The Impact of Minority Status in the Application of Affirmative Action: Naidoo v Minister of Safety and Security 2013 5 BLLR 490 (LC)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a1160

Keywords:

Affirmative action, minority group, multi layered disadvantage, situation sensitive, designated groups, equality, employment equity.

Abstract

Affirmative action measures within the workplace seek to ensure equal employment opportunities and create a workforce that is representative of South African society. Accordingly, employers need to ensure that the substantive goal of equality is achieved when implementing affirmative action. One of the challenges faced by employers is the choice of beneficiary from designated groups which is diverse and unequal within itself. This paper seeks to address this challenge by looking at the definition given to beneficiaries of affirmative action and the concept of multi layered disadvantage within the Employment Equity Act. The paper will focus on the decision in Naidoo v Minister of Safety and Security and National Commissioner of the South African Police Service which is an example of the disadvantages experienced by members of the designated groups who are also part of a minority group within the designated groups. Particular focus will be placed on the disadvantages experienced by a black female who is also part of a minority. This paper highlights the multi-layered nature of disadvantage experienced by such members of the designated groups and the need to ensure that new forms of disadvantage are not created in the implementation of affirmative action policies by using a situation sensitive approach. It argues that affirmative action as a means to an end needs to evolve with the understanding that it functions within an ever changing social and economic environment. If such changes are ignored the true beneficiaries of affirmative action will not be given recognition and the desired end of creating a workforce representative of South African society together with the goal of substantive equality cannot be realised.

     Google_Scholar_12056.png

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Helen Papacostantis, WITS
    BCom LLB LLM (Wits). Lecturer, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
  • Muriel Mushariwa, WITS
    LLB, LLM (UKZN). Senior Lecturer in Law, School of Law,University of the Witwatersrand. .

References

Bibliography

Literature

Albertyn 2011 Stell LR

Albertyn C "Gendered Transformation in South African Jurisprudence: Poor

Women and the Constitutional Court" 2011 Stell LR 591-613

Albertyn 2015 SALJ

Albertyn C "Adjudicating Affirmative Action within the Normative Framework

of Substantive Equality in the Employment Equity Act –AnOpportunity

Missed? South African Police Services v Solidarity obo Barnard" 2015 SALJ

-734

Albertyn and Goldblatt "Equality"

Albertyn C and Goldblatt B "Equality" in Woolman S, Roux T and Bishop M

(eds) Constitutional Law of South Africa 2nd ed (Juta Cape Town 2007) ch

Bezuidenhout and Theron 2000 Acta Criminologica

Bezuidenhout C and Theron A "Attitudes of Male and Female Officers

towards the Role of Female Police Officers" 2000 13(3) Acta Criminologica

-31

Crenshaw 1989 U Chi Legal F

Crenshaw K "Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black

Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and

Antiracist Politics" 1989 U Chi Legal F 139-168

Dupper 2008 SAJHR

Dupper O "Affirmative Action: Who, How and How Long?" 2008 SAJHR

-444

Dupper and Garber et alEssential Employment Discrimination Law

Dupper O and Garber C et alEssential Employment Discrimination Law

(Juta Cape Town 2004)

