"Public Purpose or Public Interest" and Third Party Transfers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2014/v17i1a2210

Keywords:

Constitution, Economic development, Expropriation, Property, Public interest, Public purpose, Third party transfers

Abstract

 

In this article the difference between public purpose and public interest in section 25(2) of the 1996 Constitution is considered. It is generally accepted that public purpose is a narrower category than public interest and that the distinction between public purpose and public interest does not make any practical difference. However, in this contribution it is suggested that the difference between public purpose and public interest makes no practical difference only in cases where expropriated property is used by the state for the realisation of a particular purpose.

 

The difference between public purpose and public interest becomes more important when a particular expropriation also involves a third party transfer, since it indicates the level of scrutiny that the courts should apply in determining the lawfulness of the expropriation. When property is expropriated and transferred to a third party for the realisation of a public purpose, such as building and managing electricity plants, the lawfulness of the expropriation is not easily questioned. As such, the application of a rationality test to determine the legitimacy of the expropriation is generally easy to accept. However, this lenient approach cannot be as easily accepted where an expropriation and third party transfer takes place in the public interest. Examples of third party transfers in the public interest include land reform, slum clearance and economic development. In the examples of land reform and slum clearance the expropriation and third party transfer is usually authorised in legislation or, as is the case with land reform in South Africa, the 1996 Constitution. Because (as in the land reform example) the expropriation and third party transfer is authorised by the Constitution and regulated by legislation, the application of a rationality test to determine the legitimacy is acceptable.

 

However, the application of a rationality test where property is expropriated and transferred to third parties for broader purposes such as economic development is problematic, especially if there is no specific legislation authorising such expropriation. Although an expropriation involving a third party transfer for purposes of economic development may well be in the public interest because it can lead to the creation of employment opportunities, it is argued that in the absence of specific legislation that authorises both the expropriation and the transfer of the property to third parties, the justification for the expropriation and the transfer is not entirely clear. Therefore, in the absence of a clear legislative scheme authorising the expropriation and transfer of property to third parties for the purpose of economic development, which can be said to fall within a very broad interpretation of the public interest requirement in section 25(2), the courts should apply a stricter scrutiny in evaluating its legitimacy.

    

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Literature

Allen Right to Property

Allen T The Right to Property in Commonwealth Constitutions (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2000)

Badenhorst, Pienaar and Mostert Silberberg and Schoeman's Law of Property

Badenhorst PJ, Pienaar JM and Mostert H Silberberg and Schoeman's The Law of Property 5th ed (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 2006)

Bell and Parchomovsky 2006 Col LR

Bell A and Parchomovsky G "The Uselessness of Public Use" 2006 Col LR 1412-1449

Berger 1987 Oregon LR

Berger L "The Public Use Requirement in Eminent Domain" 1978 Oregon LR 203-246

Budlender "Constitutional Protection of Property Rights"

Budlender G "The Constitutional Protection of Property Rights: Overview and Commentary" in Budlender G, Latsky J and Roux T Juta's New Land Law (Juta Cape Town 1998) ch 1

Carey Miller and Pope Land Title in South Africa

Carey Miller DL and Pope A Land Title in South Africa (Juta Cape Town 2000)

Chaskalson 1994 SAJHR

Chaskalson M "The Property Clause: Section 28 of the Constitution" 1994 SAJHR 131-139

Chaskalson 1995 SAJHR

Chaskalson M "Stumbling towards Section 28: Negotiations over the Protection of Property Rights in the Interim Constitution" 1995 SAJHR 222-240

Cohen 2006 Harv JL & Pub Pol'y

Cohen CE "Eminent Domain after Kelo v City of New London: An Argument for Banning Economic Development Takings" 2006 Harv JL & Pub Pol'y 491-568

Davis Comparative Study

Davis NM A Comparative Study of the History and Principles of South African Expropriation Law with the Law of Eminent Domain of the United States of America (LLM-thesis University of the Witwatersrand 1987)

Du Plessis 2011 TSAR

Du Plessis E "Restitution of Expropriated Property upon Non-realisation of the Public Purpose" 2011 TSAR 579-592

Du Plessis Re-Interpretation of Statutes

Du Plessis LM Re-Interpretation of Statutes (Butterworths Durban 2002)

Du Plessis 2011 Stell LR

Du Plessis WJ "The (Shelved) Expropriation Bill B16-2008: An Unconstitutional Souvenir or an Alarmist Memento?" 2011 Stell LR 352-275

Du Plessis 1987 THRHR

Du Plessis WJ "'n Regsteoretiese Ondersoek na die Begrip 'Openbare Belang'" 1987 THRHR 290-298

