Is law Science?




Law as science, philosophy of science, demarcation criteria, scientific nature of law


The question this contribution sets out to address is whether or not law can be regarded as a science. This notion is readily accepted by many, yet it is submitted that a proper theoretical justification for such an assumption is usually missing. The traditional primary sources of law, South African case law and legislation, distinguish between legal practice and legal science, but the basis of the distinction is not clear. However, an entire body of literature in the philosophy of science has developed around the question of when a discipline will amount to science. Various demarcation criteria proposed in the philosophy of science are considered. These include that science uses the scientific method, is susceptible to falsification, is puzzle-solving within a paradigm or renders beneficial results. None of these criteria offers a satisfactory solution to the problem. The proposition by a group of philosophers including Herman Dooyeweerd, Marinus Stafleu and DFM Strauss, that the answer to the demarcation question is to be found in modal abstraction, is then considered. Modal abstraction amounts to a consideration of reality (persons, things, theories and rules) from one or more defined point(s) of entry. It is an artificial and learnt manner of thinking as it approaches reality from the perspective of one of the modalities of being. For example, juridical abstraction would mean that a cow is considered as the object of someone's proprietary rights. An abstract idea of the cow's characteristics, from a juridical point of view, is formed and the rules of property law are applied. A number of South African legal philosophers, amongst others Van Zyl, Van der Vyver and LM du Plessis, have followed this approach. The South African legislature has also attempted to define the terms "science" and "research", mainly for funding purposes. These definitions are considered and the conclusion is that they do not provide the clear-cut answers one would expect. It will be argued that the nature of activities will determine whether an endeavour is scientific or not. The conclusion is that an alignment of the demarcation criterion developed by Strauss and others and the statutory definitions can provide a workable demarcation criterion. This "test" is then applied to the activities of law students, academics, practitioners and judicial officers to determine when they will be practising "science".



Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...




Berman Law and Revolution

Berman HJ Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition (Harvard University Press Cambridge, Mass 1983)

Berman and Greiner Nature and Functions of Law

Berman HJ and Greiner WR The Nature and Functions of Law 2nd ed (Foundation Press Brooklyn 1966)

Cairns 1935 Philosophy of Science

Cairns H "Law as a Social Science" 1935 Philosophy of Science 484-498

Campbell 2014 Stell LR

Campbell J "The Role of Law Faculties and Law Academics: Academic Education or Qualification for Practice?" 2014 Stell LR 15-32

Caudill 2011 Pro Rege

Caudill DS "Science in Law: Reliance, Idealization and Some Calvinist Insights" 2011 39(3) Pro Rege 1-9

Coletto 2009 Journal for Christian Scholarship

Coletto R "The Progress of Scientific Knowledge: Evolution, Revolution or Involution?" 2009 Journal for Christian Scholarship 155-174

Coletto 2011 Acta Academica

Coletto R "The Elaboration of a Demarcation Criterion in Reformational Philosophy" 2011 43(2) Acta Academica 41-65

Coletto 2011 Journal for Christian Scholarship

Coletto R "Science and Non-science: The Search for a Demarcation Criterion in the 20th Century" 2011 Journal for Christian Scholarship 63-79

Coletto 2013 Koers

Coletto R "The Re-appreciation of the Humanities in Contemporary Philosophy of Science: From Recognition to Exaggeration?" 2013 78(2) Koers 1-7

Coletto 2013 TD

Coletto R "Transdisciplinarity: Two Preliminary Issues" 2013 TD 1-16

Dooyeweerd Dictaat

Dooyeweerd H Encyclopedie der Rechtswetenschap: Inleiding en Historisch Gedeelte: Dictaat (Drukkerij DAVID Amsterdam 1930)

Dooyeweerd Encyclopaedia

Dooyeweerd H Encyclopaedia of the Science of Law (translated from the original Dutch by Knudsen RN) (Edwin Mellen Press Lewiston 2002)

Du Plessis Inleiding tot die Reg

Du Plessis LM Inleiding tot die Reg 3rd ed (Juta Lansdowne 1999)

Farrell 2001 JGPS

Farrel RP "Feyerabend's Metaphysics: Process-realism, or Voluntarist-idealism?" 2001 JGPS 351-369

Feyerabend Against Method

Feyerabend PK Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge (NLB London 1975)

