Sink or Swim? Debt Review's Ambivalent "Lifeline" ... a Second Sequel to "… A Tale of Two Judgments" Nedbank v Andrews (240/2011) 2011 ZAECPEHC 29 (10 May 2011); Firstrand Bank Ltd v Evans 2011 4 SA 597 (KZD) and Firstrand Bank Ltd v Janse van Rensburg 2012 2 All SA 186 (ECP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i4a2514Keywords:
, National Credit Act 34 of 2005, act of insolvency, Insolvency Act 24 of 1936, debt review, debt restructuring, debt re-arrangement, sequestration, debt enforcement, notice of inability pay debtsAbstract
The interface between the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 and the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 has been the object of our courts' attention in a number of recent cases including Ex parte Ford and Two Similar Cases 2009 3 SA 376 (WCC), Investec Bank Ltd v Mutemeri 2010 1 SA 265 (GSJ), Naidoo v ABSA Bank Ltd 2010 4 SA 597 (SCA) and, more recently, Nedbank v Andrews (240/2011) 2011 ZAECPEHC 29 (10 May 2011), FirstRand Bank Ltd v Evans 2011 4 597 (KZD) and FirstRand Bank Ltd v Janse van Rensburg 2012 2 All SA 186 (ECP).
The question raised in all of the three most recent cases was whether or not a debtor's application for debt review in terms of the National Credit Act constitutes an "act of insolvency" in terms of section 8 of the Insolvency Act, upon which a creditor may rely in an application for the compulsory sequestration of the debtor's estate. If it does, it would mean that by resorting to the debt relief measures provided by the National Credit Act a debtor commits the very act on which a creditor may base an application for a sequestration order which, if granted, will render the debtor's estate insolvent and bring about the liquidation of his assets. From the debtor's perspective, this is probably precisely the situation that he seeks to avert by applying for debt review. Further, sequestration would frustrate the stated purpose of the National Credit Act, which is that debtors should take responsibility for their debts by satisfying them in full. Concurrent creditors might also ultimately receive a dividend which falls far short of what is due to them.
The question of whether a debtor's resorting to debt review may or should be the very act that triggers his estate's sequestration and its attendant consequences is an important issue, the treatment of which impacts significantly on the efficacy of the South African consumer debt relief system. This article analyses the most recent judgments and considers whether or not statutory regulation of the position is required.
Downloads
References
Bibliography
Bertelsmann, Mars and Nagel Law of Insolvency
Bertelsmann E, Mars WH and Nagel C Mars The Law of Insolvency in South Africa 9th ed (Juta Cape Town 2008)
Boraine 2003 De Jure
Boraine A "Some thoughts on the reform of administration orders and related issues" 2003 De Jure 217-251
Boraine and Roestoff 1993 De Jure
Boraine A and Roestoff M "Vriendskaplike sekwestrasies – 'n produk van verouderde beginsels? (Deel I)" 1993 De Jure 229-236
Boraine and Roestoff 1994 De Jure
Boraine A and Roestoff M "Vriendskaplike sekwestrasies – 'n produk van verouderde beginsels? (Deel II)" 1994 De Jure 31-53
Boraine and Roestoff 2000 Obiter
Boraine A and Roestoff M "Developments in American consumer bankruptcy law: lessons for South Africa (Part Two)" 2000 Obiter 241-270
Boraine and Roestoff 2002 Int Insolv Rev
Boraine A and Roestoff M "Fresh start procedures for consumer debtors in South African bankruptcy law" 2002 Int Insolv Rev 1-11
Boraine and Van Heerden 2010 PELJ
Boraine A and Van Heerden CM "To sequestrate or not to sequestrate in view of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005: A tale of two judgments" 2010 PELJ 13(3) 83-124
Calitz 2007 Obiter
Calitz J "Developments in the United States' consumer bankruptcy law: A South African perspective" 2007 Obiter 397-417
Coetzee "Personal bankruptcy and alternative measures"
Coetzee H "Personal bankruptcy and alternative measures - adequate debt relief for over-indebted consumers in South Africa?" (Unpublished paper delivered at the Eighth International Workshop on Commercial Law 3 August 2011 Sandton, Johannesburg)
Evans 2001 SA Merc LJ
Evans RG "Friendly sequestrations, the abuse of the process of court, and possible solutions for overburdened debtors" 2001 SA Merc LJ 485-508
Evans 2010 CILSA
Evans RG "A brief explanation of consumer bankruptcy and aspects of the bankruptcy estate in the United States of America" 2010 CILSA 337-351
Evans 2010 SA Merc LJ
Evans RG "Law reform in respect of assets in insolvent estates in South Africa" 2010 SA Merc LJ 465-483
Evans 2011 PELJ
Evans RG "Legislative exclusions or exemptions of property from the insolvent estate" 2011 PELJ 14(5) 39-56
Ferriell and Janger Understanding Bankruptcy
Ferriell J and Janger JE Understanding Bankruptcy 2nd ed (LexisNexis Newark, NJ 2007)
