Marimuthu Munien V BMW Financial Services (SA) (PTY) LTD Unreported Case No 16103/08 (KZD)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i4a2748

Keywords:

National Credit Act, Munien, debt enforcement, notice, delivery, section 129

Abstract

Section 129(1)(a) read with section 130(1) and 130(3) of the National Credit Act 34 of 2005 (the NCA) provides that, as a required procedure before debt enforcement, a credit provider must draw the default to the consumer's notice in writing and propose that the consumer refer the credit agreement to a debt counsellor, alternative dispute resolution agent, consumer court or ombud with jurisdiction, with the intent that the parties resolve any dispute under the agreement or develop and agree on a plan to bring the payments under the agreement up to date. Even though section 129(1)(a) is silent as to the method by which the default should be brought to the consumer's notice, section 130(1)(a) provides clarity by requiring the section 129(1)(a) notice to be delivered. It appears that a credit provider who fails to comply with the provisions of section 129(1)(a) prior to debt enforcement by means of litigation will be in a procedural predicament as the credit provider will not possess a complete cause of action thus, for instance, rendering the summons excipiable. The crucial question thus appears to be whether or not in a given situation one may say that there was proper compliance with section 129(1)(a) as this directly affects the existence or absence of a complete and proper cause of action. A number of factors has to be considered in order to address this question, the most important being if the section 129(1)(a) notice was duly 'delivered'. In this regard two questions are especially relevant:

 

a)     When exactly can it be said that a section 129(1)(a) notice was 'delivered' for purposes of the NCA?

 

b)     Is it necessary for such notice to be received by the consumer in order to constitute proper compliance with the delivery requirement pertaining to section 129(1)(a)?

 

The above questions were decided on in a recent judgment, Marimuthu Munien v BMW Financial Services (SA) (Pty) Ltd Case no 16103/08 (KZD) (unreported). This article will analyse section 129(1)(a) of the NCA by inter alia considering the above questions against the backdrop of the particular decision.

    

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bibliography

Mills 2009 De Rebus

Mills L "National Credit Act 34 of 2005 – Section 129 notice – dispatch or receipt?" 2009 De Rebus August 26

Otto 2001 JSAL

Otto JM "Kennisgewings van ontbinding by kredietooreenkomste en afbetalingskope van grond" 2001 (1) Journal of South African Law 169-176

Otto Consumer Credit

Otto JM Consumer Credit (LexisNexis Butterworths 1996)

Otto Explained

Otto JM The National Credit Act Explained (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 2006)

Scholtz et al Credit Act

Scholtz JW et al Guide to the National Credit Act (LexisNexis Butterworths Durban 2008)

Register of legislation and government documents

Alienation of Land Act 68 of 1981

Alienation of Land Amendment Act 51 of 1983

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996

Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008

Credit Agreements Act 75 of 1980

GN R489 in Government Gazette 28864 of 31 May 2006

Hire-Purchase Act 36 of 1942

National Credit Act 35 of 2005

Sale of Land on Instalments Act 72 of 1971

Register of court cases

ABSA Bank Ltd v Prochaska t/a Bianca Cara Interiors 2009 (2) SA 512 (D& CLD)

ABSA Bank Limited v Kritzinger Case no 6474/2009 (WCH) (unreported)

Firstrand Bank v Bernardo Case no 608/09 (EC) (unreported)

Fitzgerald v Western Agencies 1968 (1) SA 228 (T)

Holme v Bardsley 1984 (1) SA 429 (W)

Maharaj v Tongaat Development Corporation (Pty) Ltd 1976 (1) SA 314 (D)

Maharaj v Tongaat Development Corporation (Pty) Ltd 1976 (4) SA 994 (A)

Marimuthu Munien v BMW Financial Services (SA) (Pty) Ltd Case no 16103/08 (KZD) (unreported)

Maron v Mulbarton Gardens (Pty) Ltd 1975 (4) SA 123 (W)

Marques v Unibank 2001 (1) SA 145 (W)

Weinbren v Michaelides 1957 (1) SA 650 (W)

Fitzgerald v Western Agencies 1968 (1) SA 288 (T)

Marques v Unibank Ltd 2001 (1) SA 145 (W)

Van Niekerk v Favel 2006 (4) SA 548 (W)

Vessels v Brink 1950 (4) SA 352 (T)

Published

26-06-2017

Issue

Section

Notes

How to Cite

van Heerden, C., & Coetzee, H. (2017). Marimuthu Munien V BMW Financial Services (SA) (PTY) LTD Unreported Case No 16103/08 (KZD). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 12(4), 332-360. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i4a2748

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1123

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.