An Analysis of the Significance of Integration of the Bride in Customary Marriages and its Potential Constitutionality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15492

Keywords:

customary marriage, integration of the bride, rituals, customary law, waiver, consent, cultural group

Abstract

Firstly, this contribution opts for the words "integration of the bride" rather than "handing over of the bride" during customary marriages. It is argued that the term "handing over of the bride" is problematic because it creates the impression that a woman is being treated as property or that she is being sold to the groom's family. The integration of the bride is a significant step in the conclusion of a customary marriage. However, this does not mean that the process carries the same importance and weight for all traditional groups in South Africa. Some groups may regard a ritual performed during the integration of the bride so important that a customary marriage cannot be concluded without it. It is therefore important for courts to focus on cultural nuances and differences between various groups when determining if certain rituals can be waived. Courts recognise an intimate relationship as a valid customary marriage even when it has not complied with an important ritual regarded as significant for the conclusion of a customary marriage. The courts should rather focus on other available avenues to protect vulnerable partners from the consequences of an intimate relationship’s not being recognised as a valid customary marriage. The courts must recognise the fact that the consent of the bride-to-be is important when determining whether a marriage was concluded. This refers to the consent of the bride to perform a ritual which is part of the ceremony of the integration of the bride. So, a marriage must not be recognised as valid if the bride did not consent to it or did not consent to a ritual performed as part of concluding a customary marriage. While the constitutionality of the integration of the bride was raised in an obiter dictum in the 2019 case of Sengadi v Tsambo, the primary consideration should be the consent of the bride. Integration should not be a problem where the bride has consented to it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tshepo Aubrey Manthwa, University of South Africa

Head of Department, Department of Public, Constitutional and International Law. University of South Africa.

References

Bibliography

Literature

Allott AN "What is to be Done with African Customary Law? The Experience of Problems and Reforms in Anglophone Africa from 1950" 1984 JAL 56-71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855300005246

Bakker P "Integration of the Bride as a Requirement for Validity of a Customary Marriage: Mkabi v Minister of Home Affairs [2016] ZAGPPHC 4601" 2018 PELJ 1-18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a1737

Bakker P "Integration of the Bride and the Courts: Is Integration as a Living Customary Law Requirement Still Required?" 2022 PELJ 1-21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2022/v25i0a14012

Bekker JC "Requirements for the Validity of a Customary Marriage: Mabuza v Mbatha 2003 4 SA 218" 2004 THRHR 146-150

Bekker JC and Boonzaaier CC "Succession of Women to Traditional Leadership: Is the Judgment in Shilubana v Nwamitwa Based on Sound Legal Principles" 2009 SAPL 449-462

Bekker JC and Boonzaaier C "How Equal is Equal? An Anthropological Note on the Status of African Women in South Africa" 2007 De Jure 277-289

Bogopa D "Health and Ancestors: The Case of South Africa and Beyond" 2010 IPJP 1-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2989/IPJP.2010.10.1.8.1080

Craven M "Between Law and History: The Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 and the Logic of Free Trade" 2015 Lond Rev Int Law 31-59 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrv002

Diala AC "The Concept of Living Customary Law: A Critique" 2017 J Legal Plur 143-165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2017.1331301

Diala J and Diala A "Child Marriage, Bride Wealth and Legal Pluralism in Africa" 2017 JCLA 77-104

Diala AC and Kangwa B "Rethinking the Interface between Customary Law and Constitutionalism in Sub-Saharan Africa" 2019 De Jure 189-206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2019/v52a12

Himonga C "Determining the Content of Indigenous Law with Specific Reference to Recording of the Law: Continental Views" 2019 PELJ 1-10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a7662

Himonga C and Moore E Reform of Customary Marriage, Divorce and Succession in South Africa: Living Customary Law and Social Realities (Juta Cape Town 2014)

Himonga C and Nhlapho T (eds) African Customary Law in South Africa: Post-Apartheid and Living Law Perspectives (Oxford University Press Cape Town 2014)

Himonga C and Pope C "Mayelane v Ngwenyama and Minister of Home Affairs: A Reflection on Wider Implications" 2013 Acta Juridica 318-338

Hlophe "The KwaZulu-Natal Act on Code of Zulu Law, 6 of 19181: A Guide to Intending Spouses and Some Comments on the Custom of Lobolo" 1984 CILSA 163-171

Kaganas F and Murray C "Law, Women and the Family: The Question of Polygyny in a New South Africa" 1991 Acta Juridica 116-129

Hund J "Customary Law is What People Say It is: HLA Hart's Contribution to Legal Anthropology" 1998 Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Practice 420-433

Lehnert W "The Role of the Courts in the Conflict between African Customary Law and Human Rights" 2005 SAJHR 241-277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2005.11865135

