DNA Evidence as the Basis for Conviction





primary, secondary and tertiary transfer, contamination, cold hit, activity and offence levels, DNA profiles, match probability, sufficiency of evidence


The sufficiency of DNA evidence alone, with regard to convicting accused persons, has been interrogated and challenged in criminal cases. The availability of offender databases and the increasing sophistication of crime scene recovery of evidence have resulted in a new type of prosecution in which the State's case focuses on match statistics to explain the significance of a match between the accused's DNA profile and the crime-scene evidence. A number of such cases have raised critical jurisprudential questions about the proper role of probabilistic evidence, and the misapprehension of match statistics by courts. This article, with reference to selected cases from specific jurisdictions, investigates the issue of DNA evidence as the exclusive basis for conviction and important factors such as primary, secondary and tertiary transfer, contamination, cold hits and match probability which can influence the reliability of basing a conviction on DNA evidence alone, are discussed.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Lirieka Meintjes-Van der Walt, UFH

BJuris LLB (UPE) LLM (Rhodes) DJuris (Leiden) Adjunct Professor and Leader of the Law, Science and Justice Research Niche Area, Nelson Mandela School of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Fort Hare, South Africa

Priviledge Dhliwayo, UFH

LLB (University of Fort Hare), LLM LLD (University of Stellenbosch). Postdoctoral Research Fellow, University of Fort Hare



How to Cite

Meintjes-Van der Walt, L., & Dhliwayo, P. . (2021). DNA Evidence as the Basis for Conviction. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 24, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a8537