Arbitrary Deprivation of an Unregistered Credit Provider's Right to Claim Restitution of Performance Rendered: Opperman v Boonzaaier (24887/2010) 2012 ZAWCHC 27 (17 April 2012) and National Credit Regulator v Opperman 2013 2 SA 1 (CC)

  • Reghard Brits Stellenbosch University
Keywords: National Credit Act, Constitution, property, arbitrary deprivation, forfeiture, restitution claim, unregistered credit provider, unlawful credit agreement.

Abstract

 The Constitutional Court in National Credit Regulator v Opperman confirmed the Cape High Court's decision in Opperman v Boonzaaier to declare section 89(5)(c) of the National Credit Act unconstitutional. Therefore, the forfeiture to the state of an unregistered creditor provider's right to claim restitution of monies advanced in terms of an unlawful (and void) credit agreement, was held to amount to an arbitrary deprivation of property in contravention of section 25(1) of the Constitution – the property clause. The provision in effect prohibited courts from deviating from the common law's strict par delictum rule in as far as the effects of unlawful contracts are concerned, the result being that creditors could not retrieve any of the amounts extended to the debtor, despite there being no turpitude or bad faith present. The purpose of this provision was to discourage the concluding of unlawful credit agreements – for instance, agreements concluded by unregistered credit providers – so as to protect consumers against unscrupulous behaviour. Although the broad purposes of the Act are undeniably valid, the Court held that there was no "sufficient reason" for the effects that the Act had in this case, since the credit provider in question was not guilty of the behaviour that the Act tried to combat. In other words, the effects of the Act were over-broad and not proportionate to its stated purposes. This case note comprehensively analyses these decisions in view of interpreting the "confused and confusing" wording of section 89(5)(c), with a specific focus on the application of the section 25(1) non-arbitrariness test. Reference is also made to the earlier judgments in the matter of Cherangani Trade and Investment 107 (Edms) Bpk v Mason. The Opperman decisions illustrate well how the non-arbitrariness test should be conducted in consitutional property cases generally but particularly also in the credit context. Of significance is the fact that the Court for the first time recognised that personal rights sounding in money (an enrichment claim in this instance) should qualify as "property" for constitutional property law purposes. In certain circumstances, therefore, credit regulation may involve deprivation of property such as must satisfy the requirements of the property clause. It is contended that recognising the role of section 25 in the credit context is a positive development that can be explored further. The constitutional provision also calls for lawmakers to draft legislation in such a way that regulatory mechanisms are rational and sufficiently proportionate to its stated goals.

   ScienceOpen_Log0343295.png

References

Bibliography

Currie and De Waal Bill of Rights

Currie I and De Waal J The Bill of Rights Handbook 5th ed (Juta Claremont 2005)

De Wet and Van Wyk Kontraktereg en Handelsreg

De Wet JC and Van Wyk AH Die Suid-Afrikaanse Kontraktereg en Handelsreg 5th ed (Butterworths Durban 1992)

Kelly-Louw "Consumer Credit"

Kelly-Louw M "Consumer Credit" in Joubert WA and Faris JA (eds) The Law of South Africa vol 5 part 1 2nd ed (LexisNexis Durban 2010) 1-256

Kelly-Louw Consumer Credit Regulation

Kelly-Louw M Consumer Credit Regulation in South Africa (Juta Cape Town 2012)

Lotz "Enrichment"

Lotz JG "Enrichment" (updated by Brand FDJ in Harms LTC and Faris JA (eds)) in Joubert WA and Faris JA (eds) The Law of South Africa vol 9 2nd ed (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 2005) 108-138

Otto 2009 TSAR

Otto JM "Die par delictum-reël en die National Credit Act" 2009 TSAR 417-435

Otto 2010 TSAR

Otto JM "National Credit Act, ongeoorloofde ooreenkomste en meevallertjies vir die fiscus" 2010 TSAR 161-169

Otto "Conclusion"

Otto JM "Conclusion, Alteration and Termination of Credit Agreements" in Scholtz JW et al (eds) Guide to the National Credit Act 4th revised service (LexisNexis Durban May 2012) chapter 9

Otto 2013 TSAR

Otto JM "Onagsame wetsopstelling – die Nasionale Kredietwet op die operasietafel" 2013 TSAR 217-235

Otto and Otto National Credit Act

Otto JM and Otto R-L The National Credit Act Explained 3rd ed (LexisNexis Durban 2013)

Roux "Property"

Roux T "Property" in Woolman S, Bishop M and Brickhill J (eds) Constitutional Law of South Africa vol 3 2nd ed (Juta Claremont 2003) chapter 46

Sonnekus Verryking

Sonnekus JC Ongegronde Verryking in die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg (LexisNexis Durban 2007)