Mailula DT "Abdication of Judicial Responsibility, Cultural Self-Determination and the Development of Customary Law: Lessons from Shilubana" 2008 SAPL 215-235

Manthwa TA "Lobolo, Consent as Requirement for the Validity of a Customary Marriage and the Proprietary Consequences of a Customary Marriage: N v D 92011/3726) [2016] ZAGPJHC 163 (5 June 2016)" 2017 Obiter 438-445

Manthwa TA "Proof of the Content of Customary Law in Light of MM v MN: A Constitutional Approach" 2017 THRHR 300-307

Manthwa TA "The Interplay between Proving Living Customary Law and Upholding the Constitution" 2019 Stell LR 464-476

Manthwa TA "A Re-interpretation of the Families' Participation in Customary Law of Marriage" 2019 THRHR 416-428

Manthwa TA "Handing Over of the Bride as a Requirement for the Validity of a Customary Marriage: C v P (1009/2016) [2017] ZAFSHC 57 (6 April 2017)" 2019 THRHR 652-662

Manthwa TA "The Relevance of Handing Over the Bride in Contemporary South Africa" 2021 THRHR 403-411

Manthwa TA "Towards a New Form of Customary Marriage and Ignorance of Precedence" 2021 TSAR 199-208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47348/TSAR/2021/i1a13

Manthwa TA "An Appraisal of the Hurdles with Ascertaining the Applicable Customary Law when Determining Conclusion of a Customary Marriage: ND v MM (18404/2018) (2020) ZAGPJHC 113 (12 May 2020)" 2022 Speculum Juris 223-232

Manthwa TA and Ntsoane L "The Space for Lobolo in the Post-Constitutional South Africa: Revisiting the Debate" 2022 THRHR 509-521

Mfecane S "Ndiyindoda" [I am a Man]: Theorising Xhosa Masculinity" 2016 Anthropology Southern Africa 204-214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2016.1208535

Moore E "Forms of Femininity at the End of a Customary Marriage" 2015 Gender and Society 1-24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243215599646

Mwambene L "The Essence Vindicated? Courts and Customary Marriages in South Africa" 2017 AHRLJ 35-54 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2017/v17n1a2

Mwambene L and Kruuse H "Form over Function: The Practical Application of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 1998 in South Africa" 2013 Acta Juridica 292-317

Mwambene L and Mgidlana RH "Should South Africa Criminalise Ukuthwala Leading to Forced Marriages and Child Marriages?" 2021 PELJ 1-27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a9423

Ndima DD "The African Law of the 21st Century in South Africa" 2003 CILSA 325-345

Ndima DD Re-imagining and Re-interpreting African Jurisprudence under the South Africa Constitution (LLD-thesis Unisa 2013)

Ngema NM "The Enforcement of the Payment of Lobolo and Its Impact on Children's Rights in South Africa" 2013 PELJ 404-425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i1a2316

Nkosi G and Van Niekerk GJ "The Unpredictable Judicial Interpretation of Section 3(1)(b) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998: Eunice Xoliswa Nengwa (2011/3726) [2016] ZAGPJHC 163 (15 June 2016)" 2018 THRHR 345-354

Ntlama N "The Dentrality of Customary Law in the Judicial Resolution of Disputes that Emanate from It: Dalisile v Mgoduka (5056/2018) [2018] ZAECMHC" 2019 Obiter 202-213

Ntlama N "The Changing Identity on Succession to Chieftaincy in the Institution of Traditional Leadership: Mphephu v Mphephu-Ramabulana: (948/17) [2019] ZASCA 58" 2020 PELJ 1-25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2020/v23i0a6804

Ntsoane LS and Manthwa TA "The Right to Bury the Deceased in Terms of Customary Law: Whose Right is It? Sengadi v Tsambo 2019 4 SA 50 (GJ)" 2020 THRHR 611-621

O'Regan K "Change v Certainty: Precedent under the Constitution" April 2001 Advocate 31-33

Osman F "The Ascertainment of Living Customary Law: An Analysis of the Constitutional Court's Jurisprudence" 2019 J Legal Plur 98-113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2019.1596013

Radebe KM "Tsambo v Sengadi (244/19) [2020] ZASCA 46 (30 April 2020); Sengadi v Tsambo; In Re: Tsambo (40344/2018) [2018] ZAGPJHC 666; [2019] 1 All SA 569 (GJ) (8 November 2018) Assessing the Insurmountable Challenge in Proving the Existence of a Customary Marriage in Terms of Section 3(1)(b) of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 and the Misplacing of Gender Inequality" 2022 De Jure 77-86

