Monkey Selfie and Authorship in Copyright Law: The Nigerian and South African Perspectives




monkey selfie, authorship, copyright, South Africa, Nigeria


A photograph taken by a monkey is in the centre of a copyright claim in the famous monkey selfie case in the United States of America. Suing as next friend of the monkey, named Naruto, the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals contended that copyright in the photograph belongs to the monkey as author of the photograph since the monkey created the photograph unaided by any person. On the motion of the defendants, the case was dismissed by the US district court on the ground that the concept of authorship under US Copyright Act cannot be defined to include non-human animals. The dismissal order was confirmed by a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeal of Ninth Circuit a request for an appeal before a panel of eleven judges of the appellate court was denied. This paper reviews the case in the light of the concept of authorship and ownership, with specific focus on the authorship of photographs, under the Nigerian Copyright Act and South African Copyright Act. In so doing, it examines and relies on Ginsburg's six principles for testing authorship to test the authorship of photographs under the Acts. It also relies on the concepts of subjective rights and legal personality to explain the implication of conferring copyright ownership on non-human animals. It argues that for authorship of and ownership of the copyright in a photograph to be established under the Nigerian Copyright Act and South African Copyright Act, a legal person must have created the photograph. Consequently, for the purposes of argument, the paper proceeds on the assumption that the monkey selfie case originated from Nigeria or South Africa. After analysing relevant statutory provisions and case law, the paper finds that the Nigerian Copyright Act and the South African Copyright Act do not envisage the conferral of authorship in particular, and copyright protection in general, to a non-human animal. It then concludes that the courts in both countries would not reach a different conclusion from the one made by the US courts.




Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...



Abrams 1992 LCP

Abrams HB "Originality and Creativity in Copyright Law" 1992 LCP 3-44

Adewopo According to Intellectual Property

Adewopo A According to Intellectual Property: A Pro-Development Vision of the Law and the Nigerian Intellectual Property Law and Policy Reform in the Knowledge Era (Nigerian Institute of Advanced Legal Studies Lagos 2012)

Adewopo Nigerian Copyright System

Adewopo A Nigerian Copyright System: Principles and Perspectives (Odade Abuja 2012)

Asein 2007 IIC

Asein JO "Redefinition of First Ownership under Nigerian Copyright Law – Lessons from an Inchoate Mutation" 2007 IIC 299-315

Asein Nigerian Copyright Law and Practice

Asein JO Nigerian Copyright Law and Practice (Books and Gavel Abuja 2012)

Bansi and Reddy 2015 Procedia

Bansi R and Reddy K "Intellectual Property from Publicly Financed Research and Intellectual Property Registration by Universities: A Case Study of a University in South Africa" 2015 Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 185-196

Cornish 2002 CJLA

Cornish W "The Author as Risk-sharer" 2002 CJLA 2-16

Dean Handbook of South African Copyright Law

Dean OH Handbook of South African Copyright Law (Juta Cape Town 2015)

Drassinower 2003-2004 UOLTJ

Drassinower A "Sweat of the Brow, Creativity, and Authorship: On Originality in Canadian Copyright Law" 2003-2004 UOLTJ 105-123

Du Plessis Introduction to Law

Du Plessis L An Introduction to Law (Juta Cape Town 2009)

Ekpa 2014 KSUBJPL

Ekpa FO "The Preconditions for Copyright Protection in Nigeria" 2014 KSUBJPL 76-89

Gervais 2002 J Copyright Soc'y USA

Gervais DJ "Feist goes Global: A Comparative Analysis of the Notion of Originality in Copyright Law" 2002 J Copyright Soc'y USA 949-981

Ginsburg 2003 DePaul L Rev

Ginsburg JC "The Concept of Authorship in Comparative Copyright Law" 2003 DePaul L Rev 1063-1092

Guadamuz 2016 IP Review

Guadamuz A "The Monkey Selfie: Copyright Lessons for Originality in Photographs and Internet Jurisdiction" 2016 IP Review 1-2

Harms 2013 PELJ

Harms LTC "Originality' and 'Reproduction' in Copyright Law with Special Reference to photographs" 2013 PELJ 488-513

Hobololo 2015 SAIPLJ

Hobololo V "Rethinking Ownership of Intellectual Property Developed from Publicly-financed R&D: The Case for Indigenous Knowledge Holders" 2015 SAIPLJ 1-14

