Constitutionalising The Right to Legal Representation at CCMA Arbitration Proceedings: Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Minister of Labour 2013 1 SA 468 (GNP)

  • Koboro J Selala North West University(PotchefstroomCampus)
Keywords: Legal representation, CCMA, Irrational, Constitution, Administrative action, Arbitration.

Abstract

Recently, the issue of legal representation at internal disciplinary hearings and CCMA arbitrations has been a fervent topic of labour law discourse in South Africa. While the courts have consistently accepted the common law principle that there is no absolute right to legal representation at tribunals other than courts of law, a study of recent case law reveals that the majority of court judgments seem to be leaning in favour of granting legal representation at disciplinary hearings and CCMA arbitrations than denying it. In the recent case, Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Minister of Labour, the High Court struck down the rule of the CCMA which restricted legal representation at CCMA arbitration as unconstitutional on grounds of irrationality. The High Court considered that the impugned rule was inconsistent with section 3(3)(a) of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, which was specifically enacted to give effect to the right to administrative justice entrenched in the Constitution. In so deciding the High Court considered the importance of job security and the possible loss of job by an employee as a serious matter. This case note aims to analyse critically the court’s judgment in Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Minister of Labour and to consider its implications for dispute resolution in South Africa. It is asserted that although the right to legal representation is not absolute at labour proceedings, in light of the court’s decision in Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Minister of Labour it is not easy to identify the circumstances that would provide justification for the infringement of the right at CCMA arbitrations and probably at disciplinary hearings as well. Here, an argument is made suggesting that the court in the Law Society case has taken the right to legal representation too far.

    

References

Bibliography

Baxter Adminstrative Law

Baxter L Adminstrative Law (Juta Cape Town 1984)

Benjamin 1994 ILJ

Benjamin P "Legal Representation in Labour Courts" 1994 ILJ 250 - 260

Buchner Constitutional Right to Legal Representation

Buchner JJ The Constitutional Right to Legal Representation during Disciplinary Hearings and Proceedings before the CCMA (LLM-thesis UPE 2003)

Buirski 1995 ILJ

Buirski P "The Draft Labour Relations Bill 1995 – The Case for Legal Representation at its Proposed Fora for Dispute Resolution" 1995 ILJ 529-544

Collier 2003 ILJ

Collier D "The Right to Legal Representation under the LRA" 2003 ILJ 753-770

Grogan Dismissal

Grogan J Dismissal (Juta Cape Town 2010)

Ncukaitobi 2012 Acta Juridica

Ncukaitobi T "Precedent, Separation of Powers and the Constitutional Court" 2012 Acta Juridica 148-169

Plasket Administrative Action

Plasket C Administrative Action, the Constitution and the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (A paper presented to a Legal Resources Centre seminar on the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 23 October 2001 Johannesburg)

Van Eck 2012 TSAR

Van Eck BPS "Representation during Arbitration Hearings: Spotlight on Members of Bargaining Councils" 2012 4 TSAR 774-785

Wallis 2005 Law, Development and Democracy

Wallis M "The LRA and the common law" 2005 Law Development and Democracy 181-191

Register of legislation and official documents

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Explanatory Memorandum of the Labour Relations Bill 1995 ILJ 278

Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995

Labour Relations Amendment Act 12 of 2002

Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000

Register of case law

Administrator, Transvaal v Zezile 1991 1 SA 21 (A)

Affordable Medicines Trust v Minister of Health 2006 3 SA 247 (CC)

Bato Star Fishing (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Environmental Affairs 2004 4 SA 490 (CC)

Chirwa v Transnet Ltd 2008 4 SA 367 (CC)

Commissioner, SARS v Executor, Frith's Estate 2001 2 SA 261 (SCA)

Dabner v SA Railways and Harbours 1920 AD 583

Hamata v Chairperson, Peninsula Technikon Internal Disciplinary Committee 2002 5 SA 445 (SCA)

Lace v Diack 1992 13 ILJ 860 (W)

Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Minister of Labour 2013 1 SA 468 (GNP)

Lunt v University of Cape Town 1989 2 SA 438 (C)

Majola v MEC, Department of Public Works, Northern Province 2004 25 ILJ 131 (LC)

MEC: Department of Finance, Economic Affairs & Tourism, Northern Province v Mahumani 2002 5 SA 449 (SCA)

Morali v President of the Industrial Court 1986 7 ILJ 690 (C)

Netherburn Engineering CC t/a Netherburn Ceramics v Mudau 2009 30 ILJ 1521 (CC)

Netherburn Engineering CC t/a Netherburn Ceramics v Robert Mudau 2009 30 ILJ 269 (LAC)

New National Party of SA v Government of the Republic of SA 1999 3 SA 191 (CC)

Norman Ntsie Taxis v Pooe 2005 26 ILJ 109 (LC)

Pharmaceutical Manufacturers of SA: In re Ex parte President of the Republic of SA 2000 2 SA 674 (CC)

Poswa v Member of the Executive Council of Economic Affairs, Environment and Tourism, Eastern Cape 2001 3 SA 582 (SCA)

Sidumo v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd 2008 2 BCLR 158 (CC)

Yates v University of Bophuthatswana 1994 3 SA 815 (B)

Published
2017-05-17
How to Cite
SelalaK. J. (2017). Constitutionalising The Right to Legal Representation at CCMA Arbitration Proceedings: Law Society of the Northern Provinces v Minister of Labour 2013 1 SA 468 (GNP). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 16(4), 396-420. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i4a2425
Section
Notes