Chief Justice Coke: Common Law v Royal Absolutism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15647

Keywords:

Royal prerogative, common law, parliamentary sovereignty, reason, Dr Bonham's case, Sir Edward Coke, King James I, Sir Francis Bacon, Magna Charta

Abstract

This contribution considers the character of Chief Justice Coke and his contribution to the development of English law. More specifically the focus falls on his profound knowledge of the common law and the concomitant emphasis he placed on human freedom. Coke's reliance on the common law was the cause of continuous conflict between himself and King James 1, and later also King Charles 1. True to the Royal approach in this era they strongly endorsed royal absolutism, believing it stemmed from a divine origin. James 1 enjoyed the support of Sir Francis Bacon. Intense rivalry of a personal nature existed between him and Coke too. In response to James 1 and Bacon's continuing attacks on his views, Coke could only turn to the common law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Robbie Robinson, North-West University South Africa

Professor, Faculty of Law, Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, South Africa.

References

Bibliography

Literature

Alston L (ed) De Republica Anglorum: A Discourse on the Commonwealth of England (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1906)

Barrett OR "A Brief for Sir Edward Coke" 1942 ABAJ 609-611

Hicks FC Men and Books Famous in the Law (Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Rochester 1921)

Holdsworth W "Sir Edward Coke" 1935 CLJ 332-346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300124687

Levy BH Cardozo and the Frontiers of Legal Thinking (Press of Case Western Reserve University Cleveland 1969)

Lewis JU "Sir Edward Coke (1552-1633): His Theory of 'Artificial Reason' as a Context for Modern Basic Legal Theory" 1968 LQR 330-342

MacKay RA "Coke – Parliamentary Sovereignty or the Supremacy of the Law?" 1924 Mich L Rev 215-247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1277428

Maitland FW The Constitutional History of England: A Course of Lectures (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 1941)

Orth JV "Did Sir Edward Coke Mean What He Said?" 1999 Constitutional Commentary 33-38

Palmer BW "Edward Coke, Champion of Liberty" 1946 ABAJ 135-139

Plucknett BS "Bonham's Case and Judicial Review" 1926 Harv L Rev 30-70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1330126

Plucknett TFT A Concise History of the Common Law 5th ed (Little Brown Boston 2001)

Plucknett TFT and Barton JL St German's Doctor and Student (Selden Society London 1974)

Robinson J "Gedagtes oor die Regsteoretiese Grondslae van Parlementêre Soewereiniteit met Besondere Verwysing na die Invloed van Sir Edward Coke" 1991 SA Public Law 46-61

Saint Germain C Doctor and Student: Or Dialogues between a Doctor of Divinity and a Student in the Laws of England (R Clarke Cincinnati 1874)

Seagle W Men of Law: From Hammurabi to Holmes (McMillan New York 1947)

Taswell-Langmead TP English Constitutional History from the Teutonic Conquest to the Present Time (Houghton Mifflin Boston 1960)

Thorne S "Dr Bonham's Case" 1938 LQR 543-552

Case law

Case of Proclamations 1611 12 Co Rep 74

Published

23-11-2023

How to Cite

Robinson, R. (2023). Chief Justice Coke: Common Law v Royal Absolutism. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 26, (Published on 23 November 2023) pp 1 – 24. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15647

Issue

Section

Special Edition: Legal History

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.