The Influence of Reasonableness in Determining Delictual or Tort Liability for Psychological or Psychiatric Harm in South African and English Law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15262

Keywords:

Delict, English law, intentionally inflicted psychiatric harm, negligently inflicted psychiatric harm, primary victims, psychiatric harm, psychological harm, reasonableness, reasonable foreseeability, secondary victims, South African law, tort, tort of negligence

Abstract

Due to a lack of authority in Roman-Dutch law in respect of claims for psychological harm, our courts in South Africa relied on English law for guidance, in particular the tort of negligence where emphasis is placed on reasonable foreseeability of harm. The courts in both jurisdictions generally face challenges with who exactly is entitled to claim, the quantification of the damages that should be awarded and how to limit delictual or tort liability emanating from these types of claims. South African law also followed English law in making the distinction between primary and secondary victims and as will be shown in this contribution, limiting liability in respect of secondary victims is problematic. The courts generally tread with caution in awarding damages for pure psychological or psychiatric harm and several policy considerations are taken into account when deciding to award damages or not. Nevertheless, as will be shown in this contribution, the courts in South Africa and the United Kingdom acknowledge these claims and have been developing the law around the cases that have come before them. What is rather interesting and prevalent though with regard to primary and secondary victim claims for psychological or psychiatric harm in these jurisdictions, is the implicit and explicit influence of "reasonableness" in determining delictual or tort liability for these types of claims. This will be explored further in this contribution.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Raheel Ahmed, University of South Africa

    Raheel Ahmed. LLB LLM LLD (UNISA). Admitted Attorney, Conveyancer and Notary of the High Court of South Africa. Professor, Department of Private Law, University of South Africa.

References

Bibliography

Literature

Ahmed R The Explicit and Implicit Influence of Reasonableness on the Elements of Delictual Liability (LLD-thesis Unisa 2018)

Ahmed R "The Influence of Reasonableness on the Element of Conduct in Delictual or Tort Liability—Comparative Conclusions" 2019 PELJ 1-34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a6122

Ahmed R and Steynberg L "Claims for Emotional Shock Suffered by Primary and Secondary Victims" 2015 THRHR 181-199

Bailey S and Nolan D "The Page and Smith Saga: A Tale of Inauspicious Origins and Unintended Consequences" 2010 CLJ 495-528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197310000784

Deakin S and Adams Z Markesinis and Deakin's Tort Law 8th ed (Clarendon Press Oxford 2019) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198747963.001.0001

Giliker P Tort 7th ed (Sweet & Maxwell London 2020)

Handford P "A New Chapter in the Foresight Saga: Psychiatric Damage in the House of Lords" 1996 Tort L Rev 5-8

Jones MA "Negligence" in Jones MA (gen ed) Clerk and Lindsell on Torts 21st ed (Sweet & Maxwell London 2014) 439-607

Loubser MM and Midgley JR (eds) The Law of Delict in South Africa 3rd ed (Oxford University Press Cape Town 2017)

Lunney M, Nolan D and Oliphant K Tort Law: Text and Materials 6th ed (Oxford University Press Oxford 2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198745525.001.0001

McBride NJ and Bagshaw R Tort Law 6th ed (Pearson Education New York 2018)

Mukheibir A and Mitchell G "The Price of Sadness: Comparison between the Netherlands and South Africa" 2019 PELJ 1-37 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a6413

Mullany NJ "Psychiatric Damage in the House of Lords: Fourth Time Unlucky: Page v Smith" 1995 J L & Med 112-120

Neethling J and Potgieter JM Law of Delict 8th ed (LexisNexis Durban 2020)

Sprince A "Page v Smith—Being 'Primary' Colours House of Lords Judgment" 1995 Professional Negligence 124-131

Steele J Tort Law 4th ed (Oxford University Press Oxford 2017) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198768807.001.0001

Tan KF "Case Comments: Nervous Shock to Primary Victims" 1995 Song JLS 649-654

Todd S "Psychiatric Injury and Rescuers" 1999 LQR 345-350

Trindade FA "Nervous Shock and Negligent Conduct" 1996 LQR 22-27

Van der Walt JC and Midgley JR Principles of Delict 4th ed (LexisNexis Durban 2016)

Witting CA Street on Torts 16th ed (Oxford University Press Oxford 2021) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198865506.001.0001

Zitzke E "Critiquing the Komape Decision" 2019 TSAR 814-829

Zitzke E "Transforming the Law on Psychiatric Lesions" 2021 Stell LR 253-271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47348/SLR/2021/i2a4

Case law

Canada

Saadati v Moorhead 2017 1 SCR 543

South Africa

Barnard v Santam Bpk 1999 1 SA 202 (SCA)

