Determining the Effect (the Social Costs) of Exclusion under the South African Exclusionary Rule: Should Factual Guilt Tilt the Scales in Favour of the Admission of Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i5a2532Keywords:
Admissibility of evidence, unconstitutionally obtained evidence, exclusion of unconstitutionally obtained evidence, section 35(5), exclusionary rule, effect of exclusion, presumption of innocenceAbstract
Section 35(5) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 governs the exclusion of unconstitutionally obtained evidence in criminal trials. Three groups of factors must be considered to assess whether unconstitutionally obtained evidence should either be excluded or admitted. This contribution is focussed on the third group of factors (also known as the "effect of exclusion", or the "social costs of exclusion") which consists of the "seriousness of the charge faced by the accused", and the "importance of the evidence to secure a conviction". This group of factors is concerned with the public interest in crime control. Some scholars argue that the "public mood" should be a weighty factor when our courts consider this group of factors.
Against this background this article considers three issues: First, whether considerable weight should be attached to the "current mood" of society when our courts weigh and balance this group of factors against other relevant factors; secondly, whether a consideration of the "seriousness of the charge" and the "importance of the evidence for a successful prosecution" could possibly encroach upon the presumption of innocence; and, thirdly, whether factual guilt should be allowed to tip the scales in favour of the admission of unconstitutionally obtained evidence when the evidence is crucial for a conviction on a serious charge.
Downloads
References
Bibliography
Ally 2010 SACJ
Ally D "Constitutional exclusion under section 35(5) of the Constitution: Should an accused bear a 'threshold burden' of proving that his or her constitutional right has been infringed?" 2010 SACJ 22-38
Ally 2010 SALJ
Ally D "Avoiding the pitfall encountered by the Canadian courts when assessing the admissibility of unconstitutionally obtained evidence in criminal trials in South Africa – A proposed alternative admissibility framework" 2010 SALJ 694-724
Ally 2010 CILSA
Ally D "The need for clarity on whether 'suspects' may rely on section 35(5) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996: a comparative analysis" 2010 CILSA 239-259
Currie and De Waal (eds) Bill of Rights Handbook
Currie I and De Waal J (eds) The Bill of Rights Handbook 5th ed (Juta Cape Town 2005)
Davies 2002 CLQ
Davies M "Alternative approaches to the exclusion of evidence under section 24(2) of the Charter" 2002 CLQ 21-39
De Villiers 1997 TSAR
De Villiers DS "Dra die keiser klere? Diskressie en wetteloosheid in strafregpleging – quo vadis Suid-Afrika?" 1997 TSAR 615-625
De Villiers 1998 TSAR
De Villiers DS "Dra die keiser klere? Diskressie en wetteloosheid in strafregpleging – quo vadis Suid-Afrika?" 1998 TSAR 20-38
De Villiers (ed) TRC Report
De Villiers S (ed) (Tutu D chairperson) The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report Vol 6 (The Commission Cape Town 2003)
De Vos 2011 TSAR
De Vos W "Illegally or unconstitutionally obtained evidence: a South African perspective" 2011 TSAR 268-282
Du Toit et al Commentary