Feyerabend "Consolation for the Specialist"

Feyerabend PK "Consolation for the Specialist" in Lakatos I and Musgrave A (eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1970) 197-230

Garvin 2003 Harvard Magazine

Garvin D "Making the Case - Professional Education for the World of Practice" 2003 106(1) Harvard Magazine 56-65, 107

Hamoudi 2007 Cornell Int'l LJ

Hamoudi HA "Muhammad's Social Justice or Muslim Cant? Langdellianism and the Failures of Islamic Finance" 2007 Cornell Int'l LJ 89-133

Kleyn and Viljoen Beginner's Guide

Kleyn D and Viljoen F Beginner's Guide for Law Students 4th ed (Juta Lansdowne 2013)

Kroeze 2013 PELJ

Kroeze IJ "Legal Research Methodology and the Dream of Interdisciplinarity" 2013 (16)3 PELJ 36-65

Kuhn "Function of Dogma"

Kuhn TS "The Function of Dogma in Scientific Research" in Crombie AC (ed) Scientific Change: Historical Studies in the Intellectual, Social and Technical Conditions for Scientific Discovery and Technical Invention, from Antiquity to the Present (Heinemann London 1963) 347-369

Kuhn "Logic of Discovery"

Kuhn TS "Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?" in Lakatos I and Musgrave A (eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1970) 1-23

Kuhn "Postscript"

Kuhn TS "Postscript" in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press Chicago 1996) 174-210

Laudan 1971 Philosophy of Science

Laudan L "Towards a Reassessment of Comte's 'Méthode Positive'" 1971 Philosophy of Science 35-53

Laudan 1987 Am Phil Q

Laudan L "Progress or Rationality? The Prospects for Normative Naturalism" 1987 Am Phil Q 19-31

Lloyd 1997 Philosophy of Science

Lloyd EA "Feyerabend, Mill and Pluralism" 1997 64(Suppl) Philosophy of Science 396-407

Lugg 1977 Can J Philos

Lugg A "Feyerabend's Rationalism" 1977 Can J Philos 755-775

Mautner Dictionary of Philosophy

Mautner T Dictionary of Philosophy (Penguin Books London 2005)

Meynell 1978 Philosophy Quarterly

Meynell H "Feyerabend's Method" 1978 The Philosophy Quarterly 242-252

Popper Conjectures and Refutations

Popper KR Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Science and Knowledge (Routledge and Kegan Paul London 1963)

Popper "Normal Science and its Dangers"

Popper KR "Normal Science and its Dangers" in Lakatos I and Musgrave A (eds) Criticism and the Growth of knowledge (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1970) 51-58

Popper Objective Knowledge

Popper KR Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (Clarendon Press Oxford 1979)

Post Introduction to the Law

Post CG An Introduction to the Law (Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs NJ 1963)

Preston 1997 Philosophy of Science

Preston J "Feyerabend's Retreat from Realism" 1997 Philosophy of Science 64(Suppl) 421-431

Schafer 2006 SALJ

Schafer L "Marriage and Marriage-like Relationships: Constructing a New Hierarchy of Life Partnerships" 2006 SALJ 626-647

Settle 1979 Systematic Zoology

Settle T "Popper on 'When is a Science not a Science'" 1979 Systematic Zoology 521-529

Smits "Redefining Normative Legal Science"

Smits JM "Redefining Normative Legal Science: Towards an Argumentative Discipline" in Coomans F, Grünfeld F and Kamminga M (eds) Methods of Human Rights Research (Intersentia Antwerpen 2009) 45-58

Smits 2014 Critical Analysis of Law

Smits JM "Law and Interdisciplinarity: On the Inevitable Normativity of Legal Studies" 2014 Critical Analysis of Law 76-86

Speziale 1980 Vt L Rev

Speziale M "Langdell's Concept of Law as Science: The Beginning of Anti-formalism in American Legal Theory" 1980 Vt L Rev 1-37

Stafleu 1980 Philosophia Reformata

Stafleu MD "The Opening Up of a Field of Science by Abstraction and Synthesis" 1980 Philosophia Reformata 47-76

Stafleu 1981 Philosophia Reformata

Stafleu MD "Theories as Logically Qualified Artefacts (I)" 1981 Philosophia Reformata 164-189