Ramose MB "In Memoriam: Sovereignty and the 'New' South Africa" 2007 GLR 310-329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2007.10854593

Raphaphalani TD "Understanding Some Aspects of the Vhavenda Customary Law Marriage Practices: A Descriptive Approach" 2016 Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 262-266 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09766634.2016.11885725

Raphaphalani and Musehane "Arranged Marriage Practices of the Vhavenda Community of the Vhembe District, Limpopo Province, South Africa" 2013 Journal of Languages and Culture 18-22

Rautenbach C (ed) Introduction to Legal Pluralism in South Africa 5th ed (LexisNexis Durban 2018)

Sibisi S "Is the Requirement of Integration of the Bride Optional in Customary Marriages?" 2020 De Jure 90-103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2020/v53a6

Sibisi S "The Juristic Nature of iLobolo Agreements in Modern South Africa" 2021 Obiter 57-69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v42i1.11056

Spies A "The Importance and Relevance of Amicus Curiae Participation in Litigating on the Customary Law of Marriage" 2016 AHRLJ 247-264 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2016/v16n1a11

Spies A "Relevance and Importance of the Amicus Curiae Participation in Mayelane v Ngwenyama [Discussion of Mayelane v Ngwenyama 2013 4 SA 415 (CC)]" 2016 Stell LR 156-167

Van der Vyver JD "The Right to Self-Determination of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities in South Africa" 2011 PELJ 2-28 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i4a2594

Case law

Alexkor v Richtersveld Community 2004 5 SA 460 (CC)

Bhe v Magistrate Khayelitsha 2005 1 SA 580 (CC)

Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1997 2 SA 974 (CC)

Eunice Xoliswa Ngema v Sifiso Raymond Debengwa (2011/3726) [2016] ZAGPJHC 163 (15 June 2016)

Fanti v Bonto 2008 5 SA 405 (C)

Fraser v Children's Court 1997 2 SA 261 (CC)

Harksen v Lane 1997 1 SA 300 (CC)

Hoffman v South African Airways 2001 1 SA 1 (CC)

Mabuza v Mbatha 2003 4 SA 218 (C)

Maluleke v Minister of Home Affairs (02/24921) [2008] ZAGPHC 129 (9 April 2008)

Mbungela v Mkabi 2020 1 SA 41 (SCA)

Miya v Mnqayane (3342/2018) [2020] ZAFSHC 17 (3 February 2020)

Mkabi v Minister of Home Affairs (2014/84704) [2016] ZAGPPHC 460 (9 June 2016)

MM v MN 2013 4 SA 415 (CC) DOI: https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2013_06_201306

Mmutle v Thinda (20949/2007) [2008] ZAGPHC 352 (23 July 2008) DOI: https://doi.org/10.3139/217.0834

Moropane v Southon (755/12) [2014] ZASCA 76 (29 May 2014) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TPM.0000441940.82395.1d

Motsoatsoa v Roro 2011 2 All SA 324 (GSJ)

Mthethwa v Road Accident Fund (48435/2013) [2016] ZAGPPHC 893 (30 September 2016)

Mxiki v Mbata in re: Mbatha v Department of Home Affairs (A844/2012) [2014] ZAGPPHC 825 (23 October 2014)

National Coalition for Gays and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Home Affairs 2000 2 SA 1 (CC) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718160020958926

ND v MM (18404/2018) [2020] ZAGPJHC 113 (12 May 2020)

Ndlovu v Mokoena 2009 5 SA 400 (GNP)

Nthejane v Road Accident Fund (3183/2010) [2011] ZAFSHC 196 (1 December 2011)

PSC v LPM [2013] JOL 29847 (GNP)

Prinsloo v Van der Linde 1997 3 SA 1012 (CC)

Rasello v Chali (A69/2012) [2013] ZAFSHC 182 (23 October 2013)

S v Jezile 2016 2 SA 62 (WCC)

Sengadi v Tsambo 2019 4 SA 50 (GJ)

Shilubana v Nwamitwa 2009 2 SA 66 (CC) DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1chrr93.8

Tsambo v Sengadi (244/19) [2020] ZASCA 46 (30 April 2020) DOI: https://doi.org/10.33993/TR.2020.2.03

Legislation

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998

Internet sources

Diala AC 2020 Understanding the Relevance of African Customary Law in Modern Times https://theconversation.com/understanding-the-relevance-of-african-customary-law-inmodern-times-150762 accessed 14 December 2022

Published

23-11-2023

How to Cite

Manthwa, T. A. (2023). An Analysis of the Significance of Integration of the Bride in Customary Marriages and its Potential Constitutionality. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 26, (Published on 23 November 2023) pp 1 – 22. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15492

Issue

Section

Special Edition: Land & Customary Law

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.