Analysing the Onus Issue in Dismissals Emanating from the Enforcement of Unilateral Changes to Conditions of Employment

Authors

  • Riaz Ismail Umiversity of South Africa
  • Clarence Itumeleng Tshoose University South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i7a2620

Keywords:

Employee, onus, dismissals, unilateral, changes, conditions, employment

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to analyse the issue of onus emanating from the enforcement of unilateral changes to conditions of employment. At the heart of the controversy that has faced the Labour Appeal Court was how to interpret dismissals that appear to be based on operational requirements, and yet at the same time, such dismissals also appear to have the effect of compelling an employee to accept a demand in respect of a matter of mutual interest between the employer and the employee.

 

The core section in the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 relating to disputes of this nature is section 187(1)(c) of the Act, and the central enquiry to such disputes is whether they are automatically unfair or operationally justifiable. The fine line that determines whether a dismissal is acceptable or not merits an analysis of the overall onus that faces an employer and employee. This analysis is the focus of the article, which deals predominantly with procedural issues. The issue relating to the promotion of collective bargaining will be assessed against the right to dismiss, based on an analysis of the situation in South Africa, and a brief comparison with the situations in the United Kingdom and Canada. Thereafter, recommendations are made to the South African legislature.

   ScienceOpen_Log0377.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bibliography

Basson et al Essential Labour Law

Basson A et al Essential Labour Law 5th ed (Labour Law Publications Groenkloof 2009)

Carter et al Labour Law in Canada

Carter DD et al Labour Law in Canada 5th ed (Kluwer Law International The Hague 2002)

Cohen 2004 ILJ

Cohen T "Dismissals to Enforce Changes to Terms and Conditions of Employment: Automatically Unfair or Operationally Justifiable?" 2004 ILJ 1883-1896

Grogan 2003a EL

Grogan J "Chicken or egg? Dismissals to enforce demands" 2003 EL Vol. 19 (2) April 2003 4-12

Grogan 2003b EL

Grogan J "Termination lockout: A fatal condition" 2003 EL Vol.19 (6) 14-24

Grogan Dismissal;

Grogan J Dismissal (Juta Cape Town 2010)

Petersen Changing terms to conditions of employment

Petersen D Changing terms to conditions of employment in the South African labour relations arena – the approach of the courts: A comparative analysis LLM Dissertation submitted at the University of Western Cape 2004 chapter 5 November 2004.

Thompson 1999 ILJ

Thompson C "Bargaining Business Restructuring and the Operational Requirements Dismissal" 1999 ILJ 755-769

Todd and Damant 2004 ILJ

Todd C and Damant G "Unfair Dismissal - Operational Requirements" 2004 ILJ 897-900

Internet sources

Quebec Labour Code, RSQ http://www.canlii.org/en/qc/laws/stat/rsq-c-c-27/latest/rsq-c-c-27.html

Quebec Labour Code, RSQ http://www.canlii.org/en/qc/laws/stat/rsq-c-c-27/latest/rsq-c-c-27.html accessed 6 December 2011

Register of legislation

British Columbia Labour Relations Code, 1996

Canadian Labour Code, 1985

Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA)

Register of cases

CWIU v Algorax (Pty) Ltd 2003 11 BLLR 1081 (LAC)

Ex parte Chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly: In re Certification of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996 17 ILJ 821 (CC)

Farber v Royal Trust Co 1997 1 SCR 846

Fry's Metals (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Metal Workers of SA 2003 24 ILJ 133 (LAC)

Hollister v National Farmers Union 1979 ICR 542

Janda v First National Bank 2006 27 ILJ 2627 (LC)

Mafomane v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd 2001 22 ILJ 214 (LC)

Mazista Tiles (Pty) Ltd v National Union of Mineworkers 2004 25 ILJ 2156 (LAC)

National Union of Metalworkers of SA v Fry's Metals 2001 22 ILJ 701 (LC)

NUMSA v Fry's Metals (Pty) Ltd 2005 26 ILJ 689 (SCA)

Rosscup v Westfair Foods Rosscup v Westfair Foods Ltd 1999 AJ No 944 (QB)

SACWU v AFROX 1999 20 ILJ 1718 (LAC)

SANDU v Minister of Defence; Minister of Defence v SANDU 2007 1 All SA 57 SCA

Published

09-06-2017

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ismail, R., & Tshoose, C. I. (2017). Analysing the Onus Issue in Dismissals Emanating from the Enforcement of Unilateral Changes to Conditions of Employment. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 14(7), 146-172. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i7a2620

Similar Articles

1-10 of 831

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.