"Pay Now, Argue Later" Rule – Before and After the Tax Administration Act


  • Carika Keulder University of Pretoria




, Pay now, argue later, objections, appeal, Tax Administration Act, tax administration, taxpayers' rights, access to the courts, Constitution, tax collection, suspension of payment of tax.


The South African Revenue Service (SARS) is entrusted with the duty of collecting tax on behalf of the South African government. In order to ensure effective and prompt collection of taxes, the payment of tax is not suspended pending an objection or an appeal, unless directed otherwise. This is also known as the "pay now, argue later" rule, and, for value-added tax purposes, is provided for in terms of section 36 of the Value-Added Tax Act 89 of 1991.


The "pay now, argue later" rule in terms of section 36 of the Value-Added Tax Act prima facie infringes on a taxpayer's right of access to the courts as envisaged in section 34 of the Constitution. This is due to the fact that a taxpayer is obliged to pay tax before being afforded the opportunity to challenge the assessment in a court.


In Metcash Trading Ltd v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service, the Constitutional Court held the "pay now, argue later" rule in terms of section 36 to be constitutional. Olivier, however, does not agree with the court on several matters. Amongst the problems she indicates are that the taxpayer does not have access to the courts at the time the rule is invoked, and that the court did not consider the fact that there might be less invasive means available which would ensure that SARS's duty is balanced with the taxpayer's right of access to the courts. Guidelines were also issued which provide legal certainty regarding the factors SARS may consider in determining whether the payment of tax should be suspended or not. These guidelines also evoked some points of criticism.


Since 1 October 2012, the "pay now, argue later" rule has been applied in terms of section 164 of the Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011. The question arises whether this provision addresses the problems identified in respect of section 36 of the Value-Added Tax Act and the guidelines. In comparing these sections, only slight differences emerged. The most significant difference is that section 164(6) of the Tax Administration Act stipulates that the enforcement of tax be suspended for a period when SARS is considering a request for suspension. Section 164(6) does not provide a solution to the problems identified regarding section 36 of the Value-Added Tax Act. It is even possible that this section could give rise to further problems.


Therefore, the legislature has failed to address the imbalance between the duties of SARS and the right of a taxpayer to access the courts.



Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...



Burns Administrative Law

Burns Y Administrative Law Under the 1996 Constitution 2nd ed (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 2003)

Cheadle, Davis and Haysom Constitutional Law

Cheadle MH, Davis D and Haysom N South African Constitutional Law: Bill of Rights (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 2002)

Croome 2001 Business Day Professional

Croome BJ "Paying up or arguing first" 2001 Business Day Professional 6-6

Croome Taxpayer's Rights

Croome BJ Taxpayer's Rights in South Africa (Juta Cape Town 2010)

Currie and De Waal Bill of Rights

Currie I and De Waal J The Bill of Rights Handbook 5th ed (Juta Cape Town 2005)

Currie and Klaaren Benchbook

Currie I and Klaaren J The Promotion of Administrative Justice Act Benchbook (Siber Ink Cape Town 2001)

De Ville Judicial Review

De Ville JR Judicial Review of Administrative Action in South Africa (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 2005)

Editor February 2000 Taxgram

Editor "Editorial: Successful constitutional attack on Value-Added Tax Act in High Court" February 2000 Taxgram 1-3

Editor December 2000 Taxgram

Editor "Editorial: Metcash Constitutional Court judgement" December 2000 Taxgram 1-2

Editor February 2001 Taxgram

Editor "Editorial: The Metcash judgment and the delicate balance between state and taxpayer" February 2001 Taxgram 1-4

Hahlo and Kahn South African Legal System

Hahlo HR and Kahn E The South African Legal System and Its Background (Juta Johannesburg 1973)

Muller Wealth Transfer

Muller EA Framework for Wealth Transfer Taxation in South Africa (LLD thesis UP 2010)

Olivier 2001 TSAR

Olivier L "Tax collection and the Bill of Rights" 2001 TSAR 193-200

Olivier and Croome Tax Administration

Olivier L and Croome BJ Tax Administration (Juta Cape Town 2010)

Rood 2009 Finweek

Rood L "Pay now, argue later" 13 August 2009 Finweek 44

Silke 2002 Acta Juridica

Silke J "Taxpayers and the Constitution: a battle already lost" 2002 Acta Juridica 282-334

Silver and Beneke VAT Handbook

Silver M and Beneke C Deloitte VAT Handbook 7th ed (Butterworths Durban 2009)

Van Schalkwyk 2004 Meditari Accountancy Research

Van Schalkwyk L "Constitutionality and the Income Tax Act – Revisited" 2004 Meditari Accountancy Research 185-195

Vorster 2001 De Rebus

Vorster H "Self-help and the fiscus – Metcash Trading Ltd v the Commissioner for SARS (CC) 24-11-2000 (CCT3/00 Unreported)" January 2001 De Rebus 47-47

Williams 2012 Synopsis

Williams RC "Unresolved aspects of the 'pay now later' rule" January 2012 Synopsis 4–6

Woolman and Botha "Limitations"

Woolman S and Botha H "Limitations" in Woolman S (eds) Constitutional Law of South Africa 2nd ed (Juta Cape Town 2007) pages?