Kwall 2007 Hous L Rev

Kwall RS "Originality in Context" 2007 Hous L Rev 871-899

Logue 2014 LSG

Logue F "Monkey See, Monkey Do" 2014 LSG 26-29

Ncube et al "Effects of the South African IP Regime"

Ncube CB et al "Effects of the South African IP Regime on Generating Value from Publicly Funded Research: An Exploratory Study of Two Universities" in De Beer J et al (eds) Innovation and Intellectual Property: Collaborative Dynamics in Africa (UCT Press Cape Town 2014) 282-315

Ng 2008 Hastings Comm & Ent LJ

Ng A "Authors and Readers: Conceptualizing Authorship in Copyright Law" 2008 Hastings Comm & Ent LJ 377-418

Nimmer 2001 Hous L Rev

Nimmer D "Copyright in the Dead Sea Scrolls: Authorship and Originality" 2001 Hous L Rev 1-222

Oriakhogba 2015 SAIPLJ

Oriakhogba DO "Authorship, Ownership and Enforcement of Copyright: The Nigerian Situation" 2015 SAIPLJ 40-54

Oriakhogba and Fenemigho 2014 NAUJILJ

Oriakhogba DO and Fenemigho AI "Development, Concept and Scope of Copyright Protection in Nigeria: An Overview" 2014 NAUJILJ 179-191

Reischl 2012 YEEH

Reischl KH "Photography and the Crisis of Authorship: Tosltoy and the Popular Photographic Press" 2012 YEEH 533-549

Rosati 2017 JIPLP

Rosati E "The Monkey Selfie Case and the Concept of Authorship: An EU Perspective" 2017 JIPLP 973-977

Seignette "Authorship, Copyright Ownership"

Seignette J "Authorship, Copyright Ownership and Works Made on Commission and Under Employment" in Hugenholtz B et al (eds) A Century of Dutch Copyright Law: Auteurswet 1912-2012 (deLex Amsterdam 2012) 115-140

Tong 2010 JIPLP

Tong L "Ownership of IP Derived from Publicly Funded Research: The State Steps In" 2010 JIPLP 409-411

Ugbe 2002 UniMaid LJ

Ugbe RO "Originality and Fixation as Basis for Copyright in Music" 2002 UniMaid LJ 23

Van der Merwe 2013 De Jure

Van der Merwe A "Infringement of the Right to Goodwill: The Basic Legal Principles in Relation to South African Case Law" 2013 De Jure 1035-1055

Yen "Interdisciplinary Future"

Yen A "The Interdisciplinary Future of Copyright Theory" in Woodmansee W and Jaszi P (eds) The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature (Duke University Press Durham 1994) 159-174

Case law

Access Bank v Agege Local Government 2016 LPELR-40491 (CA)

Adventure Film Productions v Tully 1993 EMLR 376

Antiquesportfolio Com Plc v Rodney Fitch and Company Ltd 2001 ECDR 5

Biotech Laboratories (Pty) Ltd v Beecham Group Plc 2002 ZASCA 11 (25 March 2002)

CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada 2004 1 SCR 339

Century Communications Ltd v Mayfair Entertainment UK Ltd 1993 EMLR 335

Fawehinmi v NBA (No 2) 1989 2 NWLR Pt 106 558

Feldman v EMI Music SA (Pty) Ltd/ EMI Music Publishing SA (Pty) Ltd 2010 1 SA 1 (SCA)

Haupt t/a Softcopy v Brewers Marketing Intelligence (Pty) Ltd 2006 4 SA 458 (SCA)

ICIC (Directory Publishers) Ltd v Ekko Delta (Nig) Ltd 1977-1989 2 IPLR 32

Ifeanyi Okoyo v Prompt and Quality Services 2003-2007 5 IPLR 117-135

Joseph Ikhuoria v Campaign Services Ltd & Anor 1977-1989 2 IPLR 316-335

Kain v Kahn 1986 4 SA 251 (C)

Kalamazoo Division (Pty) Ltd v Gay 1978 2 SA 184 (C)

King v South African Weather Services 2009 3 SA 13 (SCA)

Naruto v David Slater (unreported) case number 15-cv-04324-WHO of 28 January 2016

Naruto v David Slater (unreported) case number 16-15469, ID: 10835881, DktEntry: 59 of 13 April 2018

Naruto v David Slater (unreported) case number 16-15469, ID: 10845881, DktEntry: 62-1 of 23 April 2018

