The Legal Nature of the Embryo: Legal Subject or Legal Object?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2018/v21i0a2914Keywords:
Legal subjectivity, Legal subject, Legal object, Cryo-preserved ova, Embryo, Person, Property, Legal status, Foetus.Abstract
This contribution addresses the question regarding the legal nature of a cryopreserved embryo. Such preservation is a relatively modern development in the medical field. Neither Tennessee (USA) law nor European law provides an acceptable explanation regarding its legal nature. It is argued herein that this is mainly due to the fact that rather unscientific language is applied. It is suggested that the using of concise legal terminology may contribute to a better understanding. The terms legal subject and object and legal subjectivity are well-known and have definite legal content. By drawing an analogy between the legal status of an infant and such embryos, the conclusion is reached that embryos are not legal subjects sui iuris but indeed share the legal subjectivity of their parents.
Downloads
References
Bahadur 2002 Human Reproduction
Bahadur G "Death and conception" 2002 Human Reproduction 2769-2775
Breen-Portnoy 2013 Md J Int'l L
Breen-Portnoy CE "Frozen embryo disposition in cases of separation and divorce: How Nahmani v Nahmani and Davis v Davis form the foundation for a workable expansion of current international family planning regimes" 2013 Maryland Journal of International Law 275-311
Browne and Hynes 1991 Journal of Legislation
Browne CM and Hynes BJ "Legal status of frozen embryos: analysis and proposed guidelines for a uniform law" 1991 Journal of Legislation 97-122
Cornescu 2010 Annals Constantin Brancusi U Targu Jiu Juridical Sci Series
Cornescu AV "Subjective Right in the Context of legal Relationship" 2010 Annals Constantin Brancusi University of Targu Jiu Juridical Science Series 139-168
Davel and Jordaan Law of Persons
Davel CJ and Jordaan RA Law of Persons 4th ed (Juta Cape Town 2005)
Dehmel 1994 Conn L Rev
Dehmel JM "To have or not to have: whose procreative rights prevail in disputes over dispositions of frozen embryos" 1994 Connecticut Law Review 1377-1405
Dooyeweerd De Wijsbegeerte
Dooyeweerd H De Wijsbegeerte der Wetsidee (Vol 3) (HJ Paris Amsterdam 1935)
Hahlo and Kahn The South African legal system
Hahlo HR and Kahn E The South African legal system and its background (Juta Cape Town 1968)
Joubert 1958 THRHR
Joubert WA " 'n Realistiese benadering van die subjektiewe reg" 1958 THRHR 98-115
Owen 1994 J Contemp Health L & Pol'y
Owen SJ "Davis v Davis: Establishing Guidelines for Resolving Disputes over Frozen Embryos" 1994 Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 493-511
Robertson 1990 Virginia L Rev
Robertson JA "In the beginning: the legal status of early embryos" 1990 Virginia Law Review 437-517
Robinson et al Law of Persons
Robinson JA, Horsten D, Human S and Coetzee E Introduction to the South African Law of Persons (Printing Things Potchefstroom 2008)
Thomas 1980 S African LJ
Thomas J "Can the Lawyer Keep up with the Doctor" 1980 South African Law Journal 77-82
Van der Merwe and Joubert 1963 THRHR
Van der Merwe NJ and Joubert WA "Nasciturus - besering van - eis na geboorte? - Pinchin and Another NO v Santam Insurance Co Ltd 1963 2 SA 254 (W)" 1963 THRHR 291-297
Van der Vyver 1973 THRHR
Van der Vyver JD "Regsubjektiwiteit" 1973 THRHR 266-273
Van der Vyver and Joubert Persone- en Familiereg
Van der Vyver JD and Joubert DJ Persone- en Familiereg 3rd ed (Juta Cape Town 1991)
Van Rensburg 1974 THRHR
Van Rensburg ADJ "Regsubjektiwiteit en die regsubjek se kompetensies" 1974 THRHR 94-101
Van Zyl and Van der Vyver Inleiding tot die regswetenskap
Van Zyl FJ and Van der Vyver JD Inleiding tot die regswetenskap 2nd ed (Butterworths Durban 1982)
Wille and Gibson Principles of South African law
Wille G and Gibson JTR Principles of South African law 7th ed (Juta Cape Town 1977)
Witte 1993 SALJ
Witte J "The development of Herman Dooyeweerd's concept of rights" 1993 South African Law Journal 543-562
Young 1991 Golden Gate UL Rev
Young NK "Frozen Embryos: New Technology Meets Family Law" 1991 Golden Gate University Law Review 559-590
Case law
A.Z. v B.Z. 725 N.E.2d (Mass. 2000)
Christian Lawyer's Association of South Africa v Minister of Health 1998 4 SA 1113 (T)
Davis v Davis No 180, 1990 WL 130807 (Tenn Ct App 13, 1990)
Davis v Davis No E-14496, 1989 WL 140495 (Tenn Cir Ct Sept 21, 1989)
Del Zio v Presbyterian Hospital of New York No. 74-3588 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 14, 1978
In re Marriage of Witten 672 N.W.2d 768 (Iowa 2003)
J.B. v M.B. 783 A.2d 707 (N.J. 2001)
Kass v Kass, 696 N.E.2d 174 (N.Y. 1998)
Kass v Kass, 91 N.Y.2d 554, 673 N.Y.S.2d 350 (1998)
Kelly v Gregory, 282 App. Div. 542, 125 N.Y.S.2d 696 (1953)
Litowitz v Litowitz 146 (Wash. 2d 514, 48 P.3d 261 (2002)
Litowitz v Litowitz 48 P3d 261 (Wash. 2002)
Martell v Merton and Sutton Health Authority [1992] 3 All ER 820 (QB)
Pinchin v Santam Insurance Co Ltd 1963 2 SA 254 (W)
Road Accident Fund v Mtati 2005 6 SA 215 (SCA)
S v Mshumpa 2008 1 SACR 126 (E)
Legislation
Abortion and Sterilisation Act 2 of 1975
Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act 92 of 1996
Correctional Services Act 111 of 1998
Correctional Services Act 8 of 1959
Multilateral Motor Vehicle Accidents Fund Act 93 of 1989
Registration of Births and Deaths Registration Act 51 of 1992
Government publications
Regulation 26D in GG 35277 of 25 April 2012
Wrongful Death Statute Tenn. Code Ann. 20-5-106
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Robbie Robinson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png){kind=spacer}