Tradisionele Leiers: Erkenning en die Pad Vorentoe

Authors

  • W du Plessis North West University(Potchefstroom Campus)
  • T Scheepers North West University(Potchefstroom Campus)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/1998/v1i1a2902

Keywords:

traditional authority, customary law

Abstract

There has for many years been legal recognition of Traditional Leaders in South African laws, such as the Black Administration Act 38 of 1927 and regulations and proclamations issued in terms of other legislation. Recently legal recognition was confirmed in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996. 

Additional recognition of Traditional Leaders and the institution of Traditional Leadership is found in the various provincial legislation providing for Provincial Houses of Traditional Leaders and the establishment and functioning of the National Council of Traditional Leaders. 

Yet the institution of Traditional Leadership has over the past few years given rise to much controversy. There are those who argue that the institution is outdated and others who regard Traditional Leaders as custodians of customary values and the only leaders who are truly responsible for the well being of communities historically and religiously entrusted to them. 

Traditional leaders fulfil a variety of functions in rural society, including that of presiding officer in customary courts, mediator of disputes, advisor in agricultural and family matters, guardian of young, old, infirm and abandoned. They perform legislative, executive and judicial functions according to the wish of the majority of the members of the tribe. 

It became apparent, that de facto Traditional Authorities are the only existing form of local government in rural areas in South Africa. It seems unlikely that, in the foreseeable future, it will be financially, politically or practically possible to replace this form of rural government with a comprehensive and sustainable alternative. 

The future role of Traditional Leadership in the development process is significant in that in addition to the recognition afforded by the Constitution and other legislation, the development law, unfolding in modern day South Africa under a new

development paradigm, distinctly provides for Traditional Leaders to play a significant role in rural development and development planning at local government level in rural areas. 

The role and function of the Traditional Leaders of South Africa in the rural development process unfolds as the Integrated planning process comes into operation as envisaged in section 10 of the Local Government Transition Act 209 of 1993 read with the .principles contained in the Development Facilitation Act 67 of 1995. 

The development principles and the regulations prescribing the process of formulating land development objectives, provides for an inclusive process in which all role players and stakeholders are to be involved. In practice this means that communities, community organizations and institutions, as concerned role players in civil society, are also the concerned and key role players in the development planning and development process at local level. No plan and development strategy will therefore meet the prescribed legal requirements of acceptable development planning standards, if the rural communities and their leaders are not directly and actively involved. 

Much of the confusion and conflict between Traditional Leadership and Customary Law Councilors on the one hand and elected Local Government Councilors on the other, arose as a result of a misunderstanding of the valuable support role which Traditional Leaders can play in the development process. The difference in the nature and scope of the tasks of elected and traditional community leaders provide a rich multi-facet basis on which a successful local governance system can be developed within the context of the current constitutional-legal framework in South Africa. 

In many other countries in Africa it was only realized after repeated failures of rural development experiments, that Traditional Leaders and Traditional Authorities constitute a most valuable asset in the rural development process. 

      ScienceOpen_Log0537.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BIBLIOGRAFIE

Balatseng en Du Plessis 1996 THRHR 349-355 Balatseng D en Du Plessis W Succession of chieftaincy: hereditary, appointment or by common consent? -Chief Pilane v Chief Linchwe and Another 1995 4 SA 686 (B) 1996 THRHR 349-355

Bennett Human Rights Bennett TW Human Rights and African Customary Law (Juta Kaapstad 1995)

Dlamini CRM Human Rights Dlamini CRM Human Rights in Africa (Butterworths Durban 1995)

Hogg Focus Forum RGN

Hogg G "Real People Driven Development is Possible" in Focus Forum RGN 4(1):9-12

Mtimkulu 1996 Politeia 89-93 Mtimkulu P "Traditional leaders and the Constitution" 1996 Politeia 89-93

Pityana Many Cultures, One Nation Pityana NB "Minorities in Global Societies" in Villa-Vicencio C en Niehaus C (reds) Many Cultures, One Nation (Human & Rousseau Kaapstad 1995) 167

Scheepers Traditional Leadership Scheepers TE “Traditional Leadership and the Development Process in South Africa” Ongepubliseerde referaat gelewer by die internasionale konferensie oor tradisionele leierskap in Suider-Afrika 16-18 April 1996 Umtata

Scheepers 1996 SA Publiekreg 490-511 Scheepers TE “Die rol van die reg in die ontwikkeling van landelike tradisionele owerheidsgebiede” 1996 SA Publiekreg 490-511

Traditional Authorities Research Group Administrative and legal position

Traditional Authorities Research Group The administrative and legal position of Traditional Authorities in South Africa and their contribution to the implementation of the Reconstruction and Development Programme

(Potchefstroom 1996)

Vorster 1996 SA Tydskrif vir Etnologie 76 Vorster LP "Tradisionele leierskap in Suid-Afrika" 1996 SA Tydskrif vir Etnologie 76

Whitfield South African Native Law Whitfield GMB South African Native Law (Juta Kaapstad 1929) 2

Hofsake

Chief Pilane v Chief Linchwe and Another 1995 4 SA 686 (B) 1996 4 SA 653 (KH) Ex Parte Speaker of the KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Legislature: In re KwaZulu-Natal Amakhosi and Iziphakanyiswa Amendment Bill of 1995; Ex Parte Speaker of the KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Legislature: In re Payment of Salaries, Allowances and other Privileges to the Ingonyama Bill of 1995 1996 4 SA 653 (KH)

Wette

Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika 200 van 1993

Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika 108 van 1996

KwaZulu-Natal Amakhosi and Iziphakanyiswa Amendment Bill of 1995

Oorgangswet op Plaaslike Regering 209 van 1993

Payment of Salaries, Allowances and other Privileges to the Ingonyama Bill of 1995

Swart Administrasie Wet 38 van 1927

Wet op die Raad van Tradisionele Leiers 10 van 1997

Wet op Nasionale Raad van Tradisionele leiers 31 van 1994

Wet op Ontwikkelingsfasilitering 67 van 1995

Wet op Swart Owerhede 68 van 1951

Published

10-07-2017

How to Cite

du Plessis, W., & Scheepers, T. (2017). Tradisionele Leiers: Erkenning en die Pad Vorentoe. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 1(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/1998/v1i1a2902

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.