Public Interest Environmental Litigation: Recent Cases Raise Possible Obstacles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2010/v13i5a2709Keywords:
Environment, environmental protection, public interest environmental litigation, locus standi, interdict, Patz v Greene, environmental right, remedies, Constitution, common law.Abstract
Despite the broadening of locus standi in environmental cases by both Section 38 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, and Section 32 of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998, two recent cases suggest that the pre-constitutional approach to locus standi still holds sway in our Courts. Moreover, failure to recognise the environmental right in Section 24 of the Constitution may be an impediment to applicants' ability to bring an interdict application successfully. Correct use of the relevant constitutional provisions ought to obviate such problems, but alternatives are suggested. In the course of the article, it is suggested that the rule in Patz v Greene is no longer relevant and should be consigned to the history books.
Downloads
References
Bibliography
Baxter Administrative Law
Baxter L Administrative Law (Juta Cape Town 1984)
Freedman SAJELP
Freedman W "Hear no evil: Noise pollution, the law of nuisance, and the noise control regulations – Laskey v Showzone CC 2007 (2) SA 48 (C)" 2009 SAJELP 79-91
Glazewski 2000 Environmental Law
Glazewski J Environmental Law in South Africa (Butterworths Durban 2000)
Glazewski 2005 Environmental Law
Glazewski J Environmental Law in South Africa 2nd ed (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 2005)
Harms "Interdict"
Harms LTC "Interdict" in Joubert WA (ed) The Law of South Africa 2nd ed Volume 11 (Butterworths Durban 2008)
Hoexter Administrative Law
Hoexter C Administrative Law in South Africa (Juta Cape Town 2007)
Register of legislation
Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Act 45 of 1965
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996
Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 200 of 1993
Land Use and Planning Ordinance 15 of 1985
National Environmental Management Act 106 of 1998
Register of cases
Director: Mineral Development, Gauteng Region v Save the Vaal Environment 1999 2 SA 709 (SCA)
Ferreira v Levin 1996 1 SA 984 (CC)
Fose v Minister of Safety and Security 1997 3 SA 786 (CC)
Hichange Investments (Pty) Ltd v Cape Produce Co (Pty) Ltd t/a Pelts Products 2004 2 SA 393 (E)
HTF Developers (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism 2006 JDR 0328 (T)
Johannesburg City Council v Knoetze & Sons 1969 2 SA 148 (W)
Laskey v Showzone CC 2007 2 SA 48 (C)
Lawyers for Human Rights v Minister of Home Affairs 2004 4 SA 125 (CC)
McCarthy v Constantia Property Owners' Association 1999 4 SA 847 (C)
Patz v Greene 1907 TS 426
Roodepoort-Maraisburg Town Council v Eastern Properties (Prop) Ltd 1933 AD 87
Tergniet and Toekoms Action Group v Outeniqua Kreosootpale (Pty) Ltd Case 10083/2008 (C) 23 January 2009 (unreported)
V & A Waterfront Properties (Pty) Ltd v Helicopter & Marine Services (Pty) Ltd 2006 1 SA 252 (SCA)
Verstappen v Port Edward Town Board 1994 3 SA 569 (D)
Wildlife Society of Southern Africa v Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism of the Republic of South Africa 1996 3 SA 1095 (Tk)
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Michael Kidd
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}