Naruto v David Slater (unreported) case number 16-15469, ID: 10886635, DktEntry: 63 of 25 May 2018

National Soccer League t/a Premier Soccer League v Gidani (Pty) Ltd 2014 2 All SA 461 (GJ)

Northern Office Micro Computers (Pty) Ltd v Rosenstein 1981 4 SA 123 (C)

Painer v Standard Verlags GmbH (unreported) case number C-145/10 of 1 December 2011

Peter Obe v Grapevine Communications Ltd 2003-2007 5 IPLR 354-384

Saunders Valve Co Ltd v Klep Values (Pty) Ltd 1985 1 SA 646 (T)

Sonora Gentil v Tabansi Agencies Ltd 1977-1989 2 IPLR 1-31

Temple Island Collection Ltd v New English Teas Ltd 2012 EWPCC 1

Universiteit van Pretoria v Tommie Meyer 1977 4 SA 376 (T)

Waylite Diaries CC v First National Bank Ltd 1995 1 SA 645 (A)

Yemitan v Daily Times 1977-1989 2 IPLR 141-156

Yeni Anikulapo-Kuti v Iseli 2003-2007 5 IPLR 53-73


Copyright Act 63 of 1968 (Australia)

Copyright Act 98 of 1978 (South Africa)

Copyright Act c C-42, RSC 1985 (Canada)

Copyright Act Cap C28 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004

Copyright Act, 1976 (USA)

Copyright Act, 1999 (Tanzania)

Copyright Act, 2001 (Kenya)

Copyright Act, 2004 (Gambia)

Copyright Act, 2005 (Ghana)

Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act, 2000 (Zimbabwe)

Copyright and Performance Act, 1994 (Zambia)

Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988 (Britain)

Intellectual Property Rights from Publicly Financed Research and Development Act 51 of 2008 (South Africa)

United States Constitution

International instruments

Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886)

WIPO Draft Model Law on Copyright (1990)

Internet sources

Bakhariev 2015$FILE/The%20Changing%20Concept%20of%20Authorship.%20Case%20of%20A%20Monkey%20Selfie,%20Iegor%20Bakhariev.pdf

Bakhariev I 2015 The Changing Concept of Authorship. Case of a Monkey Selfie

$FILE/The%20Changing%20Concept%20of%20Authorship.%20Case%20of%20A%20Monkey%20Selfie,%20Iegor%20Bakhariev.pdf accessed 28 August 2018

Campbell 2006


Campbell J 2006 Authorship, Incentives for Creation, and Copyright in the Digital 21st Century accessed 11 April 2018

Fisher Date Unknown

Fisher W Date Unknown Theories of Intellectual Property accessed 28 June 2018

Guadamuz 2018

Guadamuz A 2018 Can the Monkey Selfie Case Teach Us Anything about Copyright Law? accessed 11 April 2018

Harris 2014

Harris P 2014 Cheeky Monkey accessed 12 April 2018

Jeong 2018 S 2018 The Monkey Selfie Lawsuit Lives accessed 14 April 2018

Masnick 2018

Masnick M 2018 The Monkey Selfie Lawsuit Will Never, Ever Die: Appeals Court Judge Wants a Do Over accessed 14 April 2018

Naryskin 2018

Naryskin R 2018 What is Composition in Photography? https://photo accessed 11 April 2018

Osborne 2017


Osborne S 2017 "Monkey Selfie" Case: Photographer Wins Two Year Legal Fight against Peta over the Image Copyright accessed 11 April 2018

Pavis 2017

Pavis M 2017 The Selfie Monkey Case: The End? accessed 11 April 2018

Perle 2017

Perle D 2017 PETA Statement: "Monkey Selfie" Case Settled accessed 11 April 2018

PETA 2018

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals 2018 About PETA accessed 11 April 2018

USCO 2014

United States Copyright Office 2014 Compendium of US Copyright Office Practices accessed 11 April 2018

Wallis 2015

Wallis D 2015 Monkey Who Took Grinning Selfie Should "Receive Damages for Copyright" says PETA accessed 11 April 2018

Wienand 2012

Wienand P 2012 Copyright Protection in Photographs accessed 11 April 2018



How to Cite

Ncube, C. B., & Oriakhogba, D. O. (2018). Monkey Selfie and Authorship in Copyright Law: The Nigerian and South African Perspectives. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 21, 1–35.




Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.