Du Toit E et al Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Act Rev Serv 46 (Juta Cape Town 2011)
Hogg Constitutional Law
Hogg P Constitutional Law of Canada (Carswell Toronto 1992)
Kentridge and Spitz "Interpretation"
Kentridge J and Spitz D "Interpretation" in Chaskalson M et al (eds) Constitutional Law of South Africa Rev Serv 1 (Juta Cape Town 1996)
Kruger and Kriegler Suid-Afrikaanse Strafproses
Kruger A and Kriegler J Hiemstra: Suid-Afrikaanse Strafproses 7th ed (LexisNexis Durban 2011)
Mahoney 1999 CLQ
Mahoney R "Problems with the current approach to s 24(2) of the Charter: An inevitable discovery" 1999 CLQ 443-477
Meintjies-Van der Walt 1996 SACJ
Meintjies-Van der Walt L "S v Melani and Two Others (CC9/93 29 March 1995 ECD): Public policy and the fruits of the poisonous tree – Admissibility of evidence of a pointing-out obtained in breach of the Constitution" 1996 SACJ 83-89
Morissette 1984 McGill LJ
Morissette Y-M "The exclusion of evidence under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms: What to do and what not to do" 1984 McGill LJ 521-556
Moseneke 2012 SALJ
Moseneke D "Striking a balance between the will of the people and the supremacy of the Constitution" 2012 SALJ 9-22
Naudé 2001 SACJ
Naudé B "Die reg op 'n billike verhoor in die konteks van lokvalbetrapping en die uitsluiting van ongrondwetlik verkreё getuienis" 2001 SACJ 38-58
Naudé 2009 Obiter
Naudé B "The revised Canadian test for the exclusion of unconstitutionally obtained evidence" 2009 Obiter 607-627
Naudé 2009 SAPR/PL
Naudé BC "A suspect's right to be informed" 2009 SAPR/PL 506-527
Paciocco 1989 CLQ
Paciocco D "The judicial repeal of s 24(2) and the development of the Canadian exclusionary rule" 1989 CLQ 326-365
Roach Constitutional Remedies
Roach K Constitutional Remedies in Canada (Canada Law Book Ontario 1994)
Schmidt and Rademeyer Bewysreg
Schmidt C and Rademeyer H Schmidt Bewysreg 4th ed (LexisNexis Durban 2000)
Schutte 2000 SACJ
Schutte F "Uitsluiting van getuienis ingevolge artikel 35(5) van die Grondwet" 2000 SACJ 57-68
Schwikkard 1991 SACJ
Schwikkard P "Pointing out and inadmissible confessions" 1991 SACJ 318-328
Schwikkard 1997 SAJHR
Schwikkard P "The exclusion of evidence in the absence of an appropriate warning" 1997 SAJHR 446-457
Schwikkard "Arrested, Detained and Accused Persons"
Schwikkard P "Arrested, Detained and Accused Persons" in Currie I and De Waal J (eds) The Bill of Rights Handbook 5th ed (Juta Cape Town 2005)
Schwikkard "Evidence"
Schwikkard P "Evidence" in Woolman S et al (eds) Constitutional Law of South Africa Vol I 2nd ed (Juta Cape Town 2007)
Steytler Constitutional Criminal Procedure
Steytler N Constitutional Criminal Procedure: A Commentary on the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Butterworths Durban 1998)
Stuart 2010 Sw J Int'l L
Stuart D "Welcome flexibility and better criteria from the Supreme Court of Canada for exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms" 2010 Sw J Int'l L 313-332
Stuart Heads of Argument
Stuart D Faculty of Law Queen's University Canada Heads of Argument filed of record in the Supreme Court of Canada in the appeal of R v Grant (2006) 38 CR (6th) 58 (SCC)
Van der Merwe "Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence" (2002)
Van der Merwe SE "Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence" in Schwikkard PJ and Van der Merwe SE (eds) Principles of Evidence 2nd ed (Juta Cape Town 2002)