Van der Merwe et al Contract

Van der Merwe S et al Contract General Principles 4th ed (Juta Cape Town 2012)

Van der Walt Property Clause

Van der Walt AJ The Constitutional Property Clause: A Comparative Analysis of Section 25 of the South African Constitution of 1996 (Juta Cape Town 1997)

Van der Walt 2000 SAJHR

Van der Walt AJ "Civil forfeiture of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime and the constitutional property clause" 2000 SAJHR 1-45

Van der Walt Constitutional Property

Van der Walt AJ Constitutional Property Law 3rd ed (Juta Cape Town 2011)

Van der Walt 2012 JQR

Van der Walt AJ "Constitutional property law" 2012 2 Juta's Quarterly Review para 2.1.1

Van der Walt 2012 Stell LR

Van der Walt AJ "Procedurally arbitrary deprivation of property" 2012 Stell LR 88-94

Van Jaarsveld 2006 Fundamina

Van Jaarsveld IL "The history of in rem forfeiture: a penal legacy of the past" 2006 Fundamina 137-147

Van Rensburg, Lotz and Van Rhijn "Contract"

Van Rensburg ADJ, Lotz JG and Van Rhijn TAR "Contract" (revised by Christie RH and updated by Sharrock RD) in Joubert WA and Faris JA (eds) The Law of South Africa vol 5 part 1 2nd ed (Lexis Nexis Durban 2010) 357-516

Van Zyl "Registration"

Van Zyl E "Registration and the Consequences of Non-registration" in Scholtz JW et al (eds) Guide to the National Credit Act 4th revised service (LexisNexis Durban 2012) chapter 5

Woolman and Botha "Limitations"

Woolman S and Botha H "Limitations" in Woolman S et al Constitutional Law of South Africa vol 2 2nd ed (Juta Claremont 2005) chapter 34

Register of constitutions, legislation, bills, regulations, policy frameworks and memorandums

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Constitution of Zimbabwe, 1979

Credit Agreements Act 75 of 1980

Draft National Credit Act Policy Review Framework, 2013 (GN 559 in GG 36504 of 29 May 2013)

Draft National Credit Amendment Bill, 2013 (GN 713 in GG 28893 of 1 June 2006)

GN 560 in GG 36505 of 29 May 2013

Memorandum on the Objects of the National Credit Bill, 2005

National Credit Act 34 of 2005

Usury Act 73 of 1968

Register of case law

Absa Insurance Brokers (Pty) Ltd v Luttig 1997 4 SA 229 (SCA)

Afrisure CC v Watson 2009 2 SA 127 (SCA)

Cherangani Trade & Invest 107 (Pty) Ltd v Mason 2011 11 BCLR 1123 (CC)

Cherangani Trade and Investment 107 (Edms) Bpk v Mason (6712/2008) 2009 ZAFSHC 30 (12 March 2009)

First National Bank of SA Ltd t/a Wesbank v Commissioner, South African Revenue Service; First National Bank of SA Ltd t/a Wesbank v Minister of Finance 2002 4 SA 768 (CC)

Hewlett v Minister of Finance 1982 1 SA 490 (ZS)

In the matter of Article 26 of the Constitution and in the matter of the Health (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2004 [2005] IESC 7 (Irish Supreme Court)

Investigating Directorate: Serious Economic Offences v Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd: In re Hyundai Motor Distributors (Pty) Ltd v Smit 2001 1 SA 545 (CC)

Jajbhay v Cassim 1939 AD 537

Law Society of South Africa v Minister for Transport 2011 1 SA 44 (CC)

Mohunram v National Director of Public Prosecutions (Law Review Project as Amicus Curiae) 2007 4 SA 222 (CC)

National Credit Regulator v Opperman 2013 2 SA 1 (CC)

Offit Enterprises (Pty) Ltd v Coega Development Corporation (Pty) Ltd 2011 1 SA 293 (CC)

Opperman v Boonzaaier (24887/2010) 2012 ZAWCHC 27 (17 April 2012)

S v Bhulwana, S v Gwadiso 1996 1 SA 388 (CC)

S v Makwanyane 1995 3 SA 391 (CC)

S v Manamela (Director-General of Justice Intervening) 2000 3 SA 1 (CC)

S v Shaik 2008 2 SA 208 (CC)

Van der Burg v National Director of Public Prosecutions 2012 2 SACR 331 (CC)

Published
2017-05-17
How to Cite
BritsR. (2017). Arbitrary Deprivation of an Unregistered Credit Provider’s Right to Claim Restitution of Performance Rendered: Opperman v Boonzaaier (24887/2010) 2012 ZAWCHC 27 (17 April 2012) and National Credit Regulator v Opperman 2013 2 SA 1 (CC). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 16(4), 421-471. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2013/v16i4a2422
Section
Notes