Eisenberg 1995 SAJHR

Eisenberg A "Public Purpose and Expropriation: Some Comparative Insights and the South African Bill of Rights" 1995 SAJHR 207-221

Gildenhuys Onteieningsreg

Gildenhuys A Onteieningsreg 2nd ed (Butterworths Durban 2001)

Goodin 2007 NYU LR

Goodin AW "Rejecting the Return to Blight in Post-Kelo State Legislation" 2007 NYU LR 177-208

Gray 2005 Stell LR

Gray K "Human Property Rights: The Politics of Expropriation" 2005 Stell LR 398-412

Gray 2007 Journal of South Pacific Law

Gray K "There is No Place like Home" 2007 Journal of South Pacific Law 73-88

Gray "Recreational Property"

Gray K "Recreational Property" in Bright S (ed) Modern Studies in Property Law Vol VI (Hart Oxford 2011) 1-38

Gray and Gray Elements of Land Law

Gray K and Gray SF Elements of Land Law 5th ed (Oxford University Press Oxford 2009)

Jacobs Law of Expropriation

Jacobs M The Law of Expropriation in South Africa (Juta Cape Town 1982)

Mansnerus 1983 NYU LR

Mansnerus L "Public Use, Private Use, and Judicial Review in Eminent Domain" 1983 NYU LR 409-456

Merrill 1986 Cornell LR

Merrill TW "The Economics of Public Use" 1986 Cornell LR 61-116

Mostert Constitutional Protection and Regulation of Property

Mostert H The Constitutional Protection and Regulation of Property and its Influence on the Reform of Private Law and Landownership in South Africa and Germany (Springer Berlin 2002)

Pienaar 2009 TSAR

Pienaar G "Die Grondwetlikheid van die Voorgestelde Onteieningsraamwerk vir Suid-Afrika" 2009 TSAR 344-352

Rubenfield 1993 Yale LJ

Rubenfield J "Usings" 1993 Yale LJ 1077-1163

Schultz 2006 UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy

Schultz D "What's Yours Can be Mine: Are there any Private Takings after Kelo v City of New London?" 2006 UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 195-234

Singer Introduction to Property

Singer JW Introduction to Property 2nd ed (Aspen New York 2005)

Slade Justification of Expropriation

Slade BV The Justification of Expropriation for Economic Development (LLD-thesis Stellenbosch University 2012)

Slade 2013 TSAR

Slade BV "The Less Invasive Means Argument in Expropriation Law" 2013 TSAR 199-216

Somin 2004 Mich State LR

Somin I "Overcoming Poletown: County of Wayne v Hathcock, Economic Development Takings, and the Future of Public Use" 2004 Mich State LR 1005-1039

Somin 2007 Supreme Court Economic Review

Somin I Controlling the Grasping Hand: Economic Development Takings after Kelo 2007 Supreme Court Economic Review 183-271

Sonnekus and Pleysier 2011 TSAR

Sonnekus JC and Pleysier AJH "Eiendomsverwerwing of -verlies onder `n Tydsbepaling of `n Voorwaarde en die Privaatregtelike Implikasies vir Onteiening (Deel 2)" 2011 TSAR 601-625

Taggart "Expropriation, Public Purpose and the Constitution"

Taggart M "Expropriation, Public Purpose and the Constitution" in Forsyth C and Hare I (eds) The Golden Metwand and the Crooked Cord: Essays on Public Law in Honour of Sir William Wade QC (Clarendon Press Oxford 1998) 91-112

Van der Walt Constitutional Property Clauses

Van der Walt AJ Constitutional Property Clauses: A Comparative Analysis (Juta Cape Town 1999)

Van der Walt 2008 ASSAL

Van der Walt AJ "Constitutional Property Law" 2008 ASSAL 231-264

Van der Walt Constitutional Property Law

Van der Walt AJ Constitutional Property Law 3rd ed (Juta Cape Town 2011)

Van der Walt and Slade 2012 SALJ

Van der Walt AJ and Slade BV "Public Purpose and Changing Circumstances: Harvey v Umhlatuze Municipality and Others" 2012 SALJ 219-235

Van Wyk Planning Law

Van Wyk J Planning Law 2nd ed (Juta Cape Town 2012)

Walsh 2010 DULJ

Walsh R "'The Principles of Social Justice' and the Compulsory Acquisition of Private Property for Redevelopment in the United States and Ireland" 2010 DULJ 1-23

Waring "Prevalence of Private Takings"