Bester v Commercial Union Versekeringsmaatskappy van SA Bpk 1973 1 SA 769 (A)

Boswell v Minister of Police 1978 3 SA 268 (E)

Clinton-Parker and Dawkins v Administrator, Transvaal 1996 2 SA 37 (W)

Country Cloud Trading CC v MEC, Department of infrastructure Development 2014 2 SA 214 (SCA)

Els E v Bruce, Els J v Bruce 1922 EDL 295

Families of Mental Health Care Users Affected by the Gauteng Mental Marathon Project v National Minister of Health of the Republic of South Africa (Arbitration judgment, 2018, available at http://www.saflii.org/images/LifeEsidimeniArbitrationAward.pdf)

Fourie v Naranjo 2008 1 SA 192 (C)

Hauman v Malmesbury Divisional Council 116 CPD 216

Komape v Minister v Minister of Basic Education 2020 2 SA 347 (SCA)

Majiet v Santam Ltd 1997 4 All SA 555 (C)

Masiba v Constantia Insurance Co Ltd 1982 4 SA 333 (C)

Mbele v MEC for Health for the Gauteng Province (355/2015) [2016] ZASCA 166 (18 November 2016)

Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development v X 2015 1 SA 25 (SCA)

Minister of Justice v Hofmeyr 1993 3 SA 131 (A)

Mulder v South British Insurance Co Ltd 1957 2 SA 444 (W)

Road Accident Fund v Sauls 2002 2 SA 55 (SCA)

S v Mokgethi 1990 1 SA 32 (A)

Swartbooi v Road Accident Fund 2013 1 SA 30 (WCC)

Waring and Gillow Ltd v Sherborne 1904 TS 340

Western Cape Department of Social Development v Barley 2019 3 SA 235 (SCA)

United Kingdom

Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 1992 1 AC 310

Attiar v British Gas 1998 QB 304

Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee 1969 QB 428

Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks 1856 11 Ex 781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/phil.1856.11.4.781

Bolton v Stone 1951 AC 850

Bourhill v Young 1943 AC 92 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ml/24.2.92

Brice v Brown 1984 1 All ER 997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1632/S0030812900206615

Caparo Industries plc v Dickman 1990 2 AC 605

Chadwick v British Railways Board 1967 1 WLR 912

Cullin v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority 1999 PIQR 314

Dooley v Crammell Laird 1951 1 Lloyd's Rep 271

Dulieu v White & Sons 1901 2 KB 669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.2124.669

Farrell v Avon HA 2001 Lloyd's Rep Med 458

Hambrook v Stokes Bros 1925 1 KB 141

Hatton v Sutherland 2002 2 All ER 1

Hinz v Berry 1970 2 QB 40

Hugh v Lord Advocate 1963 AC 837

Janvier v Sweeney 1919 2 KB 316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1919.tb30497.x

Khorasandjian v Bush 1993 QB 727

Malcolm v Broadhurst 1970 3 All ER 508 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.3.5721.508

Marc Rich & Co v Bishop Rock Marine 1996 AC 211

McFarlane v EE Caledonia Ltd 1994 2 All ER 1

McLoughlin v O'Brian 1983 1 AC 410

O v Rodes 2016 AC 219

Owens v Liverpool Corporation 1939 1 KB 394

Page v Smith 1996 AC 155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66567-4

Rothwell v Chemical and Insulating Co Ltd 2008 1 AC 281

Taylor v A Novo (UK) Ltd 2014 QB 150

Vernon v Bosley 1997 1 All ER 577

Wagon Mound (No 1) Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts and Dock Engineering Co Ltd 1961 AC 388

Walker v Northumberland County Council 1995 PIQR 521

White v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police 1999 2 AC 455

Wilkinson v Downton 1897 2 QB 57

Legislation

South Africa

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996

United Kingdom

Administration of Justice Act, 1982

Protection from Harassment Act, 1997

Internet sources

Great Britain Department of Constitutional Affairs 2007 Consultation Paper: The Law on Damages (CP 9/07) https://data.parliament.uk/

DepositedPapers/Files/DEP2009-1863/DEP2009-1863.pdf accessed 21 August 2023

Great Britain Law Commission 1998 Report on Liability for Psychiatric Illness (Law Com No 249) https://s3-eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/lawcom-prod-storage-11jsxou24uy7q/uploads/2015/04/LC249.pdf accessed 21 August 2023

Published

09-11-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ahmed, R. (2023). The Influence of Reasonableness in Determining Delictual or Tort Liability for Psychological or Psychiatric Harm in South African and English Law. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 26, (Published on 9 November 2023) pp 1 - 35. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2023/v26i0a15262

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1158

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.