The International Humanitarian Law Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities – A Review of The ICRC Interpretive Guide and Subsequent Debate

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2014/v17i3a2277

Keywords:

direct participation in hostilities, international humanitarian law, revolving door of protection, continuous combative function

Abstract

The phrase "direct participation in hostilities" has a very specific meaning in international humanitarian law (IHL). Those individuals who are clothed with combatant status are authorised to participate directly in hostilities without fear of prosecution, while civilians lose their civilian immunity against direct targeting whilst they participate directly in hostilities. Any civilian activity which amounts to "direct participation in hostilities" temporarily suspends their presumptive civilian protection and exposes them to both direct targeting as a legitimate military target and prosecution for their unauthorised participation in hostilities. Since existing treaty sources of IHL do not provide a definition of what activities amount to "direct participation in hostilities", the ICRC in 2009 released an Interpretive Guide on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities - in the hope of providing a neutral, impartial and balanced interpretation of the longstanding IHL principle of direct participation in hostilities. While not without criticism, the Interpretive Guide aims to respect the customary IHL distinction between "direct participation in hostilities" and mere involvement in the general war effort. The Guide proposes a three-pronged test which establishes a threshold of harm, and requires direct causation together with a belligerent nexus. Collectively, these criteria limit overly-broad targeting policies, while distinguishing occasions of legitimate military targeting from common, criminal activities. Together with these three criteria, the Guide introduces the notion of the revolving door of protection, together with the concept of a "continuous combat function". Both these new concepts have been the subject of criticism, as too the idea that a presumption of non-participation status should apply in cases of doubt. Nevertheless "nothing indicates that the ICRC's interpretive guidance is substantively inaccurate, unbalanced, or otherwise inappropriate, or that its recommendations cannot be realistically translated into operational practice"[1] in a way which will ensure that the fundamental principles of distinction and civilian immunity upon which all of IHL is built are observed.

   ScienceOpen_Log0343230.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Literature

Ben-Naftali and Michaeli 2003 Cornell Int'l LJ

Ben-Naftali O and Michaeli KR "We Must Not Make a Scarecrow of the Law: A Legal Analysis of the Israeli Policy of Targeted Killings" 2003 Cornell Int'l LJ 233-292

Boothby 2010 NYU J Int'l L & Pol

Boothby B "'And For Such Time As': The Time Dimensions to Direct Participation in Hostilities" 2010 NYU J Int'l L & Pol 741-768

Fenrick 2009 YIHL

Fenrick WJ "ICRC Guide on Direct Participation in Hostilities" 2009 YIHL 287-301

Gasser "Protection of the Civilian Population"

Gasser HP "Protection of the Civilian Population" in Fleck D (ed) The Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press Oxford 1995) 209-292

Goodman and Jinks 2010 NYU J Int'l L & Pol

Goodman R and Jinks D "The ICRC Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under International Humanitarian Law: An Introduction to the Forum" 2010 NYU J Int'l L & Pol 637-640

Heaton 2005 A F L Rev

Heaton JR "Civilians at War: Re-examining the Status of Civilians Accompanying the Armed Forces" 2005 A F L Rev 155-208

Henckaerts and Doswald-Beck Customary International Humanitarian Law

Henckaerts JM and Doswald-Beck L (eds) Customary International Humanitarian Law Volume 1: Rules (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2005)

Ipsen "Combatants and Non-combatants"

Ipsen K "Combatants and Non-combatants" in Fleck D (ed) The Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict (Oxford University Press Oxford 1995) 65-104

Jensen "Direct Participation in Hostilities"

Jensen ET "Direct Participation in Hostilities" in Banks WC (ed) New Battlefields Old Laws: Critical Debates on Asymmetric Warfare (Columbia University Press New York 2011) (ebook version)

Kalshoven and Zegveld Constraints on the Waging of War

Kalshoven F and Zegveld L Constraints on the Waging of War: An Introduction to International Humanitarian Law 4th ed (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2011)

Melzer Targeted Killings

Melzer N Targeted Killings in International Law (Oxford University Press Oxford 2009)

Melzer 2010 NYU J Int'l L & Pol

Melzer N "Keeping the Balance Between Military Necessity and Humanity: A Response to Four Critiques of the ICRC's Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities" 2010 NYU J Int'l L & Pol 831-916

Parks 1990 A F L Rev

Parks WH "Air War and the Law of War" 1990 A F L Rev 135-145

Roberts 2009 YIHL

Roberts A "The Civilian in Modern War" 2009 YIHL 13-52

Rogers 2004 YIHL

Rogers APV "Unequal Combat and the Law of War" 2004 YIHL 3-23

Schmitt 2004 Chi J Int'l L

Schmitt MN "Humanitarian Law and Direct Participation in Hostilities by Private Contractors or Civilian Employees" 2004 Chi J Int'l L 511-546

Schmitt 2010 NYU J Int'l L & Pol

Schmitt MN "Deconstructing Direct Participation in Hostilities: the Constituent Elements" 2010 NYU J Int'l L & Pol 641-738

Schondorf 2007 JICJ

Schondorf RS "Are 'Targeted Killings' Unlawful? The Israeli Supreme Court's Response: A Preliminary Assessment" 2007 JICJ 301-309

Solis Law of Armed Conflict

Solis G The Law of Armed Conflict: International Humanitarian Law in War (Cambridge University Press New York 2010)

Watkin 2010 NYU J Int'l L & Pol

Watkin K "Opportunity Lost: Organised Armed Groups and the ICRC 'Direct Participation in Hostilities' Interpretive Guide" 2010 NYU J Int'l L & Pol 641-693

Case law

Public Committee against Torture in Israel v Government of Israel 2006 HCJ 769/02

International instruments

Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War 75 UNTS 1950 135 (Geneva Convention III (GC III))

Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War 75 UNTS 1950 287 (Geneva Convention IV (GC IV))

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts 1125 UNTS 1979 1391-441 (Additional Protocol I (AP I))

Regulations Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, Annex to the Hague Convention IV 1910 UKTS 9 (Hague Regulations (HR))

Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, Phillip Alston: Addendum - Study on Targeted Killings A/HRC/14/24/Add.6 (2010)

Internet sources

ICRC 2009 http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/direct-participation-ihl-feature-020609

ICRC 2009 Interpretive Guide on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under IHL http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/direct-participation-ihl-feature-020609 accessed 7 February 2013

Schmitt 2004 http://www.michaelschmitt.org/images/Schmitfinal.pdf

Schmitt MN 2004 Direct Participation in Hostilities and 21st Century Armed Conflict http://www.michaelschmitt.org/images/Schmitfinal.pdf accessed 7 February 2013

Van der Toorn 2009 http://www.works.bepress.com/damien_van_der_toorn/1

Van der Toorn D 2009 "Direct Participation in Hostilities": A Legal and Practical Evaluation of the ICRC Guidance http://www.works.

bepress.com/damien_van_der_toorn/1 accessed 14 July 2012

Published

24-04-2017

How to Cite

Bosch, D. S. (2017). The International Humanitarian Law Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities – A Review of The ICRC Interpretive Guide and Subsequent Debate. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 17(3), 998–1046. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2014/v17i3a2277

Issue

Section

Articles