Mare 2011 Transformation

Mare G "Broken Down by Race ... : Questioning Social Categories in

Redress Policies" 2011 Transformation 63-69

McGregor 2003 SA Merc LJ

McGregor M "Affirmative Action and the Constitutional Requirement of

'Efficiency' for the Public Service" 2003 SA Merc LJ 82-96

McGregor 2005 Codicillus

McGregor M "Categorisation to Determine Beneficiaries of Affirmative

Action: Advantages and Deficiencies" 2005 Codicillus1-12

McGregor 2006 Fundamina

McGregor M "A Legal-historical Perspective on Affirmative Action in South

Africa (Part 1)" 2006 Fundamina 79-99

McGregor 2013 TSAR

McGregor M "Affirmative Action on Trial: Determining the Legitimacy and

Fair Application of Remedial Measures" 2013 TSAR 650-667

Mochwanaesi, Steyn and Van der Walt 2005 SAJE

Mochwanaesi D, Steyn H and Van der Walt J "Education for Minority

Groups: A Case Study" 2005 SAJE287-291

Mokgoro 2003/2004 Alb L Rev

MokgoroYJ "Constitutional Claims for Gender Equality in South Africa: A

Judicial Response" 2003/2004 Alb L Rev565-574

Moosa 2002 Codicillus

Moosa N "Promoting Minority Rights in the Context of Economic, Social and

Cultural Rights in South Africa" 2002 Codicillus 37-51

Morrison 2002 Annual Journal of South African Association of Women

Graduates

Morrison CJ "Study of Women in Policing" 2002 Annual Journal of South

African Association of Women Graduates 24-30

Morrison 2005 Acta Criminologica

Morrison CJ "Gender Discrimination versus Equality in the Police" 2005

(3) Acta Criminologica 20-28

Mushariwa 2011 Obiter

Mushariwa M "Who are the Beneficiaries of Affirmative Action? Solidarity

obo Barnard v SAPS2010 5 BLLR 561 (LC)" 2011 Obiter 439-452

Pretorius 2001 Max Planck-Institut

Pretorius JL “Constitutional Standards for Affirmativ Action in South AfricaL

A Comparative Overview” 2001 Max Planck-Institut für ausländisches

öffentliches Recht und Volkerrecht 403-457

Case law

Chinese Association v Minister of Labour(TPD) unreported case number

/2007 of 18 June 2008

City Council of Pretoria v Walker1998 3 BCLR 257 (CC)

Du Preez v Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development 2006 5 SA

(E)

Minister of Finance v Frederick Jacobus van Heerden 2004 12 BLLR 1181

(CC)

Motala v University of Natal 1995 3 BCLR 374 (D)

Naidoo v Minister of Safety and Security and National Commissioner of the

South African Police Service 2013 5 BLLR 490 (LC)

Public Servants Associationof South Africa v Minister of Justice 1997 3 SA

(T)

Samuels v SAPS 2003 24 ILJ 1189 (BCA)

SAPS v Solidarity obo Barnard 2014 6 SA 123 (CC)

Solidarity obo Barnard v SAPS 2014 2 SA 1 (SCA)

Solidarity obo Barnard v SAPS 2010 5 BLLR 561 (LC)

Solidarity v Department of Correctional Services 2014 35 ILJ 504 (LC)

Solidarity v Department of Correctional Services 2015 ZALAC 6 (10 April

Legislation

Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996

Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998

Internet sources

Commission for Employment Equity 2012-2013 https://www.

labour.gov.za/downloads/documents/annual-reports/employment-

equity/commission-for-employment-

equity-annual-report-2012-

/cee13report.pdf

Commission for Employment Equity 2012-2013 Annual Report

https://www.labour.gov.za/downloads/documents/annual-

reports/employment-equity/commission-for-employment-equity-annual-

report-2012-2013/cee13report.pdf accessed 8 March 2016

Department of Labour 2013 http://www.labour.gov.za

Department of Labour 2013 Home Pagehttp://www.labour.gov.za accessed

March 2016

Nthuli 2015 http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/minorities-avoiding-

saps-jobs-1.1804696

Nthuli N 2015 Minorities avoiding SAPS jobs IOL

News http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/minorities-avoiding-saps-

jobs-1.1804696 accessed 16 March 2016

Published

17-05-2017

Issue

Section

Case Notes

How to Cite

Papacostantis, H., & Mushariwa, M. (2017). The Impact of Minority Status in the Application of Affirmative Action: Naidoo v Minister of Safety and Security 2013 5 BLLR 490 (LC). Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 19, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a1160

Similar Articles

461-470 of 1122

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.