A Tax Deduction for Home Office Expenditure: The Interpretation of and Proposed Removal of the Exclusive-Use Requirement in Section 23(b) of the Income Tax Act

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a16833

Keywords:

Home office deduction, Section 23(b), Exclusively used, De Minimis Non Curat Lex

Abstract

Hybrid and remote working opportunities have become more prevalent, leading to an increase in attempts to claim income tax deductions for home office expenditure. SARS disallowed over R1.8 billion of the R2.9 billion home office tax claims in the 2021/2022 tax year. Unfortunately, efforts to lobby government to relax the requirements of section 23(b) of the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 have not been met with legislative response. Section 23(b)'s exclusive-use requirement is particularly troublesome. Given the lack of legislative response, this article considers whether the exclusive-use requirement may be interpreted in a manner that would assist more taxpayers to claim a home office deduction. This article argues that the exclusive-use requirement does not require taxpayers to set aside an entire room to be able to claim home office expenditure. Unfortunately for taxpayers, it also finds that "exclusively" is not reasonably capable of bearing a meaning other than "solely" and that absent the application of the de minimis non curat lex rule, any private use of the home office space is fatal to the deduction of home office expenditure. The limited application of the de minimis non curat lex rule to dismiss insignificant private use offers no solution to taxpayers who live in modest homes and who necessarily work in mixed-use spaces. It also considers SAIT's proposal to tie the exclusive-use requirement to working hours through an interpretative argument and argues that it is unlikely to succeed. This article ultimately concludes that it appears as though taxpayers will find little relief from the exclusive-use requirement through interpretive arguments and must increase their efforts to lobby for legislative amendments instead. However, caution is required because SAICA's proposal that the exclusive-use requirement be removed through legislative amendment could trigger unintended consequences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Petra Claassen, Stellenbosch University

    MAcc (Taxation). CA(SA). Lecturer, Faculty of Economic and Management Sciences, Stellenbosch University, South Africa. 

References

Bibliography

Literature

Bennion FAR, Bailey D and Norbury L Bennion, Bailey and Norbury on Statutory Interpretation 8th ed (LexisNexis London 2020)

Berns MH "The Home Office Deduction: Administrative Complexity Versus Taxpayer Equity" 1975 Hofstra L Rev 51-80

Bishop M and Brickhill J "'In the Beginning Was the Word': The Role of Text in the Interpretation of Statutes" 2012 SALJ 681-716s

Claassen RC Claassen's Dictionary of Legal Words and Phrases (online) (LexisNexis Durban 2022)

Croome B (ed) Tax Law: An Introduction (Juta Cape Town 2013)

Du Plessis LM Re-Interpretation of Statutes (LexisNexis Durban 2002)

Goff NM "Commingling Business and Personal Use of Real Property: Severe Restrictions Under the 1976 Tax Reform Act" 1978 Gonz L Rev 493-521

Gooden A and Thaldar DW "Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing in South Africa: Stumbling over the First Legal Hurdle?" 2022 PELJ 1-27

Holtschneider NT "Putting the House in Order: An Analysis of and Planning Considerations for Home Office Deduction" 1985 U Balt L Rev 522-556

Labuschagne JMT "De Minimis Non Curat Lex" 1973 Acta Juridica 291-304

Lang MB "When a House is Not Entirely a Home: Deductions under Internal Revenue Code 280A for Home Offices, Vacation Homes, Etc" 1981 Utah L Rev 275-308

Le Roux W "Directory Provisions, Section 39(2) of the Constitution and the Ontology of Statutory Law" 2006 SA Public Law 382-401

Le Roux W "Editorial: Special Edition – Legal Interpretation after Endumeni: Clarification, Contestation, Application" 2019 PELJ 2-9

Mazansky E "SARS Interpretation Note 114 – An Unfortunate Document" 2021 The Taxpayer 44-50

Moosa F "A Comparison between the Modalities of Interpreting Tax Legislation Applied in South African and Australia" 2018 Revenue LJ 1-25

Mullins ME "Tools, Not Rules: The Heuristic Nature of Statutory Interpretation" 2003 J Legis 1-76

Perumalsamy K "The Life and Times of Textualism in South Africa" 2019 PELJ 1-28

Swart CJ "Horizontal Equity as a Constitutional Norm in Income Tax Law: An Analysis with Specific Reference to Section 23(b) of the Income Tax Act" 1995 THRHR 633-661

Van Hoecke M "Legal Doctrine: Which Method(s) for What Kind of Discipline?" in Van Hoecke M (ed) Methodologies of Legal Research: Which Kind of Method for What Kind of Discipline? (Hart Oxford 2011) 1-18

Wallis M "What's in a Word? Interpretation through the Eyes of Ordinary Readers" 2010 SALJ 673-369

Wallis M "Interpretation Before and After Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality 2012 4 SA 592 (SCA)" 2019 PELJ 1-29

Case law

South Africa

Airports Company South Africa v Big Five Duty Free (Pty) Ltd 2019 2 BCLR 165 (CC)

Bato Star Fishing (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism 2004 7 BCLR 687 (CC)

CSARS v United Manganese of Kalahari (Pty) Ltd 2020 4 SA 428 (SCA)

DPP (EC) v Klue 2003 1 SACR 389 (E)

KBI v Van Der Walt 1986 4 All SA 421 (T)

Marshall v CSARS 2019 6 SA 246 (CC)

Medox Ltd v CSARS 2015 6 SA 310 (SCA)

Natal Joint Municipal Pension Fund v Endumeni Municipality 2012 2 All SA 262 (SCA)

R v Dane 1957 2 SA 472 (N)

S v Kgogong 1980 3 SA 600 (AD)

