves after death under certain circumstances. It follows on the Supreme Court of Appeal decision in Monyepao v Ledwaba (1368/18) [2020] ZASCA 54 (27 May 2020). The respondent, the estranged first surviving spouse, and the deceased were married in terms of customary law in 2007. In 2008 the deceased left the matrimonial home. In 2009 the respondent entered into a civil marriage with another person. In 2010 the deceased also entered into a customary marriage with the appellant, the second surviving spouse. In 2012 the deceased died. Following his death, both the appellant and the respondent, as surviving spouses, were appointed co-executors of the deceased estate. The appellant sought an order directing the Master to withdraw the appointment as co-executor of the first surviving spouse on the ground that she had renounced her earlier customary marriage to the deceased when she entered into a civil marriage with another person. Alternatively, she sought an order in terms of section 9 of the Divorce Act that the first surviving spouse forfeit patrimonial benefits in favour of the deceased estate. The High Court, Polokwane granted the order. However, on appeal the full bench, Polokwane overturned the decision of the court a quo.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Literature

Barrat A et al Law of Persons and the Family 2nd ed (Pearson Cape Town 2016)

Bonthuys E and Sibanda S "'Til Death Us Do Part': Thembisile v Thembisile" 2003 SALJ 784-796

Carnelley M "The Impact of the Abolition of the Third Party Delictual Claim for Adultery by the Constitutional Court in DE v RH (CCT 182/14) [2015] ZACC 18" 2016 Speculum Juris 1-14

Cronje DSP and Heaton J South African Family Law (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 1991)

De Waal MJ and Schoeman-Malan MC Law of Succession 5th ed (Juta Cape Town 2015)

Hahlo HR The Law of Husband and Wife 2nd ed (Juta Wynberg 1963)

Heaton J "The Rule that a Spouse Cannot Forfeit at Divorce What He or She has Contributed to the Marriage: An Argument for Change" 2014 SALJ 439-460

Heaton J and Kruger H South African Family Law 4th ed (LexisNexis Durban 2015)

Maithufi IP and Moloi GMB "The Need for the Protection of Rights of Partners to Invalid Marital Relationships: A Revisit of the Discarded Spouse Debate" 2005 De Jure 144-153

Marumoagae MC "The Regime of Forfeiture of Patrimonial Benefits in South Africa and a Critical Analysis of the Concept of Unduly Benefited" 2014 De Jure 85-100

Marumoagae MC "Factors Justifying Forfeiture of Patrimonial Benefits Orders: Molapo v Molapo (2013) ZAFSHC 29 14 Mar 2013" 2015 Obiter 232-242

Osman F "The Million Rand Question: Does a Civil Marriage Automatically Dissolve the Parties' Customary Marriage?" 2019 PELJ 1-25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4337

Skelton and Carnelley Family Law in South Africa (Oxford University Press Cape Town 2010)

Van Heerden B, Skelton A and Du Toit Z (eds) Family Law in South Africa 2nd ed (Oxford University Press Cape Town 2021)

West A and Bekker JC "Possible Consequences of Declaring a Civil and Customary Marriage Void" 2012 Obiter 351-359

Case law

Binda v Binda 1993 2 SA 123 (W)

C v C 2016 2 SA 227 (GP)

Ex parte Boshoff: In re Boshoff v Boshoff 1953 3 SA 237 (W)

Ex parte Meyer: In Re Meyer v Meyer 1962 2 SA 688 (N)

JW v SW 2011 1 SA 545 (GNP) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/alrr/alr029

Klerck v Klerck 1991 1 SA 265 (W)

Ledwaba v Monyepao (HCAA06-2017) [2018] ZALMPPHC 61 (25 April 2018)

Mayelane v Ngwenyama 2013 4 SA 415 (CC)

Molapo v Molapo (4411/10) [2013] ZAFSHC 29 (14 March 2013)

Monyepao v Ledwaba (1368/18) [2020] ZASCA 54 (27 May 2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00265667-8623700

Murison v Murison 1930 AD 157

Netshituka v Netshituka 2011 5 SA 453 (SCA)

Swil v Swil 1978 1 SA 790 (W) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.6115.790-d

T v R 2017 1 SA 97 (GP)

Thembisile v Thembisile 2002 2 SA 209 (T)

TM v NM 2014 4 SA 575 (SCA)

Wijker v Wijker 1993 4 SA 720 (A)

Legislation

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Divorce Act 70 of 1979

Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998

Transkei Marriage Act 21 of 1978

Published

05-10-2022

Issue

Section

Case Notes

How to Cite

Sibisi, S. (2022). Forfeiture of Patrimonial Benefits and the Dissolution of Marriage through Death: Monyepao v Ledwaba (1368/18) [2020] ZASCA 54 (27 May 2020). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 25, (Published 05 October 2022) pp 1 - 16. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2022/v25i0a11707

Similar Articles

81-90 of 824

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.