Van der Merwe "Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence" (2009)
Van der Merwe SE "Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence" in Schwikkard PJ and Van der Merwe SE (eds) Principles of Evidence 3rd ed (Juta Cape Town 2009)
Viljoen "Law of Criminal Procedure and the Bill of Rights"
Viljoen F "The Law of Criminal Procedure and the Bill of Rights" in Mokgoro Y and Tlakula P (eds) Bill of Rights Compendium Service Issue No 7 (LexisNexis Durban 2008)
Zeffertt and Paizes Law of Evidence
Zeffertt D and Paizes A The South African Law of Evidence 2nd ed (LexisNexis Butterworths 2009)
Register of legislation
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 (as amended)
Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1986
Register of case law
Bennett v Minster of Safety and Security 2006 1 SACR 523 (T)
Ex Parte Minister of Justice in re R v Matemba 1941 AD 75
Ferreira v Levine; Vryenhoek v Powell 1996 1 SA 984 (CC)
Klass v Germany 1961, Series A No 28
Lam Chi-ming v R 1991 LRC (Crim) 416
Maghjane v Chairperson, North-West Gambling Board 2006 2 SACR 447 (CC)
Mahomed v National Director of Safety and Security 2006 1 SACR 495 (W)
Ntzweli v S 2001 2 All SA 184 (C)
Pillay v S 2004 2 BCLR 158 (SCA)
R v Big M Drug Mart Ltd 1985 50 CCC (3d) 1 (SCC)
R v Collins 1987 1 SCR 265 (SCC)
R v Côté 2011 SCC 46
R v Dalley 2002 NSWCCA 284
R v Jacoy 1998 38 CRR 290 (SCC)
R v Feeney 1997 115 CCC (3d) 129 (SCC)
R v Grant 1994 84 CCC (3d) (SCC)
R v Grant 2006 38 CR (6th) 58 (SCC)
R v Grant 2009 66 CR (6th) 1 (SCC)
R v Harrison 2009 SCC 34
R v Traverse 2003 Carswell Nfld 119
S v Agnew 1996 2 SACR 535 (C)
S v August 2005 2 All SA 605 (NC)
S v Basson 2007 1 SACR 566 (CC)
S v Cloete 1999 2 SACR 137 (C)
S v Desai 1997 1 All SA 298 (W)
S v Dos Santos 2010 2 SACR 382 (SCA)
S v Gumede 1998 5 BCLR 530 (D)
S v Hena 2006 2 SACR 33 (SE)
S v Hoho 1999 2 SACR 159 (C)
S v Januarie 1991 2 SACR 682 (SE)
S v January: Prokureur-Generaal, Natal v Khumalo 1994 2 SACR 801 (A)
S v Khuzwayo 1990 1 SACR 365 (A)
S v Lachman 2010 2 SACR 52 (SCA)
S v Lebone 1965 2 SA 837 (A)
S v Lottering 1999 12 BCLR 1478 (N)
S v Madiba 1998 1 BCLR 38 (D)
S v Makwanyane 1995 2 SACR 1 (CC)
S v Malefo 1998 1 SACR 127 (W)
S v Mashumpa 2008 1 SACR 128 (E)
S v Mathebula 1997 1 BCLR 123 (W)
S v Matlou 2010 2 SACR 342 (SCA)
S v Mayekiso 1996 2 SACR 298 (C)
S v Melani 1996 2 BCLR 174 (EC)
S v Mkhize 1999 2 SACR 632 (W)
S v Mkhize 2011 1 SACR 554 (KZD)
S v Motloutsi 1996 1 SACR 78 (C)
S v Mphala 1998 1 SACR 388 (W)
S v Mthembu 2008 ZASCA 51
S v Muravha 1998 JOL 3994 (V)
S v Naidoo 1998 1 SACR 479 (D)
S v Ncgobo 1998 10 BCLR 1248 (W)
S v Ndlovu 2001 1 SACR 85 (W)
S v Nell 2009 2 SACR 37 (C)
S v Nomwebu 1996 2 SACR 396 (E)
S v Nzama 2009 2 SACR 326 (KZP)
S v R 2000 1 SACR 33 (W)
S v Sheehama 1991 2 SACR 860 (A)
S v Shongwe 1998 9 BCLR 1170 (T)
S v Shongwe 1998 2 SACR 321 (T)
S v Soci 1998 2 SACR 275 (E)
S v Tandwa 2007 SCA 34 (RSA)
S v Tsotsetsi (1) 2003 2 SACR 623 (W)
S v Van der Merwe 1997 19 BCLR (O)
S v Williams 1995 7 BCLR 861 (CC)
S v Zuma 1995 4 BCLR 401 (CC)
Thint (Pty) Ltd v National Director of Public Prosecutions; Zuma v National Director of Public Prosecutions 2008 ZACC 13
Zuma v National Director of Public Prosecutions 2006 1 SACR 468 (D)
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Dane Ally
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}