Waring EJL "The Prevalence of Private Takings" in Hopkins N (ed) Modern Studies in Property Law Vol VII (Hart Oxford 2013) 419-437

Wolf "Hysteria versus History"

Wolf MA "Hysteria versus History: Public Use in the Public Eye" in Malloy RB (ed) Private Property, Community Development and Eminent Domain (Ashgate Hampshire 2008) 15-33

Case law

Germany

BVerfGE 56, 249 [1981] (Dürkheimer Gondelbahn)

BVerfGE 74, 264 [1986] (Boxberg)

Republic of Ireland

Central Dublin Development Association v Attorney General 1975 109 ILTR 69

Clinton v An Bord Pleanála 2005 IEHC 84, 2007 IESC 19

Crosbie v Custom House Docks Development Authority 1996 2 IR 53 (HC)

South Africa

Administrator, Transvaal v Van Streepen (Kempton Park) (Pty) Ltd 1990 4 SA 644 (A)

African Farms and Townships Ltd v Cape Town Municipality 1961 3 SA 392 (C)

Bartsch Consult (Pty) Ltd v Mayoral Committee of the Maluti-A-Phofung Municipality 2010 ZAFSHC 11

Erf 16 Bryntirion (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Public Works 2010 ZAGPPHC 154

Erf 16 Bryntirion (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Public Works 2011 ZASCA 246

eThekwini Municipality v Sotirios Spetsiotis 2009 ZAKZDHC 51

Fourie v Minister van Lande 1970 4 SA 165 (O)

Harvey v Umhlatuze Municipality 2011 1 SA 601 (KZP)

Minister of Lands v Rudolph 1940 SR 126

Offit Enterprises (Pty) Ltd v Coega Development Corporation (Pty) Ltd 2009 5 SA 661 (SE)

Offit Enterprises (Pty) Ltd v Coega Development Corporation (Pty) Ltd 2010 4 SA 242 (SCA)

Offit Enterprises (Pty) Ltd v Coega Development Corporation (Pty) Ltd 2011 1 SA 293 (CC)

Rondebosch Municipal Council v Trustees of the Western Province Agricultural Society 1911 AD 271

Slabbert v Minister van Lande 1963 3 SA 620 (T)

White Rocks Farm (Pty) Ltd v Minster of Community Development 1984 3 SA 785 (N)

United Kingdom

Alliance Spring Co Ltd v The First Secretary of State 2007 EWHC 1527 (Admin)

Regina (Sainsbury's Supermarket Ltd) v Wolverhampton City Council 2010 UKSC 20

United States

Berman v Parker 348 US 26 (1954)

Calder v Bull 3 Dall US 386 (1798)

Kelo v City of New London 545 US 469 (2005)

Pennsylvania Coal Co v Mahon 260 US 393 (1922)

Midkiff v Hawaii Housing Authority 267 US 229 (1984)

Legislation

England

Land Clauses Consolidation Act 16 of 1845

South Africa

Cape Act 16 of 1833

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 200 of 1993

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Expropriation Act 55 of 1965

Expropriation Act 63 of 1975

Expropriation Amendment Act 31 of 1958

Expropriation Amendment Act 45 of 1992

Expropriation of Land and Arbitration Clauses Proclamation 5 of 1902

Mountain Catchment Areas Act 63 of 1970

Municipal Act 45 of 1882

Natal Lands Clauses and Consolidation Law of 1872

Railway Expropriation of Lands Ordinance 46 of 1903 (Orange Free State)

Restitution of Land Rights Act 22 of 1994

Restitution of Land Rights Amendment Act 48 of 2003

Transvaal Road Ordinance 27 of 1957

United States

Constitution of the United States of 1787

Government publications

Administrator's Notice 1909 of 4 September 1985

Administrator's Notice 2161 of 18 December 1983

Gen N 1078 in GG 36980 of 30 October (Infrastructure Development Bill of 2013 [B49-2013])

GN 440 in GG 30963 of 11 April 2008 (Expropriation Bill of 2008 [B16-2008])

GN 234 in GG 36269 of 20 March 2013 (Draft Expropriation Bill of 2013)

Internet sources

Constitutional Court 2010 www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/Archimages/15016.PDF

Constitutional Court 2010 Offit Enterprises (Pty) Ltd v Coega Development Corporation (Pty) Ltd, Directions of the Chief Justice dated 29 March 2010 www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/Archimages/15016.PDF accessed 5 November 2013

Published

21-04-2017

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Slade, B. V. (2017). "Public Purpose or Public Interest" and Third Party Transfers. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 17(1), 166-206. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2014/v17i1a2210

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1163

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.