Some Comments on the Scheme of Arrangement as an "Affected Transaction" as Defined in the Companies Act 71 of 2008
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i5a2521Keywords:
, Scheme of arrangement, affected transaction, Companies Act, company takeover, re-acquisition of companies, south african company lawAbstract
A scheme of arrangement involving a regulated company and its shareholders is defined as an "affected transaction" in the Companies Act 71 of 2008. Although scheme of arrangements, which can be used to achieve a takeover of a company, are a common occurrence, the Act provides no definition of such schemes. The importance of knowing what actually constitutes a scheme of arrangement becomes apparent when it is noted that section 121 of the Actprovides that any person making an offer which if accepted would result in an affected transaction is obliged to comply with all the relevant reporting and approval requirements in the Act, as well as the Takeover Regulations, unless the Takeover Regulation Panel has granted an exemption. Giving effect to an affected transaction is prohibited, unless the Panel has issued a compliance certificate or granted an exemption. The article comments generally on the definition of a scheme of arrangement as an affected transaction, highlighting the elements of a scheme of arrangement. Specific consideration is given to transactions which include a re-acquisition by the company of its own previously issued securities and when such a re-acquisition on its own would be considered to be a scheme of arrangement and an affected transaction. Comment on the obligation to appoint an independent expert to report on the scheme and the relevance, if any, of the solvency and liquidity of the company embarking on a scheme of arrangement is included. Finally, consideration is given to the need to have a scheme of arrangement approved by a special resolution and the potential exclusion of certain voting rights. The article exposes a number of difficulties with the interpretation of the applicable provisions and suggests that these need to be revisited by the legislature for clarification.
Downloads
References
Bibliography
Luiz Securities Regulation Code
Luiz S An Evaluation of the South Africa Securities Regulation Code on Takeovers and Mergers (Volume 2) (LLD-thesis Unisa 2003)
Luiz 1997 SA Merc LJ
Luiz S "Some Comments on the Application of the Securities Regulation Code on Takeovers and Mergers" 1997 SA Merc LJ 239-264
Luiz 2004 SA Merc LJ
Luiz S "Some Comments on the Definition of an 'Affected Transaction' in the Companies Act" 2004 SA Merc LJ 1-16
Van Der Linde 2010 TSAR
Van der Linde K "Share Repurchases and the Protection of Shareholders" 2010 TSAR 288-308
Register of cases
Ex parte NBSA Centre Ltd 1987 2 SA 783 (T)
Ex parte Satbel (Edms) Bpk: In re Meyer v Satbel (Edms) Bpk 1984 4 SA 347 (W)
Ex parte Satbel (Pty) Ltd (Meyer intervening) 1987 3 SA 405 (C)
In re National Bank Ltd [1966] 1 All ER 1006 (ChD)
Sefalana Employee Benefits Organisation v Haslam 2000 2 SA 415 (SCA)
Namex v Kommissaris van Binnelandse Inkomste 1994 2 SA 265 (A)
Register of legislation, regulations and codes
Companies Act 61 of 1973
Companies Act 71 of 2008
Companies Regulations 2011 (GN 351 in GG 34239 of 26 April 2011)
Securities Regulation Code in Takeovers and Mergers (GNR 29 in GG 12962 of 18 January 1991)
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Stephanie M Luiz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.