The Universal Jurisdiction of South African Criminal Courts and Immunities of Foreign State Officials

Authors

  • Evode Kayitana North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v18i7.05

Keywords:

universal jurisdiction, complementarity, Rome Statute, Implementation Act, immunity ratione personae, immunity ratione materiae, international crimes.

Abstract

Under the "complementarity" regime of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC), the jurisdiction of the ICC is secondary to the jurisdiction of domestic courts. States Parties, not the ICC, have the primary responsibility of investigating and prosecuting international crimes. The ICC acts only when States are "unable" or "unwilling" to prosecute. As a State Party, in order to give effect to the complementarity principle, South Africa enacted the Implementation of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court Act 27 of 2002, which determines the modalities of prosecuting perpetrators of the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in South African courts.

The Implementation Act also provides that South African courts will have jurisdiction over these crimes not only when they are committed on the territory of South Africa but also when they are committed outside the Republic. By granting South African courts jurisdiction over a person who commits a crime outside the Republic when that person is later found on South African territory, without regard to that person's nationality or the nationality of the victims, the Implementation Act empowers South African courts with universal jurisdiction over international crimes.

This paper seeks to determine whether and to what extent foreign State officials, such as foreign heads of State, heads of government and ministers of foreign affairs, can plead immunity when they are accused of international crimes before South African courts when exercising their universal jurisdiction in terms of the Implementation Act and in accordance with the complementarity regime of the Rome Statute. In other words, the article endeavours to determine whether international law rules regarding immunities of State officials may or may not limit the ability of South African courts to exercise universal jurisdiction over international crimes committed in foreign States.

   Google_Scholar_12092.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Evode Kayitana, North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus)
    Lecturer in Law, University of Rwanda.

    The author is highly indebted to Prof PG du Toit for his guidance in writing this article and the author is a post-doctoral fellow at NWU/Potchefstroom Campus.

Published

27-12-2015

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kayitana, E. (2015). The Universal Jurisdiction of South African Criminal Courts and Immunities of Foreign State Officials. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 18(7), 2560-2603. https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v18i7.05

Similar Articles

531-540 of 1148

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.