Deadly Air and the Misinterpretation of the Section 24 Environmental Right: The Groundwork Trust Case

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15833

Keywords:

Section 24, progressive realisation, limitation, air pollution

Abstract

The judgment in Trustees for the Time Being of the Groundwork Trust v Minister of Environmental Affairs rests on a finding that
the right in section 24 of the Constitution consists of two separate rights in subsections (a) and (b), and that the right in section 24(a) is immediately realisable. I argue in this article that this approach is incorrect and that a logical and contextual interpretation of section 24 cannot justify the conclusion that the court reached. I argue that section 24(b) is a qualifying "internal modifier" to section 24(a), and that, in practical terms and due to the modifier in section 24(b), in many situations section 24 would have to be regarded as implementable over time, and not immediately. Such implementation would have to be reasonable. The article also considers the use of the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act to address the unacceptable level of air pollution in the area known as the
Highveld Priority Area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Michael Kidd, University of KwaZulu-Natal South Africa

Professor of Law, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

References

Bibliography

Literature

Altieri KE and Keen SL "Public Health Benefits of Reducing Exposure to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter in South Africa" 2019 Science of the Total Environment 610-620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.355

Centre for Environmental Rights Zero Hour: Poor Governance of Mining and the Violation of Environmental Rights in Mpumalanga (CER Cape Town 2016)

Currie I and De Waal J "Interpretation of the Bill of Rights" in Currie I and De Waal J The Bill of Rights Handbook 6th ed (Juta Cape Town 2013) ch 6

Du Plessis A "South Africa's Constitutional Environmental Right (Generously) Interpreted: What is in it for Poverty?" 2011 SAJHR 279-307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2011.11865016

Euripidou R et al "The Minimum Emission Standards (MES) and the Sabotage of Public Health" 2022 Clean Air Journal 1-4 https://doi.org/10.17159/caj/2022/32/1.14026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/caj/2022/32/1.14026

Feris L "Constitutional Environmental Rights: An Under-Utilised Resource" 2008 SAJHR 29-49 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2008.11864946

Feris L "The Socio-Economic Nature of Section 24(b) of the Constitution – Some Thoughts on HTF Developers (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (HTF)" 2008 SAPL 194-207

Glazewski J Environmental Law in South Africa (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 2013)

Humby T "The Right to Development-in-Environment and its Ecological and Developmental Thresholds" 2016 SAJHR 219-247 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2016.1210881

Kidd M "Environment" in Currie I and De Waal J The Bill of Rights Handbook 6th ed (Juta Cape Town 2013) ch 24

Kidd M "Transformative Constitutionalism and the Interface between Environmental Justice, Human Rights and Sustainable Development" in Daly E et al (eds) New Frontiers in Environmental Constitutionalism (UNEP Nairobi 2017) 117-125

Pejan R, Du Toit D and Pollard S "Using Progressive Realization and Reasonableness to Evaluate Implementation Lags in the South African Water Management Reform Process" in Kidd M et al (eds) Water and the Law: Towards Sustainability (Edward Elgar Cheltenham 2014) 305-328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479627.00021

United Nations Environment Programme Regulating Air Quality: The First Global Assessment of Air Pollution Legislation (UNEP Nairobi 2021)

Wernecke B et al "Ambient Air Pollution on the Highveld: An Airshed at a Watershed Moment?" 2022 Clean Air Journal 1-3 http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/caj/2022/32/1.14070 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/caj/2022/32/1.14070

Wolf S and Stanley N Wolf and Stanley on Environmental Law 6th ed (Routledge Abingdon 2014) DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885698

Case law

BP Southern Africa (Pty) Ltd v MEC for Agriculture, Conservation, Environment and Land Affairs 2004 5 SA 124 (W)

Fuel Retailers Association of Southern Africa v Director-General: Environmental Management, Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Environment, Mpumalanga Province 2007 6 SA 4 (CC)

Governing Body of the Juma Musjid Primary School v Essay 2011 8 BCLR 761 (CC)

Government of the Republic of South Africa v Grootboom 2001 1 SA 46 (CC).

HTF Developers (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Environmental Affairs 2006 5 SA 512 (T)

Trustees for the Time Being of Groundwork Trust v Minister of Environmental Affairs (39724/2019) [2022] ZAGPPHC 208 (18 March 2022)

Legislation

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998

National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act 39 of 2004

Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000

Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000

Government publications

GN 1123 in GG 30518 of 23 November 2007

GN 1210 in GG 32816 of 24 December 2009

GN 144 in GG 35072 of 2 March 2012

GN 486 in GG 35463 of 29 June 2012

GN 893 in GG 37054 of 22 November 2013

GN 1207 in GG 42013 of 31 October 2018

GN 2076 in GG 46355 of 12 May 2022

Internet sources

Airshed Planning Professionals (Pty) Ltd 2006 Eskom Mpumalanga Highveld Cumulative Scenario Planning Study: Air Pollution Compliance Assessment and Health Risk Analysis of Cumulative Operations of Current, RTS and Proposed Eskom Power Station Located within the Mpumalanga and Gauteng Provinces. Report No: APP/06/ESKOM-05 Rev 1.0 (2006) https://cer.org.za/programmes/pollution-climate-change/key-information/eskom (Eskom Health Studies) accessed 27 September 2023

Centre for Environmental Rights 2017 Broken Promises: The Failure of the Highveld Priority Area https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/ Broken-Promises-full-report_final.pdf accessed 27 September 2023

Eskom 2021 Eskom Receives DFFE's Decisions on Minimum Emissions Standard https://www.gov.za/speeches/eskom-receives-dffe%E2%80% 99s-decisions-minimum-emissions-standard-15-dec-2021-0000 accessed 27 September 2023

Greenpeace Africa 2019 New Greenpeace Analysis Finds Kriel in Mpumalanga is the Second Worst Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) Pollution Hotspot in the World https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-africa-stateless/2019/08/4f7f1afa-sa-briefing_-global-air-pollution-map-so2.pdf accessed 27 September 2023

Holland M 2017 Health Impacts of Coal Fired Power Plants in South Africa https://cer.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Annexure-Health-impacts-of-coal-fired-generation-in-South-Africa-310317.pdf accessed 27 September 2023

Hugo R 2022 If Barbara Creecy Appeals Against the "Deadly Air" Judgment, it will not be a Good Look for Government https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2022-03-21-if-barbara-creecy-appeals-against-the-deadly-air-judgment-it-will-not-be-a-good-look-for-government/ accessed 27 September 2023

Kings S 2014 How Eskom's Coal Kills https://mg.co.za/article/2014-06-19-power-stations-are-deadly-internal-report-reveals/ accessed 27 September 2023

Published

23-11-2023

How to Cite

Kidd, M. (2023). Deadly Air and the Misinterpretation of the Section 24 Environmental Right: The Groundwork Trust Case. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 26, (Published on 23 November 2023) pp 1 – 26. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15833

Issue

Section

Special Edition: Environmental & Energy Law

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.