Stevens Law School

Stevens RB Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1980s (University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill 1983)

Stoker Aard en Rol van die Reg

Stoker HG Die Aard en Rol van die Reg – 'n Wysgerige Besinning (Randse Afrikaanse Universiteit Johannesburg 1970)

Strauss Wysbegeerte en Vakwetenskap

Strauss DFM Wysbegeerte en Vakwetenskap (MA-dissertation University of the Orange Free State 1969)

Strauss 2001 Journal for Christian Scholarship

Strauss DFM "Does it Make Sense to Distinguish between the Natural Sciences and Humanities?" 2001 Journal for Christian Scholarship 25-36

Strauss 2004 JNGS

Strauss DFM "Science and Scholarship in Historical Perspective" 2004 JNGS 55-72

Strauss 2006 Journal for Christian Scholarship

Straus DFM "The Best Known but Least Understood Part of Dooyeweerd's Philosophy" 2006 Journal for Christian Scholarship 61-80

Strauss Philosophy

Straus DFM Philosophy: Discipline of the Disciplines (Paideia Press Grand Rapids MI 2009)

Swanepoel 2007 Regswetenskap en Regsfilosofie

Swanepoel J Regswetenskap en Regsfilosofie aan 'n Waardegedrewe Universiteit: Ou Wyn in Nuwe Sakke? (North-West University Potchefstroom 2007)

Twining 1974 Brit J L & Soc'y

Twining W "Some Jobs for Jurisprudence" 1974 Brit J L & Soc'y 149-174

Ulen 2002 U Ill L Rev

Ulen TS "A Nobel Prize in Legal Science: Theory, Empirical Work and the Scientific Method in the Study of Law" 2002 U Ill L Rev 875-920

Van der Walt 2003 SAJHR

Van der Walt J "Horizontal Application of Fundamental Rights and the Threshold of the Law in View of the Carmichele Saga" 2003 SAJHR 517-540

Van Niekerk Algemene Regsleer

Van Niekerk PJ PRF 212: Algemene Regsleer Diktaat (PU for CHE: Potchefstroom 1989)

Van Warmelo Regsleer, Regswetenskap, Regsfilosofie

Van Warmelo P Regsleer, Regswetenskap, Regsfilosofie (Juta Cape Town 1973)

Van Zyl and Van der Vyver Inleiding

Van Zyl FJ and Van der Vyver JD Inleiding tot die Regswetenskap 2nd ed (Butterworths Durban 1982)

Venter et al Regsnavorsing

Venter F et al Regsnavorsing: Metode en Publikasie (Juta Cape Town 1990)

Woolman 2010 SAPL

Woolman S "On the Common Saying 'What's True in Golf is True in Law': The Relationship between Theory and Practice across Forms of Life" 2010 SAPL 520-543

Case law

Bhe v Magistrate, Khayelitsha, (Commission for Gender Equality as Amicus Curiae); Shibi v Sithole; South African Human Rights Commission v President of The Republic of South Africa 2005 1 SA 580 (CC)

Black v Barklays Zimbabawe Nominees (Pvt) Ltd 1990 1 SACR 433 (W)

Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Co v MV Kalantiao 1987 4 SA 250 (D)

Britz v Britz 2000 JDR 0194 (SCA)

Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security (Centre for Applied Legal Studies Intervening) 2001 4 SA 938 (CC)

De Kock v Jacobson 1999 4 SA 346 (W)

Die Prokureursorde van die Oranje-Vrystaat v Schoeman 1977 4 SA 588 (O)

Erlax Properties (Pty) Ltd v Registrar of Deeds 1992 1 SA 879 (A)

Fourie v Minister of Home Affairs 2003 5 SA 301 (CC)

General Council of the Bar of South Africa v Geach 2013 2 SA 52 (SCA)

Grobler v Naspers Bpk 2004 4 SA 220 (C)

Intercompany Security Services (Cape) (Pty) Ltd v Transport & General Workers Union 1995 16 ILJ 854 (LAC)

Jubelius v Griesel 1988 2 SA SA 610 (C)

Kahn v Volschenk 1986 3 SA 84 (A)

Lean v Van der Mescht 1972 2 SA 100 (O)

Maduna v Die Streeklanddros T J La Grange (Klerksdorp) 1997 JDR 0337 (T)

Mda v Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope 2012 1 SA 15 (SCA)