SBI v Lourens Erasmus (Eiendoms) Bpk 1966 4 SA 434 (A)

United States of America

Hughes v CIR 41 TCM (CHH) 1153

Lind v CIR 50 TCM (CCH) 1096

Rayden v CIR 101 TCM (CCH) 1001

Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd 2011 UKSC 10

Tilman v United States 644 F Supp 2nd 391 (SDNY 2009)

Weightman v Commissioner 42 TCM (CCH) 104 (1981)

Legislation

Australia

Land and Income Tax Assessment Act of 1895 (New South Wales)

South Africa

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Income Tax Act 28 of 1914

Income Tax Act 41 of 1917

Income Tax Act 40 of 1925

Income Tax Act 31 of 1941

Income Tax Act 58 of 1962

Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011

United States of America

Internal Revenue Code of 1986

Internet sources

Collins English Dictionary Online 2023 Room https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/room accessed 26 June 2023

National Treasury 2021 Budget Review https://www.treasury.gov.za/

documents/National%20Budget/2021/review/FullBR.pdf accessed 9 June 2023

Oxford English Dictionary Online 2023 Exclusively https://www.oed.com/

dictionary/exclusively_adv?tab=meaning_and_use#4967480 accessed 13 June 2023

Oxford English Dictionary Online 2023 Part https://www.oed.com/dictionary/part_n1?tab=meaning_and_use#32048550 accessed 26 June 2023

Oxford English Dictionary Online 2023 Primarily https://www.oed.com/

dictionary/primarily_adv?tab=meaning_and_use#28334893 accessed 20 July 2023

Oxford English Dictionary Online 2023 Room https://www.oed.com/

dictionary/room_n1?tab=meaning_and_use#177416005 accessed 13 June 2023

Oxford English Dictionary Online 2023 Solely https://www.oed.com/

dictionary/solely_adv?tab=meaning_and_use#22013812 accessed 26 June 2023

Oxford English Dictionary Online 2023 Substantially https://www.oed.com/

dictionary/substantially_adv?tab=meaning_and_use#20113890 accessed 29 August 2023

Republic of South Africa 1991 Explanatory Memorandum on the Income Tax Bill 1991, WP 2-91 https://osall.org.za/docs/2011/02/1991-IT-Bill.pdf accessed 3 July 2023

Republic of South Africa 1992 Explanatory Memorandum on the Income Tax Bill 1992, WP 2-92 https://osall.org.za/docs/2011/02/1992-IT-Bill.pdf accessed 22 August 2023

Republic of South Africa 1993 Explanatory Memorandum on the Income Tax Bill 1993, WP 2-93 https://osall.org.za/docs/2011/02/1993-IT-Bill.pdf accessed 17 August 2023

Republic of South Africa 1994 Explanatory Memorandum on the Income Tax Bill 1994, WP 2-94 https://osall.org.za/docs/2011/02/1994-IT-Bill.pdf accessed 18 August 2023

South African Institute of Chartered Accountants National Tax Committee 2021 Submission  Annexure C 2022 Budget Review https://saicawebprstorage.blob.core.windows.net/uploads/resources/SAICA_2021_Annexure_C_submission.pdf accessed 9 June 2023

South African Institute of Taxation 2021 Comments on Draft Interpretation Note 28 (Issue 3): Deduction of Home Office Expenses Incurred by Persons in Employment or Persons Holding an Office https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.thesait.org.za/resource/resmgr/2021_technical/sars_submissions_/draft_interpretation_note_28.pdf accessed 22 August 2023

South African Revenue Service date unknown Interpretation Notes https://www.sars.gov.za/legal-counsel/interpretation-rulings/interpretation-notes accessed 3 July 2024

South African Revenue Service date unknown Home Office Expenses https://www.sars.gov.za/types-of-tax/personal-income-tax/filingseason/home-office-expenses/ accessed 31 August 2023

South African Revenue Service 2011 Interpretation Note 28 (Issue 2)  Archived https://www.sars.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/Legal/Archive/Notes/LAPD-IntR-IN-Arc-2022-01-IN-28-Issue2-Home-Office-Expenses-Deductions-Archived-4-March-2022.pdf accessed 26 June 2023

South African Revenue Service 2022 Presentation to SCOF and SeCOF: "Responses Public Hearing on Budget 2022" https://static.pmg.org.za/220304SARSPresentation.pdf accessed 9 June 2023

South African Revenue Service 2022 Interpretation Note 28 (Issue 3) https://www.sars.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/Legal/Notes/LAPD-IntR-IN-2012-28-Home-Office-Expenses-Deductions.pdf accessed 9 June 2023

Senate 1976 https://www.westlaw.com/Document/I08D77CD063E911 D9B7CECED691859821/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&VR=3.0&RS=cblt1.0 Senate 1976 S. Rep. No. 938(I), 94th Cong., 2nd Sess. https://www.westlaw.com/Document/I08D77CD063E911D9B7CECED691859821/View/FullText.html transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&VR=3.0&RS=cblt1.0 accessed 28 August 2023

Visser A 2022 Failure to Update Tax Law is Bad News for Employees Trying to Claim Home Office Expenses https://www.moonstone.co.za/failure-to-update-tax-law-is-bad-news-for-employees-trying-to-claim-home-office-expenses/ accessed 9 June 2023

Published

02-10-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Claassen, P. (2024). A Tax Deduction for Home Office Expenditure: The Interpretation of and Proposed Removal of the Exclusive-Use Requirement in Section 23(b) of the Income Tax Act. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 27, (Published on 2 October 2024) pp 1-32. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2024/v27i0a16833

Similar Articles

21-30 of 1098

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.