Register of legislation and rules

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Customs Act 90 of 1964

Income Tax Act 58 of 1962

Interim Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 200 of 1993

Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000

South African Revenue Service Act 34 of 1997

Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011

Taxation Laws Second Amendment Act 18 of 2009

Value-Added Tax Act 89 of 1991

Register of official documents

Arnold Opinion

Arnold BJ Opinion Prepared for the Commissioner for Inland Revenue (Attached as Annexure H to the Affidavit of the Commissioner for Inland Revenue in an Application to the Constitutional Court, CCT/22/96)

SARS Media Release

SARS Media Release 27 of 2000

SARS Dispute Resolution

SARS: SARS Guide on Tax Dispute Resolution 2004

SARS Guide for Vendors

SARS: SARS VAT 404 – Guide for Vendors

Register of case law

Bernstein v Bester 1996 2 SA 751 (CC)

Capstone 556 (Pty) Ltd v CSARS 2011 ZAWCHC 297

Certification of the Amended Text of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996 1997 1 BCLR 1 (CC)

Chief Lesapo v North West Agricultural Bank 1999 12 BCLR 1420 (CC)

Dawood v Minister of Home Affairs; Shalabi v Minister of Home Affairs; Thomas v Minister of Home Affairs 2000 8 BCR 837 (CC)

Hindry v Nedcor Bank Ltd 1999 2 All SA 38 (W)

Metcash Trading Ltd v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service 2002 2 SA 232 (W)

Metcash Trading Ltd v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service and Another 2001 1 BCLR 1 (CC)

Mokoena v CSARS 2011 2 SA 556 (GSJ)

S v Bhulwana 1995 ZACC 11

S v Manamela 2000 3 SA 1 (CC)

Register of internet sources

Brincker and Louw Date Unknown www.saipa.co.za

Brincker E and Louw H Date Unknown Pay Now; Argue Later – Some Further Developments www.saipa.co.za/articles/173315/pay-now-argue-later-some-further-developments [date of use 22 Mar 2012]

Croome 2011 www.bericcroome.com

Croome BJ 2011 Payment of Tax During an Objection Regulated www.bericcroome.com/2011/03/payment-of-tax-during-objection.html [date of use 22 Jul 2011]

Daya and Gers 2011 www.ens.co.za

Daya L and Gers C 2011 SARS Clarifies the ... www.ens.co.za/ news/news_article.asp?iID=187&iType=4 [date of use 22 Mar 2012]

Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs 2009 www.saica.co.za

Edward Nathan Sonnenbergs 2009 Pay Now, Argue Later www.saica.co.za/integritax/2009/1795_Pay_now_argue_later.htm [date of use 22 March 2012]

Goldberg De Villiers 2012 www.goldbergdevilliers.co.za

Goldberg De Villiers 2012 Pay Now, Argue Later – SARS 1, Tax Payers 2 www.goldbergdevilliers.co.za/news_articles.asp?NewsID=13 [date of use 22 Mar 2012]

Jazbhay 2000 www.legalcity.net

Jazbhay SA 2000 The Lesapo Judgment: Defining the Constitutional Principle Against Self-help www.legalcity.net/Index.cfm?fuseaction=MAGAZINE.article

&ArticleID=5840 [date of use 25 Jun 2012]

Magolego 2009 www.polity.org.za

Magolego M 2009 Pay Now, Argue Later – SARS Shed Some Light for Taxpayer's Benefit www.polity.org.za/article/pay-now-argue-later-sars-shed-some-light-for-the-taxpayers-benefit-2009-11-17 [date of use 2 Mar 2010]

Moodley Date Unknown nattymoodley.com

Moodley M Date Unknown Pay Now, Argue Later nattymoodley.com/tax.htm [date of use 2 Mar 2010]

Mukuwane Date Unknown www.belldewar.co.za

Mukuwane L Date Unknown Pay Now and Argue Later www.belldewar.co.za/ pay-now-and-argue-later [date of use 22 Mar 2012]

Pato and Spira 2009 www.saica.co.za

Pato T and Spira J 2009 Relief For Taxpayers: "Pay Now, Argue Later" Rule Clarified www.saica.co.za/News/NewsArticlesandPressmediareleases/tabid/695/itemid/1867/language/en-US/Default.aspx [date of use 2 Mar 2011]

Sapa 2011 mybroadband.co.za

Sapa 2011 Law Clarifies ‘"Pay Now, Argue Later" Rule: SARS mybroadband.co.za/vb/content.php/2231-Law-clarifies-pay-now-argue-later-rule [date of use 22 Mar 2012]

SARS Date Unknown www.sars.gov.za

SARS Date Unknown "Pay Now, Argue Later" Principle Clarified www.sars.gov.za/home.asp [date of use 17 Mar 2011]

SARS 2011 www.sars.gov.za

SARS March 2011 The Interest Rate – Table 1 www.sars.gov.za [date of use 18 Jan 2012]

Temkin 2012 www.businessday.co.za

Temkin S 2012 "Pay Now, Argue Later’" Tax Issue Clarified www.businessday.co.za/Content.aspx?id=134342 [date of use 22 Mar 2012]

Tsikwe and Schultz 2011 www.saica.co.za

Tsikwe B and Schultz T 2011 Taxpayers May be at Risk With New "Pay Now, Argue Later" Rule www.saica.co.za/About/Regions/SAICAUnitedKingdom/ UKMediaCenter/ArticlesandPressReleases/tabid/1405/itemid/2824/language/en-ZA/Default.aspx [date of use 22 Mar 2012]

Vanek 2012 www.moneywebtax.co.za

Vanek M 2012 Big Tax Changes You Should be Aware Of www.moneywebtax.co.za/moneywebtax/view/moneywebtax/en/page1/page34677?oid=71806&sn=Detail&pid=1 [date of use 22 Mar 2012]



How to Cite

Keulder, C. (2017). "Pay Now, Argue Later" Rule – Before and After the Tax Administration Act. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 16(4), 124–158. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i4a2412




Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.