Mgcina v Regional Magistrate, Lenasia 1997 2 SACR 711 (W)

Moeketsi v Mininster van Justisie 1988 4 SA 707 (T)

Mota v Moloantoa 1984 4 SA 761 (O)

Netshituka v Netshituka 2011 5 SA 453 (SCA)

Nakani v Attorney-General, Ciskei 1989 3 SA 655 (CK)

Napier v Barkhuizen 2006 4 SA 1 (SCA)

National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Justice 1999 1 SA 6 (CC)

Northview Shopping Centre (Pty) Ltd v Revelas Properties Johannesburg CC 2010 3 SA 630 (SCA)

Nortje v Pool 1966 3 SA 96 (A)

Powel v Alabama 287 US 45 (1932)

Olivier v Jonck BK h/a Bothaville Vleismark 1999 JDR 0068 (O)

Rand Waterraad v Bothma 1997 3 SA 120 (O)

S v Adams 1986 4 SA 882 (A)

S v Bailey 1982 3 SA 772 (A)

S v Chavulla 1999 1 SACR 39 (C)

S v Collop 1981 1 SA 150 (A)

S v Damoyi 2004 1 SACR 121 (C)

S v Khanyile 1988 3 SA 795 (N)

S v Maake 2003 JDR 0848 (T)

S v Mabeti 2005 JDR 1031 (T)

S v Maduna 1997 1 SA SACR 646 (T)

S v Maema 2002 JDR 0593 (T)

S v Masogo 2001 JDR 0582 (T)

S v Mbambo 1999 2 SACR 421 (W)

S v Mbele 1991 1 SA 307 (W)

S v Nkambule 2011 JDR 0520 (GNP)

S v Philemon 1997 2 SACR 651 (W)

S v Pietersen 1994 2 SACR 434 (C)

S v Pitso 2002 2 SACR 686 (O)

S v Radebe; S v Mbonani 1988 1 SA 191 (T)

S v Ramokone 1995 1 SACR 634 (O)

S v Viljoen 2003 JDR 0104 (T)

S v Zulu 1990 1 SA 655 (T)

Sempapalele v Sempapalele 2001 2 SA 306 (O)

Taylor v Kurtstag 2005 1 SA 362 (W)

Telematrix (Pty) Ltd t/a Matrix Vehicle Tracking v Advertising Standards Authority of South Africa 2005 JDR 0985 (W)

Telematrix (Pty) Ltd t/a Matrix Vehicle Tracking v Advertising Standards Authority of South Africa 2006 1 SA 461 (SCA)

Universiteit van Pretoria v Tommie Meyer Films (Edms) Bpk 1977 4 SA 376 (T)

Van den Berg & Kie Rekenkundige Beamptes v Boomprops 1028 BK 1999 1 SA 780 (T)


Admission of Advocates Act 74 of 1964

Attorneys Act 53 of 1979

Human Sciences Research Act 23 of 1968

Human Sciences Research Amendment Act 99 of 1990

Human Sciences Research Council Act 17 of 2008

National Research Foundation Act 23 of 1998

Science and Technology Laws Amendment Act 16 of 2011

Government publications

Legal Practice Bill B20-2012

Internet sources

HSRC 2013

Human Sciences Research Council 2013 Research Outputs accessed 29 September 2013

NRF 2014a

NRF 2014a Researchers with a Valid NRF Rating as at 4 Feb 2014 accessed 23 June 2014

NRF 2014b procedure%20for%20NRF%20Awards_February%202014.pdf

NRF 2014b Assessment Procedure for NRF Awards accessed 30 October 2014

Preston 2009

Preston J 2009 Paul Feyerabend accessed 24 March 2010

SAQA 2012

South African Qualifications Authority 2012 Level Descriptors for the South African National Qualifications Framework

/level_descriptors.pdf accessed 27 October 2013

Smits 2012

Smits JM 2012 What Do Legal Academics Do? accessed 23 June 2014

Stafleu 1980

Stafleu MD 1980 Time and Again: A Systematic Analysis of the Foundation of Physics accessed 18 May 2010

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2013

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2013 Karl Popper accessed 24 August 2013 accessed 30 October 2014



How to Cite

MC Roos, R. (2017). Is law Science?. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 17(4), 1391–1439.




Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.