Jones and Buckle Civil Practice of the Magistrates' Courts
Jones PST and Buckle HO The Civil Practice of the Magistrates' Courts in South Africa 5th ed (Juta Cape Town 1946)
Kupiso 2011 De Rebus
Kupiso OB "Can debt enforcement procedures be circumvented by insolvency proceedings?" 2011 De Rebus (Nov) 26-27
Maghembe 2011 PELJ
Maghembe N "The Appellate Division has spoken – sequestration proceedings do not qualify as proceedings to enforce a credit agreement under the National Credit Act 34 of 2005: Naidoo v ABSA Bank 2010 4 SA 597" 2011 PELJ 14(2) 171-226
McKenzie Skene 2005 Int Insolv Rev
McKenzie Skene DW "Forgiving our debtors: a Scottish perspective on a fresh start for debtors" 2005 Int Insolv Rev 1-26
McKenzie Skene 2010 Int Insolv Rev
McKenzie Skene DW "The composition of the debtor's estate on insolvency: A comparative study of exemptions" 2010 Int Insolv Rev 29-55
Meskin Insolvency Law
Meskin PM et al Insolvency Law (Butterworths Durban 1990-)
Otto and Otto National Credit Act Explained
Otto JM and Otto RL The National Credit Act Explained 2nd ed (LexisNexis Durban 2010)
Roestoff et al 2009 PELJ
Roestoff M et al "The debt counselling process – closing the loopholes in the National Credit Act 34 of 2005" 2009 PELJ 12(4) 247-306
Roestoff and Jacobs 1997 De Jure
Roestoff M and Jacobs L "Statutêre akkoord voor likwidasie: 'n toereikende skuldenaarremedie?" 1997 De Jure 189-212
Roestoff and Renke 2005 Obiter
Roestoff M and Renke S "Debt relief for consumers – the interaction between insolvency and consumer protection legislation (Part One)" 2005 Obiter 561-574
Roestoff and Renke 2006 Obiter
Roestoff M and Renke S "Debt relief for consumers – the interaction between insolvency and consumer protection legislation (Part Two)" 2006 Obiter 98-110
Steyn Statutory Regulation
Steyn L Statutory Regulation of Forced Sale of the Home in South Africa. LLD – thesis UP 2012)
Van Apeldoorn 2008 Int Insolv Rev
Van Apeldoorn JC "The 'Fresh Start' for individual debtors: Social, moral and practical issues" 2008 Int Insolv Rev 57-72
Van Heerden "The interaction between debt review"
Van Heerden C "The interaction between debt review in terms of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 and insolvency law" in University of Johannesburg Annual Banking Law Update 23 April 2009 University of Johannesburg
Van Heerden and Boraine 2009 PELJ
Van Heerden C and Boraine A "The interaction between the debt relief measures in the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 and aspects of insolvency law" 2009 PELJ 12(3) 22-63
Register of reports and draft Bills
Department of Justice and Constitutional Development Unofficial working draft
Unofficial working draft of a proposed Insolvency and Business Recovery Bill (compiled in 2010); available from Mr MB (Tienie) Cronje (mcronje@justice.gov.za) at the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, Pretoria, South Africa
INSOL International Consumer Debt Report
INSOL International Consumer Debt Report (INSOL London 2001)
INSOL International Consumer Debt Report II
INSOL International Consumer Debt Report II (INSOL London 2011)
Register of legislation and regulations
Insolvency Act 24 of 1936
Magistrates' Courts Act 32 of 1944
National Credit Act 34 of 2005
Regulations to the NCA in GNR 489 in GG 28864 of 31 May 2006
Register of case law
Barlows (Eastern Province) Ltd v Bouwer 1950 4 SA 385 (E)
Chenille Industries v Vorster 1953 2 SA 691 (O)
Collett v FirstRand Bank Ltd 2011 4 SA 508 (SCA)
Court v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 1995 3 SA 123 (A)
De Waard v Andrew & Thienhaus Limited 1907 TS 727
Du Plessis v Tzerefos 1979 4 SA 819 (O)
Eli Spilkin (Pty) Ltd v Mather 1970 4 SA 22 (E)
Ex parte Ford and Two Similar Cases 2009 3 SA 376 (WCC)
FirstRand Bank Ltd v Evans 2011 4 SA 597 (KZD)
FirstRand Bank Ltd v Janse van Rensburg 2012 2 All SA 186 (ECP)
Investec Bank Ltd v Mutemeri 2010 1 SA 265 (GSJ)
Madari v Cassim 1950 2 SA 35 (D)
Naidoo v ABSA Bank Ltd 2010 4 SA 597 (SCA)
Nedbank v Andrews (240/2011) 2011 ZAECPEHC 29 (10 May 2011)
Ohlsson's Cape Breweries Ltd v Totten 1911 TPD 48
Optima Fertilizers (Pty) Ltd v Turner 1968 4 SA 29 (D)
Port Shepstone Fresh Meat and Fish Co (Pty) Ltd v Schultz 1940 NPD 163
Rodrew (Pty) Ltd v Rossouw 1975 3 SA 137 (O)
Shaban & Co (Pty) Ltd v Plank 1966 1 SA 59 (O)
Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Court 1993 3 SA 286 (C)
Weiner v Broekhuysen 2003 4 SA 301 (SCA)
Register of internet sources
SALRC 2000 www.justice.gov.za
South African Law Reform Commission 2000 Report on the Review of the Law of Insolvency: Draft Insolvency Bill and Explanatory Memorandum (Project 63) www.justice.gov.za/salrc/reports/r_prj63_insolv_2000apr.pdf [date of use 10 Feb 2012]
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Lienne Steyn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}