Five Shaky Pillars – A Criticism of the Reasoning on Which the Stay at South Point Properties v Mqulwana (SCA) Decision Rests
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a17158Keywords:
eviction, home, student accommodationAbstract
In July 2023 in the case of Stay at South Point Properties (Pty) Ltd v Mqulwana the Supreme Court of Appeal (the SCA) found that student accommodation does not constitute a "home" in terms of section 26(3) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (hereafter the Constitution). Section 26(3) of the Constitution provides that "[n]o one may be evicted from their home … without an order of court made after considering all the relevant circumstances." The students' "residence" was not their "home". This meant that they could not rely on the protection provided by section 26(3) of the Constitution or the legislation giving effect to this right, the Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998 (hereafter PIE). This note identifies five shaky pillars that the decision rests on and argues that these pillars may be too weak to uphold the judgment. Importantly, the note does not aim to determine whether a residence should in fact be considered a home. Rather the note intends to highlight the problems with the reasoning of the court in coming to its conclusion.
Downloads
References
Bibliography
Literature
Boggenpoel ZT and Mahomedy S "Reflecting on Evictions and Unlawful Occupation of Land in South Africa: Where Do Some Gaps Still Remain?" 2023 PELJ 1-23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a14687
Chenwi L "Implementation of Housing Rights in South Africa: Approaches and Strategies" 2015 J L & Social Pol'y [i]-87 DOI: https://doi.org/10.60082/0829-3929.1209
Cramer R and Mostert H "'Home' and Unlawful Occupation: The Horns of Local Government's Dilemma: Fischer and Another v Persons Unknown 2014 3 SA 291 (WCC)" 2015 Stell LR 583-611
Fick S "Obtaining Alternative Accommodation Through Family: [Discussion of Omar NO v Omar [2011] ZAWCHC 415]" 2015 Stell LR 678-690
Fick S and Vols M "Best Protection Against Eviction? A Comparative Analysis of Protection Against Evictions in the European Convention on Human Rights and the South African Constitution" 2016 EJCL 40-69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00301002
Fox O'Mahony L Conceptualising Home: Theories, Laws and Policies (Hart Oxford 2006)
Fox O'Mahoney L "The Meaning of Home: From Theory to Practice" IJLBE 156-171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLBE-11-2012-0024
Loots C "Standing, Ripeness and Mootness" in Woolman S and Bishop M (eds) Constitutional Law of South Africa (Juta Cape Town OS 02-05 2013) 7-1 – 7-23
Van der Merwe CG and Pienaar JM "The Law of Property (Including Real Security)" 2014 ASSL 890-995
Van der Walt AJ and Pienaar GJ Introduction to the Law of Property 7th ed (Juta Cape Town 2016)
Van der Walt AJ "October to December" 2007 JQR 1-2.3
Viljoen S "A Systemically Correct Approach in State Evictions" 2020 Stell LR 201-225
Wilson S " Breaking the Tie: Evictions from Private Land, Homelessness and a New Normality" 2009 SALJ 270-290
Case law
Barnett v Minister of Land Affairs 2007 6 SA 313 (SCA)
City of Cape Town v Rudolph (8970/01) [2003] ZAWCHC 29 (7 July 2003)
City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Blue Moonlight Properties 39 (Pty) Ltd 2012 2 SA 104 (CC)
City of Johannesburg v Changing Tides 74 (Pty) Ltd 2012 6 SA 294 (SCA)
City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality v Mamelodi Hostel Residents Association (025/2011) [2011] ZASCA 227 (30 November 2011)
De Reuck v Director of Public Prosecutions (Witwatersrand Local Division) 2004 1 SA 406 (CC)
Grobler v Msimanga 2008 3 All SA 549 (W)
Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom 2001 1 SA 46 (CC)
Lester v Ndlambe Municipality (514/12) [2013] ZASCA 95 (22 August 2013)
Ndlambe Municipality v Lester (92/2011) [2012] ZAECGHC 33 (3 May 2012)
Ndlovu v Ngcobo, Bekker v Jika 2002 4 All SA 384 (SCA)
Ngomane v City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality 2020 1 SA 52 (SCA)
Occupiers of 51 Olivia Road, Berea Township and 197 Main Street Johannesburg v City of Johannesburg 2008 3 SA 208 (CC)
Occupiers of Erven 87 and 88 Berea v De Wet 2017 5 SA 346 (CC) DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/cerpsy.087.0088
Port Elizabeth Municipality v Various Occupiers 2005 1 SA 217 (CC)
Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd v Jardim 2004 1 SA 14 (O)
Stay at South Point Properties (Pty) Ltd v Mqulwana (UCT Intervening as Amicus Curiae) (1335/2021) [2023] ZASCA 108 (3 July 2023)
S v Makwanyane 1995 3 SA 391 (CC)
S v Zuma 1995 2 SA 642 (CC)
Tshwane University Technology v All Members of the Central Student Representative Council of the Applicant (67856/14) [2016] ZAGPPHC 881 (22 September 2016)
Yussuf v Ye Khan Investments CC (1355/2011) [2011] ZAWCHC 416 (1 November 2011)
Legislation
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
Extension of Security of Tenure Act 62 of 1997
Land Reform (Labour Tenants) Act 3 of 1996
National Building Regulations and Building Standards Act 103 of 1977
Prevention of Illegal Eviction from and Unlawful Occupation of Land Act 19 of 1998
Internet sources
Snyman R 2022 CPUT Students Gets a Piece of the Pie https://www.derebus.org.za/cput-students-gets-a-piece-of-the-pie/ accessed 31 October 2023
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sarah Fick
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}