Automatically unfair and operational requirement dismissals: Making sense of the 2014 amendments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a1203

Keywords:

Amendments to the Labour Relations Act (LRA), automatic unfair dismissal, dismissal on grounds of operational requirements, disputes of interest, disputes of right.

Abstract

This article explores the concept of the automatic unfair dismissal that is regulated in s 187(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act, where the reason for the dismissal is to "compel the employee to accept a demand in respect of any matter of mutual interest". This provision raised important questions of law, as it brought to the fore the conflict that existed between this provision and sections 188(1)(a)(ii) and 189 of the LRA, which permits dismissals for operational requirements. This dichotomy was dealt with by the court in Fry's Metals, but the decision was controversial and faced criticism. The decision of the court was consequently rendered incorrect, resulting in the amendment to s 187(1)(c), which now reads that a dismissal is automatically unfair if the reason for the dismissal is a refusal by employees to accept a demand in respect of any matter of mutual interest between them and their employer. However, it is doubtful whether the amended provision provides a solution to the contradiction that exists. Resultantly, this article seeks to critique the amendment and to make recommendations regarding the regulation of this part of labour law.

     Google_Scholar_12048.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Literature

Cohen 2004 ILJ

Cohen T "Dismissals to Enforce Changes to Terms and Conditions of Employment – Automatically Unfair or Operationally Justifiable?" 2004 ILJ 1883-1896

Du Toit 2005 ILJ

Du Toit D "Business Restructuring and Operational Requirements Dismissals: Algorax and Beyond" 2005 ILJ 595-617

Du Toit et al Labour Relations Law

Du Toit D et al Labour Relations Law: A Comprehensive Guide 6th ed (LexisNexis Durban 2015)

Grogan 2003 ELJ

Grogan J "Chicken or Egg" 2003 ELJ 4-12

Grogan Workplace Law

Grogan J Workplace Law 11th ed (Juta Cape Town 2014)

Mischke 2003 CLL

Mischke C "Changing Terms and Conditions of Employment: The Return of the Automatically Unfair Dismissal" 2003 CLL 31-37

Qotoyi and Van Der Walt 2009 Obiter

Qotoyi T and Van Der Walt A "Dismissals within the Context of Collective Bargaining" 2009 Obiter 63-119

Thompson 1999 ILJ

Thompson C "Bargaining, Business Restructuring and the Operational Requirements Dismissal" 1999 ILJ 755-772

Thompson 2006 ILJ

Thompson C "Bargaining Over Business Imperatives: The Music of the Spheres After Fry's Metals" 2006 ILJ 704-730

Todd and Damant 2004 ILJ

Todd C and Damant G "Unfair Dismissal - Operational Requirements" 2004 ILJ 896-922

Van Niekerk and Smit Law@work

Van Niekerk A and Smit N Law@work 3rd ed (LexisNexis Durban 2015)

Vettori 2005 De Jure

Vettori S "A Judicially Enforceable Duty to Bargain?" 2005 De Jure 382

Case law

BEMAWU obo Mohapi v Clear Channel Independent (Pty) Ltd 2010 ILJ 2863 (LC)

Bifawu & SACCAWU obo PV Mpanza v Zurich Insurance Company South Africa 2015 ZALCJHB 141 (23 April 2015)

Chemical Workers Industrial Union v Algorax (Pty) Ltd 2003 ILJ 1917 (LAC)

Commercial Catering and Allied Workers Union v Game Discount World Ltd 1990 ILJ 162 (IC)

De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd v CCMA 2000 5 BLLR 578 (LC)

Ex Parte Chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly: In Re Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 1996 ILJ 821 (CC)

Fry's Metals (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Metalworkers of SA 2003 ILJ 133 (LAC)

General Food Industries Ltd v Food and Allied Workers Union 2004 ILJ 1260 (LAC)

Mazista Tiles (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Mineworkers 2004 ILJ 2156 (LAC)

Michael Peter Wilkin v Warwick Invest (Pty) Ltd 2013 ZALCCT 10 (30 April 2013)

National Union of Metalworkers of SA v Aerial King Sales (Pty) (Ltd) 1994 ILJ 1384 (IC)

National Union of Metalworkers of SA v Fry's Metals (Pty) Ltd 2001 ILJ 701 (LC)

National Union of Metalworkers of SA v Fry's Metals (Pty) Ltd 2005 ILJ 689 (SCA)

National Union of Mineworkers v East Rand Gold and Uranium Co Ltd 1991 ILJ 1221 (A)

Ntimane v Agrinet 1999 3 BLLR 248 (LC)

NUMSA v Bader Bop (Pty) Ltd 2003 2 BLLR 103 (CC)

SA Chemical Workers Union v Afrox Ltd 1999 ILJ 1718 (LAC)

SACTWU v Stuttafords Department Stores Ltd 1999 ILJ 2692 (LC)

Solidarity obo Wehncke v Surf4cars (Pty) Ltd 2011 ILJ 3037 (LC)

South African Chemical Workers Union v Afrox Ltd 1998 ILJ 62 (LC)

South African Commercial and Catering Workers Union obo J Bheki v Entabeni Private Game Lodge (Pty) Ltd 2015 ZALCJHB 410 (18 November 2015)

South African Transport and Allied Workers Union v G4S Aviation Secure Solutions 2016 ZALCJHB 10 (13 January 2016)

Stuttafords Department Stores Ltd v SACTWU 2001 1 BLLR 46 (LAC)

Technikon SA v NUTESA 2001 1 BLLR 46 (LAC)

Legislation

Labour Relations Act 28 of 1956

Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995

Labour Relations Amendment Act 6 of 2014

Government publications

Code on Dismissal Based on Operational Requirements (Gen N 1517 in GG 20254 of 16 July 1999)

Explanatory Memorandum Prepared by the Ministerial Legal Task Team 1995 ILJ 278

Memorandum of Objects: Labour Relations Amendment Bill, 2012

Downloads

Published

2017-10-10

How to Cite

Newaj, K., & Van Eck, S. (2017). Automatically unfair and operational requirement dismissals: Making sense of the 2014 amendments. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 19, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a1203

Issue

Section

Articles